Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality
The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, ther...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176921-e0176921 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0176921 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e0176921 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Götz, Friedrich M Stieger, Stefan Reips, Ulf-Dietrich |
| description | The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, thereby excluding large numbers of users who use a different operating system. However, empirical evidence investigating any selection biases that might result thereof is scarce. Henceforth, we conducted two studies drawing from a large multi-national (Study 1; N = 1,081) and a German-speaking sample (Study 2; N = 2,438). As such Study 1 compared iOS and Android users across an array of key personality traits (i.e., well-being, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, optimism, pessimism, Dark Triad, and the Big Five). Focusing on Big Five personality traits in a broader scope, in addition to smartphone users, Study 2 also examined users of the main computer operating systems (i.e., Mac OS, Windows). In both studies, very few significant differences were found, all of which were of small or even tiny effect size mostly disappearing after sociodemographics had been controlled for. Taken together, minor differences in personality seem to exist, but they are of small to negligible effect size (ranging from OR = 0.919 to 1.344 (Study 1), ηp2 = .005 to .036 (Study 2), respectively) and may reflect differences in sociodemographic composition, rather than operating system of smartphone users. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0176921 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1990447223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491068838</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_84136eb6e6e348139a883a15bf9cc2d0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A491068838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-3a9504636e54f08ba37bb37520a31801978a1b61f9743f1439a7ebd66d64eb883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl9r2zAUxc3YWLtu32Bsgr10sGSSJUvWyyCU_SkU-rD1Wcj2VaJgW5mkDPLtd724pRlFDxbyOb97j3SL4i2jS8YV-7wN-zjafrkLIywpU1KX7FlxzjQvF7Kk_Pmj_VnxKqUtpRWvpXxZnJW1kEoofl6YuwQxkeBI3gAZrB9JGmzMuw1iSdhBtNmPa5IOKcOQyKW__fmJrMYuBt99JJ13DiIJY38gvc-5B4IEdKWAvfl8eF28cLZP8Gb-XhR3377-uvqxuLn9fn21ulm0leZ5wa2uqJBcQiUcrRvLVdNwVZXUclZTplVtWSOZ00pwxwTXVkHTSdlJAU1d84vi_ZG760My890kw7SmQqiy5Ki4Piq6YLdmFz3GPJhgvfl3EOLaYG7f9mBqwbCTRoIELmqGxbCCZVXjdNuWHUXWl7navhmga2HM0fYn0NM_o9-YdfhjKsEqfBUEXM6AGH7vIWUz-NRC39sRwh77rnVVKl7yKdmH_6RPp5tVa4sB_OgC1m0nqFkJzajEBBNr-YQKVweDb_HFncfzE4M4GtoYUorgHjIyaqYxvG_GTGNo5jFE27vH9_Ngup87_hf_f9j0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990447223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Götz, Friedrich M ; Stieger, Stefan ; Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</creator><contributor>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Götz, Friedrich M ; Stieger, Stefan ; Reips, Ulf-Dietrich ; Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, thereby excluding large numbers of users who use a different operating system. However, empirical evidence investigating any selection biases that might result thereof is scarce. Henceforth, we conducted two studies drawing from a large multi-national (Study 1; N = 1,081) and a German-speaking sample (Study 2; N = 2,438). As such Study 1 compared iOS and Android users across an array of key personality traits (i.e., well-being, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, optimism, pessimism, Dark Triad, and the Big Five). Focusing on Big Five personality traits in a broader scope, in addition to smartphone users, Study 2 also examined users of the main computer operating systems (i.e., Mac OS, Windows). In both studies, very few significant differences were found, all of which were of small or even tiny effect size mostly disappearing after sociodemographics had been controlled for. Taken together, minor differences in personality seem to exist, but they are of small to negligible effect size (ranging from OR = 0.919 to 1.344 (Study 1), ηp2 = .005 to .036 (Study 2), respectively) and may reflect differences in sociodemographic composition, rather than operating system of smartphone users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176921</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28467473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Applications programs ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cellular telephones ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Data collection ; Engineering and Technology ; Extraversion (Psychology) ; Female ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Internet ; Male ; Methyltestosterone ; Middle Aged ; Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data ; Mobile operating systems ; Personality ; Personality Tests ; Personality traits ; Personality types ; Psychological aspects ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Science ; Scientists ; Self Concept ; Smart phones ; Smartphone - statistics & numerical data ; Smartphones ; Social psychology ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Well being ; Windows (computer programs) ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176921-e0176921</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Götz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Götz et al 2017 Götz et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-3a9504636e54f08ba37bb37520a31801978a1b61f9743f1439a7ebd66d64eb883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-3a9504636e54f08ba37bb37520a31801978a1b61f9743f1439a7ebd66d64eb883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8900-6844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415193/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28467473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Götz, Friedrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</creatorcontrib><title>Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, thereby excluding large numbers of users who use a different operating system. However, empirical evidence investigating any selection biases that might result thereof is scarce. Henceforth, we conducted two studies drawing from a large multi-national (Study 1; N = 1,081) and a German-speaking sample (Study 2; N = 2,438). As such Study 1 compared iOS and Android users across an array of key personality traits (i.e., well-being, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, optimism, pessimism, Dark Triad, and the Big Five). Focusing on Big Five personality traits in a broader scope, in addition to smartphone users, Study 2 also examined users of the main computer operating systems (i.e., Mac OS, Windows). In both studies, very few significant differences were found, all of which were of small or even tiny effect size mostly disappearing after sociodemographics had been controlled for. Taken together, minor differences in personality seem to exist, but they are of small to negligible effect size (ranging from OR = 0.919 to 1.344 (Study 1), ηp2 = .005 to .036 (Study 2), respectively) and may reflect differences in sociodemographic composition, rather than operating system of smartphone users.