Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study
Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205533-e0205533 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0205533 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0205533 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Briggs, Andrew M Araujo de Carvalho, Islene |
| description | Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach.
A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1-9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify 'essential' actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus.
After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as 'important' and three (9·7%) as 'uncertain'. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6-97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential.
Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2118381028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A559617884</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b804001701e04e33a1c671a20b0a5d2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A559617884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a6e9862a26f9140870fd4965cfcaa82fa299293a6ed644908e345c048937b7d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvhDRBYqsThIsGHPXi5QIpKoZEqBXG8tBzv7MaV197aXkR4H94TJ02rBvUC-cLW-Jt_POOZLHtK8JSwiry5cKO30kwHZ2GKKS4Kxu5lh6RmdFJSzO7fOh9kj0K4wLhgvCwfZgcMM8xxVR1mf2YqamcD8nA5ag8Nig7pfjDQg41I2widlzHZlfSAWueRMw14NIBLUAJQXAFSru9Hq-MajUHbbmv74bxp0BlIE1do4Ttp9W-5CfYyoPnJ4tMpksPgnVSrt2iGOuOW0qD3YIaVTno2gA1jQCGOzfpx9qCVJsCT3X6Ufftw-vXkbHK--Dg_mZ1PVFnTOJEl1LykkpZtTXLMK9w2eV0WqlVSctpKWte0ZglryjyvMQeWFwrnvGbVsmpydpQ9v9IdjAtiV-EgKCGccYIpT8T8imicvBCD1730a-GkFluD852QPmplQCw5zjEmFSaAc2BMElVWRFK8xLJoaJu03u2ijcseGpUK7qXZE92_sXolOvdTlIQTxosk8Gon4N3lCCGKXgcFxkgLbty-u04tUOBNZsf_oHdnt6M6mRLQtnUprtqIillR1CWpON9oTe-g0mqg1-nnoNXJvufwes8hMRF-xU6OIYj5l8__zy6-77MvbrGrbacFZ8ZtR--D-RWovAvBQ3tTZILFZpquqyE20yR205Tcnt3-oBun6_FhfwGHJxsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118381028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Briggs, Andrew M ; Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</creator><contributor>Van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Andrew M ; Araujo de Carvalho, Islene ; Van Bogaert, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach.
A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1-9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify 'essential' actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus.
After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as 'important' and three (9·7%) as 'uncertain'. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6-97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential.
Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205533</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30308077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aging ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Chronic illnesses ; Communities ; Consent ; Consultation ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods ; Delphi Technique ; Elderly ; Frailty ; Health aspects ; Health Plan Implementation - methods ; Humans ; Long term health care ; Low income groups ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Older people ; People and Places ; Population ; Public health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Systematic review ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205533-e0205533</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Briggs, Araujo de Carvalho. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Briggs, Araujo de Carvalho 2018 Briggs, Araujo de Carvalho</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a6e9862a26f9140870fd4965cfcaa82fa299293a6ed644908e345c048937b7d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a6e9862a26f9140870fd4965cfcaa82fa299293a6ed644908e345c048937b7d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6736-3098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181385/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181385/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,727,780,784,789,790,864,885,2100,2926,23865,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30308077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</creatorcontrib><title>Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach.
A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1-9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify 'essential' actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus.
After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as 'important' and three (9·7%) as 'uncertain'. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6-97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential.
Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Plan Implementation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tuEzEQhlcIREvhDRBYqsThIsGHPXi5QIpKoZEqBXG8tBzv7MaV197aXkR4H94TJ02rBvUC-cLW-Jt_POOZLHtK8JSwiry5cKO30kwHZ2GKKS4Kxu5lh6RmdFJSzO7fOh9kj0K4wLhgvCwfZgcMM8xxVR1mf2YqamcD8nA5ag8Nig7pfjDQg41I2widlzHZlfSAWueRMw14NIBLUAJQXAFSru9Hq-MajUHbbmv74bxp0BlIE1do4Ttp9W-5CfYyoPnJ4tMpksPgnVSrt2iGOuOW0qD3YIaVTno2gA1jQCGOzfpx9qCVJsCT3X6Ufftw-vXkbHK--Dg_mZ1PVFnTOJEl1LykkpZtTXLMK9w2eV0WqlVSctpKWte0ZglryjyvMQeWFwrnvGbVsmpydpQ9v9IdjAtiV-EgKCGccYIpT8T8imicvBCD1730a-GkFluD852QPmplQCw5zjEmFSaAc2BMElVWRFK8xLJoaJu03u2ijcseGpUK7qXZE92_sXolOvdTlIQTxosk8Gon4N3lCCGKXgcFxkgLbty-u04tUOBNZsf_oHdnt6M6mRLQtnUprtqIillR1CWpON9oTe-g0mqg1-nnoNXJvufwes8hMRF-xU6OIYj5l8__zy6-77MvbrGrbacFZ8ZtR--D-RWovAvBQ3tTZILFZpquqyE20yR205Tcnt3-oBun6_FhfwGHJxsQ</recordid><startdate>20181011</startdate><enddate>20181011</enddate><creator>Briggs, Andrew M</creator><creator>Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-3098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181011</creationdate><title>Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study</title><author>Briggs, Andrew M ; Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a6e9862a26f9140870fd4965cfcaa82fa299293a6ed644908e345c048937b7d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Plan Implementation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briggs, Andrew M</au><au>Araujo de Carvalho, Islene</au><au>Van Bogaert, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-10-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0205533</spage><epage>e0205533</epage><pages>e0205533-e0205533</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Integrated care is recognised as an important enabler to healthy ageing, yet few countries have managed to sustainably deliver integrated care for older people. We aimed to gather global consensus on the key actions required to realign health and long-term systems and integrate services to implement the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach.
A two-round eDelphi study, including a global consultation meeting, was undertaken to identify, refine and generate consensus on the actions required across high-, middle- and low-income countries to implement the WHO ICOPE approach. In round 1, a framework of 31 actions, empirically derived from previous WHO evidence reviews was presented to panellists to judge the relative importance of each action (numeric rating scale; range:1-9) and provide free-text comments concerning the scope of the actions. These outcomes were discussed and debated at the global consultation meeting. In round 2, a revised framework of 19 actions was presented to panellists to measure their extent of agreement and identify 'essential' actions (five-point Likert scale; range: strongly agree to strongly disagree). A threshold of ≥80% for agree/strongly agree was set a priori for consensus.
After round 1 (n = 80 panellists), median scores across 31 actions ranged from 6 to 9. Based on pre-defined category thresholds for median scores, panellists considered 28 actions (90·3%) as 'important' and three (9·7%) as 'uncertain'. Fifteen additional actions were suggested for inclusion based on free-text comments, creating 46 for consideration at the global consultation meeting. In round 2 (n = 84 panellists), agreement (agree or strongly agree) ranged from 84·6-97·6%, suggesting consensus. Fourteen (73·7%) actions were rated as essential.
Fourteen essential actions and five important actions are necessary at system (macro; n = 10) and service (meso; n = 9) levels to implement community-based integrated care for older people.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30308077</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0205533</doi><tpages>e0205533</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-3098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205533-e0205533 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2118381028 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Aged Aging Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Chronic illnesses Communities Consent Consultation Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods Delphi Technique Elderly Frailty Health aspects Health Plan Implementation - methods Humans Long term health care Low income groups Medicine and Health Sciences Older people People and Places Population Public health Research and Analysis Methods Systematic review World Health Organization |
| title | Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A15%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actions%20required%20to%20implement%20integrated%20care%20for%20older%20people%20in%20the%20community%20using%20the%20World%20Health%20Organization's%20ICOPE%20approach:%20A%20global%20Delphi%20consensus%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Briggs,%20Andrew%20M&rft.date=2018-10-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0205533&rft.epage=e0205533&rft.pages=e0205533-e0205533&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205533&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA559617884%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118381028&rft_id=info:pmid/30308077&rft_galeid=A559617884&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b804001701e04e33a1c671a20b0a5d2f&rfr_iscdi=true |