Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The surgical technique used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is crucial for achieving good short and long term clinical outcomes. The medial mobile bearing UKA has shown excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. But release of the medial collateral ligament during entering joint is ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205469-e0205469
Hauptverfasser: Pongcharoen, Boonchana, Chanalithichai, Nuttawut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0205469
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0205469
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Pongcharoen, Boonchana
Chanalithichai, Nuttawut
description The surgical technique used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is crucial for achieving good short and long term clinical outcomes. The medial mobile bearing UKA has shown excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. But release of the medial collateral ligament during entering joint is cause of mobile bearing dislocation in short term outcomes and lateral compartment osteoarthritis may occur in the mid to long term outcomes. Removing all osteophytes at the time of UKA is sometime impossible due to their large size and extend to the inferior part of medial tibial plateau and removing them completely my result in release of the MCL. But no data exist on clinical outcomes in such patients. We conducted a prospective study from 2010 to 2015 of patients undergoing mobile bearing UKA and classified them in to two groups: those with (Gp1) and without (Gp2) residual osteophytes. Osteophyte size was measured using Hernborg's technique. The primary outcomes were pain score, functional score, and knee scores and the presence of reported medial knee pain. 176 patients who underwent 199 mobile bearing UKAs were recruited: Gp1 = 42 patients (46 knees) and Gp2 = 134 patients (153 knees). Residual osteophyte sizes ranged from 2.13-9.42 mm (mean 4.12). The mean Gp1 Gp2 pain score (49.04, 48.92, p = 0.84), functional score (83.75, 84.04, p = 0.83) and knee score (89.86, 98.7, p = 0.0.78) scores were almost identical and no one complained of medial joint pain. Followed up ranged from 2 - 7 years (mean 4.23). No patients were lost to follow up. The patients with residual osteophytes of length less than 9 mm had good and similar clinical outcomes as patients without residual osteophytes following mobile bearing UKA. Level II-2, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort studies or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0205469
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2118363824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A559617870</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_97f56b689f494e5f8ecac243a3ba8413</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A559617870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b57a4253cb3a125744176a0abc1945a9785fd200cfec1869641c4e3ae31f0333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTpumNsAx-DCws-HUb0szpNGPadJPUdfz1pjvdZSp7Ib1Ikzzve3LO4STJc4yWmBT43c4OrpNm2dsOlihDOWXlg-QUlyRbsAyRh0f_J8kT73cI5YQz9jg5IYggjjA-Tf6sjO60kia1Q1C2BZ_aOu1l0NAFn17r0KQOvN4MEWlho0fSB7B9sw8Rrq0x9lp327S1lTaQViDduB2iq2176UIbnaLqZweQxm3jbG-kD_unyaNaGg_PpvUs-f7xw7fV58XF5af16vxioViZhUVW5YWkWU5URSTO8oJSXDCJZKVwSXNZFjyvNxlCqgaFOSsZxYoCkUBwjQghZ8nLg29vrBdT2bzIMOaEEZ7RSKwPxMbKneidbqXbCyu1uDmwbiviw7UyIMqizlnFeFnTkkJec1BSRQtJKskpHqO9n6INVayXisk7aWam85tON2JrfwmGeewrjwZvJgNnrwbwQbTaKzBGdmCHm3eXsa-4RBF99Q96f3YTtZUxAd3VNsZVo6k4z_OS4YIXo9fyHip-G2hjJzuoY3fngrczQWQC_A5bOXgv1l-__D97-WPOvj5iG5AmNN6aIWjb-TlID6By1nsH9V2RMRLjiNxWQ4wjIqYRibIXxw26E93OBPkLvToN-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118363824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pongcharoen, Boonchana ; Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</creator><contributor>Pérez-Prieto, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pongcharoen, Boonchana ; Chanalithichai, Nuttawut ; Pérez-Prieto, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The surgical technique used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is crucial for achieving good short and long term clinical outcomes. The medial mobile bearing UKA has shown excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. But release of the medial collateral ligament during entering joint is cause of mobile bearing dislocation in short term outcomes and lateral compartment osteoarthritis may occur in the mid to long term outcomes. Removing all osteophytes at the time of UKA is sometime impossible due to their large size and extend to the inferior part of medial tibial plateau and removing them completely my result in release of the MCL. But no data exist on clinical outcomes in such patients. We conducted a prospective study from 2010 to 2015 of patients undergoing mobile bearing UKA and classified them in to two groups: those with (Gp1) and without (Gp2) residual osteophytes. Osteophyte size was measured using Hernborg's technique. The