Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations
Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) was developed to move beyond single species management by incorporating ecosystem considerations for the sustainable utilization of marine resources. Due to the wide range of fishery characteristics, including different goals of fisheries management across...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0190467-e0190467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0190467 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0190467 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Trochta, John T Pons, Maite Rudd, Merrill B Krigbaum, Melissa Tanz, Alexander Hilborn, Ray |
description | Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) was developed to move beyond single species management by incorporating ecosystem considerations for the sustainable utilization of marine resources. Due to the wide range of fishery characteristics, including different goals of fisheries management across regions and species, theoretical best practices for EBFM vary greatly. Here we highlight the lack of consensus in the interpretation of EBFM amongst professionals in marine science and its implementation. Fisheries policy-makers and managers, stock assessment scientists, conservationists, and ecologists had very different opinions on the degree to which certain management strategies would be considered EBFM. We then assess the variability of the implementation of EBFM, where we created a checklist of characteristics typifying EBFM and scored fisheries across different regions, species, ecosystems, and fishery size and capacity. Our assessments show fisheries are unlikely to meet all the criteria on the EBFM checklist. Consequentially, it is unnecessary for management to practice all the traits of EBFM, as some may be disparate from the ecosystem attributes or fishery goals. Instead, incorporating some ecosystem-based considerations to fisheries management that are context-specific is a more realistic and useful way for EBFM to occur in practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0190467 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1992660757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A525648498</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5368f0dc4d0e432b80094b62fe30753e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A525648498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-92278baf19f97466e9fd241b88eff870d86b6fde4b43baf515e1d3d8abdd55c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgii4a56aJr4QjuPUhYMTn96GtJns5mibXtKK9-3N7vaOrdwLaaDt5Df_yUxmsuw5RktMS_z-yo-h082y9x0sEZaI8fJBdowlJQtOEH148H2UPYnxCqGCCs4fZ0dEUoFLhI4zfV77eBMHaBeVjmBy6-IGgoOYt7rTa2ihGz7kXyHU0A_Od3laBqzr3PYvvstd2zc7Sk8G3Zlcx96FveFp9sjqJsKz6X2S_fx0_uPsy-Li8vPq7PRiUXNJhoUkpBSVtlhaWTLOQVpDGK6EAGtFiYzgFbcGWMVowgpcADbUCF0ZUxQ1oyfZy71u3_iopupEhaUknKOyKBOx2hPG6yvVB9fqcKO8dmpn8GGtdBhc3YAqKBcWmZoZBIySSiAkWcWJBZqkKCStj1O0sWrB1Cn_oJuZ6Hyncxu19r9VUUpEME8CbyaB4K9HiINqXayhaXQHftydmyKMCrzN7NU_6P3ZTdRapwRcZ32KW29F1WlBCs4EkyJRy3uo9BhoXZ1aybpknzm8nTkkZoA_w1qPMarV92__z17-mrOvD9gN6GbYRN-Mu56Zg2wP1sHHGMDeFRkjtZ2E22qo7SSoaRKS24vDC7pzum19-hcMDwTx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992660757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Trochta, John T ; Pons, Maite ; Rudd, Merrill B ; Krigbaum, Melissa ; Tanz, Alexander ; Hilborn, Ray</creator><contributor>Patterson, Heather M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Trochta, John T ; Pons, Maite ; Rudd, Merrill B ; Krigbaum, Melissa ; Tanz, Alexander ; Hilborn, Ray ; Patterson, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) was developed to move beyond single species management by incorporating ecosystem considerations for the sustainable utilization of marine resources. Due to the wide range of fishery characteristics, including different goals of fisheries management across regions and species, theoretical best practices for EBFM vary greatly. Here we highlight the lack of consensus in the interpretation of EBFM amongst professionals in marine science and its implementation. Fisheries policy-makers and managers, stock assessment scientists, conservationists, and ecologists had very different opinions on the degree to which certain management strategies would be considered EBFM. We then assess the variability of the implementation of EBFM, where we created a checklist of characteristics typifying EBFM and scored fisheries across different regions, species, ecosystems, and fishery size and capacity. Our assessments show fisheries are unlikely to meet all the criteria on the EBFM checklist. Consequentially, it is unnecessary for management to practice all the traits of EBFM, as some may be disparate from the ecosystem attributes or fishery goals. Instead, incorporating some ecosystem-based considerations to fisheries management that are context-specific is a more realistic and useful way for EBFM to occur in practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190467</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29381700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cod ; Commercial fishing ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic aspects ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; Environmental policy ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Fishery policy ; Fishery sciences ; Fishing ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine resources ; Perceptions ; Pterois ; Resource management ; Social aspects ; Species ; Stock assessment</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0190467-e0190467</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Trochta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Trochta et al 2018 Trochta et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-92278baf19f97466e9fd241b88eff870d86b6fde4b43baf515e1d3d8abdd55c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-92278baf19f97466e9fd241b88eff870d86b6fde4b43baf515e1d3d8abdd55c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4127-7300</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790216/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790216/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29381700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Patterson, Heather M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Trochta, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Maite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Merrill B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krigbaum, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilborn, Ray</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) was