Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar
The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0199899 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0199899 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Yu, James J Manus, Melissa B Mueller, Olaf Windsor, Sarah C Horvath, Julie E Nunn, Charles L |
description | The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these products affect skin microbial communities of people living in rural areas of developing countries, where risks of infection and injury often differ from urban populations in developed countries. We investigated the effect of antibacterial soap on skin microbial communities in a rural Malagasy population that practices subsistence agriculture in the absence of electricity and running water. We quantified the amount of soap used by each participant and obtained skin swab samples at three time points: prior to soap use, immediately after one week of soap use, and two weeks after soap use was discontinued. Soap use did not significantly impact ecological measures of diversity and richness (alpha diversity). However, the amount of soap used was a predictor of community-level change (beta diversity), with changes persisting for at least two weeks after subjects stopped using soap. Our results indicate that the overall species richness of skin microbial communities may be resistant to short-term use of antibacterial soap in settings characterized by regular contact with the natural environment, yet these communities may undergo shifts in microbial composition. Lifestyle changes associated with the use of antibacterial soap may therefore cause rapid alterations in skin microbial communities, with the potential for effects on skin health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0199899 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2090277654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550931781</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2da6f1735b214a5695e1599f20de003f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A550931781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d876883d2e4cc7176b6cd802d9da294da705ae83ea2ec49cfcec6193d05180833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguDFjPlo0uZGGBY_BnZZ8Os2nCZpJ2Pb1CQV_fdmnO4yBQXJRcI5z3lzcvJm2VOM1piW-PXeTX6Abj26wawRFqIS4l52jgUlK04QvX9yPssehbBHiNGK84fZGUWYMFKK8-x6M0Rbg4rGW-jy4GDMp2By248pGPLwzQ55b5V39SGvXN9Pg43WhDwl_ORT8Bo0tBAU-MfZgwa6YJ7M-0X25d3bz5cfVlc377eXm6uV4oLEla5KXlVUE1MoVeKS11zpChEtNBBRaCgRA1NRA8SoQqhGGcXTYzRiuEIVpRfZ86Pu2Lkg50kESZBApCw5KxKxPRLawV6O3vbgf0kHVv4JON9K8NGqzkiigTe4pKwmuADGBTOYCdEQpA1CtElab-bbpro3WpkhpmcvRJeZwe5k635IjhGmTCSBF7OAd98nE-I_Wp6pFlJXdmhcElO9DUpuGEOC4rLCiVr_hUpLm_RNyQuNTfFFwatFQWKi-RlbmEKQ208f_5-9-bpkX56wOwNd3AXXTdG6ISzB4ggmE4XgTXM3OYzkwcq305AHK8vZyqns2enU74puvUt_A0uN7lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090277654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Yu, James J ; Manus, Melissa B ; Mueller, Olaf ; Windsor, Sarah C ; Horvath, Julie E ; Nunn, Charles L</creator><contributor>Larsen, Peter E.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, James J ; Manus, Melissa B ; Mueller, Olaf ; Windsor, Sarah C ; Horvath, Julie E ; Nunn, Charles L ; Larsen, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><description>The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these products affect skin microbial communities of people living in rural areas of developing countries, where risks of infection and injury often differ from urban populations in developed countries. We investigated the effect of antibacterial soap on skin microbial communities in a rural Malagasy population that practices subsistence agriculture in the absence of electricity and running water. We quantified the amount of soap used by each participant and obtained skin swab samples at three time points: prior to soap use, immediately after one week of soap use, and two weeks after soap use was discontinued. Soap use did not significantly impact ecological measures of diversity and richness (alpha diversity). However, the amount of soap used was a predictor of community-level change (beta diversity), with changes persisting for at least two weeks after subjects stopped using soap. Our results indicate that the overall species richness of skin microbial communities may be resistant to short-term use of antibacterial soap in settings characterized by regular contact with the natural environment, yet these communities may undergo shifts in microbial composition. Lifestyle changes associated with the use of antibacterial soap may therefore cause rapid alterations in skin microbial communities, with the potential for effects on skin health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199899</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30125279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Antibacterial agents ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Developed countries ; Developing countries ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug resistance ; Drug therapy ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Electric contacts ; Genomics ; Hand Disinfection ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Humans ; LDCs ; Madagascar ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbial activity ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota - drug effects ; Microorganisms ; Middle Aged ; Museums ; Physical Sciences ; Physiology ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Skin ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin - microbiology ; Soap ; Soaps ; Species richness ; Subsistence agriculture ; Time Factors ; Urban populations ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0199899</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Yu et al 2018 Yu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d876883d2e4cc7176b6cd802d9da294da705ae83ea2ec49cfcec6193d05180833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d876883d2e4cc7176b6cd802d9da294da705ae83ea2ec49cfcec6193d05180833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9967-8449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6101359/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6101359/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23868,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30125279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Larsen, Peter E.