Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study
Balancing the number of nursing staff in relation to the number of patients is important for hospitals to remain efficient and optimizing the use of resources. One way to do this is to work with a workload management method. Many workload management methods use a time study to determine how nurses s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0191807-e0191807 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0191807 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0191807 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | van den Oetelaar, W F J M van Stel, H F van Rhenen, W Stellato, R K Grolman, W |
description | Balancing the number of nursing staff in relation to the number of patients is important for hospitals to remain efficient and optimizing the use of resources. One way to do this is to work with a workload management method. Many workload management methods use a time study to determine how nurses spend their time and to relate this to patient characteristics in order to predict nurse workload.
In our study, we aim to determine how nurses spend their working day and we will attempt to explain differences between specialized surgical wards.
The research took place in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Six surgical wards were included, capacity 15 to 30 beds.
We have used a work sampling methodology where trained observers registered activities of nurses and patient details every ten minutes during the day shift for a time period of three weeks.
The work sampling showed that nurses spend between 40.1% and 55.8% of their time on direct patient care. In addition to this, nurses spend between 11.0% and 14.1% on collective patient care. In total, between 52.1% and 68% of time spent on tasks is directly patient related. We found significant differences between wards for 10 of the 21 activity groups. We also found that nurses spend on average 31% with the patient (bedside), which is lower than in another study (37%). However, we noticed a difference between departments. For regular surgical departments in our study this was on average 34% and for two departments that have additional responsibilities in training and education of nursing students, this was on average 25%.
We found a relatively low percentage of time spent on direct plus indirect care, and a lower percentage of time spent with the patient. We suspect that this is due to the academic setting of the study; in our hospital, there are more tasks related to education than in hospitals in other study settings. We also found differences between the wards in our study, which are mostly explained by differences in the patient mix, nurse staffing (proportion of nursing students), type of surgery and region of the body where the surgery was performed. However, we could not explain all differences. We made a first attempt in identifying and explaining differences in nurses' activities between wards, however this domain needs more research in order to better explain the differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0191807 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2030210552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A536038412</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_eb1ca84762fc48068a312dbd03566d62</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A536038412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2bd0fbcf7a6e406962d548fc0df7bea55b5f776916f1796a8318392d4fd4d3383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1DAYhoso7rr6D0QLgoeLGXNo0tQLYRg8DKwseLoNaQ6dDJ2mm6Sr--9Nne4ylb2QXCQkz_d-eZM3y55CsIS4hG93bvCdaJe96_QSwAoyUN7LTmGF0YIigO8frU-yRyHsACCYUfowO0EVZRUo2Gm2_iL63nZN3g0-6PAqFzLaKxutDrnt8jD4xkrR5lsXehvT4pfwKrzLV3m0e52HOKjrx9kDI9qgn0zzWfbj44fv68-L84tPm_XqfCFpheIC1QqYWppSUF0AWlGkSMGMBMqUtRaE1MSUJa0gNbCsqGAYMlwhVRhVKIwZPsueH3T71gU--Q88-QMIAkJQIjYHQjmx4723e-GvuROW_91wvuHCRytbzXUNpWBFSZGRBQOUCQyRSlfEhFJFR633U7eh3msldRe9aGei85PObnnjrjhJDhihSeD1JODd5aBD5HsbpG5b0Wk3HO5dQcRoldAX_6B3u5uoRiQDtjMu9ZWjKF8RTAFmBRyp5R1UGkrvrUxhMTbtzwrezAoSE_Xv2IghBL759vX_2Yufc_blEbvVoo3b4NohWteFOVgcQOldCF6b20eGgI9Zv3kNPmadT1lPZc-OP-i26Cbc-A_cLfec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2030210552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>van den Oetelaar, W F J M ; van Stel, H F ; van Rhenen, W ; Stellato, R K ; Grolman, W</creator><contributor>van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>van den Oetelaar, W F J M ; van Stel, H F ; van Rhenen, W ; Stellato, R K ; Grolman, W ; van Bogaert, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Balancing the number of nursing staff in relation to the number of patients is important for hospitals to remain efficient and optimizing the use of resources. One way to do this is to work with a workload management method. Many workload management methods use a time study to determine how nurses spend their time and to relate this to patient characteristics in order to predict nurse workload.
In our study, we aim to determine how nurses spend their working day and we will attempt to explain differences between specialized surgical wards.
The research took place in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Six surgical wards were included, capacity 15 to 30 beds.
