Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China

From a previous field investigation in Yunnan, southwest China between 2001 and 2015, we selected two types of landscapes to make a retrospectively comparative study on the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. One landscape is "mountainous uncultivated land (MUL)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0189987-e0189987
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Pei-Ying, Guo, Xian-Guo, Jin, Dao-Chao, Dong, Wen-Ge, Qian, Ti-Jun, Qin, Feng, Yang, Zhi-Hua, Fan, Rong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0189987
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0189987
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Peng, Pei-Ying
Guo, Xian-Guo
Jin, Dao-Chao
Dong, Wen-Ge
Qian, Ti-Jun
Qin, Feng
Yang, Zhi-Hua
Fan, Rong
description From a previous field investigation in Yunnan, southwest China between 2001 and 2015, we selected two types of landscapes to make a retrospectively comparative study on the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. One landscape is "mountainous uncultivated land (MUL)" with higher biodiversity, which is located in a famous "World Nature Heritage Site", the Three-Parallel-Rivers Region in the northwest of Yunnan. The other is "cultivated flatland landscape (CFL)" with lower biodiversity, which is located in the south of Yunnan. The landscapes with different biodiversity apparently influenced the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. Much more species of small mammals and mites were found in MUL than in CFL. A total of 3,177 small mammals captured from MUL were identified as 55 species, 30 genera and 10 families in five orders. From these small mammal hosts, 5,882 chigger mites were collected and identified as 127 species, 15 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. A total of 1,112 small mammals captured from CFL were identified as 19 species, 12 genera and 5 families in three orders. From these hosts, 17,742 chiggers were collected and identified as 86 species, 12 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. Both the species diversity (S = 55) and community diversity (H = 2.673) of small mammals in MUL were much higher than those in CFL (S = 19; H = 0.926). There were also higher values of β diversity in MUL than in CFL. Different main reservoir rodent hosts of zoonoses (including tsutsugamushi disease) were found in two types of landscapes. Rattus tanezumi (one main reservoir host) was most abundant in CFL, which accounted for 80.22% of all the small mammals. Another two main reservoir hosts, Eothenomys miletus and Apodemus chevrieri were the dominant species in MUL, but they were not as abundant as R. tanezumi in CFL. Different vector species of chigger mites also existed in MUL and CFL. Leptotrombidium deliense (a main and powerful vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) and Ascoschoengastia indica (a potential vector of tsutsugamushi disease) were the dominant species of chigger mites in CFL (Cr = 25.81% for A. indica; Cr = 23.47% for L. deliense). Leptotrombidium scutellare (also a main vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) was the dominant chigger species in MUL (Cr = 26.09%). Higher infestation of vector mites on small mammals was found in the simple landscape with lower biodiversity (CFL
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1990922527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A524690750</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fc6c5d9c97f54337b1c2b951945c907d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A524690750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65ce6963d67bfbdf9b7a43ab8fbb7a11d679048858b2de8170115b08e150189b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujcdfVf2CUxMToxYxQCi1emEwmfkwyySZ-3RKg0LJpywh01_kz_laZj91MzV4YLiCH57wHXjhZ9hzBOcIlenflRj-Ibr5xg55DVDFWlQ-yc8RwPqM5xA9P1mfZkxCuICS4ovRxdpYzTAsGq_Psz1oMdVBiowO4sbEFtTVGez1EIK2r7bX2wcYtsIPpRj0onYAQvZVjtG4AzoDQi64DvejTHEBSA7HV1gOtotsIL1K6VUC1tmm0B72NOrwHC6Bcv9uNqQIIcay3wHjXg-DG2N7oEMGytYN4mj0ySVY_O84X2Y9PH78vv8zWl59Xy8V6pijL44wSpSmjuKalNLI2TJaiwEJWRqYVQinOYFFVpJJ5rStUQoSIhJVGZOecxBfZy4PupnOBH60NHDEGWZ6TvEzE6kDUTlzxjbe98FvuhOX7gPMNFz7dtNPcKKpIzRQrDSkwLiVSuWQEsYIoBss6aX04Vhtlr2uV3Paim4hOdwbb8sZdc1JWGFOYBN4cBbz7NSa3eG-D0l0nBu3G_bkRKllJaEJf_YPef7sj1Yh0gfTYLtVVO1G-IHlB07HJruz8HiqNWvdWpX9obIpPEt5OEhIT9e_YiDEEvvr29f_Zy59T9vUJ22rRxTa4bv8nwxQsDqDyLgSvzZ3JCPJdG926wXdtxI9tlNJenD7QXdJt3-C_14IbfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990922527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Peng, Pei-Ying ; Guo, Xian-Guo ; Jin, Dao-Chao ; Dong, Wen-Ge ; Qian, Ti-Jun ; Qin, Feng ; Yang, Zhi-Hua ; Fan, Rong</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Pei-Ying ; Guo, Xian-Guo ; Jin, Dao-Chao ; Dong, Wen-Ge ; Qian, Ti-Jun ; Qin, Feng ; Yang, Zhi-Hua ; Fan, Rong</creatorcontrib><description>From a previous field investigation in Yunnan, southwest China between 2001 and 2015, we selected two types of landscapes to make a retrospectively comparative study on the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. One landscape is "mountainous uncultivated land (MUL)" with higher biodiversity, which is located in a famous "World Nature Heritage Site", the Three-Parallel-Rivers Region in the northwest of Yunnan. The other is "cultivated flatland landscape (CFL)" with lower biodiversity, which is located in the south of Yunnan. The landscapes with different biodiversity apparently influenced the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. Much more species of small mammals and mites were found in MUL than in CFL. A total of 3,177 small mammals captured from MUL were identified as 55 species, 30 genera and 10 families in five orders. From these small mammal hosts, 5,882 chigger mites were collected and identified as 127 species, 15 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. A total of 1,112 small mammals captured from CFL were identified as 19 species, 12 genera and 5 families in three orders. From these hosts, 17,742 chiggers were collected and identified as 86 species, 12 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. Both the species diversity (S = 55) and community diversity (H = 2.673) of small mammals in MUL were much higher than those in CFL (S = 19; H = 0.926). There were also higher values of β diversity in MUL than in CFL. Different main reservoir rodent hosts of zoonoses (including tsutsugamushi disease) were found in two types of landscapes. Rattus tanezumi (one main reservoir host) was most abundant in CFL, which accounted for 80.22% of all the small mammals. Another two main reservoir hosts, Eothenomys miletus and Apodemus chevrieri were the dominant species in MUL, but they were not as abundant as R. tanezumi in CFL. Different vector species of chigger mites also existed in MUL and CFL. Leptotrombidium deliense (a main and powerful vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) and Ascoschoengastia indica (a potential vector of tsutsugamushi disease) were the dominant species of chigger mites in CFL (Cr = 25.81% for A. indica; Cr = 23.47% for L. deliense). Leptotrombidium scutellare (also a main vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) was the dominant chigger species in MUL (Cr = 26.09%). Higher infestation of vector mites on small mammals was found in the simple landscape with lower biodiversity (CFL) than in the complex landscape with higher biodiversity (MUL). The overall prevalence (P), mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity (MI) of chigger mites on small mammals were much higher in CFL than in MUL. The main vector mite species on their main rodent hosts also showed a higher P, MA and MI in CFL than in MUL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189987</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29364908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Comparative studies ; Disease prevention ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ectoparasites ; Field investigations ; Historic sites ; Infestation ; Laboratories ; Landscape ; Mammals ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mites ; Orientia tsutsugamushi ; Pathogens ; Rivers ; Rodents ; Small mammals ; Species diversity ; Studies ; Typhus ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0189987-e0189987</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Peng et al 2018 Peng et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65ce6963d67bfbdf9b7a43ab8fbb7a11d679048858b2de8170115b08e150189b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65ce6963d67bfbdf9b7a43ab8fbb7a11d679048858b2de8170115b08e150189b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7297-2261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783360/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5783360/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Pei-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xian-Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Dao-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Wen-Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ti-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhi-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Rong</creatorcontrib><title>Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>From a previous field investigation in Yunnan, southwest China between 2001 and 2015, we selected two types of landscapes to make a retrospectively comparative study on the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. One landscape is "mountainous uncultivated land (MUL)" with higher biodiversity, which is located in a famous "World Nature Heritage Site", the Three-Parallel-Rivers Region in the