Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)

Microorganisms, including rotifers, are thought to be capable of long distance dispersal. Therefore, they should show little population genetic structure due to high gene flow. Nevertheless, substantial genetic structure has been reported among populations of many taxa. In rotifers, genetic studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205203-e0205203
Hauptverfasser: Kordbacheh, Azar, Wallace, Robert L, Walsh, Elizabeth J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0205203
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0205203
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Kordbacheh, Azar
Wallace, Robert L
Walsh, Elizabeth J
description Microorganisms, including rotifers, are thought to be capable of long distance dispersal. Therefore, they should show little population genetic structure due to high gene flow. Nevertheless, substantial genetic structure has been reported among populations of many taxa. In rotifers, genetic studies have focused on planktonic taxa leaving sessile groups largely unexplored. Here, we used COI gene and ITS region sequences to study genetic structure and delimit cryptic species in two sessile species (Limnias melicerta [32 populations]; L. ceratophylli [21 populations]). Among populations, ITS region sequences were less variable as compared to those of the COI gene (ITS; L. melicerta: 0-3.1% and L. ceratophylli: 0-4.4%; COI; L. melicerta: 0-22.7% and L. ceratophylli: 0-21.7%). Moreover, L. melicerta and L. ceratophylli were not resolved in phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences. Thus, we used COI sequences for species delimitation. Bayesian Species Delimitation detected nine putative cryptic species within L. melicerta and four putative cryptic species for L. ceratophylli. The genetic distance in the COI gene was 0-15.4% within cryptic species of L. melicerta and 0.5-0.6% within cryptic species of L. ceratophylli. Among cryptic species, COI genetic distance ranged 8.1-21.9% for L. melicerta and 15.1-21.2% for L. ceratophylli. The correlation between geographic and genetic distance was weak or lacking; thus geographic isolation cannot be considered a strong driver of genetic variation. In addition, geometric morphometric analyses of trophi did not show significant variation among cryptic species. In this study we used a conservative approach for species delimitation, yet we were able to show that species diversity in these sessile rotifers is underestimated.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0205203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2127656642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3cb74ed61014486aaf87552ba4351113</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2127952558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa023fd7215305327f8a8409479ac023ba45d53b8c52d82369a684a839f09fdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUltrFDEUHkSxF_0HogFfKnTXXCaZzEtBSq2FBUH0OZzNZHazZJIxyWzZn-C_Nu1uSys-5eSc73zn9lXVO4LnhDXk8yZM0YObj8GbOaaYU8xeVMekZXQmiv3yiX1UnaS0wZgzKcTr6ohh1rSS8uPqz9XWdsZrg9I0jiFm61dIx92YrUZpNNqahG5tXluP8m1AyaRknUGD1TFYvzUxm2WEbNI5WtjBW0hoMM7qEgAEvkOLOSofyGFc75yz6OxHyLYvnnN07U2yIceg1_DpTfWqB5fM28N7Wv36evXz8tts8f365vLLYqY5FXnWA6as7xpKOCvz0KaXIGvc1k0LuoSWUPOOs6Us8E5SJloQsgbJ2h63fafZafVhzzu6kNRhi0lRQhvBhahpQdzsEV2AjRqjHSDuVACr7h0hrhSURWlnFNPLpjadIJjUtRQAvWw4p6UJxgkhrHBdHKpNy8F02vgcwT0jfR7xdq1WYavK2VrCRSE4OxDE8HsyKavBJm2cA2_CtO-75ZRzWaAf_4H-f7p6jyoHTCma_rEZgtWdsh6y1J2y1EFZJe3900Eekx6kxP4CTSnN6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2127656642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kordbacheh, Azar ; Wallace, Robert L ; Walsh, Elizabeth J</creator><contributor>Munderloh, Ulrike Gertrud</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kordbacheh, Azar ; Wallace, Robert L ; Walsh, Elizabeth J ; Munderloh, Ulrike Gertrud</creatorcontrib><description>Microorganisms, including rotifers, are thought to be capable of long distance dispersal. Therefore, they should show little population genetic structure due to high gene flow. Nevertheless, substantial genetic structure has been reported among populations of many taxa. In rotifers, genetic studies have focused on planktonic taxa leaving sessile groups largely unexplored. Here, we used COI gene and ITS region sequences to study genetic structure and delimit cryptic species in two sessile species (Limnias melicerta [32 populations]; L. ceratophylli [21 populations]). Among populations, ITS region sequences were less variable as compared to those of the COI gene (ITS; L. melicerta: 0-3.1% and L. ceratophylli: 0-4.4%; COI; L. melicerta: 0-22.7% and L. ceratophylli: 0-21.7%). Moreover, L. melicerta and L. ceratophylli were not resolved in phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences. Thus, we used COI sequences for species delimitation. Bayesian Species Delimitation detected nine putative cryptic species within L. melicerta and