Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms
Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination us...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192155-e0192155 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0192155 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | e0192155 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Berkhout, Christophe Willefert-Bouche, Amy Chazard, Emmanuel Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna Favre, Jonathan Peremans, Lieve Ficheur, Grégoire Van Royen, Paul |
| description | Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in GPs' waiting rooms.
Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial, a cluster gathering the enlisted patients of 75 GPs aged over 16 years. The trial, run during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign, compared patient's awareness from being in 50 GPs' standard waiting rooms (control group) versus that of waiting in 25 rooms from GPs who had received and exposed pamphlets and one poster on influenza vaccine (intervention group), in addition to standard mandatory information. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were extracted from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (France). The association between the intervention (yes/no) and the main outcome was assessed through a generalized estimating equation. Seventy-five GPs enrolled 10,597 patients over 65 years or suffering from long lasting diseases (intervention/control as of 3781/6816 patients) from October 15, 2014 to February 28, 2015. No difference was found regarding the number of influenza vaccination units delivered (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% Confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; p = 0.561).
Effects of the monothematic campaign promoting vaccination against influenza using a poster and pamphlets exposed in GPs' waiting rooms could not be demonstrated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0192155 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2000042834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_387c011ec6544de59d88df0b91d6b2e5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2000042834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-9e630c3def8fb86dd280e3bbb61fd7fa16f966b9b722e9a03cd0abd56939cd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAd80Ydd8zHJJC9CKWoLC4L0PebjzjZLJlkzMyv215vdnZa2mJdc7j3n3A9OVb3FaIlpiz9v0pSjDsttirBEWBLM2LPqFEtKFpwg-vxBfFK9GoYNQowKzl9WJ0Q2hBHCT6tfP3V0qfe34Gqb4phTCCUcs9ehTrHe5tSn0cd17WMXJoi3ut5pa33Uoy91H-s1RMgFvc3ajt5C_Uf7AyOn1A-vqxedDgO8mf-z6vrb1-uLy8Xqx_eri_PVwjKOxoUETpGlDjrRGcGdIwIBNcZw3Lm205h3knMjTUsISI2odUgbx7ik0rqGnlXvj7LbkAY132ZQBJXXEEH3iKsjwiW9Udvse53_qqS9OiRSXiudy_wBFBWtRRiD5axpHDDphHAdMhI7bgiwovVl7jaZHpyFcjgdHok-rkR_o9Zpp5hAXHBSBD4dBW6e0C7PV2qfQ4RRIgXf4YL9ODfL6fcEw6h6P1gIQUdI02FHjHiLKS3QD0-g_79Ec0TZnIYhQ3c_AUZq7607ltp7S83eKrR3D5e-J92Zif4DKJ7Oqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000042834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Berkhout, Christophe ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Chazard, Emmanuel ; Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Ficheur, Grégoire ; Van Royen, Paul</creator><contributor>Ortiz, Justin R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Chazard, Emmanuel ; Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Ficheur, Grégoire ; Van Royen, Paul ; Ortiz, Justin R.</creatorcontrib><description>Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in GPs' waiting rooms.
Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial, a cluster gathering the enlisted patients of 75 GPs aged over 16 years. The trial, run during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign, compared patient's awareness from being in 50 GPs' standard waiting rooms (control group) versus that of waiting in 25 rooms from GPs who had received and exposed pamphlets and one poster on influenza vaccine (intervention group), in addition to standard mandatory information. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were extracted from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (France). The association between the intervention (yes/no) and the main outcome was assessed through a generalized estimating equation. Seventy-five GPs enrolled 10,597 patients over 65 years or suffering from long lasting diseases (intervention/control as of 3781/6816 patients) from October 15, 2014 to February 28, 2015. No difference was found regarding the number of influenza vaccination units delivered (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% Confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; p = 0.561).
Effects of the monothematic campaign promoting vaccination against influenza using a poster and pamphlets exposed in GPs' waiting rooms could not be demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29425226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Aged ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brochures ; Clinical trials ; Clusters ; Confidence intervals ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; France ; General Practice ; Health education ; Health insurance ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunology ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Intervention ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Primary care ; Public health ; Randomization ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Social Sciences ; Systematic review ; Tetanus ; Vaccination ; Vaccinology ; Visual aids ; Waiting rooms</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192155-e0192155</ispartof><rights>2018 Berkhout et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2018 Berkhout et al 2018 Berkhout et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-9e630c3def8fb86dd280e3bbb61fd7fa16f966b9b722e9a03cd0abd56939cd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-9e630c3def8fb86dd280e3bbb61fd7fa16f966b9b722e9a03cd0abd56939cd43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9354-1505 ; 0000-0001-7841-5925 ; 0000-0002-1471-4894 ; 0000-0001-6849-0040</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806862/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806862/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,4024,23866,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29425226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02532986$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ortiz, Justin R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favre, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peremans, Lieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficheur, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Royen, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in GPs' waiting rooms.
Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial, a cluster gathering the enlisted patients of 75 GPs aged over 16 years. The trial, run during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign, compared patient's awareness from being in 50 GPs' standard waiting rooms (control group) versus that of waiting in 25 rooms from GPs who had received and exposed pamphlets and one poster on influenza vaccine (intervention group), in addition to standard mandatory information. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were extracted from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (France). The association between the intervention (yes/no) and the main outcome was assessed through a generalized estimating equation. Seventy-five GPs enrolled 10,597 patients over 65 years or suffering from long lasting diseases (intervention/control as of 3781/6816 patients) from October 15, 2014 to February 28, 2015. No difference was found regarding the number of influenza vaccination units delivered (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% Confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; p = 0.561).
Effects of the monothematic campaign promoting vaccination against influenza using a poster and pamphlets exposed in GPs' waiting rooms could not be demonstrated.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brochures</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccinology</subject><subject>Visual aids</subject><subject>Waiting rooms</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUHUSxtfoPRAd80Ydd8zHJJC9CKWoLC4L0PebjzjZLJlkzMyv215vdnZa2mJdc7j3n3A9OVb3FaIlpiz9v0pSjDsttirBEWBLM2LPqFEtKFpwg-vxBfFK9GoYNQowKzl9WJ0Q2hBHCT6tfP3V0qfe34Gqb4phTCCUcs9ehTrHe5tSn0cd17WMXJoi3ut5pa33Uoy91H-s1RMgFvc3ajt5C_Uf7AyOn1A-vqxedDgO8mf-z6vrb1-uLy8Xqx_eri_PVwjKOxoUETpGlDjrRGcGdIwIBNcZw3Lm205h3knMjTUsISI2odUgbx7ik0rqGnlXvj7LbkAY132ZQBJXXEEH3iKsjwiW9Udvse53_qqS9OiRSXiudy_wBFBWtRRiD5axpHDDphHAdMhI7bgiwovVl7jaZHpyFcjgdHok-rkR_o9Zpp5hAXHBSBD4dBW6e0C7PV2qfQ4RRIgXf4YL9ODfL6fcEw6h6P1gIQUdI02FHjHiLKS3QD0-g_79Ec0TZnIYhQ3c_AUZq7607ltp7S83eKrR3D5e-J92Zif4DKJ7Oqw</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Berkhout, Christophe</creator><creator>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creator><creator>Chazard, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creator><creator>Favre, Jonathan</creator><creator>Peremans, Lieve</creator><creator>Ficheur, Grégoire</creator><creator>Van Royen, Paul</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-1505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-5925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-0040</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms</title><author>Berkhout, Christophe ; Willefert-Bouche, Amy ; Chazard, Emmanuel ; Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna ; Favre, Jonathan ; Peremans, Lieve ; Ficheur, Grégoire ; Van Royen, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-9e630c3def8fb86dd280e3bbb61fd7fa16f966b9b722e9a03cd0abd56939cd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brochures</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccinology</topic><topic>Visual aids</topic><topic>Waiting rooms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berkhout, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favre, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peremans, Lieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficheur, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Royen, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berkhout, Christophe</au><au>Willefert-Bouche, Amy</au><au>Chazard, Emmanuel</au><au>Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna</au><au>Favre, Jonathan</au><au>Peremans, Lieve</au><au>Ficheur, Grégoire</au><au>Van Royen, Paul</au><au>Ortiz, Justin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0192155</spage><epage>e0192155</epage><pages>e0192155-e0192155</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in GPs' waiting rooms.
Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial, a cluster gathering the enlisted patients of 75 GPs aged over 16 years. The trial, run during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign, compared patient's awareness from being in 50 GPs' standard waiting rooms (control group) versus that of waiting in 25 rooms from GPs who had received and exposed pamphlets and one poster on influenza vaccine (intervention group), in addition to standard mandatory information. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were extracted from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (France). The association between the intervention (yes/no) and the main outcome was assessed through a generalized estimating equation. Seventy-five GPs enrolled 10,597 patients over 65 years or suffering from long lasting diseases (intervention/control as of 3781/6816 patients) from October 15, 2014 to February 28, 2015. No difference was found regarding the number of influenza vaccination units delivered (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% Confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; p = 0.561).
Effects of the monothematic campaign promoting vaccination against influenza using a poster and pamphlets exposed in GPs' waiting rooms could not be demonstrated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29425226</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0192155</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-1505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-5925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-4894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-0040</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192155-e0192155 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2000042834 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Advertising Aged Biology and Life Sciences Brochures Clinical trials Clusters Confidence intervals Feasibility studies Female France General Practice Health education Health insurance Health promotion Humans Immunization Immunology Influenza Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage Interdisciplinary aspects Intervention Life Sciences Male Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Patients Pharmacy Primary care Public health Randomization Research and Analysis Methods Santé publique et épidémiologie Social Sciences Systematic review Tetanus Vaccination Vaccinology Visual aids Waiting rooms |
| title | Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20controlled%20trial%20on%20promoting%20influenza%20vaccination%20in%20general%20practice%20waiting%20rooms&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Berkhout,%20Christophe&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0192155&rft.epage=e0192155&rft.pages=e0192155-e0192155&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0192155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2000042834%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000042834&rft_id=info:pmid/29425226&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_387c011ec6544de59d88df0b91d6b2e5&rfr_iscdi=true |