Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smartphone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202116-e0202116
Hauptverfasser: Kohara, Eduardo K, Abdala, Camilla G, Novaes, Tatiane F, Braga, Mariana M, Haddad, Ana E, Mendes, Fausto M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0202116
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0202116
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Kohara, Eduardo K
Abdala, Camilla G
Novaes, Tatiane F
Braga, Mariana M
Haddad, Ana E
Mendes, Fausto M
description The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smartphone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphones (iPhone and Nexus 4) and a conventional macro camera setup. First, in the laboratory phase of the study, we compared the images of 20 exfoliated primary teeth having caries lesions at different stages. Then, in the clinical phase of the study, the images of 119 primary molars from fifteen children (3 to 6 years old) were used. All of the photographic images were taken using the previously described devices. In both groups, two examiners, blinded to the photographic equipment used, assessed the images independently on a computer screen, and classified them according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The teeth were then examined directly by two other experienced examiners, and the consensus reached was considered the reference standard. Parameters of validity, such as percentage of correct answers, agreement with the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner agreement (using the weighted kappa test) were calculated. The examiners performed similarly in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Inter-examiner reliability was approximately 0.7 for all the devices in the laboratory setting, and for the macro camera photography system in the clinical setting, but it was approximately 0.9 for the iPhone and Nexus images taken in vivo. With regard to the percentage of correct answers, the highest values were observed for sound and extensive caries lesions in both laboratory and clinical settings. The percentage of correct answers for initial and moderate lesions was particularly low in the clinical evaluation, irrespective of the camera devices used. Therefore, we concluded that photographic diagnosis using smartphone images is feasible and accurate for distinguishing sound tooth surfaces from extensive caries lesions; however, photographic images are not a good method for accurately detecting initial and moderate caries lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0202116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2100363079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557791869</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f37d212c2b5e486c842ebab71209656d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557791869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7301f4b9ef694d3022b3eca3d6e7c46cb2c04b09731f52c576fe6fcb644ffba83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlok_ZGWRY_BhYW_LoNaXrSyZJpukkq-u9NZ7rLVPZCcpFw8pw3OW9ysuw5RmtMOX537UbfS7seXA9rRBDBmD3ITnFNyYoRRB8erU-yJyFcI1TSirHH2QlFuKpqhE6zYRNyE3MNMpjGQh5dPgbIw076OGyTdG52soMwbQzgtfO7PIKF1siud8GE3Om8NVqDhz7mIe7hFHNK2TFImyvpTQpZCMb14cPT7JGWNsCzeT7Lfnz6-P3iy-ry6vPm4vxypVhN4oqnK-qiqUGzumgpIqShoCRtGXBVMNUQhYoG1ZxiXRJVcqaBadWwotC6kRU9y14edAfrgpjNCoJghCijiNeJ2ByI1slrMfhUqP8jnDRiH3C-E8kEoywITXlLMFGkKaGomKoKAo1sOCaoZiVrk9b7-bSx2UGrkhde2oXocqc3W9G5X4JhwipCksCbWcC7mxFCFDsTFFgre3Dj_t6YcI4rlNBX_6D3VzdTnUwFmF67dK6aRMV5WXJe44pN1PoeKo0Wdkal59cmxRcJbxcJiYnwO3ZyDEFsvn39f_bq55J9fcRuQdq4Dc6Ocfo0S7A4gMq7EDzoO5MxElNj3LohpsYQc2OktBfHD3SXdNsJ9C__LgmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100363079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kohara, Eduardo K ; Abdala, Camilla G ; Novaes, Tatiane F ; Braga, Mariana M ; Haddad, Ana E ; Mendes, Fausto M</creator><contributor>Lalloo, Ratilal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kohara, Eduardo K ; Abdala, Camilla G ; Novaes, Tatiane F ; Braga, Mariana M ; Haddad, Ana E ; Mendes, Fausto M ; Lalloo, Ratilal</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smartphone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphones (iPhone and Nexus 4) and a conventional macro camera setup. First, in the laboratory phase of the study, we compared the images of 20 exfoliated primary teeth having caries lesions at different stages. Then, in the clinical phase of the study, the images of 119 primary molars from fifteen children (3 to 6 years old) were used. All of the photographic images were taken using the previously described devices. In both groups, two examiners, blinded to the photographic equipment used, assessed the images independently on a computer screen, and classified them according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The teeth were then examined directly by two other experienced examiners, and the consensus reached was considered the reference standard. Parameters of validity, such as percentage of correct answers, agreement with the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner agreement (using the weighted kappa test) were calculated. The examiners performed similarly in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Inter-examiner reliability was approximately 0.7 for all the devices in the laboratory setting, and for the macro camera photography system in the clinical setting, but it was approximately 0.9 for the iPhone and Nexus images taken in vivo. With regard to the percentage of correct answers, the highest values were observed for sound and extensive caries lesions in both laboratory and clinical settings. The percentage of correct answers for initial and moderate lesions was particularly low in the clinical evaluation, irrespective of the camera devices used. Therefore, we concluded that photographic diagnosis using smartphone images is feasible and