Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability
Previous work suggests that to restore postural stability for individuals with lower-limb amputation, ankle-foot prostheses should be designed with a flat effective rocker shape for standing. However, most commercially available ankle-foot prostheses are designed with a curved effective rocker shape...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0204512-e0204512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0204512 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0204512 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R Savvas Slater, Billie C Koester, Karl Nickel, Eric A Ferguson, John E Hansen, Andrew H |
description | Previous work suggests that to restore postural stability for individuals with lower-limb amputation, ankle-foot prostheses should be designed with a flat effective rocker shape for standing. However, most commercially available ankle-foot prostheses are designed with a curved effective rocker shape for walking. To address the demands of both standing and walking, we designed a novel bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis that can accommodate both functional modes using a rigid foot plate and an ankle that can lock and unlock. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the bimodal ankle-foot system could improve various aspects of standing balance (static, dynamic, and functional) and mobility in a group of Veterans with lower-limb amputation (n = 18). Standing balance was assessed while subjects completed a series of tests on a NeuroCom Clinical Research System (NeuroCom, a Division of Natus, Clackamas, OR), including a Sensory Organization Test, a Limits of Stability Test, and a modified Motor Control Test. Few statistically significant differences were observed between the locked and unlocked ankle conditions while subjects completed these tests. However, in the absence of visual feedback, the locked bimodal ankle appeared to improve static balance in a group of experienced lower-limb prosthesis users whose PLUS-M mobility rating was higher than approximately 73% of the sample population used to develop the PLUS-M survey. Given the statistically significant increase in mean equilibrium scores between the unlocked and locked conditions (p = 0.004), future testing of this system should focus on new amputees and lower mobility users (e.g., Medicare Functional Classification Level K1 and K2 prosthesis users). Furthermore, commercial implementation of the bimodal ankle-foot system should include a robust control system that can automatically switch between modes based on the user's activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0204512 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2112601608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557752200</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_525198b96f7348bead582ffe5c311f55</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557752200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-98116b293bc456b899ebe9b220608b6b6d4a24817b1887e8b0adbea9397980b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EFQfRi1nxMMsmFQi1-LBQKft2GZObMbtZssk4ypf33ZrvTsiO9kFwknDznPTknb1E8x2iOaY3frcPQe-3m2-BhjgiqGCYPimMsKSk5QfThwfmoeBLjGiFGBeePiyOKCOOC4ePi_Ue7Ca12M-1_Oyi7ENJs24eYVhBtnHWhn4Ffad9AO4tJ-9b65e5grLPp-mnxqNMuwrNxPyl-fv704-xreX7xZXF2el42XJJUSoExN0RS01SMGyElGJCGEMSRMNzwttKkErg2WIgahEG6NaAllbUUyAh6Urzc625diGrsPCqCMeEIZ5FMLPZEG_RabXu70f21Ctqqm0Dol0r3yTYOFCMMS2Ek72paiVynZYJ0HbCGYtwxlrU-jNUGs4G2AZ967Sai0xtvV2oZLhXHrBaSZoE3o0Af_gwQk9rY2IBz2kMYbt5NiSAVIxl99Q96f3cjtdS5Aeu7kOs2O1F1ylhdszxKlKn5PVReLWxsk23S2RyfJLydJGQmwVVa6iFGtfj-7f_Zi19T9vUBuwLt0ioGNyQbfJyC1R5ssuViD93dkDFSO5ffTkPtXK5Gl-e0F4cfdJd0a2v6Fxje9VE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112601608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability</title><source>PLoS</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R ; Savvas Slater, Billie C ; Koester, Karl ; Nickel, Eric A ; Ferguson, John E ; Hansen, Andrew H</creator><creatorcontrib>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R ; Savvas Slater, Billie C ; Koester, Karl ; Nickel, Eric A ; Ferguson, John E ; Hansen, Andrew H</creatorcontrib><description>Previous work suggests that to restore postural stability for individuals with lower-limb amputation, ankle-foot prostheses should be designed with a flat effective rocker shape for standing. However, most commercially available ankle-foot prostheses are designed with a curved effective rocker shape for walking. To address the demands of both standing and walking, we designed a novel bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis that can accommodate both functional modes using a rigid foot plate and an ankle that can lock and unlock. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the bimodal ankle-foot system could improve various aspects of standing balance (static, dynamic, and functional) and mobility in a group of Veterans with lower-limb amputation (n = 18). Standing balance was assessed while subjects completed a series of tests on a NeuroCom Clinical Research System (NeuroCom, a Division of Natus, Clackamas, OR), including a Sensory Organization Test, a Limits of Stability Test, and a modified Motor Control Test. Few statistically significant differences were observed between the locked and unlocked ankle conditions while subjects completed these tests. However, in the absence of visual feedback, the locked bimodal ankle appeared to improve static balance in a group of experienced lower-limb prosthesis users whose PLUS-M mobility rating was higher than approximately 73% of the sample population used to develop the PLUS-M survey. Given the statistically significant increase in mean equilibrium scores between the unlocked and locked conditions (p = 0.004), future testing of this system should focus on new amputees and lower mobility users (e.g., Medicare Functional Classification Level K1 and K2 prosthesis users). Furthermore, commercial implementation of the bimodal ankle-foot system should include a robust control system that can automatically switch between modes based on the user's activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30256851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Amputation ; Ankle ; Balance ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Control stability ; Control systems ; Design ; Feet ; Gait ; Government programs ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mobility ; Motor task performance ; Older people ; Physical Sciences ; Physiology ; Posture ; Prostheses ; Prostheses and implants ; Prosthetics ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Robust control ; Social Sciences ; Stability tests ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Veterans ; Visual perception ; Walking</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0204512-e0204512</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-98116b293bc456b899ebe9b220608b6b6d4a24817b1887e8b0adbea9397980b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-98116b293bc456b899ebe9b220608b6b6d4a24817b1887e8b0adbea9397980b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7201-3607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157893/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157893/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savvas Slater, Billie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koester, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew H</creatorcontrib><title>Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Previous work suggests that to restore postural stability for individuals with lower-limb amputation, ankle-foot prostheses should be designed with a flat effective rocker shape for standing. However, most commercially available ankle-foot prostheses are designed with a curved effective rocker shape for walking. To address the demands of both standing and walking, we designed a novel bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis that can accommodate both functional modes using a rigid foot plate and an ankle that can lock and unlock. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the bimodal ankle-foot system could improve various aspects of standing balance (static, dynamic, and functional) and mobility in a group of Veterans with lower-limb amputation (n = 18). Standing balance was assessed while subjects completed a series of tests on a NeuroCom Clinical Research System (NeuroCom, a Division of Natus, Clackamas, OR), including a Sensory Organization Test, a Limits of Stability Test, and a modified Motor Control Test. Few statistically significant differences were observed between the locked and unlocked ankle conditions while subjects completed these tests. However, in the absence of visual feedback, the locked bimodal ankle appeared to improve static balance in a group of experienced lower-limb prosthesis users whose PLUS-M mobility rating was higher than approximately 73% of the sample population used to develop the PLUS-M survey. Given the statistically significant increase in mean equilibrium scores between the unlocked and locked conditions (p = 0.004), future testing of this system should focus on new amputees and lower mobility users (e.g., Medicare Functional Classification Level K1 and K2 prosthesis users). Furthermore, commercial implementation of the bimodal ankle-foot system should include a robust control system that can automatically switch between modes based on the user's activity.