Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection
The precise sizing of the stent graft in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) affects aortic remodeling and hence, further outcome. Covering the proximal entry tear is essential for successful treatment of Type B aortic dissection. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables real-time aortic diam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196180-e0196180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0196180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0196180 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Lortz, Julia Tsagakis, Konstantinos Rammos, Christos Horacek, Michael Schlosser, Thomas Jakob, Heinz Rassaf, Tienush Jánosi, Rolf Alexander |
description | The precise sizing of the stent graft in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) affects aortic remodeling and hence, further outcome. Covering the proximal entry tear is essential for successful treatment of Type B aortic dissection. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables real-time aortic diameter assessment, and is especially useful when computed tomography (CT) image quality is poor. IVUS, however, is not routinely utilized due to cost inefficiency. We investigated the impact of IVUS-assisted stent graft sizing on aortic remodeling in TEVAR. In this single-center retrospective study we evaluated patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing both CT and IVUS before TEVAR. We assessed the aortic diameter at the level of the left subclavian artery via both methods before stent implantation and analyzed due to which method the implanted stent graft was chosen, retrospectively. To determine the degrees of aortic remodeling involved, we evaluated true lumen and false lumen diameters, and total aortic remodeling in CT. We analyzed 45 patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR. The mean ages were 66.9±10.0 years fo0072 IVUS (n = 20) and 62.3±14.2 years for CT-assisted TEVAR (n = 25; p = 0.226). The follow-up time for both groups did not differ between the two groups (IVUS: 22.9±23.1 months, CT: 25.6±23.0 months; p = 0.700). While both methods were associated with advantages regarding aortic remodeling, IVUS-assisted sizing yielded a greater increase in true lumen (30.4±6.2 vs. 25.6±5.3; p = 0.008) and reductions in false lumen (14.4±8.5 vs. 23.9±9.3; p = 0.001) and total aortic diameter (35.5±6.0 vs. 39.9±8.1; p = 0.045). IVUS-guided stent graft sizing in Type B aortic dissection shows beneficial effects on aortic remodeling and might be of additional advantage in aortic diseases, especially when CT image quality is poor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0196180 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2027633393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535337584</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_769c3a4e59014f94ac0596d9055f222a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A535337584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79b32d1d2c11a8c4f9555fee37641a7e28246e1eda840d3e6d734b1952eb0f673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxIlvkMbER6VJk2Bwa7n2SevKiTM7qRg_gN-Ns6alQbtAuUh8_LyvzznxSZLnGM0xLfC7jet9I-28dQ3MEeYMl-hBcoo5JTNGEH149H2SPAlhg1BOS8YeJyeEs4IwTE-T34um83Irg-qt9Glv4yq4vtGpDMGEDnQazC_TrFLTpN3aeamMSqHR7qCRzncx5qGVxqembr3bQvgbrp0GOzpc37aQftjvaRMCqM645mnyqJI2wLPxfZZ8__Tx-uLL7PLq8-Li_HKmGCfdrOBLSjTWRGEsS5VVPM_zCoAWLMOyAFKSjAEGLcsMaQpMFzRbYp4TWKKKFfQsebnzba0LYmxhEASRglFKOY3EYkdoJzei9aaW_lY4acRdwPmVkEPyFkTBuKIyg5wjHFPJpEI5Z5qjmBMhREav9-Np_bIGrWDotZ2YTncasxYrtxXRscSMRIM3o4F3Nz2ETtQmKLBWNuD6u7xLnpc8Gyp79Q96f3UjtZKxANNULp6rBlNxntOc0iIvs0jN76Hio6E2Kt63ysT4RPB2IohMBz-7lexDEItvX_-fvfoxZV8fsWuQtlsHZ_vhyoQpmO1A5V0IHqpDkzESw7jsuyGGcRHjuETZi-MfdBDt54P-AcVbEgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2027633393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Lortz, Julia ; Tsagakis, Konstantinos ; Rammos, Christos ; Horacek, Michael ; Schlosser, Thomas ; Jakob, Heinz ; Rassaf, Tienush ; Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</creator><contributor>Yu, Jun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lortz, Julia ; Tsagakis, Konstantinos ; Rammos, Christos ; Horacek, Michael ; Schlosser, Thomas ; Jakob, Heinz ; Rassaf, Tienush ; Jánosi, Rolf Alexander ; Yu, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>The precise sizing of the stent graft in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) affects aortic remodeling and hence, further outcome. Covering the proximal entry tear is essential for successful treatment of Type B aortic dissection. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables real-time aortic diameter assessment, and is especially useful when computed tomography (CT) image quality is poor. IVUS, however, is not routinely utilized due to cost inefficiency. We investigated the impact of IVUS-assisted stent graft sizing on aortic remodeling in TEVAR. In this single-center retrospective study we evaluated patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing both CT and IVUS before TEVAR. We assessed the aortic diameter at the level of the left subclavian artery via both methods before stent implantation and analyzed due to which method the implanted stent graft was chosen, retrospectively. To determine the degrees of aortic remodeling involved, we evaluated true lumen and false lumen diameters, and total aortic remodeling in CT. We analyzed 45 patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR. The mean ages were 66.9±10.0 years fo0072 IVUS (n = 20) and 62.3±14.2 years for CT-assisted TEVAR (n = 25; p = 0.226). The follow-up time for both groups did not differ between the two groups (IVUS: 22.9±23.1 months, CT: 25.6±23.0 months; p = 0.700). While both methods were associated with advantages regarding aortic