accurate for distinguishing sound tooth surfaces from extensive caries lesions; however, photographic images are not a good method for accurately detecting initial and moderate caries lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30188900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Cameras ; Cameras (Photography) ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Dental caries ; Dental Caries - diagnosis ; Dental Caries - pathology ; Dentistry ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diagnosis ; Enamel ; Engineering and Technology ; Female ; Humans ; In vivo methods and tests ; Juvenile offenders ; Lesions ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Molar - pathology ; Molars ; Patient satisfaction ; Pediatrics ; Photographic equipment ; Photographic equipment &amp; supplies ; Photography ; Photography, Dental - instrumentation ; Photography, Dental - methods ; Risk factors ; Smart phones ; Smartphone ; Smartphones ; Systematic review ; Teeth ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - instrumentation ; Telemedicine - methods</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202116-e0202116</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Kohara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Kohara et al 2018 Kohara et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7301f4b9ef694d3022b3eca3d6e7c46cb2c04b09731f52c576fe6fcb644ffba83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7301f4b9ef694d3022b3eca3d6e7c46cb2c04b09731f52c576fe6fcb644ffba83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0693-9014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126822/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126822/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30188900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lalloo, Ratilal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kohara, Eduardo K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdala, Camilla G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novaes, Tatiane F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braga, Mariana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Ana E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Fausto M</creatorcontrib><title>Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smartphone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphones (iPhone and Nexus 4) and a conventional macro camera setup. First, in the laboratory phase of the study, we compared the images of 20 exfoliated primary teeth having caries lesions at different stages. Then, in the clinical phase of the study, the images of 119 primary molars from fifteen children (3 to 6 years old) were used. All of the photographic images were taken using the previously described devices. In both groups, two examiners, blinded to the photographic equipment used, assessed the images independently on a computer screen, and classified them according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The teeth were then examined directly by two other experienced examiners, and the consensus reached was considered the reference standard. Parameters of validity, such as percentage of correct answers, agreement with the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner agreement (using the weighted kappa test) were calculated. The examiners performed similarly in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Inter-examiner reliability was approximately 0.7 for all the devices in the laboratory setting, and for the macro camera photography system in the clinical setting, but it was approximately 0.9 for the iPhone and Nexus images taken in vivo. With regard to the percentage of correct answers, the highest values were observed for sound and extensive caries lesions in both laboratory and clinical settings. The percentage of correct answers for initial and moderate lesions was particularly low in the clinical evaluation, irrespective of the camera devices used. Therefore, we concluded that photographic diagnosis using smartphone images is feasible and accurate for distinguishing sound tooth surfaces from extensive caries lesions; however, photographic images are not a good method for accurately detecting initial and moderate caries lesions.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Cameras (Photography)</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental Caries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dental Caries - pathology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Juvenile offenders</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Molar - pathology</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Photographic equipment</subject><subject>Photographic equipment &amp; supplies</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Photography, Dental - instrumentation</subject><subject>Photography, Dental - methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Smart phones</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlok_ZGWRY_BhYW_LoNaXrSyZJpukkq-u9NZ7rLVPZCcpFw8pw3OW9ysuw5RmtMOX537UbfS7seXA9rRBDBmD3ITnFNyYoRRB8erU-yJyFcI1TSirHH2QlFuKpqhE6zYRNyE3MNMpjGQh5dPgbIw076OGyTdG52soMwbQzgtfO7PIKF1siud8GE3Om8NVqDhz7mIe7hFHNK2TFImyvpTQpZCMb14cPT7JGWNsCzeT7Lfnz6-P3iy-ry6vPm4vxypVhN4oqnK-qiqUGzumgpIqShoCRtGXBVMNUQhYoG1ZxiXRJVcqaBadWwotC6kRU9y14edAfrgpjNCoJghCijiNeJ2ByI1slrMfhUqP8jnDRiH3C-E8kEoywITXlLMFGkKaGomKoKAo1sOCaoZiVrk9b7-bSx2UGrkhde2oXocqc3W9G5X4JhwipCksCbWcC7mxFCFDsTFFgre3Dj_t6YcI4rlNBX_6D3VzdTnUwFmF67dK6aRMV5WXJe44pN1PoeKo0Wdkal59cmxRcJbxcJiYnwO3ZyDEFsvn39f_bq55J9fcRuQdq4Dc6Ocfo0S7A4gMq7EDzoO5MxElNj3LohpsYQc2OktBfHD3SXdNsJ9C__LgmA</recordid><startdate>20180906</startdate><enddate>20180906</enddate><creator>Kohara, Eduardo K</creator><creator>Abdala, Camilla G</creator><creator>Novaes, Tatiane F</creator><creator>Braga, Mariana M</creator><creator>Haddad, Ana E</creator><creator>Mendes, Fausto M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-9014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180906</creationdate><title>Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?