Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study

We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e0200532-e0200532
Hauptverfasser: Giovannetti, Ambra Mara, Borreani, Claudia, Bianchi, Elisabetta, Giordano, Andrea, Cilia, Sabina, Cipollari, Susanna, Rossi, Ilaria, Cavallaro, Claudia, Torri Clerici, Valentina, Rossetti, Edoardo, Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia, Totis, Amadio, Pappalardo, Angelo, Occhipinti, Gina, Confalonieri, Paolo, Veronese, Simone, Grasso, Maria Grazia, Patti, Francesco, Zaratin, Paola, Battaglia, Mario Alberto, Solari, Alessandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0200532
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0200532
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Giovannetti, Ambra Mara
Borreani, Claudia
Bianchi, Elisabetta
Giordano, Andrea
Cilia, Sabina
Cipollari, Susanna
Rossi, Ilaria
Cavallaro, Claudia
Torri Clerici, Valentina
Rossetti, Edoardo
Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia
Totis, Amadio
Pappalardo, Angelo
Occhipinti, Gina
Confalonieri, Paolo
Veronese, Simone
Grasso, Maria Grazia
Patti, Francesco
Zaratin, Paola
Battaglia, Mario Alberto
Solari, Alessandra
description We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the intervention, and circumstances that may have influenced its efficacy. Participants to the qualitative study were the patients, their caregivers, patient referring physicians, and the teams who delivered the HPA intervention. We performed semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 patients and 15 informal caregivers chosen using a maximum variation strategy, two focus group meetings with patient referring physicians (4 participants each), and one with the HPA teams (9 participants). From data analysis (framework method) 38 sub-categories emerged, which were grouped into 10 categories and 3 themes: 'expectations,' 'met and unmet needs', and 'barriers'. Intervention benefits were improved control of symptoms and reduced sense of isolation of the patient-caregiver dyads. Limitations were: factors related to experimental design (difficulty of dyads in identifying examiner and team roles, additional burden for caregivers); team issues (insufficient team building /supervision, competing priorities); limitations of the intervention itself (insufficient length, lack of rehabilitation input); and external factors (resource limitations, under-responsive services/professionals). The referring physician focus groups provided little experiential data. The HPA reduced patient symptoms and sense of isolation in patients and caregivers. The indirect role of the HPA teams, and insufficient length of the intervention were key limitations. The experimental design imposed additional burdens on the dyads. Key barriers were the paucity of available services, the demanding administrative procedures, and lack of networking facilities. These findings suggest that two major requirements are necessary for home palliative care to be effective in this patient population: HPA teams well-connected with MS rehabilitation services, and care delivered over the long-term, with variable intensity. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73082124 (Registered 19/06/2014).
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0200532
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2068892747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A546354715</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d2f4cf2d142a4bc6be8863e7c50ced93</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A546354715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5e0e63c2077efc6913bc091703d634a314e49856bc47c861b92a0e6396b9559b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjGnSps1eCMPix8DCil-3IU1PpxkyTTdJVxf_vOlOd5nKXkguGk6e903yNidJnqd4mdIifbe1g-ukWfa2gyUmGOeUPEiOU07JghFMHx7Mj5In3m9HpGTscXJEMcZpRuhx8ueLdEEr3csuoB6c70EFfQUe2QZJ1NodLCrpoUa9NEbLcQ3JvndWqhY11kWR7Q2gXzq0yMMVOEC7wQQ9Fr0y4KzX_hSt0OUgjQ57Bx-G-vpp8qiRxsOz6XuS_Pj44fvZ58X5xaf12ep8oRgnYZEDBkYVwUUBTSyltFKYpwWmNaOZpGkGGS9zVqmsUCVLK07kqOCs4nnOK3qSvNz79sZ6MeXmBcGsLDkpsiIS6z1RW7kVvdM76a6FlVrcFKzbiJuYDIiaNJlqSB3jk1mlWAVlySgUKscKak6j1_tpt6HaQa2gC06amel8pdOt2NgrwXBGinw8zJvJwNnLAXwQO-0VGCM7sMN47gITmnPOI_rqH_T-203URsYL6K6xcV81mopVnjGaZ0WaR2p5DxVHDTut4iNrdKzPBG9ngsgE-B02cvBerL99_X_24uecfX3AtiBNaL01Q9C283Mw24MqvjHvoLkLOcVi7JHbNMTYI2LqkSh7cfiD7kS3TUH_AlNGDWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068892747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara ; Borreani, Claudia ; Bianchi, Elisabetta ; Giordano, Andrea ; Cilia, Sabina ; Cipollari, Susanna ; Rossi, Ilaria ; Cavallaro, Claudia ; Torri Clerici, Valentina ; Rossetti, Edoardo ; Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia ; Totis, Amadio ; Pappalardo, Angelo ; Occhipinti, Gina ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Veronese, Simone ; Grasso, Maria Grazia ; Patti, Francesco ; Zaratin, Paola ; Battaglia, Mario Alberto ; Solari, Alessandra</creator><contributor>Soundy, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara ; Borreani, Claudia ; Bianchi, Elisabetta ; Giordano, Andrea ; Cilia, Sabina ; Cipollari, Susanna ; Rossi, Ilaria ; Cavallaro, Claudia ; Torri Clerici, Valentina ; Rossetti, Edoardo ; Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia ; Totis, Amadio ; Pappalardo, Angelo ; Occhipinti, Gina ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Veronese, Simone ; Grasso, Maria Grazia ; Patti, Francesco ; Zaratin, Paola ; Battaglia, Mario Alberto ; Solari, Alessandra ; PeNSAMI project ; on behalf of the PeNSAMI project ; Soundy, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the intervention, and circumstances that may have influenced its efficacy. Participants to the qualitative study were the patients, their caregivers, patient referring physicians, and the teams who delivered the HPA intervention. We performed semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 patients and 15 informal caregivers chosen using a maximum variation strategy, two focus group meetings with patient referring physicians (4 participants each), and one with the HPA teams (9 participants). From data analysis (framework method) 38 sub-categories emerged, which were grouped into 10 categories and 3 themes: 'expectations,' 'met and unmet needs', and 'barriers'. Intervention benefits were improved control of symptoms and reduced sense of isolation of the patient-caregiver dyads. Limitations were: factors related to experimental design (difficulty of dyads in identifying examiner and team roles, additional burden for caregivers); team issues (insufficient team building /supervision, competing priorities); limitations of the intervention itself (insufficient length, lack of rehabilitation input); and external factors (resource limitations, under-responsive services/professionals). The referring physician focus groups provided little experiential data. The HPA reduced patient symptoms and sense of isolation in patients and caregivers. The indirect role of the HPA teams, and insufficient length of the intervention were key limitations. The experimental design imposed additional burdens on the dyads. Key barriers were the paucity of available services, the demanding administrative procedures, and lack of networking facilities. These findings suggest that two major requirements are necessary for home palliative care to be effective in this patient population: HPA teams well-connected with MS rehabilitation services, and care delivered over the long-term, with variable intensity. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73082124 (Registered 19/06/2014).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200532</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30001423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Caregivers ; Charitable foundations ; Clinical psychology ; Clinical trials ; Councils ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Data processing ; Design factors ; Disease ; Experimental design ; Female ; Home Care Services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - therapy ; Neurology ; Neuromuscular diseases ; Palliation ; Palliative Care ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Qualitative research ; Quality of life ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social Sciences ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e0200532-e0200532</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Giovannetti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Giovannetti et al 2018 Giovannetti et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5e0e63c2077efc6913bc091703d634a314e49856bc47c861b92a0e6396b9559b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5e0e63c2077efc6913bc091703d634a314e49856bc47c861b92a0e6396b9559b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9930-7579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042757/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042757/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,2932,23875,27933,27934,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Soundy, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borreani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilia, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipollari, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallaro, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torri Clerici, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totis, Amadio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappalardo, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confalonieri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaratin, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Mario Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PeNSAMI project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the PeNSAMI project</creatorcontrib><title>Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the intervention, and circumstances that may have influenced its efficacy. Participants to the qualitative study were the patients, their caregivers, patient referring physicians, and the teams who delivered the HPA intervention. We performed semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 patients and 15 informal caregivers chosen using a maximum