northwest of Yunnan. The other is "cultivated flatland landscape (CFL)" with lower biodiversity, which is located in the south of Yunnan. The landscapes with different biodiversity apparently influenced the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. Much more species of small mammals and mites were found in MUL than in CFL. A total of 3,177 small mammals captured from MUL were identified as 55 species, 30 genera and 10 families in five orders. From these small mammal hosts, 5,882 chigger mites were collected and identified as 127 species, 15 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. A total of 1,112 small mammals captured from CFL were identified as 19 species, 12 genera and 5 families in three orders. From these hosts, 17,742 chiggers were collected and identified as 86 species, 12 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. Both the species diversity (S = 55) and community diversity (H = 2.673) of small mammals in MUL were much higher than those in CFL (S = 19; H = 0.926). There were also higher values of β diversity in MUL than in CFL. Different main reservoir rodent hosts of zoonoses (including tsutsugamushi disease) were found in two types of landscapes. Rattus tanezumi (one main reservoir host) was most abundant in CFL, which accounted for 80.22% of all the small mammals. Another two main reservoir hosts, Eothenomys miletus and Apodemus chevrieri were the dominant species in MUL, but they were not as abundant as R. tanezumi in CFL. Different vector species of chigger mites also existed in MUL and CFL. Leptotrombidium deliense (a main and powerful vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) and Ascoschoengastia indica (a potential vector of tsutsugamushi disease) were the dominant species of chigger mites in CFL (Cr = 25.81% for A. indica; Cr = 23.47% for L. deliense). Leptotrombidium scutellare (also a main vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) was the dominant chigger species in MUL (Cr = 26.09%). Higher infestation of vector mites on small mammals was found in the simple landscape with lower biodiversity (CFL) than in the complex landscape with higher biodiversity (MUL). The overall prevalence (P), mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity (MI) of chigger mites on small mammals were much higher in CFL than in MUL. The main vector mite species on their main rodent hosts also showed a higher P, MA and MI in CFL than in MUL.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ectoparasites</subject><subject>Field investigations</subject><subject>Historic sites</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Orientia tsutsugamushi</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Typhus</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujcdfVf2CUxMToxYxQCi1emEwmfkwyySZ-3RKg0LJpywh01_kz_laZj91MzV4YLiCH57wHXjhZ9hzBOcIlenflRj-Ibr5xg55DVDFWlQ-yc8RwPqM5xA9P1mfZkxCuICS4ovRxdpYzTAsGq_Psz1oMdVBiowO4sbEFtTVGez1EIK2r7bX2wcYtsIPpRj0onYAQvZVjtG4AzoDQi64DvejTHEBSA7HV1gOtotsIL1K6VUC1tmm0B72NOrwHC6Bcv9uNqQIIcay3wHjXg-DG2N7oEMGytYN4mj0ySVY_O84X2Y9PH78vv8zWl59Xy8V6pijL44wSpSmjuKalNLI2TJaiwEJWRqYVQinOYFFVpJJ5rStUQoSIhJVGZOecxBfZy4PupnOBH60NHDEGWZ6TvEzE6kDUTlzxjbe98FvuhOX7gPMNFz7dtNPcKKpIzRQrDSkwLiVSuWQEsYIoBss6aX04Vhtlr2uV3Paim4hOdwbb8sZdc1JWGFOYBN4cBbz7NSa3eG-D0l0nBu3G_bkRKllJaEJf_YPef7sj1Yh0gfTYLtVVO1G-IHlB07HJruz8HiqNWvdWpX9obIpPEt5OEhIT9e_YiDEEvvr29f_Zy59T9vUJ22rRxTa4bv8nwxQsDqDyLgSvzZ3JCPJdG926wXdtxI9tlNJenD7QXdJt3-C_14IbfA</recordid><startdate>20180124</startdate><enddate>20180124</enddate><creator>Peng, Pei-Ying</creator><creator>Guo, Xian-Guo</creator><creator>Jin, Dao-Chao</creator><creator>Dong, Wen-Ge</creator><creator>Qian, Ti-Jun</creator><creator>Qin, Feng</creator><creator>Yang, Zhi-Hua</creator><creator>Fan, Rong</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7297-2261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180124</creationdate><title>Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China</title><author>Peng, Pei-Ying ; Guo, Xian-Guo ; Jin, Dao-Chao ; Dong, Wen-Ge ; Qian, Ti-Jun ; Qin, Feng ; Yang, Zhi-Hua ; Fan, Rong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-65ce6963d67bfbdf9b7a43ab8fbb7a11d679048858b2de8170115b08e150189b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ectoparasites</topic><topic>Field investigations</topic><topic>Historic sites</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Orientia tsutsugamushi</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Typhus</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Pei-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xian-Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Dao-Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Wen-Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Ti-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhi-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Rong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Pei-Ying</au><au>Guo, Xian-Guo</au><au>Jin, Dao-Chao</au><au>Dong, Wen-Ge</au><au>Qian, Ti-Jun</au><au>Qin, Feng</au><au>Yang, Zhi-Hua</au><au>Fan, Rong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-01-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0189987</spage><epage>e0189987</epage><pages>e0189987-e0189987</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>From