Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities

Researchers typically conduct fatality monitoring to determine a wind energy facility's direct impacts on wildlife. In the United States, wind energy impacts on eagles have received increased attention in recent years because eagle incidental take permits became available. Permit holders are re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208700-e0208700
Hauptverfasser: Hallingstad, Eric C, Rabie, Paul A, Telander, Andrew C, Roppe, Jerry A, Nagy, Laura R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0208700
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0208700
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Hallingstad, Eric C
Rabie, Paul A
Telander, Andrew C
Roppe, Jerry A
Nagy, Laura R
description Researchers typically conduct fatality monitoring to determine a wind energy facility's direct impacts on wildlife. In the United States, wind energy impacts on eagles have received increased attention in recent years because eagle incidental take permits became available. Permit holders are required to conduct fatality monitoring to evaluate compliance with permitted eagle take. Our objective was to develop an efficient eagle fatality monitoring protocol with a quantifiable detection probability based on a stationary scanning search method. We conducted scanning searches for eagle carcasses at four wind energy facilities. We estimated searcher efficiency of the scanning search method using feathered turkey decoys as eagle carcass surrogates, used publicly available data on large raptor carcass distances from turbines to evaluate the proportion of carcasses expected to occur in searched areas, and estimated carcass persistence rates for game birds and raptors. These three bias adjustments were combined to estimate the overall probability of detection for the scanning search method. We found generally high searcher efficiency for the scanning search method, with 76% of decoys detected; however, detection decreased with distance and difficulty of visibility class. Mean carcass persistence time varied between 28 and 76 days for raptors and between three and nine days for game birds, showing that game birds do not persist as long as raptors. We estimated that 95% of large avian carcasses fall within 100 m of turbine bases, and 99% fall within 150 m. Using these estimates and assuming a 30-day search interval for all facility turbines, we estimated that the probability of detecting a large raptor carcass using the scanning search method at a wind facility ranged from 0.50 to 0.69. Our research suggests a monitoring program that uses scanning searches can be a cost-effective approach for gathering data necessary to meet incidental eagle take permit requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0208700
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2155130784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3b860f4985154c96b65b9cb59ad10b3d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2155899766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c156a80517d665f85651aa819ae12c32b12f8754f596775595ccee3d2be5e1243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBE4sJlF39kHPuCVJWvSpW4wIWL5Tjj4JXXDna2qP-eLEmrFnGy5feZ1zOjt6peUrKlvKXvdumQownbMUXcEkZkS8ij6pQqzjaCEf743v2kelbKjhDgUoin1Qkn0BDZkNPqxwe8xpBGH4faxBqd89ZjnOoxpynZFGqXcr1P0U8pHyE0Q8DamckEP3kstZnq3z72NUbMw82sWL8oz6snzoSCL9bzrPr-6eO3iy-bq6-fLy_OrzYWmJg2loIwkgBteyHASRBAjZFUGaTMctZR5mQLjQMl2hZAgbWIvGcdwkw0_Kx6vfiOIRW9rqVoRgEoJ608EpcL0Sez02P2e5NvdDJe_31IedAmT94G1LyTgrhGSaDQWCU6AZ2yHSjTU9LxfvZ6v_526PbY23lX2YQHpg-V6H_qIV1rwRSltJ0N3q4GOf06YJn03heLIZiI6bD0LZVqhZjRN_-g_5-uWSibUykZ3V0zlOhjVG6r9DEqeo3KXPbq_iB3RbfZ4H8AjKC8tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155130784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hallingstad, Eric C ; Rabie, Paul A ; Telander, Andrew C ; Roppe, Jerry A ; Nagy, Laura R</creator><contributor>Deng, Z. Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallingstad, Eric C ; Rabie, Paul A ; Telander, Andrew C ; Roppe, Jerry A ; Nagy, Laura R ; Deng, Z. Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers typically conduct fatality monitoring to determine a wind energy facility's direct impacts on wildlife. In the United States, wind energy impacts on eagles have received increased attention in recent years because eagle incidental take permits became available. Permit holders are required to conduct fatality monitoring to evaluate compliance with permitted eagle take. Our objective was to develop an efficient eagle fatality monitoring protocol with a quantifiable detection probability based on a stationary scanning search method. We conducted scanning searches for eagle carcasses at four wind energy facilities. We estimated searcher efficiency of the scanning search method using feathered turkey decoys as eagle carcass surrogates, used publicly available data on large raptor carcass distances from turbines to evaluate the proportion of carcasses expected to occur in searched areas, and estimated carcass persistence rates for game birds and raptors. These three bias adjustments were combined to estimate the overall probability of detection for the scanning search method. We found generally high searcher efficiency for the scanning search method, with 76% of decoys detected; however, detection decreased with distance and difficulty