Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands

Peatlands are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems that develop due to a complex set of autogenic physical and biogeochemical processes and allogenic factors such as the climate and topography. They are significant stocks of global soil carbon, and therefore predicting the depth of peatlands is an imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202691-e0202691
Hauptverfasser: Young, Dylan M, Parry, Lauren E, Lee, Duncan, Ray, Surajit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0202691
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0202691
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Young, Dylan M
Parry, Lauren E
Lee, Duncan
Ray, Surajit
description Peatlands are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems that develop due to a complex set of autogenic physical and biogeochemical processes and allogenic factors such as the climate and topography. They are significant stocks of global soil carbon, and therefore predicting the depth of peatlands is an important part of establishing an accurate assessment of their magnitude. Yet there have been few attempts to account for both internal and external processes when predicting the depth of peatlands. Using blanket peatlands in Great Britain as a case study, we compare a linear and geostatistical (spatial) model and several sets of covariates applicable for peatlands around the world that have developed over hilly or undulating terrain. We hypothesized that the spatial model would act as a proxy for the autogenic processes in peatlands that can mediate the accumulation of peat on plateaus or shallow slopes. Our findings show that the spatial model performs better than the linear model in all cases-root mean square errors (RMSE) are lower, and 95% prediction intervals are narrower. In support of our hypothesis, the spatial model also better predicts the deeper areas of peat, and we show that its predictive performance in areas of deep peat is dependent on depth observations being spatially autocorrelated. Where they are not, the spatial model performs only slightly better than the linear model. As a result, we recommend that practitioners carrying out depth surveys fully account for the variation of topographic features in prediction locations, and that sampling approach adopted enables observations to be spatially autocorrelated.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0202691
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2100863079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557791738</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_33701c4d96d945e78a6ae4875af25909</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557791738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-57ef3836493f22f6e7598f80f33869bca137b833dd3cc1a935898339c9a22c363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2o5vkKaJj0qTJlHg1nIdu3Vx4mA7Zfv3uG02NWgXKBexT57z2ufNWxQvIZhBzOCHre9DK92s862eAQQQ5fBRcQ45RlOKAH58sj4rnsW4BYDgitKnxRkGkCPGwXmxXHYyWenKxtfaxfKPTZtS-Z0MViYdS9t0we90qWOyzaHiTdlpmcpadxm1bblysv2l06Gal3V8Xjwx0kX9YnhPih-fP32__Dq9uv6yuLy4mkoGSZoSpg2uMJ1zbBAyVDPCK1MBg_Mt-UrJPOaqwriusVJQckwqnrdccYmQwhRPitdH3c75KAY_okAQgIpiwHgmFkei9nIrupBHCLfCSysOBR_WQoZkldMCYwagmtec1nxONKsklXpeMSINIhzstT4Op_WrRtdKtylINxIdf2ntRqz9TlCIKoJgFng3CAT_u8-GisZGpV32TPv-cG-IKAMIZ_TNP-jD0w3UWuYBbGt8PlftRcUFIYxxyLK_k2L2AJWfWjdW5fAYm-ujhvejhswkfZPWso9RLJbf_p-9_jlm356wGy1d2kTv-mR9G8fg_Aiq4GMM2tybDIHYZ__ODbHPvhiyn9tenf6g-6a7sOO_Bs39MQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100863079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Young, Dylan M ; Parry, Lauren E ; Lee, Duncan ; Ray, Surajit</creator><contributor>Minasny, Budiman</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Dylan M ; Parry, Lauren E ; Lee, Duncan ; Ray, Surajit ; Minasny, Budiman</creatorcontrib><description>Peatlands are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems that develop due to a complex set of autogenic physical and biogeochemical processes and allogenic factors such as the climate and topography. They are significant stocks of global soil carbon, and therefore predicting the depth of peatlands is an important part of establishing an accurate assessment of their magnitude. Yet there have been few attempts to account for both internal and external processes when predicting the depth of peatlands. Using blanket peatlands in Great Britain as a case study, we compare a linear and geostatistical (spatial) model and several sets of covariates applicable for peatlands around the world that have developed over hilly or undulating terrain. We hypothesized that the spatial model would act as a proxy for the autogenic processes in peatlands that can mediate the accumulation of peat on plateaus or shallow slopes. Our findings show that the spatial model performs better than the linear model in all cases-root mean square errors (RMSE) are lower, and 95% prediction intervals are narrower. In support of our hypothesis, the spatial model also better predicts the deeper areas of peat, and we show that its predictive performance in areas of deep peat is dependent on depth observations being spatially autocorrelated. Where they are not, the spatial model performs only slightly better than the linear model. As a result, we recommend that practitioners carrying out depth surveys fully account for the variation of topographic features in prediction locations, and that sampling approach adopted enables observations to be spatially autocorrelated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30192790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Analysis of Variance ; Autocorrelation ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Decomposition ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Geostatistics ; Hydrology ; Models, Statistical ; Morphology ; Peat ; Peatlands ; People and places ; Performance prediction ; Physical Sciences ; Plateaus ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Root-mean-square errors ; Soil ; Soil sciences ; Spatial Analysis ; Topography</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202691-e0202691</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Young et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Young et al 2018 Young et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-57ef3836493f22f6e7598f80f33869bca137b833dd3cc1a935898339c9a22c363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-57ef3836493f22f6e7598f80f33869bca137b833dd3cc1a935898339c9a22c363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6519-5473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128521/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128521/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30192790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Minasny, Budiman</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Dylan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Surajit</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Peatlands are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems that develop due to a complex set of autogenic