Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries
Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1002492 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e1002492 |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Oladapo, Olufemi T Souza, Joao Paulo Fawole, Bukola Mugerwa, Kidza Perdoná, Gleici Alves, Domingos Souza, Hayala Reis, Rodrigo Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia Maiorano, Alexandre Akintan, Adesina Alu, Francis E Oyeneyin, Lawal Adebayo, Amos Byamugisha, Josaphat Nakalembe, Miriam Idris, Hadiza A Okike, Ola Althabe, Fernando Hundley, Vanora Donnay, France Pattinson, Robert Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C Jardine, Jen E Tunçalp, Özge Vogel, Joshua P Stanton, Mary Ellen Bohren, Meghan Zhang, Jun Lavender, Tina Liljestrand, Jerker Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra Mathai, Matthews Bahl, Rajiv Gülmezoglu, A Metin |
description | Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset.
This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2002618485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A525916824</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2a43d12475414f5caf3924867856a7ad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A525916824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJwyGInzoc5IK0qPlaqKKLA1Zo4duIqG6e2U-i_x2HTaoP2APLB1viZdzwznih6SvCKpAV5c2lG20O3GrayXhGME8qSe9ExySiLSV7k9_fOR9Ej5y4DwzDDD6OjhKVpiTE-jsYv1jRWOqdNj4xCvpVIaes8ch4aOZncYHoPvTSjQx1UIexbtEaDNW6QwutriYRpjZ08xvoG6R75nwa5sYovoAULPVorq0XYhRl7b7V0j6MHCjonn8z7SfT9w_tvp5_is_OPm9P1WSyKnPpYVaqkQGsQlFSQlwwXBBTNoc4IrVSaiqqiaSZqRQGntchJSSBjtcolzkFk6Un0fKc7dMbxuWKOJ6ESgaXlRGx2RG3gkg9Wb8HecAOa_zEY23CwXotO8gRoWpOEFhklVGUCVMoSWuZFmeVQQB203s3Rxio0RciQLHQL0eVNr1vemGueFUV4URIEXs0C1lyN0nm-1U7IrttVnxNWssCW5YS--As9nN1MNRAS0L0yIa6YRPk6SzJG8jKhgYoPUI3sZXik6aXSwbzgVwf4sGq51eKgw-uFQ2C8_OUbGJ3jm4uv_8F-_nf2_MeSfbnHthI63zrTjT58fLcE6Q4U4Yc7K9VdAwnm0-TdVppPk8fnyQtuz_abf-d0O2rpbxG1KMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002618485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creator><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><description>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset.
This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns.
Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29338000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Cesarean section ; Cohort analysis ; Computer applications ; Decision making ; Development and progression ; Female ; Funding ; Gestation ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Labor Stage, First - physiology ; Labor, Obstetric - physiology ; Markov processes ; Median (statistics) ; Medical research ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nigeria ; Obstetrics ; Oxytocin ; Parity ; Patient outcomes ; Physical Sciences ; Population studies ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Prospective Studies ; Reproductive health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Supervision ; Uganda ; Vagina ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Fawole B, Mugerwa K, Perdoná G, Alves D, et al. (2018) Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS Med 15(1): e1002492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</rights><rights>2018 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Fawole B, Mugerwa K, Perdoná G, Alves D, et al. (2018) Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS Med 15(1): e1002492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0479-5499 ; 0000-0002-3371-5892 ; 0000-0002-2288-4244 ; 0000-0003-1706-1611 ; 0000-0001-6425-6281 ; 0000-0003-4674-0998 ; 0000-0001-7569-8173 ; 0000-0002-4179-4682 ; 0000-0002-9932-6865 ; 0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770022/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770022/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29338000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, Bukola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugerwa, Kidza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdoná, Gleici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Hayala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akintan, Adesina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alu, Francis E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebayo, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakalembe, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Hadiza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okike, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, Jen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçalp, Özge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohren, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljestrand, Jerker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, Matthews</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset.
This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns.
Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor Stage, First - physiology</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Median (statistics)</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oxytocin</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJwyGInzoc5IK0qPlaqKKLA1Zo4duIqG6e2U-i_x2HTaoP2APLB1viZdzwznih6SvCKpAV5c2lG20O3GrayXhGME8qSe9ExySiLSV7k9_fOR9Ej5y4DwzDDD6OjhKVpiTE-jsYv1jRWOqdNj4xCvpVIaes8ch4aOZncYHoPvTSjQx1UIexbtEaDNW6QwutriYRpjZ08xvoG6R75nwa5sYovoAULPVorq0XYhRl7b7V0j6MHCjonn8z7SfT9w_tvp5_is_OPm9P1WSyKnPpYVaqkQGsQlFSQlwwXBBTNoc4IrVSaiqqiaSZqRQGntchJSSBjtcolzkFk6Un0fKc7dMbxuWKOJ6ESgaXlRGx2RG3gkg9Wb8HecAOa_zEY23CwXotO8gRoWpOEFhklVGUCVMoSWuZFmeVQQB203s3Rxio0RciQLHQL0eVNr1vemGueFUV4URIEXs0C1lyN0nm-1U7IrttVnxNWssCW5YS--As9nN1MNRAS0L0yIa6YRPk6SzJG8jKhgYoPUI3sZXik6aXSwbzgVwf4sGq51eKgw-uFQ2C8_OUbGJ3jm4uv_8F-_nf2_MeSfbnHthI63zrTjT58fLcE6Q4U4Yc7K9VdAwnm0-TdVppPk8fnyQtuz_abf-d0O2rpbxG1KMI</recordid><startdate>20180116</startdate><enddate>20180116</enddate><creator>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creator><creator>Souza, Joao Paulo</creator><creator>Fawole, Bukola</creator><creator>Mugerwa, Kidza</creator><creator>Perdoná, Gleici</creator><creator>Alves, Domingos</creator><creator>Souza, Hayala</creator><creator>Reis, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creator><creator>Maiorano, Alexandre</creator><creator>Akintan, Adesina</creator><creator>Alu, Francis E</creator><creator>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creator><creator>Adebayo, Amos</creator><creator>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creator><creator>Nakalembe, Miriam</creator><creator>Idris, Hadiza A</creator><creator>Okike, Ola</creator><creator>Althabe, Fernando</creator><creator>Hundley, Vanora</creator><creator>Donnay, France</creator><creator>Pattinson, Robert</creator><creator>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creator><creator>Jardine, Jen E</creator><creator>Tunçalp, Özge</creator><creator>Vogel, Joshua P</creator><creator>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creator><creator>Bohren, Meghan</creator><creator>Zhang, Jun</creator><creator>Lavender, Tina</creator><creator>Liljestrand, Jerker</creator><creator>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creator><creator>Mathai, Matthews</creator><creator>Bahl, Rajiv</creator><creator>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-5499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-5892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-4244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-8173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-6865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180116</creationdate><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><author>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor Stage, First - physiology</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Median (statistics)</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oxytocin</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, Bukola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugerwa, Kidza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdoná, Gleici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Hayala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akintan, Adesina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alu, Francis E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebayo, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakalembe, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Hadiza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okike, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, Jen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçalp, Özge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohren, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljestrand, Jerker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, Matthews</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oladapo, Olufemi T</au><au>Souza, Joao Paulo</au><au>Fawole, Bukola</au><au>Mugerwa, Kidza</au><au>Perdoná, Gleici</au><au>Alves, Domingos</au><au>Souza, Hayala</au><au>Reis, Rodrigo</au><au>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</au><au>Maiorano, Alexandre</au><au>Akintan, Adesina</au><au>Alu, Francis E</au><au>Oyeneyin, Lawal</au><au>Adebayo, Amos</au><au>Byamugisha, Josaphat</au><au>Nakalembe, Miriam</au><au>Idris, Hadiza A</au><au>Okike, Ola</au><au>Althabe, Fernando</au><au>Hundley, Vanora</au><au>Donnay, France</au><au>Pattinson, Robert</au><au>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</au><au>Jardine, Jen E</au><au>Tunçalp, Özge</au><au>Vogel, Joshua P</au><au>Stanton, Mary Ellen</au><au>Bohren, Meghan</au><au>Zhang, Jun</au><au>Lavender, Tina</au><au>Liljestrand, Jerker</au><au>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</au><au>Mathai, Matthews</au><au>Bahl, Rajiv</au><au>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2018-01-16</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e1002492</spage><epage>e1002492</epage><pages>e1002492-e1002492</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset.
This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns.
Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29338000</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-5499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-5892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-4244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-8173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-6865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492 |
issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2002618485 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adult Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Birth Cesarean section Cohort analysis Computer applications Decision making Development and progression Female Funding Gestation Gynecology Health aspects Hospitals Humans Labor Stage, First - physiology Labor, Obstetric - physiology Markov processes Median (statistics) Medical research Medical schools Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Nigeria Obstetrics Oxytocin Parity Patient outcomes Physical Sciences Population studies Pregnancy Pregnant women Prospective Studies Reproductive health Research and Analysis Methods Software Statistical analysis Supervision Uganda Vagina Young Adult |
title | Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A10%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progression%20of%20the%20first%20stage%20of%20spontaneous%20labour:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study%20in%20two%20sub-Saharan%20African%20countries&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Oladapo,%20Olufemi%20T&rft.date=2018-01-16&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e1002492&rft.epage=e1002492&rft.pages=e1002492-e1002492&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA525916824%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002618485&rft_id=info:pmid/29338000&rft_galeid=A525916824&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2a43d12475414f5caf3924867856a7ad&rfr_iscdi=true |