Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries

Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS medicine 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492
Hauptverfasser: Oladapo, Olufemi T, Souza, Joao Paulo, Fawole, Bukola, Mugerwa, Kidza, Perdoná, Gleici, Alves, Domingos, Souza, Hayala, Reis, Rodrigo, Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia, Maiorano, Alexandre, Akintan, Adesina, Alu, Francis E, Oyeneyin, Lawal, Adebayo, Amos, Byamugisha, Josaphat, Nakalembe, Miriam, Idris, Hadiza A, Okike, Ola, Althabe, Fernando, Hundley, Vanora, Donnay, France, Pattinson, Robert, Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C, Jardine, Jen E, Tunçalp, Özge, Vogel, Joshua P, Stanton, Mary Ellen, Bohren, Meghan, Zhang, Jun, Lavender, Tina, Liljestrand, Jerker, Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra, Mathai, Matthews, Bahl, Rajiv, Gülmezoglu, A Metin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1002492
container_issue 1
container_start_page e1002492
container_title PLoS medicine
container_volume 15
creator Oladapo, Olufemi T
Souza, Joao Paulo
Fawole, Bukola
Mugerwa, Kidza
Perdoná, Gleici
Alves, Domingos
Souza, Hayala
Reis, Rodrigo
Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia
Maiorano, Alexandre
Akintan, Adesina
Alu, Francis E
Oyeneyin, Lawal
Adebayo, Amos
Byamugisha, Josaphat
Nakalembe, Miriam
Idris, Hadiza A
Okike, Ola
Althabe, Fernando
Hundley, Vanora
Donnay, France
Pattinson, Robert
Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C
Jardine, Jen E
Tunçalp, Özge
Vogel, Joshua P
Stanton, Mary Ellen
Bohren, Meghan
Zhang, Jun
Lavender, Tina
Liljestrand, Jerker
Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra
Mathai, Matthews
Bahl, Rajiv
Gülmezoglu, A Metin
description Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset. This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2002618485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A525916824</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2a43d12475414f5caf3924867856a7ad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A525916824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJwyGInzoc5IK0qPlaqKKLA1Zo4duIqG6e2U-i_x2HTaoP2APLB1viZdzwznih6SvCKpAV5c2lG20O3GrayXhGME8qSe9ExySiLSV7k9_fOR9Ej5y4DwzDDD6OjhKVpiTE-jsYv1jRWOqdNj4xCvpVIaes8ch4aOZncYHoPvTSjQx1UIexbtEaDNW6QwutriYRpjZ08xvoG6R75nwa5sYovoAULPVorq0XYhRl7b7V0j6MHCjonn8z7SfT9w_tvp5_is_OPm9P1WSyKnPpYVaqkQGsQlFSQlwwXBBTNoc4IrVSaiqqiaSZqRQGntchJSSBjtcolzkFk6Un0fKc7dMbxuWKOJ6ESgaXlRGx2RG3gkg9Wb8HecAOa_zEY23CwXotO8gRoWpOEFhklVGUCVMoSWuZFmeVQQB203s3Rxio0RciQLHQL0eVNr1vemGueFUV4URIEXs0C1lyN0nm-1U7IrttVnxNWssCW5YS--As9nN1MNRAS0L0yIa6YRPk6SzJG8jKhgYoPUI3sZXik6aXSwbzgVwf4sGq51eKgw-uFQ2C8_OUbGJ3jm4uv_8F-_nf2_MeSfbnHthI63zrTjT58fLcE6Q4U4Yc7K9VdAwnm0-TdVppPk8fnyQtuz_abf-d0O2rpbxG1KMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002618485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creator><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><description>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset. This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns. Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29338000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Cesarean section ; Cohort analysis ; Computer applications ; Decision making ; Development and progression ; Female ; Funding ; Gestation ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Labor Stage, First - physiology ; Labor, Obstetric - physiology ; Markov processes ; Median (statistics) ; Medical research ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nigeria ; Obstetrics ; Oxytocin ; Parity ; Patient outcomes ; Physical Sciences ; Population studies ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant women ; Prospective Studies ; Reproductive health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Supervision ; Uganda ; Vagina ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Fawole B, Mugerwa K, Perdoná G, Alves D, et al. (2018) Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS Med 15(1): e1002492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</rights><rights>2018 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Fawole B, Mugerwa K, Perdoná G, Alves D, et al. (2018) Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS Med 15(1): e1002492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0479-5499 ; 0000-0002-3371-5892 ; 0000-0002-2288-4244 ; 0000-0003-1706-1611 ; 0000-0001-6425-6281 ; 0000-0003-4674-0998 ; 0000-0001-7569-8173 ; 0000-0002-4179-4682 ; 0000-0002-9932-6865 ; 0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770022/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770022/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29338000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, Bukola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugerwa, Kidza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdoná, Gleici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Hayala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akintan, Adesina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alu, Francis E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebayo, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakalembe, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Hadiza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okike, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, Jen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçalp, Özge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohren, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljestrand, Jerker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, Matthews</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset. This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns. Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor Stage, First - physiology</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Median (statistics)</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oxytocin</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJwyGInzoc5IK0qPlaqKKLA1Zo4duIqG6e2U-i_x2HTaoP2APLB1viZdzwznih6SvCKpAV5c2lG20O3GrayXhGME8qSe9ExySiLSV7k9_fOR9Ej5y4DwzDDD6OjhKVpiTE-jsYv1jRWOqdNj4xCvpVIaes8ch4aOZncYHoPvTSjQx1UIexbtEaDNW6QwutriYRpjZ08xvoG6R75nwa5sYovoAULPVorq0XYhRl7b7V0j6MHCjonn8z7SfT9w_tvp5_is_OPm9P1WSyKnPpYVaqkQGsQlFSQlwwXBBTNoc4IrVSaiqqiaSZqRQGntchJSSBjtcolzkFk6Un0fKc7dMbxuWKOJ6ESgaXlRGx2RG3gkg9Wb8HecAOa_zEY23CwXotO8gRoWpOEFhklVGUCVMoSWuZFmeVQQB203s3Rxio0RciQLHQL0eVNr1vemGueFUV4URIEXs0C1lyN0nm-1U7IrttVnxNWssCW5YS--As9nN1MNRAS0L0yIa6YRPk6SzJG8jKhgYoPUI3sZXik6aXSwbzgVwf4sGq51eKgw-uFQ2C8_OUbGJ3jm4uv_8F-_nf2_MeSfbnHthI63zrTjT58fLcE6Q4U4Yc7K9VdAwnm0-TdVppPk8fnyQtuz_abf-d0O2rpbxG1KMI</recordid><startdate>20180116</startdate><enddate>20180116</enddate><creator>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creator><creator>Souza, Joao Paulo</creator><creator>Fawole, Bukola</creator><creator>Mugerwa, Kidza</creator><creator>Perdoná, Gleici</creator><creator>Alves, Domingos</creator><creator>Souza, Hayala</creator><creator>Reis, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creator><creator>Maiorano, Alexandre</creator><creator>Akintan, Adesina</creator><creator>Alu, Francis E</creator><creator>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creator><creator>Adebayo, Amos</creator><creator>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creator><creator>Nakalembe, Miriam</creator><creator>Idris, Hadiza A</creator><creator>Okike, Ola</creator><creator>Althabe, Fernando</creator><creator>Hundley, Vanora</creator><creator>Donnay, France</creator><creator>Pattinson, Robert</creator><creator>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creator><creator>Jardine, Jen E</creator><creator>Tunçalp, Özge</creator><creator>Vogel, Joshua P</creator><creator>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creator><creator>Bohren, Meghan</creator><creator>Zhang, Jun</creator><creator>Lavender, Tina</creator><creator>Liljestrand, Jerker</creator><creator>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creator><creator>Mathai, Matthews</creator><creator>Bahl, Rajiv</creator><creator>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-5499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-5892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-4244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-8173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-6865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180116</creationdate><title>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</title><author>Oladapo, Olufemi T ; Souza, Joao Paulo ; Fawole, Bukola ; Mugerwa, Kidza ; Perdoná, Gleici ; Alves, Domingos ; Souza, Hayala ; Reis, Rodrigo ; Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia ; Maiorano, Alexandre ; Akintan, Adesina ; Alu, Francis E ; Oyeneyin, Lawal ; Adebayo, Amos ; Byamugisha, Josaphat ; Nakalembe, Miriam ; Idris, Hadiza A ; Okike, Ola ; Althabe, Fernando ; Hundley, Vanora ; Donnay, France ; Pattinson, Robert ; Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C ; Jardine, Jen E ; Tunçalp, Özge ; Vogel, Joshua P ; Stanton, Mary Ellen ; Bohren, Meghan ; Zhang, Jun ; Lavender, Tina ; Liljestrand, Jerker ; Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra ; Mathai, Matthews ; Bahl, Rajiv ; Gülmezoglu, A Metin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c764t-fbf84a4dac41ba689071af46ad514bf33cbb435cdf4a03dc6181a59df6e06ac53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor Stage, First - physiology</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Median (statistics)</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oxytocin</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oladapo, Olufemi T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Joao Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, Bukola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugerwa, Kidza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdoná, Gleici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Domingos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Hayala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akintan, Adesina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alu, Francis E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyeneyin, Lawal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebayo, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byamugisha, Josaphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakalembe, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Hadiza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okike, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althabe, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, Jen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunçalp, Özge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Mary Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohren, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljestrand, Jerker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, Matthews</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahl, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oladapo, Olufemi T</au><au>Souza, Joao Paulo</au><au>Fawole, Bukola</au><au>Mugerwa, Kidza</au><au>Perdoná, Gleici</au><au>Alves, Domingos</au><au>Souza, Hayala</au><au>Reis, Rodrigo</au><au>Oliveira-Ciabati, Livia</au><au>Maiorano, Alexandre</au><au>Akintan, Adesina</au><au>Alu, Francis E</au><au>Oyeneyin, Lawal</au><au>Adebayo, Amos</au><au>Byamugisha, Josaphat</au><au>Nakalembe, Miriam</au><au>Idris, Hadiza A</au><au>Okike, Ola</au><au>Althabe, Fernando</au><au>Hundley, Vanora</au><au>Donnay, France</au><au>Pattinson, Robert</au><au>Sanghvi, Harshadkumar C</au><au>Jardine, Jen E</au><au>Tunçalp, Özge</au><au>Vogel, Joshua P</au><au>Stanton, Mary Ellen</au><au>Bohren, Meghan</au><au>Zhang, Jun</au><au>Lavender, Tina</au><au>Liljestrand, Jerker</au><au>Ten