of visibility class. Mean carcass persistence time varied between 28 and 76 days for raptors and between three and nine days for game birds, showing that game birds do not persist as long as raptors. We estimated that 95% of large avian carcasses fall within 100 m of turbine bases, and 99% fall within 150 m. Using these estimates and assuming a 30-day search interval for all facility turbines, we estimated that the probability of detecting a large raptor carcass using the scanning search method at a wind facility ranged from 0.50 to 0.69. Our research suggests a monitoring program that uses scanning searches can be a cost-effective approach for gathering data necessary to meet incidental eagle take permit requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208700</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30540840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accipitridae ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Birds of prey ; California ; Carcasses ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Decoys ; Eagles ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Energy ; Engineering and Technology ; Fatalities ; Humans ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Models, Biological ; Monitoring ; Mortality ; Permits ; Physical Sciences ; Renewable Energy ; Scanning ; Search methods ; Time Factors ; Turbines ; Turkeys ; Visual Perception ; Washington ; Wildlife ; Wind ; Wind farms ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208700-e0208700</ispartof><rights>2018 Hallingstad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Hallingstad et al 2018 Hallingstad et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c156a80517d665f85651aa819ae12c32b12f8754f596775595ccee3d2be5e1243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c156a80517d665f85651aa819ae12c32b12f8754f596775595ccee3d2be5e1243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7725-0698</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291117/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291117/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30540840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Deng, Z. Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallingstad, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telander, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roppe, Jerry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, Laura R</creatorcontrib><title>Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Researchers typically conduct fatality monitoring to determine a wind energy facility's direct impacts on wildlife. In the United States, wind energy impacts on eagles have received increased attention in recent years because eagle incidental take permits became available. Permit holders are required to conduct fatality monitoring to evaluate compliance with permitted eagle take. Our objective was to develop an efficient eagle fatality monitoring protocol with a quantifiable detection probability based on a stationary scanning search method. We conducted scanning searches for eagle carcasses at four wind energy facilities. We estimated searcher efficiency of the scanning search method using feathered turkey decoys as eagle carcass surrogates, used publicly available data on large raptor carcass distances from turbines to evaluate the proportion of carcasses expected to occur in searched areas, and estimated carcass persistence rates for game birds and raptors. These three bias adjustments were combined to estimate the overall probability of detection for the scanning search method. We found generally high searcher efficiency for the scanning search method, with 76% of decoys detected; however, detection decreased with distance and difficulty of visibility class. Mean carcass persistence time varied between 28 and 76 days for raptors and between three and nine days for game birds, showing that game birds do not persist as long as raptors. We estimated that 95% of large avian carcasses fall within 100 m of turbine bases, and 99% fall within 150 m. Using these estimates and assuming a 30-day search interval for all facility turbines, we estimated that the probability of detecting a large raptor carcass using the scanning search method at a wind facility ranged from 0.50 to 0.69. Our research suggests a monitoring program that uses scanning searches can be a cost-effective approach for gathering data necessary to meet incidental eagle take permit requirements.</description><subject>Accipitridae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Decoys</subject><subject>Eagles</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Permits</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Search methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Turkeys</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind farms</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBE4sJlF39kHPuCVJWvSpW4wIWL5Tjj4JXXDna2qP-eLEmrFnGy5feZ1zOjt6peUrKlvKXvdumQownbMUXcEkZkS8ij6pQqzjaCEf743v2kelbKjhDgUoin1Qkn0BDZkNPqxwe8xpBGH4faxBqd89ZjnOoxpynZFGqXcr1P0U8pHyE0Q8DamckEP3kstZnq3z72NUbMw82sWL8oz6snzoSCL9bzrPr-6eO3iy-bq6-fLy_OrzYWmJg2loIwkgBteyHASRBAjZFUGaTMctZR5mQLjQMl2hZAgbWIvGcdwkw0_Kx6vfiOIRW9rqVoRgEoJ608EpcL0Sez02P2e5NvdDJe_31IedAmT94G1LyTgrhGSaDQWCU6AZ2yHSjTU9LxfvZ6v_526PbY23lX2YQHpg-V6H_qIV1rwRSltJ0N3q4GOf06YJn03heLIZiI6bD0LZVqhZjRN_-g_5-uWSibUykZ3V0zlOhjVG6r9DEqeo3KXPbq_iB3RbfZ4H8AjKC8tQ</recordid><startdate>20181212</startdate><enddate>20181212</enddate><creator>Hallingstad, Eric