Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil
Homicide kills more people than war globally and is associated with income inequality. In Brazil, one of the most unequal countries of the world, the homicide rate is four times higher than the world average. Establishing if the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme [Bolsa Familia Programme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208925-e0208925 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0208925 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0208925 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Machado, Daiane Borges Rodrigues, Laura C Rasella, Davide Lima Barreto, Maurício Araya, Ricardo |
description | Homicide kills more people than war globally and is associated with income inequality. In Brazil, one of the most unequal countries of the world, the homicide rate is four times higher than the world average. Establishing if the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme [Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)], the largest in the world, is associated with a reduction in the rate of homicide is relevant for violence prevention programs. We aimed to assess the effect of BFP coverage on homicide and hospitalization rates from violence.
BFP coverage and rates of homicide (overall and disaggregated by sex and age) and hospitalizations from violence from all 5,507 Brazilian municipalities between 2004 and 2012 were explored using multivariable negative binomial regression models with fixed effect for panel data. Robustness of results was explored using sensitivity analyses such as difference-in-difference models.
Homicide rates and hospitalization from violence decreased as BFP coverage in the target population increased. For each percent increase in the uptake of the BFP, the homicide rate decreased by 0.3% (Rate Ratio:0.997; 95%CI:0.996-0.997) and hospitalizations from violence by 0.4% (RR: 0.996;95%CI:0.995-0.996). Rates of homicide and hospitalizations from violence were also negatively associated with the duration of BFP coverage. When, coverage of the target population was at least 70% for one-year, hospitalizations from violence decreased by 8%; two-years 14%, three-years 20%, and four years 25%.
Our results support the hypothesis that conditional cash transfer programs might have as an additional benefit the prevention of homicides and hospitalizations from violence. Social protection interventions could contribute to decrease levels of violence in low-and-middle-income-countries through reducing poverty and/or socioeconomic inequalities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0208925 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2161934932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_77e2cfd0c526442f9e6a9fe13abef967</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2161934932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-4ebedf7a5a3936cfe579cf46c94383cc2d401cc4595d1605c782eaf8d5fcccaa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhHyCwxKWXBH_vmgMSjfiIVIkLnK2Jd5w42rUXe1MJfj2bZlu1iJOt8TuPZ169VfWa0SUTNXu_T4ccoVsOKeKSctoYrp5U58wIvtCciqcP7mfVi1L2lCrRaP28OhNUGa21PK_2qxTbMIY0oYiDsiNjhlg8ZjLktM3Q9_iBrPsB3EhSJLvUBxdaJBlGLARiO5XKEEboQoEjpxCfU09uQuowOiQhkqsMf0L3snrmoSv4aj4vqp9fPv9YfVtcf_-6Xn26XjjF9biQuMHW16BAGKGdR1Ub56V2RopGOMdbSZlzUhnVMk2VqxuO4JtWeeccgLio3p64Q5eKnW0qljM9-SEnSybF-qRoE-ztkEMP-bdNEOxtIeWthTwG16Gta-TOt_Q4m5TcG9RgPDIBG_RG1xPr4_zbYdNj6zBOBnaPoI9fYtjZbbqxWjDOGzUBLmdATr8OWEbbh-Kw6yBiOtzOzaVRmulJ-u4f6f-3kyeVy6mUjP5-GEbtMTp3XfYYHTtHZ2p783CR-6a7rIi_tWnFKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161934932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Machado, Daiane Borges ; Rodrigues, Laura C ; Rasella, Davide ; Lima Barreto, Maurício ; Araya, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado, Daiane Borges ; Rodrigues, Laura C ; Rasella, Davide ; Lima Barreto, Maurício ; Araya, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>Homicide kills more people than war globally and is associated with income inequality. In Brazil, one of the most unequal countries of the world, the homicide rate is four times higher than the world average. Establishing if the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme [Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)], the largest in the world, is associated with a reduction in the rate of homicide is relevant for violence prevention programs. We aimed to assess the effect of BFP coverage on homicide and hospitalization rates from violence.
BFP coverage and rates of homicide (overall and disaggregated by sex and age) and hospitalizations from violence from all 5,507 Brazilian municipalities between 2004 and 2012 were explored using multivariable negative binomial regression models with fixed effect for panel data. Robustness of results was explored using sensitivity analyses such as difference-in-difference models.