Hoope-Bender, Petra</au><au>Mathai, Matthews</au><au>Bahl, Rajiv</au><au>Gülmezoglu, A Metin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2018-01-16</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e1002492</spage><epage>e1002492</epage><pages>e1002492-e1002492</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>Escalation in the global rates of labour interventions, particularly cesarean section and oxytocin augmentation, has renewed interest in a better understanding of natural labour progression. Methodological advancements in statistical and computational techniques addressing the limitations of pioneer studies have led to novel findings and triggered a re-evaluation of current labour practices. As part of the World Health Organization's Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty (BOLD) project, which aimed to develop a new labour monitoring-to-action tool, we examined the patterns of labour progression as depicted by cervical dilatation over time in a cohort of women in Nigeria and Uganda who gave birth vaginally following a spontaneous labour onset. This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study of 5,606 women with singleton, vertex, term gestation who presented at ≤ 6 cm of cervical dilatation following a spontaneous labour onset that resulted in a vaginal birth with no adverse birth outcomes in 13 hospitals across Nigeria and Uganda. We independently applied survival analysis and multistate Markov models to estimate the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre until 10 cm and the cumulative duration of labour from the cervical dilatation at admission through 10 cm. Multistate Markov and nonlinear mixed models were separately used to construct average labour curves. All analyses were conducted according to three parity groups: parity = 0 (n = 2,166), parity = 1 (n = 1,488), and parity = 2+ (n = 1,952). We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of oxytocin augmentation on labour progression by re-examining the progression patterns after excluding women with augmented labours. Labour was augmented with oxytocin in 40% of nulliparous and 28% of multiparous women. The median time to advance by 1 cm exceeded 1 hour until 5 cm was reached in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Based on a 95th percentile threshold, nulliparous women may take up to 7 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and over 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm. Median cumulative duration of labour indicates that nulliparous women admitted at 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm reached 10 cm within an expected time frame if the dilatation rate was ≥ 1 cm/hour, but their corresponding 95th percentiles show that labour could last up to 14, 11, and 9 hours, respectively. Substantial differences exist between actual plots of labour progression of individual women and the 'average labour curves' derived from study population-level data. Exclusion of women with augmented labours from the study population resulted in slightly faster labour progression patterns. Cervical dilatation during labour in the slowest-yet-normal women can progress more slowly than the widely accepted benchmark of 1 cm/hour, irrespective of parity. Interventions to expedite labour to conform to a cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour may be inappropriate, especially when applied before 5 cm in nulliparous and multiparous women. Averaged labour curves may not truly reflect the variability associated with labour progression, and their use for decision-making in labour management should be de-emphasized.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29338000</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-5499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-5892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-4244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-1611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-8173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-6865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-1676
ispartof PLoS medicine, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.e1002492-e1002492
issn 1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2002618485
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Adult
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Birth
Cesarean section
Cohort analysis
Computer applications
Decision making
Development and progression
Female
Funding
Gestation
Gynecology
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Labor Stage, First - physiology
Labor, Obstetric - physiology
Markov processes
Median (statistics)
Medical research
Medical schools
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Nigeria
Obstetrics
Oxytocin
Parity
Patient outcomes
Physical Sciences
Population studies
Pregnancy
Pregnant women
Prospective Studies
Reproductive health
Research and Analysis Methods
Software
Statistical analysis
Supervision
Uganda
Vagina
Young Adult
title Progression of the first stage of spontaneous labour: A prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A10%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progression%20of%20the%20first%20stage%20of%20spontaneous%20labour:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study%20in%20two%20sub-Saharan%20African%20countries&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Oladapo,%20Olufemi%20T&rft.date=2018-01-16&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e1002492&rft.epage=e1002492&rft.pages=e1002492-e1002492&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002492&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA525916824%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002618485&rft_id=info:pmid/29338000&rft_galeid=A525916824&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2a43d12475414f5caf3924867856a7ad&rfr_iscdi=true