Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships
Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194092-e0194092 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0194092 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0194092 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Gaeta, Jereme W Ahrenstorff, Tyler D Diana, James S Fetzer, William W Jones, Thomas S Lawson, Zach J McInerny, Michael C Santucci, Jr, Victor J Vander Zanden, M Jake |
description | Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10-20% and 32-46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log10 predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9-2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0194092 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2014373611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A531127160</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b1f5c8ab6be2412fb31bad4867ecdfdf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A531127160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c75f9c79978790332f6156971dea73e2fe332d4431c06c15c6a24491891d65e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggsIfFx0RLbiRPfgKoJRqVJk_i6tRz7uHFJ48xOCuOKp-HBeBLcNptatAvkC1vHv___2Mc-SfIYp1NMC_x66QbfymbauRamKeZZysmd5BhzSiaMpPTu3vooeRDCMk1zWjJ2PzkiPM9ombPj5NuZQ5VdIOfRn1-_kXbti_4tmiFjodGTSgbQSFvoEaxlM8jeuhY5g4yHUH-XPXjU2aDs2nlAstWo83AVxaFGwf4E5KHZakJtu_AwuWdkE-DROJ8kX96_-3z6YXJ-cTY_nZ1PFOOkn1BV5IargvOiLHhKKTEM54wXWIMsKBADMaazjGKVMoVzxSTJMo5LjjXLgZ4kT3e-XeOCGOsUBElxRgvKMI7EfEdoJ5ei83Yl_ZVw0optwPmFkL63qgFRYZOrUlasApJhYiqKK6mzkhWgtNEmer0Zsw3VCrSCtveyOTA93GltLRZuLfIyPgIpo8HL0cC7ywFCL1axpNA0sgU37M7NswIXLKLP_kFvv91ILWS8gG2Ni3nVxlTMcooxKTBLIzW9hYpDw8qq-KmMjfEDwasDQWR6-NEv5BCCmH_6-P_sxddD9vkeW4Ns-jq4Ztj-m0Mw24HKuxA8mJsi41RseuK6GmLTE2LsiSh7sv9AN6LrJqB_Adc-BrE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2014373611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gaeta, Jereme W ; Ahrenstorff, Tyler D ; Diana, James S ; Fetzer, William W ; Jones, Thomas S ; Lawson, Zach J ; McInerny, Michael C ; Santucci, Jr, Victor J ; Vander Zanden, M Jake</creator><contributor>Doi, Hideyuki</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gaeta, Jereme W ; Ahrenstorff, Tyler D ; Diana, James S ; Fetzer, William W ; Jones, Thomas S ; Lawson, Zach J ; McInerny, Michael C ; Santucci, Jr, Victor J ; Vander Zanden, M Jake ; Doi, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10-20% and 32-46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log10 predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9-2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194092</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29543856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Bass ; Bioenergetics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body mass ; Body size ; Body weights and measures ; Chasmistes liorus ; Diet ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Esox lucius ; Esox masquinongy ; Fish ; Food chains ; Food webs ; Freshwater fish ; Freshwater fishes ; Mass ratios ; Micropterus dolomieu ; Micropterus salmoides ; Natural resources ; Optimization ; Pomoxis annularis ; Pomoxis nigromaculatus ; Predation ; Predation (Biology) ; Predator-prey interactions ; Predators ; Prey ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sander vitreus ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194092-e0194092</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Gaeta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Gaeta et al 2018 Gaeta et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c75f9c79978790332f6156971dea73e2fe332d4431c06c15c6a24491891d65e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c75f9c79978790332f6156971dea73e2fe332d4431c06c15c6a24491891d65e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6925-6907</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854328/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854328/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Doi, Hideyuki</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gaeta, Jereme W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrenstorff, Tyler D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetzer, William W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Thomas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Zach J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerny, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santucci, Jr, Victor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Zanden, M Jake</creatorcontrib><title>Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10-20% and 32-46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log10 predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9-2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bass</subject><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Body weights and measures</subject><subject>Chasmistes liorus</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Esox lucius</subject><subject>Esox masquinongy</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Mass ratios</subject><subject>Micropterus dolomieu</subject><subject>Micropterus salmoides</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pomoxis annularis</subject><subject>Pomoxis nigromaculatus</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Predator-prey interactions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sander vitreus</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggsIfFx0RLbiRPfgKoJRqVJk_i6tRz7uHFJ48xOCuOKp-HBeBLcNptatAvkC1vHv___2Mc-SfIYp1NMC_x66QbfymbauRamKeZZysmd5BhzSiaMpPTu3vooeRDCMk1zWjJ2PzkiPM9ombPj5NuZQ5VdIOfRn1-_kXbti_4tmiFjodGTSgbQSFvoEaxlM8jeuhY5g4yHUH-XPXjU2aDs2nlAstWo83AVxaFGwf4E5KHZakJtu_AwuWdkE-DROJ8kX96_-3z6YXJ-cTY_nZ1PFOOkn1BV5IargvOiLHhKKTEM54wXWIMsKBADMaazjGKVMoVzxSTJMo5LjjXLgZ4kT3e-XeOCGOsUBElxRgvKMI7EfEdoJ5ei83Yl_ZVw0optwPmFkL63qgFRYZOrUlasApJhYiqKK6mzkhWgtNEmer0Zsw3VCrSCtveyOTA93GltLRZuLfIyPgIpo8HL0cC7ywFCL1axpNA0sgU37M7NswIXLKLP_kFvv91ILWS8gG2Ni3nVxlTMcooxKTBLIzW9hYpDw8qq-KmMjfEDwasDQWR6-NEv5BCCmH_6-P_sxddD9vkeW4Ns-jq4Ztj-m0Mw24HKuxA8mJsi41RseuK6GmLTE2LsiSh7sv9AN6LrJqB_Adc-BrE</recordid><startdate>20180315</startdate><enddate>20180315</enddate><creator>Gaeta, Jereme