Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America

Climate change has been identified as the primary threat to the integrity and functioning of ecosystems in this century, although there is still much uncertainty about its effects and the degree of vulnerability for different ecosystems to this threat. Here we propose a new methodological approach c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194654
Hauptverfasser: Anjos, Luciano J S, de Toledo, Peter Mann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0194654
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Anjos, Luciano J S
de Toledo, Peter Mann
description Climate change has been identified as the primary threat to the integrity and functioning of ecosystems in this century, although there is still much uncertainty about its effects and the degree of vulnerability for different ecosystems to this threat. Here we propose a new methodological approach capable of measuring and mapping the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems at large scales based on their climatic niche. To do this, we used high spatial resolution remote sensing data and ecological niche modeling techniques to calculate and spatialize the resilience of three stable states of ecosystems in South America: forest, savanna, and grassland. Also, we evaluated the sensitivity of ecosystems to climate stress, the likelihood of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions, and their respective adaptive capacities in the face of climate change. Our results indicate that forests, the most productive and biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems on the earth, are more vulnerable to climate change than savannas or grasslands. Forests showed less resistance to climate stress and a higher chance of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions. If this scenario occurs, the forest ecosystems would have less chance of adaptation compared to savannas or grasslands because of their narrow climate niche. Therefore, we can conclude that a possible consolidation of non-analogous climatic conditions would lead to a loss of resilience in the forest ecosystem, significantly increasing the chance of a critical transition event to another stable state with a lower density of vegetation cover (e.g., savanna or grassland).
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0194654
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2015396701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_06f7c0c5dbf5473a9ed99c6bfce27ae7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2015396701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c03b61ada63573701c24c1a0b77a09ac1161f183eaaced3dc69a42f67c0467693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwDxBY4ryLHcd2fEGqKiiVijgAZ2viTHa9SuzFdirtv8fbTav2wMkjvzffjEavqt4zumZcsc-7MEcP43ofPK4p040UzYvqnGler2RN-csn9Vn1JqUdpYK3Ur6uzmotRMN4fV5NPxDSHJ3fkIjJjQ69RQK-J5ASpnQU7ubRY4SuqPlAwkAyxmLO0cFI0IZ0SBmnRHIgdnQTZCR2C36DxHnyK8x5Sy4njM7C2-rVAGPCd8t7Uf359vX31ffV7c_rm6vL25UVtcwrS3knGfQguVBcUWbrxjKgnVJANVjGJBtYyxHAYs97KzU09SCVpY1UUvOL6uOJux9DMsulkqkpE1zLAiyOm5OjD7Az-1jWjgcTwJn7jxA3BmJ2dkRD5VDAVvTdIBrFQWOvtZXdYLFWgKqwvizT5m7C3qLPEcZn0OeKd1uzCXdGtKJteVMAnxZADH_nctn_rNycXDaGlCIOjxMYNcdIPHSZYyTMEonS9uHpdo9NDxng_wCNw7gR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015396701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Anjos, Luciano J S ; de Toledo, Peter Mann</creator><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luciano J S ; de Toledo, Peter Mann</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change has been identified as the primary threat to the integrity and functioning of ecosystems in this century, although there is still much uncertainty about its effects and the degree of vulnerability for different ecosystems to this threat. Here we propose a new methodological approach capable of measuring and mapping the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems at large scales based on their climatic niche. To do this, we used high spatial resolution remote sensing data and ecological niche modeling techniques to calculate and spatialize the resilience of three stable states of ecosystems in South America: forest, savanna, and grassland. Also, we evaluated the sensitivity of ecosystems to climate stress, the likelihood of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions, and their respective adaptive capacities in the face of climate change. Our results indicate that forests, the most productive and biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems on the earth, are more vulnerable to climate change than savannas or grasslands. Forests showed less resistance to climate stress and a higher chance of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions. If this scenario occurs, the forest ecosystems would have less chance of adaptation compared to savannas or grasslands because of their narrow climate niche. Therefore, we can conclude that a possible consolidation of non-analogous climatic conditions would lead to a loss of resilience in the forest ecosystem, significantly increasing the chance of a critical transition event to another stable state with a lower density of vegetation cover (e.g., savanna or grassland).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194654</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29554132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acclimatization - physiology ; Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Climate Change ; Climatic conditions ; Consolidation ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological niches ; Ecological Parameter Monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; Endangered Species ; Environmental changes ; Exposure ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; Models, Theoretical ; People and places ; Rainforests ; Remote sensing ; Resilience ; Savannahs ; Sensitivity analysis ; South America ; Spatial data ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Stress, Physiological - physiology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments ; Trees ; Uncertainty ; Vegetation cover</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194654</ispartof><rights>2018 Anjos, de Toledo. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Anjos, de Toledo 2018 Anjos, de Toledo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c03b61ada63573701c24c1a0b77a09ac1161f183eaaced3dc69a42f67c0467693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c03b61ada63573701c24c1a0b77a09ac1161f183eaaced3dc69a42f67c0467693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3270-6679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858834/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5858834/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29554132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luciano J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Toledo, Peter Mann</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Climate change has been identified as the primary threat to the integrity and functioning of ecosystems in this century, although there is still much uncertainty about its effects and the degree of vulnerability for different ecosystems to this threat. Here we propose a new methodological approach capable of measuring and mapping the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems at large scales based on their climatic niche. To do this, we used high spatial resolution remote sensing data and ecological niche modeling techniques to calculate and spatialize the resilience of three stable states of ecosystems in South America: forest, savanna, and grassland. Also, we evaluated the sensitivity of ecosystems to climate stress, the likelihood of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions, and their respective adaptive capacities in the face of climate change. Our results indicate that forests, the most productive and biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems on the earth, are more vulnerable to climate change than savannas or grasslands. Forests showed less resistance to climate stress and a higher chance of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions. If this scenario occurs, the forest ecosystems would have less chance of adaptation compared to savannas or grasslands because of their narrow climate niche. Therefore, we can conclude that a possible consolidation of non-analogous climatic conditions would lead to a loss of resilience in the forest ecosystem, significantly increasing the chance of a critical transition event to another stable state with a lower density of vegetation cover (e.g., savanna or grassland).</description><subject>Acclimatization - physiology</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecological Parameter Monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Savannahs</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwDxBY4ryLHcd2fEGqKiiVijgAZ2viTHa9SuzFdirtv8fbTav2wMkjvzffjEavqt4zumZcsc-7MEcP43ofPK4p040UzYvqnGler2RN-csn9Vn1JqUdpYK3Ur6uzmotRMN4fV5NPxDSHJ3fkIjJjQ69RQK-J5ASpnQU7ubRY4SuqPlAwkAyxmLO0cFI0IZ0SBmnRHIgdnQTZCR2C36DxHnyK8x5Sy4njM7C2-rVAGPCd8t7Uf359vX31ffV7c_rm6vL25UVtcwrS3knGfQguVBcUWbrxjKgnVJANVjGJBtYyxHAYs97KzU09SCVpY1UUvOL6uOJux9DMsulkqkpE1zLAiyOm5OjD7Az-1jWjgcTwJn7jxA3BmJ2dkRD5VDAVvTdIBrFQWOvtZXdYLFWgKqwvizT5m7C3qLPEcZn0OeKd1uzCXdGtKJteVMAnxZADH_nctn_rNycXDaGlCIOjxMYNcdIPHSZYyTMEonS9uHpdo9NDxng_wCNw7gR</recordid><startdate>20180319</startdate><enddate>20180319</enddate><creator>Anjos, Luciano J S</creator><creator>de Toledo, Peter Mann</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-6679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180319</creationdate><title>Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America</title><author>Anjos, Luciano J S ; de Toledo, Peter Mann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c03b61ada63573701c24c1a0b77a09ac1161f183eaaced3dc69a42f67c0467693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acclimatization - physiology</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecological Parameter Monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Savannahs</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luciano J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Toledo, Peter Mann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anjos, Luciano J S</au><au>de Toledo, Peter Mann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-03-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0194654</spage><pages>e0194654-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Climate change has been identified as the primary threat to the integrity and functioning of ecosystems in this century, although there is still much uncertainty about its effects and the degree of vulnerability for different ecosystems to this threat. Here we propose a new methodological approach capable of measuring and mapping the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems at large scales based on their climatic niche. To do this, we used high spatial resolution remote sensing data and ecological niche modeling techniques to calculate and spatialize the resilience of three stable states of ecosystems in South America: forest, savanna, and grassland. Also, we evaluated the sensitivity of ecosystems to climate stress, the likelihood of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions, and their respective adaptive capacities in the face of climate change. Our results indicate that forests, the most productive and biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems on the earth, are more vulnerable to climate change than savannas or grasslands. Forests showed less resistance to climate stress and a higher chance of exposure to non-analogous climatic conditions. If this scenario occurs, the forest ecosystems would have less chance of adaptation compared to savannas or grasslands because of their narrow climate niche. Therefore, we can conclude that a possible consolidation of non-analogous climatic conditions would lead to a loss of resilience in the forest ecosystem, significantly increasing the chance of a critical transition event to another stable state with a lower density of vegetation cover (e.g., savanna or grassland).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29554132</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0194654</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-6679</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194654
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2015396701
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acclimatization - physiology
Adaptation, Physiological - physiology
Animals
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Climate Change
Climatic conditions
Consolidation
Earth Sciences
Ecological niches
Ecological Parameter Monitoring
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystem
Ecosystem assessment
Endangered Species
Environmental changes
Exposure
Forest ecosystems
Forests
Grassland
Grasslands
Models, Theoretical
People and places
Rainforests
Remote sensing
Resilience
Savannahs
Sensitivity analysis
South America
Spatial data
Spatial discrimination
Spatial resolution
Stress, Physiological - physiology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Terrestrial environments
Trees
Uncertainty
Vegetation cover
title Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A44%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20resilience%20and%20assessing%20vulnerability%20of%20terrestrial%20ecosystems%20to%20climate%20change%20in%20South%20America&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Anjos,%20Luciano%20J%20S&rft.date=2018-03-19&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0194654&rft.pages=e0194654-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194654&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2015396701%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015396701&rft_id=info:pmid/29554132&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_06f7c0c5dbf5473a9ed99c6bfce27ae7&rfr_iscdi=true