a previous field investigation in Yunnan, southwest China between 2001 and 2015, we selected two types of landscapes to make a retrospectively comparative study on the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. One landscape is "mountainous uncultivated land (MUL)" with higher biodiversity, which is located in a famous "World Nature Heritage Site", the Three-Parallel-Rivers Region in the northwest of Yunnan. The other is "cultivated flatland landscape (CFL)" with lower biodiversity, which is located in the south of Yunnan. The landscapes with different biodiversity apparently influenced the distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites. Much more species of small mammals and mites were found in MUL than in CFL. A total of 3,177 small mammals captured from MUL were identified as 55 species, 30 genera and 10 families in five orders. From these small mammal hosts, 5,882 chigger mites were collected and identified as 127 species, 15 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. A total of 1,112 small mammals captured from CFL were identified as 19 species, 12 genera and 5 families in three orders. From these hosts, 17,742 chiggers were collected and identified as 86 species, 12 genera and 3 subfamilies in two families. Both the species diversity (S = 55) and community diversity (H = 2.673) of small mammals in MUL were much higher than those in CFL (S = 19; H = 0.926). There were also higher values of β diversity in MUL than in CFL. Different main reservoir rodent hosts of zoonoses (including tsutsugamushi disease) were found in two types of landscapes. Rattus tanezumi (one main reservoir host) was most abundant in CFL, which accounted for 80.22% of all the small mammals. Another two main reservoir hosts, Eothenomys miletus and Apodemus chevrieri were the dominant species in MUL, but they were not as abundant as R. tanezumi in CFL. Different vector species of chigger mites also existed in MUL and CFL. Leptotrombidium deliense (a main and powerful vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) and Ascoschoengastia indica (a potential vector of tsutsugamushi disease) were the dominant species of chigger mites in CFL (Cr = 25.81% for A. indica; Cr = 23.47% for L. deliense). Leptotrombidium scutellare (also a main vector of tsutsugamushi disease in China) was the dominant chigger species in MUL (Cr = 26.09%). Higher infestation of vector mites on small mammals was found in the simple landscape with lower biodiversity (CFL) than in the complex landscape with higher biodiversity (MUL). The overall prevalence (P), mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity (MI) of chigger mites on small mammals were much higher in CFL than in MUL. The main vector mite species on their main rodent hosts also showed a higher P, MA and MI in CFL than in MUL.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29364908</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189987</doi><tpages>e0189987</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7297-2261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0189987-e0189987
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1990922527
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Analysis
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Comparative studies
Disease prevention
Dominant species
Ecology
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ectoparasites
Field investigations
Historic sites
Infestation
Laboratories
Landscape
Mammals
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mites
Orientia tsutsugamushi
Pathogens
Rivers
Rodents
Small mammals
Species diversity
Studies
Typhus
Zoonoses
title Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscapes%20with%20different%20biodiversity%20influence%20distribution%20of%20small%20mammals%20and%20their%20ectoparasitic%20chigger%20mites:%20A%20comparative%20study%20from%20southwest%20China&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Peng,%20Pei-Ying&rft.date=2018-01-24&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0189987&rft.epage=e0189987&rft.pages=e0189987-e0189987&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189987&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA524690750%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990922527&rft_id=info:pmid/29364908&rft_galeid=A524690750&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fc6c5d9c97f54337b1c2b951945c907d&rfr_iscdi=true