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manus, Melissa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, Julie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunn, Charles L</creatorcontrib><title>Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these products affect skin microbial communities of people living in rural areas of developing countries, where risks of infection and injury often differ from urban populations in developed countries. We investigated the effect of antibacterial soap on skin microbial communities in a rural Malagasy population that practices subsistence agriculture in the absence of electricity and running water. We quantified the amount of soap used by each participant and obtained skin swab samples at three time points: prior to soap use, immediately after one week of soap use, and two weeks after soap use was discontinued. Soap use did not significantly impact ecological measures of diversity and richness (alpha diversity). However, the amount of soap used was a predictor of community-level change (beta diversity), with changes persisting for at least two weeks after subjects stopped using soap. Our results indicate that the overall species richness of skin microbial communities may be resistant to short-term use of antibacterial soap in settings characterized by regular contact with the natural environment, yet these communities may undergo shifts in microbial composition. Lifestyle changes associated with the use of antibacterial soap may therefore cause rapid alterations in skin microbial communities, with the potential for effects on skin health.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Electric contacts</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Madagascar</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota - drug effects</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin - microbiology</subject><subject>Soap</subject><subject>Soaps</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Subsistence agriculture</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguDFjPlo0uZGGBY_BnZZ8Os2nCZpJ2Pb1CQV_fdmnO4yBQXJRcI5z3lzcvJm2VOM1piW-PXeTX6Abj26wawRFqIS4l52jgUlK04QvX9yPssehbBHiNGK84fZGUWYMFKK8-x6M0Rbg4rGW-jy4GDMp2By248pGPLwzQ55b5V39SGvXN9Pg43WhDwl_ORT8Bo0tBAU-MfZgwa6YJ7M-0X25d3bz5cfVlc377eXm6uV4oLEla5KXlVUE1MoVeKS11zpChEtNBBRaCgRA1NRA8SoQqhGGcXTYzRiuEIVpRfZ86Pu2Lkg50kESZBApCw5KxKxPRLawV6O3vbgf0kHVv4JON9K8NGqzkiigTe4pKwmuADGBTOYCdEQpA1CtElab-bbpro3WpkhpmcvRJeZwe5k635IjhGmTCSBF7OAd98nE-I_Wp6pFlJXdmhcElO9DUpuGEOC4rLCiVr_hUpLm_RNyQuNTfFFwatFQWKi-RlbmEKQ208f_5-9-bpkX56wOwNd3AXXTdG6ISzB4ggmE4XgTXM3OYzkwcq305AHK8vZyqns2enU74puvUt_A0uN7lw</recordid><startdate>20180820</startdate><enddate>20180820</enddate><creator>Yu, James J</creator><creator>Manus, Melissa B</creator><creator>Mueller, Olaf</creator><creator>Windsor, Sarah C</creator><creator>Horvath, Julie E</creator><creator>Nunn, Charles L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180820</creationdate><title>Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar</title><author>Yu, James J ; Manus, Melissa B ; Mueller, Olaf ; Windsor, Sarah C ; Horvath, Julie E ; Nunn, Charles L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d876883d2e4cc7176b6cd802d9da294da705ae83ea2ec49cfcec6193d05180833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Electric contacts</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Madagascar</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota - drug effects</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin - microbiology</topic><topic>Soap</topic><topic>Soaps</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Subsistence agriculture</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manus, Melissa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windsor, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, Julie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunn, Charles L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, James J</au><au>Manus, Melissa B</au><au>Mueller, Olaf</au><au>Windsor, Sarah C</au><au>Horvath, Julie E</au><au>Nunn, Charles L</au><au>Larsen, Peter E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-08-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0199899</spage><pages>e0199899-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The skin harbors diverse communities of microorganisms, and alterations to these communities can impact the effectiveness of the skin as a barrier to infectious organisms or injury. As the global availability and adoption of antibacterial products increases, it is important to understand how these products affect skin microbial communities of people living in rural areas of developing countries, where risks of infection and injury often differ from urban populations in developed countries. We investigated the effect of antibacterial soap on skin microbial communities in a rural Malagasy population that practices subsistence agriculture in the absence of electricity and running water. We quantified the amount of soap used by each participant and obtained skin swab samples at three time points: prior to soap use, immediately after one week of soap use, and two weeks after soap use was discontinued. Soap use did not significantly impact ecological measures of diversity and richness (alpha diversity). However, the amount of soap used was a predictor of community-level change (beta diversity), with changes persisting for at least two weeks after subjects stopped using soap. Our results indicate that the overall species richness of skin microbial communities may be resistant to short-term use of antibacterial soap in settings characterized by regular contact with the natural environment, yet these communities may undergo shifts in microbial composition. Lifestyle changes associated with the use of antibacterial soap may therefore cause rapid alterations in skin microbial communities, with the potential for effects on skin health.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30125279</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0199899</doi><tpages>e0199899</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0199899 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2090277654 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Agricultural practices Agriculture Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Antibacterial agents Antiinfectives and antibacterials Antimicrobial agents Bacteria Biodiversity Biology and Life Sciences Developed countries Developing countries Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug resistance Drug therapy Ecological monitoring Ecology and Environmental Sciences Electric contacts Genomics Hand Disinfection Health aspects Health risks Humans LDCs Madagascar Male Medicine and Health Sciences Microbial activity Microbiomes Microbiota - drug effects Microorganisms Middle Aged Museums Physical Sciences Physiology Rural areas Rural Population Skin Skin - drug effects Skin - microbiology Soap Soaps Species richness Subsistence agriculture Time Factors Urban populations Young Adult |
title | Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibacterial%20soap%20use%20impacts%20skin%20microbial%20communities%20in%20rural%20Madagascar&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yu,%20James%20J&rft.date=2018-08-20&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0199899&rft.pages=e0199899-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0199899&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA550931781%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090277654&rft_id=info:pmid/30125279&rft_galeid=A550931781&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2da6f1735b214a5695e1599f20de003f&rfr_iscdi=true |