Homicide rates and hospitalization from violence decreased as BFP coverage in the target population increased. For each percent increase in the uptake of the BFP, the homicide rate decreased by 0.3% (Rate Ratio:0.997; 95%CI:0.996-0.997) and hospitalizations from violence by 0.4% (RR: 0.996;95%CI:0.995-0.996). Rates of homicide and hospitalizations from violence were also negatively associated with the duration of BFP coverage. When, coverage of the target population was at least 70% for one-year, hospitalizations from violence decreased by 8%; two-years 14%, three-years 20%, and four years 25%.
Our results support the hypothesis that conditional cash transfer programs might have as an additional benefit the prevention of homicides and hospitalizations from violence. Social protection interventions could contribute to decrease levels of violence in low-and-middle-income-countries through reducing poverty and/or socioeconomic inequalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30596664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Brazil ; Domestic violence ; Evidence ; Female ; Firearm laws & regulations ; Firearms ; Homicide ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Income ; Income inequality ; Intervention ; Low income groups ; Lung diseases ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mortality ; Municipalities ; Panel data ; People and places ; Population growth ; Poverty ; Prevention ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomics ; Tuberculosis ; Violence ; Violence - prevention & control ; Violence - statistics & numerical data ; Welfare state ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208925-e0208925</ispartof><rights>2018 Machado et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Machado et al 2018 Machado et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-4ebedf7a5a3936cfe579cf46c94383cc2d401cc4595d1605c782eaf8d5fcccaa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-4ebedf7a5a3936cfe579cf46c94383cc2d401cc4595d1605c782eaf8d5fcccaa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2959-4650 ; 0000-0002-0215-4930 ; 0000-0002-7260-4386 ; 0000-0002-0420-5148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312285/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312285/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27321,27901,27902,33751,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado, Daiane Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasella, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima Barreto, Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Homicide kills more people than war globally and is associated with income inequality. In Brazil, one of the most unequal countries of the world, the homicide rate is four times higher than the world average. Establishing if the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme [Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)], the largest in the world, is associated with a reduction in the rate of homicide is relevant for violence prevention programs. We aimed to assess the effect of BFP coverage on homicide and hospitalization rates from violence.
BFP coverage and rates of homicide (overall and disaggregated by sex and age) and hospitalizations from violence from all 5,507 Brazilian municipalities between 2004 and 2012 were explored using multivariable negative binomial regression models with fixed effect for panel data. Robustness of results was explored using sensitivity analyses such as difference-in-difference models.
Homicide rates and hospitalization from violence decreased as BFP coverage in the target population increased. For each percent increase in the uptake of the BFP, the homicide rate decreased by 0.3% (Rate Ratio:0.997; 95%CI:0.996-0.997) and hospitalizations from violence by 0.4% (RR: 0.996;95%CI:0.995-0.996). Rates of homicide and hospitalizations from violence were also negatively associated with the duration of BFP coverage. When, coverage of the target population was at least 70% for one-year, hospitalizations from violence decreased by 8%; two-years 14%, three-years 20%, and four years 25%.