primary outcomes were pain score, functional score, and knee scores and the presence of reported medial knee pain. 176 patients who underwent 199 mobile bearing UKAs were recruited: Gp1 = 42 patients (46 knees) and Gp2 = 134 patients (153 knees). Residual osteophyte sizes ranged from 2.13-9.42 mm (mean 4.12). The mean Gp1 Gp2 pain score (49.04, 48.92, p = 0.84), functional score (83.75, 84.04, p = 0.83) and knee score (89.86, 98.7, p = 0.0.78) scores were almost identical and no one complained of medial joint pain. Followed up ranged from 2 - 7 years (mean 4.23). No patients were lost to follow up. The patients with residual osteophytes of length less than 9 mm had good and similar clinical outcomes as patients without residual osteophytes following mobile bearing UKA. Level II-2, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort studies or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205469</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30308011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Bearing ; Biocompatibility ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Clinical outcomes ; Dislocation ; Dislocation mobility ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee replacement arthroplasty ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteophytes ; Pain ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Quality of life ; Rheumatology ; Skin ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical implants ; Surgical techniques ; Survival ; Treatment outcome</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205469-e0205469</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Pongcharoen, Chanalithichai. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Pongcharoen, Chanalithichai 2018 Pongcharoen, Chanalithichai</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b57a4253cb3a125744176a0abc1945a9785fd200cfec1869641c4e3ae31f0333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b57a4253cb3a125744176a0abc1945a9785fd200cfec1869641c4e3ae31f0333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6907-0224 ; 0000-0002-1356-7888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181378/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181378/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30308011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pérez-Prieto, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pongcharoen, Boonchana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The surgical technique used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is crucial for achieving good short and long term clinical outcomes. The medial mobile bearing UKA has shown excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. But release of the medial collateral ligament during entering joint is cause of mobile bearing dislocation in short term outcomes and lateral compartment osteoarthritis may occur in the mid to long term outcomes. Removing all osteophytes at the time of UKA is sometime impossible due to their large size and extend to the inferior part of medial tibial plateau and removing them completely my result in release of the MCL. But no data exist on clinical outcomes in such patients. We conducted a prospective study from 2010 to 2015 of patients undergoing mobile bearing UKA and classified them in to two groups: those with (Gp1) and without (Gp2) residual osteophytes. Osteophyte size was measured using Hernborg's technique. The primary outcomes were pain score, functional score, and knee scores and the presence of reported medial knee pain. 176 patients who underwent 199 mobile bearing UKAs were recruited: Gp1 = 42 patients (46 knees) and Gp2 = 134 patients (153 knees). Residual osteophyte sizes ranged from 2.13-9.42 mm (mean 4.12). The mean Gp1 Gp2 pain score (49.04, 48.92, p = 0.84), functional score (83.75, 84.04, p = 0.83) and knee score (89.86, 98.7, p = 0.0.78) scores were almost identical and no one complained of medial joint pain. Followed up ranged from 2 - 7 years (mean 4.23). No patients were lost to follow up. The patients with residual osteophytes of length less than 9 mm had good and similar clinical outcomes as patients without residual osteophytes following mobile bearing UKA. Level II-2, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort studies or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Dislocation</subject><subject>Dislocation mobility</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee replacement arthroplasty</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteophytes</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Treatment