Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources
How information is communicated influences the public's environmental perceptions and behaviors. Information channels and sources both play an important role in the dissemination of information. Trust in a source is often used as a proxy for whether a particular piece of information is credible...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0209013-e0209013 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0209013 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0209013 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Wilkins, Emily J Miller, Holly M Tilak, Elizabeth Schuster, Rudy M |
| description | How information is communicated influences the public's environmental perceptions and behaviors. Information channels and sources both play an important role in the dissemination of information. Trust in a source is often used as a proxy for whether a particular piece of information is credible. To determine preferences for information channels and trust in various sources for information on nature-related topics, a mail-out survey was sent to randomly selected U.S. addresses (n = 1,030). Diverse groups of people may have differing communication preferences. Therefore, we explored differences in channel preferences and trust by demographics using regression models. Overall, the most preferred channels were personal experience, reading online content, and watching visual media online. The most trusted sources were science organizations, universities, and friends/family. Channel preferences varied the most by education level and age, while source trust was most influenced by education, race, age, and size of current residence (rural-urban). The influence of demographics varied depending on the individual channel and source, with some groups preferring certain channels or sources but not others. Results are useful to consider when disseminating information on nature-related topics to a general public audience. More broadly, results also suggest spreading information using different channels and sources depending on the specific audience being targeted. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0209013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2155129175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6c15eba403634c6684668c7952a3e948</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2155898731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-95cd10fd09249bd41851311886456fd63abe708abee8e0cf5af2e4730be5407c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAd88WXWfE_iQ0EWPwoFfdDnkMnc2WbJJGuSEfz3pu60bEXIx-Xm3JNzk9M0LzHaYNrjd_u4pGD85hADbBBBCmH6qDnHipJOEEQfn8RnzbOc9whxKoV42pxRxBmSlJ03u22c5yU4a4oLu9aFKaa5xjG0dQRTlgRdAm8KjG2JB2fz-_ZbgglSqplTvL0xIYDPrQkVmpZc6nGbq0wL-XnzZDI-w4t1v2h-fPr4ffulu_76-Wr74bqzXJHSKW5HjKYRKcLUMDIsOaYYSykYF9MoqBmgR7KuIAHZiZuJAOspGqB21Ft60bw-8h58zHp9o6wJ5hwThXteEVdHxBjNXh-Sm036raNx-m8ipp02qTjrQQuLOQyGISoos0JIVqftFSeGgmKycl2uty3DDKOFUJLxD0gfngR3o3fxlxZVC-aqErxdCVL8uUAuenbZgvcmQFyOuqWSPcUV-uYf6P-7Y0eUTTHn-k_3YjDSt765q9K3vtGrb2rZq9NG7ovujEL_AEApwjM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155129175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wilkins, Emily J ; Miller, Holly M ; Tilak, Elizabeth ; Schuster, Rudy M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, Emily J ; Miller, Holly M ; Tilak, Elizabeth ; Schuster, Rudy M</creatorcontrib><description>How information is communicated influences the public's environmental perceptions and behaviors. Information channels and sources both play an important role in the dissemination of information. Trust in a source is often used as a proxy for whether a particular piece of information is credible. To determine preferences for information channels and trust in various sources for information on nature-related topics, a mail-out survey was sent to randomly selected U.S. addresses (n = 1,030). Diverse groups of people may have differing communication preferences. Therefore, we explored differences in channel preferences and trust by demographics using regression models. Overall, the most preferred channels were personal experience, reading online content, and watching visual media online. The most trusted sources were science organizations, universities, and friends/family. Channel preferences varied the most by education level and age, while source trust was most influenced by education, race, age, and size of current residence (rural-urban). The influence of demographics varied depending on the individual channel and source, with some groups preferring certain channels or sources but not others. Results are useful to consider when disseminating information on nature-related topics to a general public audience. More broadly, results also suggest spreading information using different channels and sources depending on the specific audience being targeted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30540834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Agricultural biotechnology ; Channels ; Climate change ; Colleges & universities ; Communication ; Demographics ; Demography ; Education ; Engineering and Technology ; Female ; Geology ; Global warming ; Humans ; Information dissemination ; Information sources ; Internet ; Internet - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Mass Media - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Nature ; Older people ; People and Places ; Preferences ; Public health ; Public opinion ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trends ; Trust ; Water conservation ; Web sites ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0209013-e0209013</ispartof><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-95cd10fd09249bd41851311886456fd63abe708abee8e0cf5af2e4730be5407c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-95cd10fd09249bd41851311886456fd63abe708abee8e0cf5af2e4730be5407c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3055-4808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291159/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291159/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30540834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, Emily J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Holly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilak, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Rudy M</creatorcontrib><title>Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>How information is communicated influences the public's environmental perceptions and behaviors. Information