Our results support the hypothesis that conditional cash transfer programs might have as an additional benefit the prevention of homicides and hospitalizations from violence. Social protection interventions could contribute to decrease levels of violence in low-and-middle-income-countries through reducing poverty and/or socioeconomic inequalities.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Firearm laws & regulations</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence - prevention & control</subject><subject>Violence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhHyCwxKWXBH_vmgMSjfiIVIkLnK2Jd5w42rUXe1MJfj2bZlu1iJOt8TuPZ169VfWa0SUTNXu_T4ccoVsOKeKSctoYrp5U58wIvtCciqcP7mfVi1L2lCrRaP28OhNUGa21PK_2qxTbMIY0oYiDsiNjhlg8ZjLktM3Q9_iBrPsB3EhSJLvUBxdaJBlGLARiO5XKEEboQoEjpxCfU09uQuowOiQhkqsMf0L3snrmoSv4aj4vqp9fPv9YfVtcf_-6Xn26XjjF9biQuMHW16BAGKGdR1Ub56V2RopGOMdbSZlzUhnVMk2VqxuO4JtWeeccgLio3p64Q5eKnW0qljM9-SEnSybF-qRoE-ztkEMP-bdNEOxtIeWthTwG16Gta-TOt_Q4m5TcG9RgPDIBG_RG1xPr4_zbYdNj6zBOBnaPoI9fYtjZbbqxWjDOGzUBLmdATr8OWEbbh-Kw6yBiOtzOzaVRmulJ-u4f6f-3kyeVy6mUjP5-GEbtMTp3XfYYHTtHZ2p783CR-6a7rIi_tWnFKQ</recordid><startdate>20181231</startdate><enddate>20181231</enddate><creator>Machado, Daiane Borges</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Laura C</creator><creator>Rasella, Davide</creator><creator>Lima Barreto, Maurício</creator><creator>Araya, Ricardo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-4650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-4386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-5148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181231</creationdate><title>Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil</title><author>Machado, Daiane Borges ; Rodrigues, Laura C ; Rasella, Davide ; Lima Barreto, Maurício ; Araya, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-4ebedf7a5a3936cfe579cf46c94383cc2d401cc4595d1605c782eaf8d5fcccaa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Firearm laws & regulations</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence - prevention & control</topic><topic>Violence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado, Daiane Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasella, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima Barreto, Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado, Daiane Borges</au><au>Rodrigues, Laura C</au><au>Rasella, Davide</au><au>Lima Barreto, Maurício</au><au>Araya, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-12-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0208925</spage><epage>e0208925</epage><pages>e0208925-e0208925</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Homicide kills more people than war globally and is associated with income inequality. In Brazil, one of the most unequal countries of the world, the homicide rate is four times higher than the world average. Establishing if the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme [Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)], the largest in the world, is associated with a reduction in the rate of homicide is relevant for violence prevention programs. We aimed to assess the effect of BFP coverage on homicide and hospitalization rates from violence.
BFP coverage and rates of homicide (overall and disaggregated by sex and age) and hospitalizations from violence from all 5,507 Brazilian municipalities between 2004 and 2012 were explored using multivariable negative binomial regression models with fixed effect for panel data. Robustness of results was explored using sensitivity analyses such as difference-in-difference models.
Homicide rates and hospitalization from violence decreased as BFP coverage in the target population increased. For each percent increase in the uptake of the BFP, the homicide rate decreased by 0.3% (Rate Ratio:0.997; 95%CI:0.996-0.997) and hospitalizations from violence by 0.4% (RR: 0.996;95%CI:0.995-0.996). Rates of homicide and hospitalizations from violence were also negatively associated with the duration of BFP coverage. When, coverage of the target population was at least 70% for one-year, hospitalizations from violence decreased by 8%; two-years 14%, three-years 20%, and four years 25%.
Our results support the hypothesis that conditional cash transfer programs might have as an additional benefit the prevention of homicides and hospitalizations from violence. Social protection interventions could contribute to decrease levels of violence in low-and-middle-income-countries through reducing poverty and/or socioeconomic inequalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30596664</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0208925</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-4650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-4386</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-5148</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208925-e0208925 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2161934932 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Aggression Brazil Domestic violence Evidence Female Firearm laws & regulations Firearms Homicide Hospitalization Humans Income Income inequality Intervention Low income groups Lung diseases Male Medicine and Health Sciences Mortality Municipalities Panel data People and places Population growth Poverty Prevention Public health Regression analysis Regression models Robustness (mathematics) Sensitivity analysis Social Sciences Socioeconomic Factors Socioeconomics Tuberculosis Violence Violence - prevention & control Violence - statistics & numerical data Welfare state Womens health |
title | Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A57%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditional%20cash%20transfer%20programme:%20Impact%20on%20homicide%20rates%20and%20hospitalisations%20from%20violence%20in%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Machado,%20Daiane%20Borges&rft.date=2018-12-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0208925&rft.epage=e0208925&rft.pages=e0208925-e0208925&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0208925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2161934932%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161934932&rft_id=info:pmid/30596664&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_77e2cfd0c526442f9e6a9fe13abef967&rfr_iscdi=true |