Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines
Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0204720-e0204720 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0204720 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0204720 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Meyer, Chase Bowers, Aaron Wayant, Cole Checketts, Jake Scott, Jared Musuvathy, Sanjeev Vassar, Matt |
description | Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research.
We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence.
A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence.
Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0204720 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2117860490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557683648</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b37a42c7f5254b1796f4f1b5e56f8077</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557683648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c7e02b2f9565dbe114fdbb21ffb09a58dc6677340fb1923fe731fcecc65546e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQuLjosUfsZPcIFUVjEqTJjHg1nKc49SVa3d2MtF_j7t2U4N2gXLh6Ph5X59z7JNlrzGaYVriz2s_BCftbOsdzBBBRUnQk-wc15RMOUH06cn_WfYixjVCjFacP8_OKCIV5iU-z_S1MuB6o43K4da04BTkg2sh2J1xXd6vIJ9vIBglXb7w1kIHudf5hYx98EkJwVvf7T7EXFnjEmbzbZCqN8mnG5JhikJ8mT3T0kZ4dVwn2a9vX38uvk8vry6Wi_nlVPGa9FNVAiIN0TXjrG0A40K3TUOw1g2qJataxXlZ0gLpBteEaigp1gqU4owVHDCdZG8Pvlvrozi2KAqCcVlxVNQoEcsD0Xq5FttgNjLshJdG3AV86IQMKXsLoqGlLIgqNSOsaHBZc11o3DBgXFco5THJvhxPG5oNtCq1I0g7Mh3vOLMSnb8VHPO6JvtkPh4Ngr8ZIPZiY6ICa6UDP9zlzTHhhOwre_cP-nh1R6qTqQDjtE_nqr2pmDNW8oryokrU7BEqfS1sjErvSZsUHwk-jQSJ6eFP38khRrG8_vH_7NXvMfv-hF2BtP0qejv0xrs4BosDqIKPMYB-aDJGYj8O990Q-3EQx3FIsjenF_Qgun__9C9bgQYX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117860490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Meyer, Chase ; Bowers, Aaron ; Wayant, Cole ; Checketts, Jake ; Scott, Jared ; Musuvathy, Sanjeev ; Vassar, Matt</creator><contributor>Grimmer, Karen Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Chase ; Bowers, Aaron ; Wayant, Cole ; Checketts, Jake ; Scott, Jared ; Musuvathy, Sanjeev ; Vassar, Matt ; Grimmer, Karen Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research.
We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence.
A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence.
Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204720</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30281671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Clinical trials ; Evidence-Based Medicine - standards ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroenterology - standards ; Guidelines ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Internet ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Quality ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Science Policy ; Societies, Medical - standards ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0204720-e0204720</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Meyer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Meyer et al 2018 Meyer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c7e02b2f9565dbe114fdbb21ffb09a58dc6677340fb1923fe731fcecc65546e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c7e02b2f9565dbe114fdbb21ffb09a58dc6677340fb1923fe731fcecc65546e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8829-8179 ; 0000-0003-2440-4643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169920/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169920/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30281671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grimmer, Karen Anne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Chase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayant, Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checketts, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musuvathy, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research.
We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence.
A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence.
Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQuLjosUfsZPcIFUVjEqTJjHg1nKc49SVa3d2MtF_j7t2U4N2gXLh6Ph5X59z7JNlrzGaYVriz2s_BCftbOsdzBBBRUnQk-wc15RMOUH06cn_WfYixjVCjFacP8_OKCIV5iU-z_S1MuB6o43K4da04BTkg2sh2J1xXd6vIJ9vIBglXb7w1kIHudf5hYx98EkJwVvf7T7EXFnjEmbzbZCqN8mnG5JhikJ8mT3T0kZ4dVwn2a9vX38uvk8vry6Wi_nlVPGa9FNVAiIN0TXjrG0A40K3TUOw1g2qJataxXlZ0gLpBteEaigp1gqU4owVHDCdZG8Pvlvrozi2KAqCcVlxVNQoEcsD0Xq5FttgNjLshJdG3AV86IQMKXsLoqGlLIgqNSOsaHBZc11o3DBgXFco5THJvhxPG5oNtCq1I0g7Mh3vOLMSnb8VHPO6JvtkPh4Ngr8ZIPZiY6ICa6UDP9zlzTHhhOwre_cP-nh1R6qTqQDjtE_nqr2pmDNW8oryokrU7BEqfS1sjErvSZsUHwk-jQSJ6eFP38khRrG8_vH_7NXvMfv-hF2BtP0qejv0xrs4BosDqIKPMYB-aDJGYj8O990Q-3EQx3FIsjenF_Qgun__9C9bgQYX</recordid><startdate>20181003</startdate><enddate>20181003</enddate><creator>Meyer, Chase</creator><creator>Bowers, Aaron</creator><creator>Wayant, Cole</creator><creator>Checketts, Jake</creator><creator>Scott, Jared</creator><creator>Musuvathy, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Vassar, Matt</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8829-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-4643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181003</creationdate><title>Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines</title><author>Meyer, Chase ; Bowers, Aaron ; Wayant, Cole ; Checketts, Jake ; Scott, Jared ; Musuvathy, Sanjeev ; Vassar, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c7e02b2f9565dbe114fdbb21ffb09a58dc6677340fb1923fe731fcecc65546e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Chase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayant, Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checketts, Jake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musuvathy, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, Chase</au><au>Bowers, Aaron</au><au>Wayant, Cole</au><au>Checketts, Jake</au><au>Scott, Jared</au><au>Musuvathy, Sanjeev</au><au>Vassar, Matt</au><au>Grimmer, Karen Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-10-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0204720</spage><epage>e0204720</epage><pages>e0204720-e0204720</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research.
We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence.
A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence.
Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30281671</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0204720</doi><tpages>e0204720</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8829-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-4643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0204720-e0204720 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2117860490 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Clinical medicine Clinical practice guidelines Clinical trials Evidence-Based Medicine - standards Gastroenterology Gastroenterology - standards Guidelines Health sciences Humans Identification methods Internet Medical personnel Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Physicians Practice guidelines (Medicine) Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Quality Research and Analysis Methods Science Policy Societies, Medical - standards Studies United States |
title | Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A39%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientific%20evidence%20underlying%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Gastroenterology's%20clinical%20practice%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Meyer,%20Chase&rft.date=2018-10-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0204720&rft.epage=e0204720&rft.pages=e0204720-e0204720&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0204720&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA557683648%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117860490&rft_id=info:pmid/30281671&rft_galeid=A557683648&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b37a42c7f5254b1796f4f1b5e56f8077&rfr_iscdi=true |