variation strategy, two focus group meetings with patient referring physicians (4 participants each), and one with the HPA teams (9 participants). From data analysis (framework method) 38 sub-categories emerged, which were grouped into 10 categories and 3 themes: 'expectations,' 'met and unmet needs', and 'barriers'. Intervention benefits were improved control of symptoms and reduced sense of isolation of the patient-caregiver dyads. Limitations were: factors related to experimental design (difficulty of dyads in identifying examiner and team roles, additional burden for caregivers); team issues (insufficient team building /supervision, competing priorities); limitations of the intervention itself (insufficient length, lack of rehabilitation input); and external factors (resource limitations, under-responsive services/professionals). The referring physician focus groups provided little experiential data. The HPA reduced patient symptoms and sense of isolation in patients and caregivers. The indirect role of the HPA teams, and insufficient length of the intervention were key limitations. The experimental design imposed additional burdens on the dyads. Key barriers were the paucity of available services, the demanding administrative procedures, and lack of networking facilities. These findings suggest that two major requirements are necessary for home palliative care to be effective in this patient population: HPA teams well-connected with MS rehabilitation services, and care delivered over the long-term, with variable intensity. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73082124 (Registered 19/06/2014).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Charitable foundations</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Design factors</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - therapy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuromuscular diseases</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjGnSps1eCMPix8DCil-3IU1PpxkyTTdJVxf_vOlOd5nKXkguGk6e903yNidJnqd4mdIifbe1g-ukWfa2gyUmGOeUPEiOU07JghFMHx7Mj5In3m9HpGTscXJEMcZpRuhx8ueLdEEr3csuoB6c70EFfQUe2QZJ1NodLCrpoUa9NEbLcQ3JvndWqhY11kWR7Q2gXzq0yMMVOEC7wQQ9Fr0y4KzX_hSt0OUgjQ57Bx-G-vpp8qiRxsOz6XuS_Pj44fvZ58X5xaf12ep8oRgnYZEDBkYVwUUBTSyltFKYpwWmNaOZpGkGGS9zVqmsUCVLK07kqOCs4nnOK3qSvNz79sZ6MeXmBcGsLDkpsiIS6z1RW7kVvdM76a6FlVrcFKzbiJuYDIiaNJlqSB3jk1mlWAVlySgUKscKak6j1_tpt6HaQa2gC06amel8pdOt2NgrwXBGinw8zJvJwNnLAXwQO-0VGCM7sMN47gITmnPOI_rqH_T-203URsYL6K6xcV81mopVnjGaZ0WaR2p5DxVHDTut4iNrdKzPBG9ngsgE-B02cvBerL99_X_24uecfX3AtiBNaL01Q9C283Mw24MqvjHvoLkLOcVi7JHbNMTYI2LqkSh7cfiD7kS3TUH_AlNGDWQ</recordid><startdate>20180712</startdate><enddate>20180712</enddate><creator>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara</creator><creator>Borreani, Claudia</creator><creator>Bianchi, Elisabetta</creator><creator>Giordano, Andrea</creator><creator>Cilia, Sabina</creator><creator>Cipollari, Susanna</creator><creator>Rossi, Ilaria</creator><creator>Cavallaro, Claudia</creator><creator>Torri Clerici, Valentina</creator><creator>Rossetti, Edoardo</creator><creator>Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia</creator><creator>Totis, Amadio</creator><creator>Pappalardo, Angelo</creator><creator>Occhipinti, Gina</creator><creator>Confalonieri, Paolo</creator><creator>Veronese, Simone</creator><creator>Grasso, Maria Grazia</creator><creator>Patti, Francesco</creator><creator>Zaratin, Paola</creator><creator>Battaglia, Mario Alberto</creator><creator>Solari, Alessandra</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9930-7579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180712</creationdate><title>Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study</title><author>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara ; Borreani, Claudia ; Bianchi, Elisabetta ; Giordano, Andrea ; Cilia, Sabina ; Cipollari, Susanna ; Rossi, Ilaria ; Cavallaro, Claudia ; Torri Clerici, Valentina ; Rossetti, Edoardo ; Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia ; Totis, Amadio ; Pappalardo, Angelo ; Occhipinti, Gina ; Confalonieri, Paolo ; Veronese, Simone ; Grasso, Maria Grazia ; Patti, Francesco ; Zaratin, Paola ; Battaglia, Mario Alberto ; Solari, Alessandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5e0e63c2077efc6913bc091703d634a314e49856bc47c861b92a0e6396b9559b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Charitable foundations</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Design factors</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - therapy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuromuscular diseases</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borreani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilia, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipollari, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallaro, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torri