C</creator><creator>Rabie, Paul A</creator><creator>Telander, Andrew C</creator><creator>Roppe, Jerry A</creator><creator>Nagy, Laura R</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-0698</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181212</creationdate><title>Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities</title><author>Hallingstad, Eric C ; Rabie, Paul A ; Telander, Andrew C ; Roppe, Jerry A ; Nagy, Laura R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c156a80517d665f85651aa819ae12c32b12f8754f596775595ccee3d2be5e1243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accipitridae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Decoys</topic><topic>Eagles</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Permits</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Search methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Turkeys</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind farms</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallingstad, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telander, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roppe, Jerry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, Laura R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallingstad, Eric C</au><au>Rabie, Paul A</au><au>Telander, Andrew C</au><au>Roppe, Jerry A</au><au>Nagy, Laura R</au><au>Deng, Z. Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-12-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0208700</spage><epage>e0208700</epage><pages>e0208700-e0208700</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Researchers typically conduct fatality monitoring to determine a wind energy facility's direct impacts on wildlife. In the United States, wind energy impacts on eagles have received increased attention in recent years because eagle incidental take permits became available. Permit holders are required to conduct fatality monitoring to evaluate compliance with permitted eagle take. Our objective was to develop an efficient eagle fatality monitoring protocol with a quantifiable detection probability based on a stationary scanning search method. We conducted scanning searches for eagle carcasses at four wind energy facilities. We estimated searcher efficiency of the scanning search method using feathered turkey decoys as eagle carcass surrogates, used publicly available data on large raptor carcass distances from turbines to evaluate the proportion of carcasses expected to occur in searched areas, and estimated carcass persistence rates for game birds and raptors. These three bias adjustments were combined to estimate the overall probability of detection for the scanning search method. We found generally high searcher efficiency for the scanning search method, with 76% of decoys detected; however, detection decreased with distance and difficulty of visibility class. Mean carcass persistence time varied between 28 and 76 days for raptors and between three and nine days for game birds, showing that game birds do not persist as long as raptors. We estimated that 95% of large avian carcasses fall within 100 m of turbine bases, and 99% fall within 150 m. Using these estimates and assuming a 30-day search interval for all facility turbines, we estimated that the probability of detecting a large raptor carcass using the scanning search method at a wind facility ranged from 0.50 to 0.69. Our research suggests a monitoring program that uses scanning searches can be a cost-effective approach for gathering data necessary to meet incidental eagle take permit requirements.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30540840</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0208700</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-0698</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208700-e0208700
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2155130784
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accipitridae
Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Birds
Birds of prey
California
Carcasses
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Decoys
Eagles
Ecosystems
Efficiency
Energy
Engineering and Technology
Fatalities
Humans
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Models, Biological
Monitoring
Mortality
Permits
Physical Sciences
Renewable Energy
Scanning
Search methods
Time Factors
Turbines
Turkeys
Visual Perception
Washington
Wildlife
Wind
Wind farms
Wind power
title Developing an efficient protocol for monitoring eagle fatalities at wind energy facilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A57%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20an%20efficient%20protocol%20for%20monitoring%20eagle%20fatalities%20at%20wind%20energy%20facilities&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hallingstad,%20Eric%20C&rft.date=2018-12-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0208700&rft.epage=e0208700&rft.pages=e0208700-e0208700&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0208700&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2155899766%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155130784&rft_id=info:pmid/30540840&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3b860f4985154c96b65b9cb59ad10b3d&rfr_iscdi=true