</title><author>Kohara, Eduardo K ; Abdala, Camilla G ; Novaes, Tatiane F ; Braga, Mariana M ; Haddad, Ana E ; Mendes, Fausto M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7301f4b9ef694d3022b3eca3d6e7c46cb2c04b09731f52c576fe6fcb644ffba83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Cameras (Photography)</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental Caries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dental Caries - pathology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Juvenile offenders</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Molar - pathology</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Photographic equipment</topic><topic>Photographic equipment &amp; supplies</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Photography, Dental - instrumentation</topic><topic>Photography, Dental - methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Smart phones</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohara, Eduardo K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdala, Camilla G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novaes, Tatiane F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braga, Mariana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Ana E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Fausto M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohara, Eduardo K</au><au>Abdala, Camilla G</au><au>Novaes, Tatiane F</au><au>Braga, Mariana M</au><au>Haddad, Ana E</au><au>Mendes, Fausto M</au><au>Lalloo, Ratilal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-09-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0202116</spage><epage>e0202116</epage><pages>e0202116-e0202116</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different models of smartphone and a conventional camera with that of direct clinical examination in detecting caries lesions at different stages of progression in deciduous molars. The photographic equipment consisted of two smartphones (iPhone and Nexus 4) and a conventional macro camera setup. First, in the laboratory phase of the study, we compared the images of 20 exfoliated primary teeth having caries lesions at different stages. Then, in the clinical phase of the study, the images of 119 primary molars from fifteen children (3 to 6 years old) were used. All of the photographic images were taken using the previously described devices. In both groups, two examiners, blinded to the photographic equipment used, assessed the images independently on a computer screen, and classified them according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The teeth were then examined directly by two other experienced examiners, and the consensus reached was considered the reference standard. Parameters of validity, such as percentage of correct answers, agreement with the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner agreement (using the weighted kappa test) were calculated. The examiners performed similarly in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Inter-examiner reliability was approximately 0.7 for all the devices in the laboratory setting, and for the macro camera photography system in the clinical setting, but it was approximately 0.9 for the iPhone and Nexus images taken in vivo. With regard to the percentage of correct answers, the highest values were observed for sound and extensive caries lesions in both laboratory and clinical settings. The percentage of correct answers for initial and moderate lesions was particularly low in the clinical evaluation, irrespective of the camera devices used. Therefore, we concluded that photographic diagnosis using smartphone images is feasible and accurate for distinguishing sound tooth surfaces from extensive caries lesions; however, photographic images are not a good method for accurately detecting initial and moderate caries lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30188900</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0202116</doi><tpages>e0202116</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-9014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202116-e0202116
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2100363079
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Cameras
Cameras (Photography)
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Dental caries
Dental Caries - diagnosis
Dental Caries - pathology
Dentistry
Diabetic retinopathy
Diagnosis
Enamel
Engineering and Technology
Female
Humans
In vivo methods and tests
Juvenile offenders
Lesions
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Molar - pathology
Molars
Patient satisfaction
Pediatrics
Photographic equipment
Photographic equipment & supplies
Photography
Photography, Dental - instrumentation
Photography, Dental - methods
Risk factors
Smart phones
Smartphone
Smartphones
Systematic review
Teeth
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - instrumentation
Telemedicine - methods
title Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T00%3A36%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20it%20feasible%20to%20use%20smartphone%20images%20to%20perform%20telediagnosis%20of%20different%20stages%20of%20occlusal%20caries%20lesions?&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kohara,%20Eduardo%20K&rft.date=2018-09-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0202116&rft.epage=e0202116&rft.pages=e0202116-e0202116&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0202116&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA557791869%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100363079&rft_id=info:pmid/30188900&rft_galeid=A557791869&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f37d212c2b5e486c842ebab71209656d&rfr_iscdi=true