developed to move beyond single species management by incorporating ecosystem considerations for the sustainable utilization of marine resources. Due to the wide range of fishery characteristics, including different goals of fisheries management across regions and species, theoretical best practices for EBFM vary greatly. Here we highlight the lack of consensus in the interpretation of EBFM amongst professionals in marine science and its implementation. Fisheries policy-makers and managers, stock assessment scientists, conservationists, and ecologists had very different opinions on the degree to which certain management strategies would be considered EBFM. We then assess the variability of the implementation of EBFM, where we created a checklist of characteristics typifying EBFM and scored fisheries across different regions, species, ecosystems, and fishery size and capacity. Our assessments show fisheries are unlikely to meet all the criteria on the EBFM checklist. Consequentially, it is unnecessary for management to practice all the traits of EBFM, as some may be disparate from the ecosystem attributes or fishery goals. Instead, incorporating some ecosystem-based considerations to fisheries management that are context-specific is a more realistic and useful way for EBFM to occur in practice.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cod</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishery policy</subject><subject>Fishery sciences</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Pterois</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgii4a56aJr4QjuPUhYMTn96GtJns5mibXtKK9-3N7vaOrdwLaaDt5Df_yUxmsuw5RktMS_z-yo-h082y9x0sEZaI8fJBdowlJQtOEH148H2UPYnxCqGCCs4fZ0dEUoFLhI4zfV77eBMHaBeVjmBy6-IGgoOYt7rTa2ihGz7kXyHU0A_Od3laBqzr3PYvvstd2zc7Sk8G3Zlcx96FveFp9sjqJsKz6X2S_fx0_uPsy-Li8vPq7PRiUXNJhoUkpBSVtlhaWTLOQVpDGK6EAGtFiYzgFbcGWMVowgpcADbUCF0ZUxQ1oyfZy71u3_iopupEhaUknKOyKBOx2hPG6yvVB9fqcKO8dmpn8GGtdBhc3YAqKBcWmZoZBIySSiAkWcWJBZqkKCStj1O0sWrB1Cn_oJuZ6Hyncxu19r9VUUpEME8CbyaB4K9HiINqXayhaXQHftydmyKMCrzN7NU_6P3ZTdRapwRcZ32KW29F1WlBCs4EkyJRy3uo9BhoXZ1aybpknzm8nTkkZoA_w1qPMarV92__z17-mrOvD9gN6GbYRN-Mu56Zg2wP1sHHGMDeFRkjtZ2E22qo7SSoaRKS24vDC7pzum19-hcMDwTx</recordid><startdate>20180130</startdate><enddate>20180130</enddate><creator>Trochta, John T</creator><creator>Pons, Maite</creator><creator>Rudd, Merrill B</creator><creator>Krigbaum, Melissa</creator><creator>Tanz, Alexander</creator><creator>Hilborn, Ray</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-7300</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180130</creationdate><title>Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations</title><author>Trochta, John T ; Pons, Maite ; Rudd, Merrill B ; Krigbaum, Melissa ; Tanz, Alexander ; Hilborn, Ray</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-92278baf19f97466e9fd241b88eff870d86b6fde4b43baf515e1d3d8abdd55c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cod</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishery policy</topic><topic>Fishery sciences</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Pterois</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trochta, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Maite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Merrill B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krigbaum, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilborn, Ray</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trochta, John T</au><au>Pons, Maite</au><au>Rudd, Merrill B</au><au>Krigbaum, Melissa</au><au>Tanz, Alexander</au><au>Hilborn, Ray</au><au>Patterson, Heather M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-01-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0190467</spage><epage>e0190467</epage><pages>e0190467-e0190467</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) was developed to move beyond single species management by incorporating ecosystem considerations for the sustainable utilization of marine resources. Due to the wide range of fishery characteristics, including different goals of fisheries management across regions and species, theoretical best practices for EBFM vary greatly. Here we highlight the lack of consensus in the interpretation of EBFM amongst professionals in marine science and its implementation. Fisheries policy-makers and managers, stock assessment scientists, conservationists, and ecologists had very different opinions on the degree to which certain management strategies would be considered EBFM. We then assess the variability of the implementation of EBFM, where we created a checklist of characteristics typifying EBFM and scored fisheries across different regions, species, ecosystems, and fishery size and capacity. Our assessments show fisheries are unlikely to meet all the criteria on the EBFM checklist. Consequentially, it is unnecessary for management to practice all the traits of EBFM, as some may be disparate from the ecosystem attributes or fishery goals. Instead, incorporating some ecosystem-based considerations to fisheries management that are context-specific is a more realistic and useful way for EBFM to occur in practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29381700</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0190467</doi><tpages>e0190467</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-7300</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0190467-e0190467 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1992660757 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Analysis Biodiversity Biology and Life Sciences Cod Commercial fishing Ecological monitoring Ecology and Environmental Sciences Economic aspects Ecosystem management Ecosystems Environmental policy Fish Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management Fishery policy Fishery sciences Fishing Marine ecosystems Marine resources Perceptions Pterois Resource management Social aspects Species Stock assessment |
title | Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem-based%20fisheries%20management:%20Perception%20on%20definitions,%20implementations,%20and%20aspirations&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Trochta,%20John%20T&rft.date=2018-01-30&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0190467&rft.epage=e0190467&rft.pages=e0190467-e0190467&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190467&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA525648498%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992660757&rft_id=info:pmid/29381700&rft_galeid=A525648498&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5368f0dc4d0e432b80094b62fe30753e&rfr_iscdi=true |