outcome</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjEmTpumNsAx-DCws-HUb0szpNGPadJPUdfz1pjvdZSp7Ib1Ikzzve3LO4STJc4yWmBT43c4OrpNm2dsOlihDOWXlg-QUlyRbsAyRh0f_J8kT73cI5YQz9jg5IYggjjA-Tf6sjO60kia1Q1C2BZ_aOu1l0NAFn17r0KQOvN4MEWlho0fSB7B9sw8Rrq0x9lp327S1lTaQViDduB2iq2176UIbnaLqZweQxm3jbG-kD_unyaNaGg_PpvUs-f7xw7fV58XF5af16vxioViZhUVW5YWkWU5URSTO8oJSXDCJZKVwSXNZFjyvNxlCqgaFOSsZxYoCkUBwjQghZ8nLg29vrBdT2bzIMOaEEZ7RSKwPxMbKneidbqXbCyu1uDmwbiviw7UyIMqizlnFeFnTkkJec1BSRQtJKskpHqO9n6INVayXisk7aWam85tON2JrfwmGeewrjwZvJgNnrwbwQbTaKzBGdmCHm3eXsa-4RBF99Q96f3YTtZUxAd3VNsZVo6k4z_OS4YIXo9fyHip-G2hjJzuoY3fngrczQWQC_A5bOXgv1l-__D97-WPOvj5iG5AmNN6aIWjb-TlID6By1nsH9V2RMRLjiNxWQ4wjIqYRibIXxw26E93OBPkLvToN-g</recordid><startdate>20181011</startdate><enddate>20181011</enddate><creator>Pongcharoen, Boonchana</creator><creator>Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6907-0224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-7888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181011</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><author>Pongcharoen, Boonchana ; Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2b57a4253cb3a125744176a0abc1945a9785fd200cfec1869641c4e3ae31f0333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Dislocation</topic><topic>Dislocation mobility</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee replacement arthroplasty</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteophytes</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Treatment outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pongcharoen, Boonchana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pongcharoen, Boonchana</au><au>Chanalithichai, Nuttawut</au><au>Pérez-Prieto, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-10-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0205469</spage><epage>e0205469</epage><pages>e0205469-e0205469</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The surgical technique used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is crucial for achieving good short and long term clinical outcomes. The medial mobile bearing UKA has shown excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. But release of the medial collateral ligament during entering joint is cause of mobile bearing dislocation in short term outcomes and lateral compartment osteoarthritis may occur in the mid to long term outcomes. Removing all osteophytes at the time of UKA is sometime impossible due to their large size and extend to the inferior part of medial tibial plateau and removing them completely my result in release of the MCL. But no data exist on clinical outcomes in such patients. We conducted a prospective study from 2010 to 2015 of patients undergoing mobile bearing UKA and classified them in to two groups: those with (Gp1) and without (Gp2) residual osteophytes. Osteophyte size was measured using Hernborg's technique. The primary outcomes were pain score, functional score, and knee scores and the presence of reported medial knee pain. 176 patients who underwent 199 mobile bearing UKAs were recruited: Gp1 = 42 patients (46 knees) and Gp2 = 134 patients (153 knees). Residual osteophyte sizes ranged from 2.13-9.42 mm (mean 4.12). The mean Gp1 Gp2 pain score (49.04, 48.92, p = 0.84), functional score (83.75, 84.04, p = 0.83) and knee score (89.86, 98.7, p = 0.0.78) scores were almost identical and no one complained of medial joint pain. Followed up ranged from 2 - 7 years (mean 4.23). No patients were lost to follow up. The patients with residual osteophytes of length less than 9 mm had good and similar clinical outcomes as patients without residual osteophytes following mobile bearing UKA. Level II-2, evidence obtained from well-designed cohort studies or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30308011</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0205469</doi><tpages>e0205469</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6907-0224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-7888</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0205469-e0205469
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2118363824
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Arthritis
Arthroplasty (knee)
Bearing
Biocompatibility
Biology and Life Sciences
Care and treatment
Clinical outcomes
Dislocation
Dislocation mobility
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee replacement arthroplasty
Medicine and Health Sciences
Osteoarthritis
Osteophytes
Pain
Patient outcomes
Patients
Quality of life
Rheumatology
Skin
Studies
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical implants
Surgical techniques
Survival
Treatment outcome
title Clinical outcomes of patients with residual medial osteophytes following mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A51%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20patients%20with%20residual%20medial%20osteophytes%20following%20mobile%20bearing%20unicompartmental%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pongcharoen,%20Boonchana&rft.date=2018-10-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0205469&rft.epage=e0205469&rft.pages=e0205469-e0205469&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0205469&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA559617870%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118363824&rft_id=info:pmid/30308011&rft_galeid=A559617870&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_97f56b689f494e5f8ecac243a3ba8413&rfr_iscdi=true