Clerici, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totis, Amadio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappalardo, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Occhipinti, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Confalonieri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaratin, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battaglia, Mario Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solari, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PeNSAMI project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the PeNSAMI project</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovannetti, Ambra Mara</au><au>Borreani, Claudia</au><au>Bianchi, Elisabetta</au><au>Giordano, Andrea</au><au>Cilia, Sabina</au><au>Cipollari, Susanna</au><au>Rossi, Ilaria</au><au>Cavallaro, Claudia</au><au>Torri Clerici, Valentina</au><au>Rossetti, Edoardo</au><au>Stefanelli, Maria Consiglia</au><au>Totis, Amadio</au><au>Pappalardo, Angelo</au><au>Occhipinti, Gina</au><au>Confalonieri, Paolo</au><au>Veronese, Simone</au><au>Grasso, Maria Grazia</au><au>Patti, Francesco</au><au>Zaratin, Paola</au><au>Battaglia, Mario Alberto</au><au>Solari, Alessandra</au><au>Soundy, Andrew</au><aucorp>PeNSAMI project</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the PeNSAMI project</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-07-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0200532</spage><epage>e0200532</epage><pages>e0200532-e0200532</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the intervention, and circumstances that may have influenced its efficacy. Participants to the qualitative study were the patients, their caregivers, patient referring physicians, and the teams who delivered the HPA intervention. We performed semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 patients and 15 informal caregivers chosen using a maximum variation strategy, two focus group meetings with patient referring physicians (4 participants each), and one with the HPA teams (9 participants). From data analysis (framework method) 38 sub-categories emerged, which were grouped into 10 categories and 3 themes: 'expectations,' 'met and unmet needs', and 'barriers'. Intervention benefits were improved control of symptoms and reduced sense of isolation of the patient-caregiver dyads. Limitations were: factors related to experimental design (difficulty of dyads in identifying examiner and team roles, additional burden for caregivers); team issues (insufficient team building /supervision, competing priorities); limitations of the intervention itself (insufficient length, lack of rehabilitation input); and external factors (resource limitations, under-responsive services/professionals). The referring physician focus groups provided little experiential data. The HPA reduced patient symptoms and sense of isolation in patients and caregivers. The indirect role of the HPA teams, and insufficient length of the intervention were key limitations. The experimental design imposed additional burdens on the dyads. Key barriers were the paucity of available services, the demanding administrative procedures, and lack of networking facilities. These findings suggest that two major requirements are necessary for home palliative care to be effective in this patient population: HPA teams well-connected with MS rehabilitation services, and care delivered over the long-term, with variable intensity. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73082124 (Registered 19/06/2014).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30001423</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0200532</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9930-7579</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e0200532-e0200532
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2068892747
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Adults
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Care and treatment
Caregivers
Charitable foundations
Clinical psychology
Clinical trials
Councils
Data analysis
Data collection
Data processing
Design factors
Disease
Experimental design
Female
Home Care Services
Hospitals
Humans
Intervention
Male
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Middle Aged
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - therapy
Neurology
Neuromuscular diseases
Palliation
Palliative Care
Patients
People and Places
Physicians
Qualitative research
Quality of life
Rehabilitation
Research and Analysis Methods
Severity of Illness Index
Social Sciences
Studies
title Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T09%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participant%20perspectives%20of%20a%20home-based%20palliative%20approach%20for%20people%20with%20severe%20multiple%20sclerosis:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Giovannetti,%20Ambra%20Mara&rft.aucorp=PeNSAMI%20project&rft.date=2018-07-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0200532&rft.epage=e0200532&rft.pages=e0200532-e0200532&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0200532&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA546354715%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068892747&rft_id=info:pmid/30001423&rft_galeid=A546354715&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d2f4cf2d142a4bc6be8863e7c50ced93&rfr_iscdi=true