physical and biogeochemical processes and allogenic factors such as the climate and topography. They are significant stocks of global soil carbon, and therefore predicting the depth of peatlands is an important part of establishing an accurate assessment of their magnitude. Yet there have been few attempts to account for both internal and external processes when predicting the depth of peatlands. Using blanket peatlands in Great Britain as a case study, we compare a linear and geostatistical (spatial) model and several sets of covariates applicable for peatlands around the world that have developed over hilly or undulating terrain. We hypothesized that the spatial model would act as a proxy for the autogenic processes in peatlands that can mediate the accumulation of peat on plateaus or shallow slopes. Our findings show that the spatial model performs better than the linear model in all cases-root mean square errors (RMSE) are lower, and 95% prediction intervals are narrower. In support of our hypothesis, the spatial model also better predicts the deeper areas of peat, and we show that its predictive performance in areas of deep peat is dependent on depth observations being spatially autocorrelated. Where they are not, the spatial model performs only slightly better than the linear model. As a result, we recommend that practitioners carrying out depth surveys fully account for the variation of topographic features in prediction locations, and that sampling approach adopted enables observations to be spatially autocorrelated.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Autocorrelation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Geostatistics</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Plateaus</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis</subject><subject>Topography</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKP2o5vkKaJj0qTJlHg1nIdu3Vx4mA7Zfv3uG02NWgXKBexT57z2ufNWxQvIZhBzOCHre9DK92s862eAQQQ5fBRcQ45RlOKAH58sj4rnsW4BYDgitKnxRkGkCPGwXmxXHYyWenKxtfaxfKPTZtS-Z0MViYdS9t0we90qWOyzaHiTdlpmcpadxm1bblysv2l06Gal3V8Xjwx0kX9YnhPih-fP32__Dq9uv6yuLy4mkoGSZoSpg2uMJ1zbBAyVDPCK1MBg_Mt-UrJPOaqwriusVJQckwqnrdccYmQwhRPitdH3c75KAY_okAQgIpiwHgmFkei9nIrupBHCLfCSysOBR_WQoZkldMCYwagmtec1nxONKsklXpeMSINIhzstT4Op_WrRtdKtylINxIdf2ntRqz9TlCIKoJgFng3CAT_u8-GisZGpV32TPv-cG-IKAMIZ_TNP-jD0w3UWuYBbGt8PlftRcUFIYxxyLK_k2L2AJWfWjdW5fAYm-ujhvejhswkfZPWso9RLJbf_p-9_jlm356wGy1d2kTv-mR9G8fg_Aiq4GMM2tybDIHYZ__ODbHPvhiyn9tenf6g-6a7sOO_Bs39MQ</recordid><startdate>20180907</startdate><enddate>20180907</enddate><creator>Young, Dylan M</creator><creator>Parry, Lauren E</creator><creator>Lee, Duncan</creator><creator>Ray, Surajit</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6519-5473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180907</creationdate><title>Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands</title><author>Young, Dylan M ; Parry, Lauren E ; Lee, Duncan ; Ray, Surajit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-57ef3836493f22f6e7598f80f33869bca137b833dd3cc1a935898339c9a22c363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Autocorrelation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Geostatistics</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Plateaus</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis</topic><topic>Topography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Dylan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Surajit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Dylan M</au><au>Parry, Lauren E</au><au>Lee, Duncan</au><au>Ray, Surajit</au><au>Minasny, Budiman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-09-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0202691</spage><epage>e0202691</epage><pages>e0202691-e0202691</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Peatlands are spatially heterogeneous ecosystems that develop due to a complex set of autogenic physical and biogeochemical processes and allogenic factors such as the climate and topography. They are significant stocks of global soil carbon, and therefore predicting the depth of peatlands is an important part of establishing an accurate assessment of their magnitude. Yet there have been few attempts to account for both internal and external processes when predicting the depth of peatlands. Using blanket peatlands in Great Britain as a case study, we compare a linear and geostatistical (spatial) model and several sets of covariates applicable for peatlands around the world that have developed over hilly or undulating terrain. We hypothesized that the spatial model would act as a proxy for the autogenic processes in peatlands that can mediate the accumulation of peat on plateaus or shallow slopes. Our findings show that the spatial model performs better than the linear model in all cases-root mean square errors (RMSE) are lower, and 95% prediction intervals are narrower. In support of our hypothesis, the spatial model also better predicts the deeper areas of peat, and we show that its predictive performance in areas of deep peat is dependent on depth observations being spatially autocorrelated. Where they are not, the spatial model performs only slightly better than the linear model. As a result, we recommend that practitioners carrying out depth surveys fully account for the variation of topographic features in prediction locations, and that sampling approach adopted enables observations to be spatially autocorrelated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30192790</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0202691</doi><tpages>e0202691</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6519-5473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202691-e0202691
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2100863079
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Analysis of Variance
Autocorrelation
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Carbon
Climate change
Computer and Information Sciences
Decomposition
Earth Sciences
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Geostatistics
Hydrology
Models, Statistical
Morphology
Peat
Peatlands
People and places
Performance prediction
Physical Sciences
Plateaus
Research and Analysis Methods
Root-mean-square errors
Soil
Soil sciences
Spatial Analysis
Topography
title Spatial models with covariates improve estimates of peat depth in blanket peatlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T14%3A33%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20models%20with%20covariates%20improve%20estimates%20of%20peat%20depth%20in%20blanket%20peatlands&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Young,%20Dylan%20M&rft.date=2018-09-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0202691&rft.epage=e0202691&rft.pages=e0202691-e0202691&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0202691&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA557791738%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100863079&rft_id=info:pmid/30192790&rft_galeid=A557791738&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_33701c4d96d945e78a6ae4875af25909&rfr_iscdi=true