The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task
In this study a cross-modal oddball task was employed to study the effect that words spoken either non-urgently or urgently would have on a digit categorization task and if women would exhibit greater behavioral inhibitory control. The words were unrelated to the task itself, but related to the acti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018, Vol.13 (11), p.e0207852-e0207852 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0207852 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | e0207852 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Neely, Gregory Sörman, Daniel Eriksson Ljungberg, Jessica K |
| description | In this study a cross-modal oddball task was employed to study the effect that words spoken either non-urgently or urgently would have on a digit categorization task and if women would exhibit greater behavioral inhibitory control. The words were unrelated to the task itself, but related to the action required to complete the task. Forty participants (21 women) conducted a computerized categorization task while exposed to a sinewave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials) or a to-be ignored word (press, stop) spoken either non-urgently or urgently as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (6.25% trials for each category). Urgent words had sharp intonation and an average fundamental frequency (F0) ranging from 191.9 (stop) to 204.6 (press) Hz. Non-urgent words had low intonation with average F0 ranging from 103.9.9 (stop) to 120.3 (press) Hz. As expected, deviant distraction and longer response times were found by exposure to the word stop, but deviant distraction was not found to be significant with the word press or due to intonation. While the results showed that women had in general longer reaction times, there were no gender differences found related to the deviant distraction caused by word or intonation. The present results do not support the hypothesis that women have greater behavioral inhibitory control, but there was evidence that the meaning of the word could influence response times. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207852 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2136226043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0f4cf098f02241a5ac4edc823b68b0dd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2136226043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-1a9fc5dae612d1cee9d55d78fc028e5b8877a2df70cc820c624af9fbcef1a0313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRAVLYV_gCASlx7I4o_YcS5IVQu0UgWXwtWa-KPN1olTO6Hi3-PdpFW3qsTJY8-bNzPPL8veYbTCtMKf134KPbjV4HuzQgRVgpEX2QGuKSk4QfTlo3g_ex3jGiFGBeevsn2KSiZQSQ-yH5fXJm-7AdSYe5vHwd-YPk-31vf5nQ865ikYTLA-dNCrBE7pXAUfY9F5DS73WjfgXD5CvHmT7Vlw0bxdzsPs17evlydnxcXP7-cnxxeFYgyNBYbaKqbBcEw0VsbUmjFdCasQEYY1QlQVEG0rpJQgSHFSgq1to4zFgCimh9mHmXdwPspFiigJppwQnjZLiPMZoT2s5RDaDsJf6aGV2wcfriSEsVXOSGRLZVEtLCKkxMBAlUanvrThokFaJ65i5op3ZpiaHbbT9vfxlm3qJokZLSlP-E__x7txkhWv8WbUL8syU9OlzqYfA7idqt1M317LK_9HJllYVbNEcLQQBH87mTjKro3KOAe98dMsCytrwjbCfXwCfV68ckZt_zkY-zAMRnLjvvsquXGfXNyXyt4_XuSh6N5u9B-AydmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2136226043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Neely, Gregory ; Sörman, Daniel Eriksson ; Ljungberg, Jessica K</creator><creatorcontrib>Neely, Gregory ; Sörman, Daniel Eriksson ; Ljungberg, Jessica K</creatorcontrib><description>In this study a cross-modal oddball task was employed to study the effect that words spoken either non-urgently or urgently would have on a digit categorization task and if women would exhibit greater behavioral inhibitory control. The words were unrelated to the task itself, but related to the action required to complete the task. Forty participants (21 women) conducted a computerized categorization task while exposed to a sinewave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials) or a to-be ignored word (press, stop) spoken either non-urgently or urgently as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (6.25% trials for each category). Urgent words had sharp intonation and an average fundamental frequency (F0) ranging from 191.9 (stop) to 204.6 (press) Hz. Non-urgent words had low intonation with average F0 ranging from 103.9.9 (stop) to 120.3 (press) Hz. As expected, deviant distraction and longer response times were found by exposure to the word stop, but deviant distraction was not found to be significant with the word press or due to intonation. While the results showed that women had in general longer reaction times, there were no gender differences found related to the deviant distraction caused by word or intonation. The present results do not support the hypothesis that women have greater behavioral inhibitory control, but there was evidence that the meaning of the word could influence response times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207852</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30458043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; attention ; Auditory stimuli ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Classification ; Cross-modal ; distraction ; emotion ; Emotions ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; kognition ; Language ; Psychology ; psykologi ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Resonant frequencies ; Semantics ; Sensorimotor integration ; Sensory integration ; Sex differences ; Social Sciences ; Sound ; Women</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (11), p.e0207852-e0207852</ispartof><rights>2018 Neely et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Neely et al 2018 Neely et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-1a9fc5dae612d1cee9d55d78fc028e5b8877a2df70cc820c624af9fbcef1a0313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2709-9966</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,4010,23845,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76913$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-153436$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neely, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sörman, Daniel Eriksson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljungberg, Jessica K</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In this study a cross-modal oddball task was employed to study the effect that words spoken either non-urgently or urgently would have on a digit categorization task and if women would exhibit greater behavioral inhibitory control. The words were unrelated to the task itself, but related to the action required to complete the task. Forty participants (21 