four putative cryptic species for L. ceratophylli. The genetic distance in the COI gene was 0-15.4% within cryptic species of L. melicerta and 0.5-0.6% within cryptic species of L. ceratophylli. Among cryptic species, COI genetic distance ranged 8.1-21.9% for L. melicerta and 15.1-21.2% for L. ceratophylli. The correlation between geographic and genetic distance was weak or lacking; thus geographic isolation cannot be considered a strong driver of genetic variation. In addition, geometric morphometric analyses of trophi did not show significant variation among cryptic species. In this study we used a conservative approach for species delimitation, yet we were able to show that species diversity in these sessile rotifers is underestimated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205203</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30379825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; COI protein ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Cryptic species ; Dispersal ; Gene flow ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic distance ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic structure ; Habitats ; Limnias ceratophylli ; Limnias melicerta ; Microorganisms ; Morphology ; Phylogeny ; Population ; Population genetics ; Populations ; Rotifera ; Sessile species ; Species diversity ; Studies ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205203-e0205203</ispartof><rights>2018 Kordbacheh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Kordbacheh et al 2018 Kordbacheh et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa023fd7215305327f8a8409479ac023ba45d53b8c52d82369a684a839f09fdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa023fd7215305327f8a8409479ac023ba45d53b8c52d82369a684a839f09fdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6305-4776 ; 0000-0001-5804-4805</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209156/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6209156/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30379825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Munderloh, Ulrike Gertrud</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kordbacheh, Azar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Microorganisms, including rotifers, are thought to be capable of long distance dispersal. Therefore, they should show little population genetic structure due to high gene flow. Nevertheless, substantial genetic structure has been reported among populations of many taxa. In rotifers, genetic studies have focused on planktonic taxa leaving sessile groups largely unexplored. Here, we used COI gene and ITS region sequences to study genetic structure and delimit cryptic species in two sessile species (Limnias melicerta [32 populations]; L. ceratophylli [21 populations]). Among populations, ITS region sequences were less variable as compared to those of the COI gene (ITS; L. melicerta: 0-3.1% and L. ceratophylli: 0-4.4%; COI; L. melicerta: 0-22.7% and L. ceratophylli: 0-21.7%). Moreover, L. melicerta and L. ceratophylli were not resolved in phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences. Thus, we used COI sequences for species delimitation. Bayesian Species Delimitation detected nine putative cryptic species within L. melicerta and four putative cryptic species for L. ceratophylli. The genetic distance in the COI gene was 0-15.4% within cryptic species of L. melicerta and 0.5-0.6% within cryptic species of L. ceratophylli. Among cryptic species, COI genetic distance ranged 8.1-21.9% for L. melicerta and 15.1-21.2% for L. ceratophylli. The correlation between geographic and genetic distance was weak or lacking; thus geographic isolation cannot be considered a strong driver of genetic variation. In addition, geometric morphometric analyses of trophi did not show significant variation among cryptic species. In this study we used a conservative approach for species delimitation, yet we were able to show that species diversity in these sessile rotifers is underestimated.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>COI protein</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Cryptic species</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic distance</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Limnias ceratophylli</subject><subject>Limnias melicerta</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>Sessile species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUltrFDEUHkSxF_0HogFfKnTXXCaZzEtBSq2FBUH0OZzNZHazZJIxyWzZn-C_Nu1uSys-5eSc73zn9lXVO4LnhDXk8yZM0YObj8GbOaaYU8xeVMekZXQmiv3yiX1UnaS0wZgzKcTr6ohh1rSS8uPqz9XWdsZrg9I0jiFm61dIx92YrUZpNNqahG5tXluP8m1AyaRknUGD1TFYvzUxm2WEbNI5WtjBW0hoMM7qEgAEvkOLOSofyGFc75yz6OxHyLYvnnN07U2yIceg1_DpTfWqB5fM28N7Wv36evXz8tts8f365vLLYqY5FXnWA6as7xpKOCvz0KaXIGvc1k0LuoSWUPOOs6Us8E5SJloQsgbJ2h63fafZafVhzzu6kNRhi0lRQhvBhahpQdzsEV2AjRqjHSDuVACr7h0hrhSURWlnFNPLpjadIJjUtRQAvWw4p6UJxgkhrHBdHKpNy8F02vgcwT0jfR7xdq1WYavK2VrCRSE4OxDE8HsyKavBJm2cA2_CtO-75ZRzWaAf_4H-f7p6jyoHTCma_rEZgtWdsh6y1J2y1EFZJe3900Eekx6kxP4CTSnN6w</recordid><startdate>20181031</startdate><enddate>20181031</enddate><creator>Kordbacheh, Azar</creator><creator>Wallace, Robert