W</creator><creator>Ahrenstorff, Tyler D</creator><creator>Diana, James S</creator><creator>Fetzer, William W</creator><creator>Jones, Thomas S</creator><creator>Lawson, Zach J</creator><creator>McInerny, Michael C</creator><creator>Santucci, Jr, Victor J</creator><creator>Vander Zanden, M Jake</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-6907</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180315</creationdate><title>Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships</title><author>Gaeta, Jereme W ; Ahrenstorff, Tyler D ; Diana, James S ; Fetzer, William W ; Jones, Thomas S ; Lawson, Zach J ; McInerny, Michael C ; Santucci, Jr, Victor J ; Vander Zanden, M Jake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3c75f9c79978790332f6156971dea73e2fe332d4431c06c15c6a24491891d65e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bass</topic><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Body weights and measures</topic><topic>Chasmistes liorus</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Esox lucius</topic><topic>Esox masquinongy</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Mass ratios</topic><topic>Micropterus dolomieu</topic><topic>Micropterus salmoides</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pomoxis annularis</topic><topic>Pomoxis nigromaculatus</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Predator-prey interactions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sander vitreus</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaeta, Jereme W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrenstorff, Tyler D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetzer, William W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Thomas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Zach J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerny, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santucci, Jr, Victor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Zanden, M Jake</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaeta, Jereme W</au><au>Ahrenstorff, Tyler D</au><au>Diana, James S</au><au>Fetzer, William W</au><au>Jones, Thomas S</au><au>Lawson, Zach J</au><au>McInerny, Michael C</au><au>Santucci, Jr, Victor J</au><au>Vander Zanden, M Jake</au><au>Doi, Hideyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-03-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0194092</spage><epage>e0194092</epage><pages>e0194092-e0194092</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Body size governs predator-prey interactions, which in turn structure populations, communities, and food webs. Understanding predator-prey size relationships is valuable from a theoretical perspective, in basic research, and for management applications. However, predator-prey size data are limited and costly to acquire. We quantified predator-prey total length and mass relationships for several freshwater piscivorous taxa: crappie (Pomoxis spp.), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The range of prey total lengths increased with predator total length. The median and maximum ingested prey total length varied with predator taxon and length, but generally ranged from 10-20% and 32-46% of predator total length, respectively. Predators tended to consume larger fusiform prey than laterally compressed prey. With the exception of large muskellunge, predators most commonly consumed prey between 16 and 73 mm. A sensitivity analysis indicated estimates can be very accurate at sample sizes greater than 1,000 diet items and fairly accurate at sample sizes greater than 100. However, sample sizes less than 50 should be evaluated with caution. Furthermore, median log10 predator-prey body mass ratios ranged from 1.9-2.5, nearly 50% lower than values previously reported for freshwater fishes. Managers, researchers, and modelers could use our findings as a tool for numerous predator-prey evaluations from stocking size optimization to individual-based bioenergetics analyses identifying prey size structure. To this end, we have developed a web-based user interface to maximize the utility of our models that can be found at www.LakeEcologyLab.org/pred_prey.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29543856</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0194092</doi><tpages>e0194092</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-6907</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194092-e0194092 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2014373611 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Bass Bioenergetics Biology and Life Sciences Body mass Body size Body weights and measures Chasmistes liorus Diet Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Esox lucius Esox masquinongy Fish Food chains Food webs Freshwater fish Freshwater fishes Mass ratios Micropterus dolomieu Micropterus salmoides Natural resources Optimization Pomoxis annularis Pomoxis nigromaculatus Predation Predation (Biology) Predator-prey interactions Predators Prey Research and Analysis Methods Sander vitreus Sensitivity analysis |
title | Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T04%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Go%20big%20or%20%E2%80%A6%20don't?%20A%20field-based%20diet%20evaluation%20of%20freshwater%20piscivore%20and%20prey%20fish%20size%20relationships&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gaeta,%20Jereme%20W&rft.date=2018-03-15&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0194092&rft.epage=e0194092&rft.pages=e0194092-e0194092&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194092&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA531127160%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2014373611&rft_id=info:pmid/29543856&rft_galeid=A531127160&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b1f5c8ab6be2412fb31bad4867ecdfdf&rfr_iscdi=true |