We have used a work sampling methodology where trained observers registered activities of nurses and patient details every ten minutes during the day shift for a time period of three weeks.
The work sampling showed that nurses spend between 40.1% and 55.8% of their time on direct patient care. In addition to this, nurses spend between 11.0% and 14.1% on collective patient care. In total, between 52.1% and 68% of time spent on tasks is directly patient related. We found significant differences between wards for 10 of the 21 activity groups. We also found that nurses spend on average 31% with the patient (bedside), which is lower than in another study (37%). However, we noticed a difference between departments. For regular surgical departments in our study this was on average 34% and for two departments that have additional responsibilities in training and education of nursing students, this was on average 25%.
We found a relatively low percentage of time spent on direct plus indirect care, and a lower percentage of time spent with the patient. We suspect that this is due to the academic setting of the study; in our hospital, there are more tasks related to education than in hospitals in other study settings. We also found differences between the wards in our study, which are mostly explained by differences in the patient mix, nurse staffing (proportion of nursing students), type of surgery and region of the body where the surgery was performed. However, we could not explain all differences. We made a first attempt in identifying and explaining differences in nurses' activities between wards, however this domain needs more research in order to better explain the differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29689048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Burnout ; Classification ; Clinical outcomes ; Education ; Health sciences ; Hospital administration ; Hospitals ; Management ; Management methods ; Management research ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing administration ; Nursing care ; Nursing services ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Primary care ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Students ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical nursing ; Work capacity ; Workforce planning ; Working conditions ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0191807-e0191807</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 van den Oetelaar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 van den Oetelaar et al 2018 van den Oetelaar et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2bd0fbcf7a6e406962d548fc0df7bea55b5f776916f1796a8318392d4fd4d3383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2bd0fbcf7a6e406962d548fc0df7bea55b5f776916f1796a8318392d4fd4d3383</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8404-4171</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916856/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916856/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29689048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>van den Oetelaar, W F J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Stel, H F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rhenen, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellato, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grolman, W</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Balancing the number of nursing staff in relation to the number of patients is important for hospitals to remain efficient and optimizing the use of resources. One way to do this is to work with a workload management method. Many workload management methods use a time study to determine how nurses spend their time and to relate this to patient characteristics in order to predict nurse workload.
In our study, we aim to determine how nurses spend their working day and we will attempt to explain differences between specialized surgical wards.
The research took place in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Six surgical wards were included, capacity 15 to 30 beds.
We have used a work sampling methodology where trained observers registered activities of nurses and patient details every ten minutes during the day shift for a time period of three weeks.
The work sampling showed that nurses spend between 40.1% and 55.8% of their time on direct patient care. In addition to this, nurses spend between 11.0% and 14.1% on collective patient care. In total, between 52.1% and 68% of time spent on tasks is directly patient related. We found significant differences between wards for 10 of the 21 activity groups. We also found that nurses spend on average 31% with the patient (bedside), which is lower than in another study (37%). However, we noticed a difference between departments. For regular surgical departments in our study this was on average 34% and for two departments that have additional responsibilities in training and education of nursing students, this was on average 25%.