remodeling, IVUS-assisted sizing yielded a greater increase in true lumen (30.4±6.2 vs. 25.6±5.3; p = 0.008) and reductions in false lumen (14.4±8.5 vs. 23.9±9.3; p = 0.001) and total aortic diameter (35.5±6.0 vs. 39.9±8.1; p = 0.045). IVUS-guided stent graft sizing in Type B aortic dissection shows beneficial effects on aortic remodeling and might be of additional advantage in aortic diseases, especially when CT image quality is poor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196180</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29672613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnosis ; Aneurysm, Dissecting - therapy ; Aneurysms ; Aorta ; Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Thoracic - pathology ; Aortic dissection ; Aortography ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular surgery ; Cardiovascular system ; Care and treatment ; Computed tomography ; Development and progression ; Dissection ; Endovascular Procedures - methods ; Female ; Grafting ; Heart surgery ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Image quality ; Implantation ; Implants ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sizing ; Surgical implants ; Tearing ; Technology application ; Thorax ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound ; Ultrasound imaging ; Vascular Remodeling</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196180-e0196180</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Lortz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Lortz et al 2018 Lortz et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79b32d1d2c11a8c4f9555fee37641a7e28246e1eda840d3e6d734b1952eb0f673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79b32d1d2c11a8c4f9555fee37641a7e28246e1eda840d3e6d734b1952eb0f673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5798-3728 ; 0000-0002-9966-6886</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908162/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908162/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29672613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yu, Jun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lortz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsagakis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammos, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horacek, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakob, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassaf, Tienush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The precise sizing of the stent graft in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) affects aortic remodeling and hence, further outcome. Covering the proximal entry tear is essential for successful treatment of Type B aortic dissection. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables real-time aortic diameter assessment, and is especially useful when computed tomography (CT) image quality is poor. IVUS, however, is not routinely utilized due to cost inefficiency. We investigated the impact of IVUS-assisted stent graft sizing on aortic remodeling in TEVAR. In this single-center retrospective study we evaluated patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing both CT and IVUS before TEVAR. We assessed the aortic diameter at the level of the left subclavian artery via both methods before stent implantation and analyzed due to which method the implanted stent graft was chosen, retrospectively. To determine the degrees of aortic remodeling involved, we evaluated true lumen and false lumen diameters, and total aortic remodeling in CT. We analyzed 45 patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR. The mean ages were 66.9±10.0 years fo0072 IVUS (n = 20) and 62.3±14.2 years for CT-assisted TEVAR (n = 25; p = 0.226). The follow-up time for both groups did not differ between the two groups (IVUS: 22.9±23.1 months, CT: 25.6±23.0 months; p = 0.700). While both methods were associated with advantages regarding aortic remodeling, IVUS-assisted sizing yielded a greater increase in true lumen (30.4±6.2 vs. 25.6±5.3; p = 0.008) and reductions in false lumen (14.4±8.5 vs. 23.9±9.3; p = 0.001) and total aortic diameter (35.5±6.0 vs. 39.9±8.1; p = 0.045). IVUS-guided stent graft sizing in Type B aortic dissection shows beneficial effects on aortic remodeling and might be of additional advantage in aortic diseases, especially when CT image quality is poor.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aneurysm, Dissecting - therapy</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic dissection</subject><subject>Aortography</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular surgery</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sizing</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tearing</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><subject>Vascular Remodeling</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxIlvkMbER6VJk2Bwa7n2SevKiTM7qRg_gN-Ns6alQbtAuUh8_LyvzznxSZLnGM0xLfC7jet9I-28dQ3MEeYMl-hBcoo5JTNGEH149H2SPAlhg1BOS8YeJyeEs4IwTE-T34um83Irg-qt9Glv4yq4vtGpDMGEDnQazC_TrFLTpN3aeamMSqHR7qCRzncx5qGVxqembr3bQvgbrp0GOzpc37aQftjvaRMCqM645mnyqJI2wLPxfZZ8__Tx-uLL7PLq8-Li_HKmGCfdrOBLSjTWRGEsS5VVPM_zCoAWLMOyAFKSjAEGLcsMaQpMFzRbYp4TWKKKFfQsebnzba0LYmxhEASRglFKOY3EYkdoJzei9aaW_lY4acRdwPmVkEPyFkTBuKIyg5wjHFPJpEI5Z5qjmBMhREav9-Np_bIGrWDotZ2YTncasxYrtxXRscSMRIM3o4F3Nz2ETtQmKLBWNuD6u7xLnpc8Gyp79Q96f3UjtZKxANNULp6rBlNxntOc0iIvs0jN76Hio6E2Kt63ysT4RPB2IohMBz-7lexDEItvX_-fvfoxZV8fsWuQtlsHZ_vhyoQpmO1A5V0IHqpDkzESw7jsuyGGcRHjuETZi-MfdBDt54P-AcVbEgA</recordid><startdate>20180419</startdate><enddate>20180419</enddate><creator>Lortz, Julia</creator><creator>Tsagakis, Konstantinos</creator><creator>Rammos, Christos</creator><creator>Horacek, Michael</creator><creator>Schlosser, Thomas</creator><creator>Jakob, Heinz</creator><creator>Rassaf, Tienush</creator><creator>Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-3728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-6886</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180419</creationdate><title>Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection</title><author>Lortz, Julia ; Tsagakis, Konstantinos ; Rammos, Christos ; Horacek, Michael ; Schlosser, Thomas ; Jakob, Heinz ; Rassaf, Tienush ; Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-79b32d1d2c11a8c4f9555fee37641a7e28246e1eda840d3e6d734b1952eb0f673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aneurysm, Dissecting - therapy</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic dissection</topic><topic>Aortography</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular surgery</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sizing</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tearing</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><topic>Vascular Remodeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lortz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsagakis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammos, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horacek, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakob, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassaf, Tienush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lortz, Julia</au><au>Tsagakis, Konstantinos</au><au>Rammos, Christos</au><au>Horacek, Michael</au><au>Schlosser, Thomas</au><au>Jakob, Heinz</au><au>Rassaf, Tienush</au><au>Jánosi, Rolf Alexander</au><au>Yu, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-04-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0196180</spage><epage>e0196180</epage><pages>e0196180-e0196180</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The precise sizing of the stent graft in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) affects aortic remodeling and hence, further outcome. Covering the proximal entry tear is essential for successful treatment of Type B aortic dissection. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables real-time aortic diameter assessment, and is especially useful when computed tomography (CT) image quality is poor. IVUS, however, is not routinely utilized due to cost inefficiency. We investigated the impact of IVUS-assisted stent graft sizing on aortic remodeling in TEVAR. In this single-center retrospective study we evaluated patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing both CT and IVUS before TEVAR. We assessed the aortic diameter at the level of the left subclavian artery via both methods before stent implantation and analyzed due to which method the implanted stent graft was chosen, retrospectively. To determine the degrees of aortic remodeling involved, we evaluated true lumen and false lumen diameters, and total aortic remodeling in CT. We analyzed 45 patients with Type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR. The mean ages were 66.9±10.0 years fo0072 IVUS (n = 20) and 62.3±14.2 years for CT-assisted TEVAR (n = 25; p = 0.226). The follow-up time for both groups did not differ between the two groups (IVUS: 22.9±23.1 months, CT: 25.6±23.0 months; p = 0.700). While both methods were associated with advantages regarding aortic remodeling, IVUS-assisted sizing yielded a greater increase in true lumen (30.4±6.2 vs. 25.6±5.3; p = 0.008) and reductions in false lumen (14.4±8.5 vs. 23.9±9.3; p = 0.001) and total aortic diameter (35.5±6.0 vs. 39.9±8.1; p = 0.045). IVUS-guided stent graft sizing in Type B aortic dissection shows beneficial effects on aortic remodeling and might be of additional advantage in aortic diseases, especially when CT image quality is poor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29672613</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0196180</doi><tpages>e0196180</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-3728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-6886</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196180-e0196180 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2027633393 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Aged Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnosis Aneurysm, Dissecting - therapy Aneurysms Aorta Aorta, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging Aorta, Thoracic - pathology Aortic dissection Aortography Biology and Life Sciences Cardiology Cardiovascular surgery Cardiovascular system Care and treatment Computed tomography Development and progression Dissection Endovascular Procedures - methods Female Grafting Heart surgery Hemodynamics Humans Image quality Implantation Implants Male Medical imaging Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Middle Aged Patient outcomes Patients Prospective Studies Research and Analysis Methods Sizing Surgical implants Tearing Technology application Thorax Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Ultrasound Ultrasound imaging Vascular Remodeling |
title | Intravascular ultrasound assisted sizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair improves aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravascular%20ultrasound%20assisted%20sizing%20in%20thoracic%20endovascular%20aortic%20repair%20improves%20aortic%20remodeling%20in%20Type%20B%20aortic%20dissection&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lortz,%20Julia&rft.date=2018-04-19&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0196180&rft.epage=e0196180&rft.pages=e0196180-e0196180&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0196180&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA535337584%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2027633393&rft_id=info:pmid/29672613&rft_galeid=A535337584&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_769c3a4e59014f94ac0596d9055f222a&rfr_iscdi=true |