The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis
The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0193478-e0193478 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0193478 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0193478 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Heritage, Brody Rees, Clare S Hegney, Desley G |
description | The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0193478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2009228542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A529306551</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_35b13516fc454c5bb4353237b77dae69</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A529306551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-c31551061bed259c7d8c818fa253e8833e439c9a17c53de480745fa385ad51753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1v0zAUjRCIjcE_QGCJl_HQYvvGic0DUjXxManSGBrPluPctB5p3Nlppf57HJJNK5r8YOvec8798Mmyt4zOGZTs063fhc60863vcE6ZgryUz7LT9OCzglN4_uh9kr2K8ZZSAbIoXmYnXOVSyVKcZn9u1kh-Bn99tZxx9pksSMC9i1iTPYbofEd8Q_oR02AcIqYl1zvTuv4w5JauQXI-Knwk0ZoWSWUGgcT9ZaJdE5Moh-ji6-xFY9qIb6b7LPv97evNxY_Z8ur75cViObNCQT-zwIRgtGAV1lwoW9bSSiYbwwWglACYg7LKsNIKqDGXtMxFY0AKUwtWCjjL3o-629ZHPe0pak6p4lyKnCfE5YiovbnV2-A2Jhy0N07_C_iw0ib0zraoQVQMBCsam4vciqrKQQCHsirL2mChktaXqdqu2mBtseuDaY9EjzOdW-uV32shgTE6NHM-CQR_t8PY642LFtvWdOh3Y9-iUByGyT78B316ugm1Sp-hXdf4VNcOonohuAJapP0m1PwJVDo1bpxNpmpcih8R8pFgg48xYPMwI6N6sOR9M3qwpJ4smWjvHu_ngXTvQfgLeH7a9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2009228542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Heritage, Brody ; Rees, Clare S ; Hegney, Desley G</creator><contributor>van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heritage, Brody ; Rees, Clare S ; Hegney, Desley G ; van Bogaert, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29489875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Adult ; Balances (scales) ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Burnout ; Burnout, Professional - psychology ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Evaluation ; Fatigue ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health status indicators ; Humanitarian aid ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental health ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Midwifery ; Models, Statistical ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Nurses - statistics & numerical data ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Professionals ; Professions ; Quality of Life ; Quantitative psychology ; Rasch model ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological ; Stresses ; Validity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0193478-e0193478</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Heritage et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Heritage et al 2018 Heritage et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-c31551061bed259c7d8c818fa253e8833e439c9a17c53de480745fa385ad51753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-c31551061bed259c7d8c818fa253e8833e439c9a17c53de480745fa385ad51753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6437-7232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831102/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831102/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>van Bogaert, Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heritage, Brody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Clare S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegney, Desley G</creatorcontrib><title>The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Balances (scales)</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health status indicators</subject><subject>Humanitarian aid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Nurses - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rasch model</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1v0zAUjRCIjcE_QGCJl_HQYvvGic0DUjXxManSGBrPluPctB5p3Nlppf57HJJNK5r8YOvec8798Mmyt4zOGZTs063fhc60863vcE6ZgryUz7LT9OCzglN4_uh9kr2K8ZZSAbIoXmYnXOVSyVKcZn9u1kh-Bn99tZxx9pksSMC9i1iTPYbofEd8Q_oR02AcIqYl1zvTuv4w5JauQXI-Knwk0ZoWSWUGgcT9ZaJdE5Moh-ji6-xFY9qIb6b7LPv97evNxY_Z8ur75cViObNCQT-zwIRgtGAV1lwoW9bSSiYbwwWglACYg7LKsNIKqDGXtMxFY0AKUwtWCjjL3o-629ZHPe0pak6p4lyKnCfE5YiovbnV2-A2Jhy0N07_C_iw0ib0zraoQVQMBCsam4vciqrKQQCHsirL2mChktaXqdqu2mBtseuDaY9EjzOdW-uV32shgTE6NHM-CQR_t8PY642LFtvWdOh3Y9-iUByGyT78B316ugm1Sp-hXdf4VNcOonohuAJapP0m1PwJVDo1bpxNpmpcih8R8pFgg48xYPMwI6N6sOR9M3qwpJ4smWjvHu_ngXTvQfgLeH7a9g</recordid><startdate>20180228</startdate><enddate>20180228</enddate><creator>Heritage, Brody</creator><creator>Rees, Clare S</creator><creator>Hegney, Desley G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6437-7232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180228</creationdate><title>The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis</title><author>Heritage, Brody ; Rees, Clare S ; Hegney, Desley G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-c31551061bed259c7d8c818fa253e8833e439c9a17c53de480745fa385ad51753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Balances (scales)</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health status indicators</topic><topic>Humanitarian aid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Nurses - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rasch model</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heritage, Brody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Clare S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegney, Desley G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heritage, Brody</au><au>Rees, Clare S</au><au>Hegney, Desley G</au><au>van Bogaert, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-02-28</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0193478</spage><epage>e0193478</epage><pages>e0193478-e0193478</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29489875</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0193478</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6437-7232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0193478-e0193478 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2009228542 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adequacy Adult Balances (scales) Biology and Life Sciences Burnout Burnout, Professional - psychology Chronic fatigue syndrome Evaluation Fatigue Female Health aspects Health status indicators Humanitarian aid Humans Intensive care Male Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Mental health Methods Middle Aged Midwifery Models, Statistical Nurses Nurses - psychology Nurses - statistics & numerical data Nursing Nursing care Patients People and Places Physical Sciences Professionals Professions Quality of Life Quantitative psychology Rasch model Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Stress Stress, Psychological Stresses Validity |
title | The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ProQOL-21:%20A%20revised%20version%20of%20the%20Professional%20Quality%20of%20Life%20(ProQOL)%20scale%20based%20on%20Rasch%20analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Heritage,%20Brody&rft.date=2018-02-28&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0193478&rft.epage=e0193478&rft.pages=e0193478-e0193478&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0193478&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA529306551%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2009228542&rft_id=info:pmid/29489875&rft_galeid=A529306551&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_35b13516fc454c5bb4353237b77dae69&rfr_iscdi=true |