We found a relatively low percentage of time spent on direct plus indirect care, and a lower percentage of time spent with the patient. We suspect that this is due to the academic setting of the study; in our hospital, there are more tasks related to education than in hospitals in other study settings. We also found differences between the wards in our study, which are mostly explained by differences in the patient mix, nurse staffing (proportion of nursing students), type of surgery and region of the body where the surgery was performed. However, we could not explain all differences. We made a first attempt in identifying and explaining differences in nurses' activities between wards, however this domain needs more research in order to better explain the differences.</description><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Hospital administration</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management methods</subject><subject>Management research</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing administration</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Nursing services</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical nursing</subject><subject>Work capacity</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1DAYhoso7rr6D0QLgoeLGXNo0tQLYRg8DKwseLoNaQ6dDJ2mm6Sr--9Nne4ylb2QXCQkz_d-eZM3y55CsIS4hG93bvCdaJe96_QSwAoyUN7LTmGF0YIigO8frU-yRyHsACCYUfowO0EVZRUo2Gm2_iL63nZN3g0-6PAqFzLaKxutDrnt8jD4xkrR5lsXehvT4pfwKrzLV3m0e52HOKjrx9kDI9qgn0zzWfbj44fv68-L84tPm_XqfCFpheIC1QqYWppSUF0AWlGkSMGMBMqUtRaE1MSUJa0gNbCsqGAYMlwhVRhVKIwZPsueH3T71gU--Q88-QMIAkJQIjYHQjmx4723e-GvuROW_91wvuHCRytbzXUNpWBFSZGRBQOUCQyRSlfEhFJFR633U7eh3msldRe9aGei85PObnnjrjhJDhihSeD1JODd5aBD5HsbpG5b0Wk3HO5dQcRoldAX_6B3u5uoRiQDtjMu9ZWjKF8RTAFmBRyp5R1UGkrvrUxhMTbtzwrezAoSE_Xv2IghBL759vX_2Yufc_blEbvVoo3b4NohWteFOVgcQOldCF6b20eGgI9Zv3kNPmadT1lPZc-OP-i26Cbc-A_cLfec</recordid><startdate>20180424</startdate><enddate>20180424</enddate><creator>van den Oetelaar, W F J M</creator><creator>van Stel, H F</creator><creator>van Rhenen, W</creator><creator>Stellato, R K</creator><creator>Grolman, W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-4171</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180424</creationdate><title>Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study</title><author>van den Oetelaar, W F J M ; van Stel, H F ; van Rhenen, W ; Stellato, R K ; Grolman, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2bd0fbcf7a6e406962d548fc0df7bea55b5f776916f1796a8318392d4fd4d3383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Hospital administration</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management methods</topic><topic>Management research</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing administration</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Nursing services</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical nursing</topic><topic>Work capacity</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van den Oetelaar, W F J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Stel, H F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rhenen, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellato, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grolman, W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van den Oetelaar, W F J M</au><au>van Stel, H F</au><au>van Rhenen, W</au><au>Stellato, R K</au><au>Grolman, W</au><au>van Bogaert, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-04-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0191807</spage><epage>e0191807</epage><pages>e0191807-e0191807</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Balancing the number of nursing staff in relation to the number of patients is important for hospitals to remain efficient and optimizing the use of resources. One way to do this is to work with a workload management method. Many workload management methods use a time study to determine how nurses spend their time and to relate this to patient characteristics in order to predict nurse workload.
In our study, we aim to determine how nurses spend their working day and we will attempt to explain differences between specialized surgical wards.
The research took place in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Six surgical wards were included, capacity 15 to 30 beds.
We have used a work sampling methodology where trained observers registered activities of nurses and patient details every ten minutes during the day shift for a time period of three weeks.
The work sampling showed that nurses spend between 40.1% and 55.8% of their time on direct patient care. In addition to this, nurses spend between 11.0% and 14.1% on collective patient care. In total, between 52.1% and 68% of time spent on tasks is directly patient related. We found significant differences between wards for 10 of the 21 activity groups. We also found that nurses spend on average 31% with the patient (bedside), which is lower than in another study (37%). However, we noticed a difference between departments. For regular surgical departments in our study this was on average 34% and for two departments that have additional responsibilities in training and education of nursing students, this was on average 25%.
We found a relatively low percentage of time spent on direct plus indirect care, and a lower percentage of time spent with the patient. We suspect that this is due to the academic setting of the study; in our hospital, there are more tasks related to education than in hospitals in other study settings. We also found differences between the wards in our study, which are mostly explained by differences in the patient mix, nurse staffing (proportion of nursing students), type of surgery and region of the body where the surgery was performed. However, we could not explain all differences. We made a first attempt in identifying and explaining differences in nurses' activities between wards, however this domain needs more research in order to better explain the differences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29689048</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0191807</doi><tpages>e0191807</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-4171</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0191807-e0191807 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2030210552 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Burnout Classification Clinical outcomes Education Health sciences Hospital administration Hospitals Management Management methods Management research Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Nurses Nursing Nursing administration Nursing care Nursing services Patients People and Places Physical Sciences Primary care Research and Analysis Methods Sampling Sampling methods Students Studies Surgery Surgical nursing Work capacity Workforce planning Working conditions Workload Workloads |
title | Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20nurses'%20activities%20in%20surgical%20hospital%20wards:%20A%20time%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=van%20den%20Oetelaar,%20W%20F%20J%20M&rft.date=2018-04-24&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0191807&rft.epage=e0191807&rft.pages=e0191807-e0191807&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0191807&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA536038412%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2030210552&rft_id=info:pmid/29689048&rft_galeid=A536038412&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_eb1ca84762fc48068a312dbd03566d62&rfr_iscdi=true |