Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale
Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194094-e0194094 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0194094 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0194094 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Matsuishi, Yujiro Hoshino, Haruhiko Shimojo, Nobutake Enomoto, Yuki Kido, Takahiro Hoshino, Tetsuya Sumitani, Masahiko Inoue, Yoshiaki |
description | Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this scale is currently unavailable in Japanese, precluding its widespread use in Japanese hospitals.
To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale.
Back-translation was first conducted by eight medical researchers, then an available sample of patients at the University of Tsukuba Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (from May 2017 to August 2017) was enrolled in a clinical study. Two researchers evaluated the validity of the translated FLACC Behavioral Scale by weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Observational pain was simultaneously measured by the visual analog scale (VAS obs) and reliability was evaluated by correlation analysis.
The original author approved the translation. For the clinical study, a total of 121 observations were obtained from 24 pediatric patients. Agreement between observers was highly correlated for each of the FLACC categories (Face: κ = 0.85, Leg: κ = 0.74, Activity: κ = 0.89, Cry: κ = 0.93, Consolability: κ = 0.93) as well as the total score (Total: κ = 0.95,). Correlation analysis demonstrated a good criterion validation between the FLACC scale and the VAS obs. (r = 0.96).
Our Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale shows high validity and reliability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2013600000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A530871161</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5195e5ef23d34ae3bdfa68b19bfcb0cb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A530871161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-6b65b8364060cc957389cfa1d900a32f7bc178e8066f6a6783f0cf423ae914c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl2PEyEUnRiNu67-A6OT-LImbYVhYODFpDZbXdPEBz9eCcNcWho6VJg26S_wby-znW62ZiHh43LOgXs5WfYWowkmFf609rvQKjfZ-hYmCIsSifJZdokFKcasQOT5o_VF9irGNUKUcMZeZheFoKREnFxm__5AsOZg22XerSDfK2cb2x1y1TZ5AGdVbV2_9-b-_LvaqhZiAkKI1ren-FxpGOULWMZRPtWd3SfOKJ-FfvBt9O6kcz1fTGezj_kXWKm99UG5_KdWDl5nL4xyEd4M81X2e37za_ZtvPjx9XY2XYx1hUg3ZjWjNSesRAxpLWhFuNBG4UYgpEhhqlrjigNHjBmmWMWJQdqUBVEgcKkpucreH3W3zkc51DDKAmHCUN8S4vaIaLxay22wGxUO0isr7wM-LKUKndUOJMWCAgVTkIaUCkjdGMV4jUVtdI10nbQ-D7ft6g00GtouZXwmen7S2pVc-r2kvBQFr5LA9SAQ_N8dxE5ubNTgXPoFvzu-u-Il5TxBP_wHfTq7AbVMRZe2NT7dq3tROaUE8QpjhhNq8gQq9QY2VifDGZviZ4TySNDBxxjAPOSIkeztenqM7O0qB7sm2rvH9XkgnfxJ7gC0pube</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013600000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Matsuishi, Yujiro ; Hoshino, Haruhiko ; Shimojo, Nobutake ; Enomoto, Yuki ; Kido, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Tetsuya ; Sumitani, Masahiko ; Inoue, Yoshiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsuishi, Yujiro ; Hoshino, Haruhiko ; Shimojo, Nobutake ; Enomoto, Yuki ; Kido, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Tetsuya ; Sumitani, Masahiko ; Inoue, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><description>Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this scale is currently unavailable in Japanese, precluding its widespread use in Japanese hospitals.
To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale.
Back-translation was first conducted by eight medical researchers, then an available sample of patients at the University of Tsukuba Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (from May 2017 to August 2017) was enrolled in a clinical study. Two researchers evaluated the validity of the translated FLACC Behavioral Scale by weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Observational pain was simultaneously measured by the visual analog scale (VAS obs) and reliability was evaluated by correlation analysis.