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Extraversion (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methyltestosterone</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Mobile operating systems</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Tests</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Personality types</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Smart phones</subject><subject>Smartphone - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Windows (computer programs)</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl9r2zAUxc3YWLtu32Bsgr10sGSSJUvWyyCU_SkU-rD1Wcj2VaJgW5mkDPLtd724pRlFDxbyOb97j3SL4i2jS8YV-7wN-zjafrkLIywpU1KX7FlxzjQvF7Kk_Pmj_VnxKqUtpRWvpXxZnJW1kEoofl6YuwQxkeBI3gAZrB9JGmzMuw1iSdhBtNmPa5IOKcOQyKW__fmJrMYuBt99JJ13DiIJY38gvc-5B4IEdKWAvfl8eF28cLZP8Gb-XhR3377-uvqxuLn9fn21ulm0leZ5wa2uqJBcQiUcrRvLVdNwVZXUclZTplVtWSOZ00pwxwTXVkHTSdlJAU1d84vi_ZG760My890kw7SmQqiy5Ki4Piq6YLdmFz3GPJhgvfl3EOLaYG7f9mBqwbCTRoIELmqGxbCCZVXjdNuWHUXWl7navhmga2HM0fYn0NM_o9-YdfhjKsEqfBUEXM6AGH7vIWUz-NRC39sRwh77rnVVKl7yKdmH_6RPp5tVa4sB_OgC1m0nqFkJzajEBBNr-YQKVweDb_HFncfzE4M4GtoYUorgHjIyaqYxvG_GTGNo5jFE27vH9_Ngup87_hf_f9j0</recordid><startdate>20170503</startdate><enddate>20170503</enddate><creator>Götz, Friedrich M</creator><creator>Stieger, Stefan</creator><creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-6844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170503</creationdate><title>Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality</title><author>Götz, Friedrich M ; Stieger, Stefan ; Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-3a9504636e54f08ba37bb37520a31801978a1b61f9743f1439a7ebd66d64eb883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Extraversion (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methyltestosterone</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Mobile operating systems</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Tests</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Personality types</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Smart phones</topic><topic>Smartphone - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Windows (computer programs)</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götz, Friedrich M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götz, Friedrich M</au><au>Stieger, Stefan</au><au>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</au><au>Jiménez-Murcia, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0176921</spage><epage>e0176921</epage><pages>e0176921-e0176921</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The increasingly widespread use of mobile phone applications (apps) as research tools and cost-effective means of vast data collection raises new methodological challenges. In recent years, it has become a common practice for scientists to design apps that run only on a single operating system, thereby excluding large numbers of users who use a different operating system. However, empirical evidence investigating any selection biases that might result thereof is scarce. Henceforth, we conducted two studies drawing from a large multi-national (Study 1; N = 1,081) and a German-speaking sample (Study 2; N = 2,438). As such Study 1 compared iOS and Android users across an array of key personality traits (i.e., well-being, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, optimism, pessimism, Dark Triad, and the Big Five). Focusing on Big Five personality traits in a broader scope, in addition to smartphone users, Study 2 also examined users of the main computer operating systems (i.e., Mac OS, Windows). In both studies, very few significant differences were found, all of which were of small or even tiny effect size mostly disappearing after sociodemographics had been controlled for. Taken together, minor differences in personality seem to exist, but they are of small to negligible effect size (ranging from OR = 0.919 to 1.344 (Study 1), ηp2 = .005 to .036 (Study 2), respectively) and may reflect differences in sociodemographic composition, rather than operating system of smartphone users.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28467473</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0176921</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-6844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176921-e0176921 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1990447223 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Applications programs Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Cellular telephones Computer and Information Sciences Data collection Engineering and Technology Extraversion (Psychology) Female Global positioning systems GPS Humans Identification and classification Internet Male Methyltestosterone Middle Aged Mobile Applications - statistics & numerical data Mobile operating systems Personality Personality Tests Personality traits Personality types Psychological aspects Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Science Scientists Self Concept Smart phones Smartphone - statistics & numerical data Smartphones Social psychology Social research Social Sciences Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Well being Windows (computer programs) Young Adult |
| title | Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Users%20of%20the%20main%20smartphone%20operating%20systems%20(iOS,%20Android)%20differ%20only%20little%20in%20personality&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=G%C3%B6tz,%20Friedrich%20M&rft.date=2017-05-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0176921&rft.epage=e0176921&rft.pages=e0176921-e0176921&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0176921&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA491068838%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990447223&rft_id=info:pmid/28467473&rft_galeid=A491068838&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_84136eb6e6e348139a883a15bf9cc2d0&rfr_iscdi=true |