channels and sources both play an important role in the dissemination of information. Trust in a source is often used as a proxy for whether a particular piece of information is credible. To determine preferences for information channels and trust in various sources for information on nature-related topics, a mail-out survey was sent to randomly selected U.S. addresses (n = 1,030). Diverse groups of people may have differing communication preferences. Therefore, we explored differences in channel preferences and trust by demographics using regression models. Overall, the most preferred channels were personal experience, reading online content, and watching visual media online. The most trusted sources were science organizations, universities, and friends/family. Channel preferences varied the most by education level and age, while source trust was most influenced by education, race, age, and size of current residence (rural-urban). The influence of demographics varied depending on the individual channel and source, with some groups preferring certain channels or sources but not others. Results are useful to consider when disseminating information on nature-related topics to a general public audience. More broadly, results also suggest spreading information using different channels and sources depending on the specific audience being targeted.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agricultural biotechnology</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Media - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAd88WXWfE_iQ0EWPwoFfdDnkMnc2WbJJGuSEfz3pu60bEXIx-Xm3JNzk9M0LzHaYNrjd_u4pGD85hADbBBBCmH6qDnHipJOEEQfn8RnzbOc9whxKoV42pxRxBmSlJ03u22c5yU4a4oLu9aFKaa5xjG0dQRTlgRdAm8KjG2JB2fz-_ZbgglSqplTvL0xIYDPrQkVmpZc6nGbq0wL-XnzZDI-w4t1v2h-fPr4ffulu_76-Wr74bqzXJHSKW5HjKYRKcLUMDIsOaYYSykYF9MoqBmgR7KuIAHZiZuJAOspGqB21Ft60bw-8h58zHp9o6wJ5hwThXteEVdHxBjNXh-Sm036raNx-m8ipp02qTjrQQuLOQyGISoos0JIVqftFSeGgmKycl2uty3DDKOFUJLxD0gfngR3o3fxlxZVC-aqErxdCVL8uUAuenbZgvcmQFyOuqWSPcUV-uYf6P-7Y0eUTTHn-k_3YjDSt765q9K3vtGrb2rZq9NG7ovujEL_AEApwjM</recordid><startdate>20181212</startdate><enddate>20181212</enddate><creator>Wilkins, Emily J</creator><creator>Miller, Holly M</creator><creator>Tilak, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Schuster, Rudy M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-4808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181212</creationdate><title>Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources</title><author>Wilkins, Emily J ; Miller, Holly M ; Tilak, Elizabeth ; Schuster, Rudy M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-95cd10fd09249bd41851311886456fd63abe708abee8e0cf5af2e4730be5407c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agricultural biotechnology</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Media - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, Emily J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Holly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilak, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Rudy M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilkins, Emily J</au><au>Miller, Holly M</au><au>Tilak, Elizabeth</au><au>Schuster, Rudy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-12-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0209013</spage><epage>e0209013</epage><pages>e0209013-e0209013</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>How information is communicated influences the public's environmental perceptions and behaviors. Information channels and sources both play an important role in the dissemination of information. Trust in a source is often used as a proxy for whether a particular piece of information is credible. To determine preferences for information channels and trust in various sources for information on nature-related topics, a mail-out survey was sent to randomly selected U.S. addresses (n = 1,030). Diverse groups of people may have differing communication preferences. Therefore, we explored differences in channel preferences and trust by demographics using regression models. Overall, the most preferred channels were personal experience, reading online content, and watching visual media online. The most trusted sources were science organizations, universities, and friends/family. Channel preferences varied the most by education level and age, while source trust was most influenced by education, race, age, and size of current residence (rural-urban). The influence of demographics varied depending on the individual channel and source, with some groups preferring certain channels or sources but not others. Results are useful to consider when disseminating information on nature-related topics to a general public audience. More broadly, results also suggest spreading information using different channels and sources depending on the specific audience being targeted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30540834</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0209013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-4808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0209013-e0209013 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2155129175 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Agricultural biotechnology Channels Climate change Colleges & universities Communication Demographics Demography Education Engineering and Technology Female Geology Global warming Humans Information dissemination Information sources Internet Internet - statistics & numerical data Male Mass Media - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Nature Older people People and Places Preferences Public health Public opinion Regression analysis Regression models Research and Analysis Methods Science Policy Social Sciences Surveys and Questionnaires Trends Trust Water conservation Web sites Young Adult |
| title | Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communicating%20information%20on%20nature-related%20topics:%20Preferred%20information%20channels%20and%20trust%20in%20sources&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wilkins,%20Emily%20J&rft.date=2018-12-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0209013&rft.epage=e0209013&rft.pages=e0209013-e0209013&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0209013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2155898731%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155129175&rft_id=info:pmid/30540834&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6c15eba403634c6684668c7952a3e948&rfr_iscdi=true |