The original author approved the translation. For the clinical study, a total of 121 observations were obtained from 24 pediatric patients. Agreement between observers was highly correlated for each of the FLACC categories (Face: κ = 0.85, Leg: κ = 0.74, Activity: κ = 0.89, Cry: κ = 0.93, Consolability: κ = 0.93) as well as the total score (Total: κ = 0.95,). Correlation analysis demonstrated a good criterion validation between the FLACC scale and the VAS obs. (r = 0.96).
Our Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale shows high validity and reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29534083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Asthma ; Behavior Rating Scale - standards ; Behavior rating scales ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Critical care ; Delirium ; Evaluation ; Face ; Facial Expression ; Female ; Health status indicators ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric ; Japan ; Leg ; Legs ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medical protocols ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mortality ; Nociception ; Nurses ; Pain ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Measurement - standards ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; People and Places ; Preschool children ; Psychometrics - methods ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Studies ; Testing ; Translating ; Translation ; Translations ; Translations and translating ; Validity ; Ventilators ; Visual observation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194094-e0194094</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Matsuishi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Matsuishi et al 2018 Matsuishi et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-6b65b8364060cc957389cfa1d900a32f7bc178e8066f6a6783f0cf423ae914c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-6b65b8364060cc957389cfa1d900a32f7bc178e8066f6a6783f0cf423ae914c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6388-9263</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849287/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5849287/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29534083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsuishi, Yujiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimojo, Nobutake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enomoto, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kido, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitani, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this scale is currently unavailable in Japanese, precluding its widespread use in Japanese hospitals.
To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale.
Back-translation was first conducted by eight medical researchers, then an available sample of patients at the University of Tsukuba Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (from May 2017 to August 2017) was enrolled in a clinical study. Two researchers evaluated the validity of the translated FLACC Behavioral Scale by weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Observational pain was simultaneously measured by the visual analog scale (VAS obs) and reliability was evaluated by correlation analysis.
The original author approved the translation. For the clinical study, a total of 121 observations were obtained from 24 pediatric patients. Agreement between observers was highly correlated for each of the FLACC categories (Face: κ = 0.85, Leg: κ = 0.74, Activity: κ = 0.89, Cry: κ = 0.93, Consolability: κ = 0.93) as well as the total score (Total: κ = 0.95,). Correlation analysis demonstrated a good criterion validation between the FLACC scale and the VAS obs. (r = 0.96).
Our Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale shows high validity and reliability.</description><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scale - standards</subject><subject>Behavior rating scales</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health status indicators</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Legs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical protocols</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nociception</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>Translations and translating</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl2PEyEUnRiNu67-A6OT-LImbYVhYODFpDZbXdPEBz9eCcNcWho6VJg26S_wby-znW62ZiHh43LOgXs5WfYWowkmFf609rvQKjfZ-hYmCIsSifJZdokFKcasQOT5o_VF9irGNUKUcMZeZheFoKREnFxm__5AsOZg22XerSDfK2cb2x1y1TZ5AGdVbV2_9-b-_LvaqhZiAkKI1ren-FxpGOULWMZRPtWd3SfOKJ-FfvBt9O6kcz1fTGezj_kXWKm99UG5_KdWDl5nL4xyEd4M81X2e37za_ZtvPjx9XY2XYx1hUg3ZjWjNSesRAxpLWhFuNBG4UYgpEhhqlrjigNHjBmmWMWJQdqUBVEgcKkpucreH3W3zkc51DDKAmHCUN8S4vaIaLxay22wGxUO0isr7wM-LKUKndUOJMWCAgVTkIaUCkjdGMV4jUVtdI10nbQ-D7ft6g00GtouZXwmen7S2pVc-r2kvBQFr5LA9SAQ_N8dxE5ubNTgXPoFvzu-u-Il5TxBP_wHfTq7AbVMRZe2NT7dq3tROaUE8QpjhhNq8gQq9QY2VifDGZviZ4TySNDBxxjAPOSIkeztenqM7O0qB7sm2rvH9XkgnfxJ7gC0pube</recordid><startdate>20180313</startdate><enddate>20180313</enddate><creator>Matsuishi, Yujiro</creator><creator>Hoshino, Haruhiko</creator><creator>Shimojo, Nobutake</creator><creator>Enomoto, Yuki</creator><creator>Kido, Takahiro</creator><creator>Hoshino, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Sumitani, Masahiko</creator><creator>Inoue, Yoshiaki</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-9263</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180313</creationdate><title>Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale</title><author>Matsuishi, Yujiro ; Hoshino, Haruhiko ; Shimojo, Nobutake ; Enomoto, Yuki ; Kido, Takahiro ; Hoshino, Tetsuya ; Sumitani, Masahiko ; Inoue, Yoshiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-6b65b8364060cc957389cfa1d900a32f7bc178e8066f6a6783f0cf423ae914c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scale - standards</topic><topic>Behavior rating scales</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health status indicators</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Legs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical protocols</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nociception</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>Translations and translating</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsuishi, Yujiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimojo, Nobutake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enomoto, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kido, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitani, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsuishi, Yujiro</au><au>Hoshino, Haruhiko</au><au>Shimojo, Nobutake</au><au>Enomoto, Yuki</au><au>Kido, Takahiro</au><au>Hoshino, Tetsuya</au><au>Sumitani, Masahiko</au><au>Inoue, Yoshiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-03-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0194094</spage><epage>e0194094</epage><pages>e0194094-e0194094</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Pediatric patients, especially in the preverbal stage, cannot self-report intensity of pain therefore several validated observational tools, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale, have been used as a benchmark to evaluate pediatric pain. Unfortunately, this scale is currently unavailable in Japanese, precluding its widespread use in Japanese hospitals.
To translate and verify the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale.
Back-translation was first conducted by eight medical researchers, then an available sample of patients at the University of Tsukuba Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (from May 2017 to August 2017) was enrolled in a clinical study. Two researchers evaluated the validity of the translated FLACC Behavioral Scale by weighted kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Observational pain was simultaneously measured by the visual analog scale (VAS obs) and reliability was evaluated by correlation analysis.
The original author approved the translation. For the clinical study, a total of 121 observations were obtained from 24 pediatric patients. Agreement between observers was highly correlated for each of the FLACC categories (Face: κ = 0.85, Leg: κ = 0.74, Activity: κ = 0.89, Cry: κ = 0.93, Consolability: κ = 0.93) as well as the total score (Total: κ = 0.95,). Correlation analysis demonstrated a good criterion validation between the FLACC scale and the VAS obs. (r = 0.96).
Our Japanese version of the FLACC Behavioral Scale shows high validity and reliability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29534083</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0194094</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-9263</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.e0194094-e0194094 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2013600000 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Asthma Behavior Rating Scale - standards Behavior rating scales Biology and Life Sciences Child Child, Preschool Correlation Correlation analysis Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Critical care Delirium Evaluation Face Facial Expression Female Health status indicators Hospitals Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Intensive care Intensive Care Units, Pediatric Japan Leg Legs Male Medical care quality Medical protocols Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Mortality Nociception Nurses Pain Pain Measurement - methods Pain Measurement - standards Patients Pediatrics People and Places Preschool children Psychometrics - methods Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Studies Testing Translating Translation Translations Translations and translating Validity Ventilators Visual observation |
title | Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verifying%20the%20validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20Japanese%20version%20of%20the%20Face,%20Legs,%20Activity,%20Cry,%20Consolability%20(FLACC)%20Behavioral%20Scale&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Matsuishi,%20Yujiro&rft.date=2018-03-13&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0194094&rft.epage=e0194094&rft.pages=e0194094-e0194094&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0194094&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA530871161%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013600000&rft_id=info:pmid/29534083&rft_galeid=A530871161&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5195e5ef23d34ae3bdfa68b19bfcb0cb&rfr_iscdi=true |