</description><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prostheses and implants</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stability tests</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9EFQfRi1nxMMsmFQi1-LBQKft2GZObMbtZssk4ypf33ZrvTsiO9kFwknDznPTknb1E8x2iOaY3frcPQe-3m2-BhjgiqGCYPimMsKSk5QfThwfmoeBLjGiFGBeePiyOKCOOC4ePi_Ue7Ca12M-1_Oyi7ENJs24eYVhBtnHWhn4Ffad9AO4tJ-9b65e5grLPp-mnxqNMuwrNxPyl-fv704-xreX7xZXF2el42XJJUSoExN0RS01SMGyElGJCGEMSRMNzwttKkErg2WIgahEG6NaAllbUUyAh6Urzc625diGrsPCqCMeEIZ5FMLPZEG_RabXu70f21Ctqqm0Dol0r3yTYOFCMMS2Ek72paiVynZYJ0HbCGYtwxlrU-jNUGs4G2AZ967Sai0xtvV2oZLhXHrBaSZoE3o0Af_gwQk9rY2IBz2kMYbt5NiSAVIxl99Q96f3cjtdS5Aeu7kOs2O1F1ylhdszxKlKn5PVReLWxsk23S2RyfJLydJGQmwVVa6iFGtfj-7f_Zi19T9vUBuwLt0ioGNyQbfJyC1R5ssuViD93dkDFSO5ffTkPtXK5Gl-e0F4cfdJd0a2v6Fxje9VE</recordid><startdate>20180926</startdate><enddate>20180926</enddate><creator>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R</creator><creator>Savvas Slater, Billie C</creator><creator>Koester, Karl</creator><creator>Nickel, Eric A</creator><creator>Ferguson, John E</creator><creator>Hansen, Andrew H</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-3607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180926</creationdate><title>Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability</title><author>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R ; Savvas Slater, Billie C ; Koester, Karl ; Nickel, Eric A ; Ferguson, John E ; Hansen, Andrew H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-98116b293bc456b899ebe9b220608b6b6d4a24817b1887e8b0adbea9397980b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prostheses and implants</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stability tests</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savvas Slater, Billie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koester, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Andrew H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koehler-McNicholas, Sara R</au><au>Savvas Slater, Billie C</au><au>Koester, Karl</au><au>Nickel, Eric A</au><au>Ferguson, John E</au><au>Hansen, Andrew H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-09-26</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0204512</spage><epage>e0204512</epage><pages>e0204512-e0204512</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Previous work suggests that to restore postural stability for individuals with lower-limb amputation, ankle-foot prostheses should be designed with a flat effective rocker shape for standing. However, most commercially available ankle-foot prostheses are designed with a curved effective rocker shape for walking. To address the demands of both standing and walking, we designed a novel bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis that can accommodate both functional modes using a rigid foot plate and an ankle that can lock and unlock. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the bimodal ankle-foot system could improve various aspects of standing balance (static, dynamic, and functional) and mobility in a group of Veterans with lower-limb amputation (n = 18). Standing balance was assessed while subjects completed a series of tests on a NeuroCom Clinical Research System (NeuroCom, a Division of Natus, Clackamas, OR), including a Sensory Organization Test, a Limits of Stability Test, and a modified Motor Control Test. Few statistically significant differences were observed between the locked and unlocked ankle conditions while subjects completed these tests. However, in the absence of visual feedback, the locked bimodal ankle appeared to improve static balance in a group of experienced lower-limb prosthesis users whose PLUS-M mobility rating was higher than approximately 73% of the sample population used to develop the PLUS-M survey. Given the statistically significant increase in mean equilibrium scores between the unlocked and locked conditions (p = 0.004), future testing of this system should focus on new amputees and lower mobility users (e.g., Medicare Functional Classification Level K1 and K2 prosthesis users). Furthermore, commercial implementation of the bimodal ankle-foot system should include a robust control system that can automatically switch between modes based on the user's activity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30256851</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0204512</doi><tpages>e0204512</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-3607</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0204512-e0204512 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2112601608 |
source | PLoS; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Amputation Ankle Balance Biology and Life Sciences Control stability Control systems Design Feet Gait Government programs Health aspects Health care Medicine and Health Sciences Mobility Motor task performance Older people Physical Sciences Physiology Posture Prostheses Prostheses and implants Prosthetics Rehabilitation Research and Analysis Methods Robust control Social Sciences Stability tests Statistical analysis Statistical significance Veterans Visual perception Walking |
title | Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bimodal%20ankle-foot%20prosthesis%20for%20enhanced%20standing%20stability&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Koehler-McNicholas,%20Sara%20R&rft.date=2018-09-26&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0204512&rft.epage=e0204512&rft.pages=e0204512-e0204512&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0204512&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA557752200%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112601608&rft_id=info:pmid/30256851&rft_galeid=A557752200&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_525198b96f7348bead582ffe5c311f55&rfr_iscdi=true |