women) conducted a computerized categorization task while exposed to a sinewave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials) or a to-be ignored word (press, stop) spoken either non-urgently or urgently as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (6.25% trials for each category). Urgent words had sharp intonation and an average fundamental frequency (F0) ranging from 191.9 (stop) to 204.6 (press) Hz. Non-urgent words had low intonation with average F0 ranging from 103.9.9 (stop) to 120.3 (press) Hz. As expected, deviant distraction and longer response times were found by exposure to the word stop, but deviant distraction was not found to be significant with the word press or due to intonation. While the results showed that women had in general longer reaction times, there were no gender differences found related to the deviant distraction caused by word or intonation. The present results do not support the hypothesis that women have greater behavioral inhibitory control, but there was evidence that the meaning of the word could influence response times.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>attention</subject><subject>Auditory stimuli</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cross-modal</subject><subject>distraction</subject><subject>emotion</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>kognition</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>psykologi</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Resonant frequencies</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensorimotor integration</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRAVLYV_gCASlx7I4o_YcS5IVQu0UgWXwtWa-KPN1olTO6Hi3-PdpFW3qsTJY8-bNzPPL8veYbTCtMKf134KPbjV4HuzQgRVgpEX2QGuKSk4QfTlo3g_ex3jGiFGBeevsn2KSiZQSQ-yH5fXJm-7AdSYe5vHwd-YPk-31vf5nQ865ikYTLA-dNCrBE7pXAUfY9F5DS73WjfgXD5CvHmT7Vlw0bxdzsPs17evlydnxcXP7-cnxxeFYgyNBYbaKqbBcEw0VsbUmjFdCasQEYY1QlQVEG0rpJQgSHFSgq1to4zFgCimh9mHmXdwPspFiigJppwQnjZLiPMZoT2s5RDaDsJf6aGV2wcfriSEsVXOSGRLZVEtLCKkxMBAlUanvrThokFaJ65i5op3ZpiaHbbT9vfxlm3qJokZLSlP-E__x7txkhWv8WbUL8syU9OlzqYfA7idqt1M317LK_9HJllYVbNEcLQQBH87mTjKro3KOAe98dMsCytrwjbCfXwCfV68ckZt_zkY-zAMRnLjvvsquXGfXNyXyt4_XuSh6N5u9B-AydmY</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Neely, Gregory</creator><creator>Sörman, Daniel Eriksson</creator><creator>Ljungberg, Jessica K</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>ADHXS</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-9966</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task</title><author>Neely, Gregory ; Sörman, Daniel Eriksson ; Ljungberg, Jessica K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-1a9fc5dae612d1cee9d55d78fc028e5b8877a2df70cc820c624af9fbcef1a0313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>attention</topic><topic>Auditory stimuli</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cross-modal</topic><topic>distraction</topic><topic>emotion</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>kognition</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>psykologi</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Resonant frequencies</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensorimotor integration</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neely, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sörman, Daniel Eriksson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljungberg, Jessica K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neely, Gregory</au><au>Sörman, Daniel Eriksson</au><au>Ljungberg, Jessica K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0207852</spage><epage>e0207852</epage><pages>e0207852-e0207852</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In this study a cross-modal oddball task was employed to study the effect that words spoken either non-urgently or urgently would have on a digit categorization task and if women would exhibit greater behavioral inhibitory control. The words were unrelated to the task itself, but related to the action required to complete the task. Forty participants (21 women) conducted a computerized categorization task while exposed to a sinewave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials) or a to-be ignored word (press, stop) spoken either non-urgently or urgently as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (6.25% trials for each category). Urgent words had sharp intonation and an average fundamental frequency (F0) ranging from 191.9 (stop) to 204.6 (press) Hz. Non-urgent words had low intonation with average F0 ranging from 103.9.9 (stop) to 120.3 (press) Hz. As expected, deviant distraction and longer response times were found by exposure to the word stop, but deviant distraction was not found to be significant with the word press or due to intonation. While the results showed that women had in general longer reaction times, there were no gender differences found related to the deviant distraction caused by word or intonation. The present results do not support the hypothesis that women have greater behavioral inhibitory control, but there was evidence that the meaning of the word could influence response times.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30458043</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0207852</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-9966</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (11), p.e0207852-e0207852 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2136226043 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SWEPUB Freely available online; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Age attention Auditory stimuli Biology and Life Sciences Classification Cross-modal distraction emotion Emotions Gender aspects Gender differences kognition Language Psychology psykologi Research and Analysis Methods Resonant frequencies Semantics Sensorimotor integration Sensory integration Sex differences Social Sciences Sound Women |
| title | The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A24%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20spoken%20action%20words%20on%20performance%20in%20a%20cross-modal%20oddball%20task&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Neely,%20Gregory&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0207852&rft.epage=e0207852&rft.pages=e0207852-e0207852&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0207852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2136226043%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2136226043&rft_id=info:pmid/30458043&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0f4cf098f02241a5ac4edc823b68b0dd&rfr_iscdi=true |