L</creator><creator>Walsh, Elizabeth J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-4776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-4805</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181031</creationdate><title>Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)</title><author>Kordbacheh, Azar ; Wallace, Robert L ; Walsh, Elizabeth J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa023fd7215305327f8a8409479ac023ba45d53b8c52d82369a684a839f09fdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>COI protein</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Cryptic species</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic distance</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Limnias ceratophylli</topic><topic>Limnias melicerta</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>Sessile species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kordbacheh, Azar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kordbacheh, Azar</au><au>Wallace, Robert L</au><au>Walsh, Elizabeth J</au><au>Munderloh, Ulrike Gertrud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-10-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0205203</spage><epage>e0205203</epage><pages>e0205203-e0205203</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Microorganisms, including rotifers, are thought to be capable of long distance dispersal. Therefore, they should show little population genetic structure due to high gene flow. Nevertheless, substantial genetic structure has been reported among populations of many taxa. In rotifers, genetic studies have focused on planktonic taxa leaving sessile groups largely unexplored. Here, we used COI gene and ITS region sequences to study genetic structure and delimit cryptic species in two sessile species (Limnias melicerta [32 populations]; L. ceratophylli [21 populations]). Among populations, ITS region sequences were less variable as compared to those of the COI gene (ITS; L. melicerta: 0-3.1% and L. ceratophylli: 0-4.4%; COI; L. melicerta: 0-22.7% and L. ceratophylli: 0-21.7%). Moreover, L. melicerta and L. ceratophylli were not resolved in phylogenetic analyses based on ITS sequences. Thus, we used COI sequences for species delimitation. Bayesian Species Delimitation detected nine putative cryptic species within L. melicerta and four putative cryptic species for L. ceratophylli. The genetic distance in the COI gene was 0-15.4% within cryptic species of L. melicerta and 0.5-0.6% within cryptic species of L. ceratophylli. Among cryptic species, COI genetic distance ranged 8.1-21.9% for L. melicerta and 15.1-21.2% for L. ceratophylli. The correlation between geographic and genetic distance was weak or lacking; thus geographic isolation cannot be considered a strong driver of genetic variation. In addition, geometric morphometric analyses of trophi did not show significant variation among cryptic species. In this study we used a conservative approach for species delimitation, yet we were able to show that species diversity in these sessile rotifers is underestimated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30379825</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0205203</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-4776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-4805</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205203-e0205203
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2127656642
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Bayesian analysis
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
COI protein
Computer and Information Sciences
Cryptic species
Dispersal
Gene flow
Gene sequencing
Genetic analysis
Genetic distance
Genetic diversity
Genetic structure
Habitats
Limnias ceratophylli
Limnias melicerta
Microorganisms
Morphology
Phylogeny
Population
Population genetics
Populations
Rotifera
Sessile species
Species diversity
Studies
Taxa
title Evidence supporting cryptic species within two sessile microinvertebrates, Limnias melicerta and L. ceratophylli (Rotifera, Gnesiotrocha)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A25%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20supporting%20cryptic%20species%20within%20two%20sessile%20microinvertebrates,%20Limnias%20melicerta%20and%20L.%20ceratophylli%20(Rotifera,%20Gnesiotrocha)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kordbacheh,%20Azar&rft.date=2018-10-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0205203&rft.epage=e0205203&rft.pages=e0205203-e0205203&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2127952558%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2127656642&rft_id=info:pmid/30379825&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3cb74ed61014486aaf87552ba4351113&rfr_iscdi=true