Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range
Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour prefer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0152194-e0152194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0152194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0152194 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Jonauskaite, Domicele Mohr, Christine Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Spiers, Peter M Althaus, Betty Anil, Selin Dael, Nele |
description | Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour preferences leaving open the question whether results generalise to specific objects. Here, 88 participants selected the colours they preferred most and least for three context conditions (general, interior walls, t-shirt) using a high-precision colour picker. Participants also indicated whether they associated their colour choice to a valenced object or concept. The chosen colours varied widely between individuals and contexts and so did the reasons for their choices. Consistent patterns also emerged, as most preferred colours in general were more chromatic, while for walls they were lighter and for t-shirts they were darker and less chromatic compared to least preferred colours. This meant that general colour preferences could not explain object specific colour preferences. Measures of the selection process further revealed that, compared to most preferred colours, least preferred colours were chosen more quickly and were less often linked to valenced objects or concepts. The high intra- and inter-individual variability in this and previous reports furthers our understanding that colour preferences are determined by subjective experiences and that most and least preferred colours are not processed equally. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0152194 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1986259986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453470190</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_02952c45a9f442ae8454c20d6c22e353</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A453470190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d7950a6f35c4bca19be4c430a88cf25ef8c2036886c555f00821c0fc589301b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uLEzEUxwdR3HX1G4gOCKIPrbnOJPsglHorVCur62tIM8k0ZZrUJOPl25va2dLKPshAJpz8zv_knJxTFI8hGENcw1dr3wcnu_HWOz0GkCLIyZ3iHHKMRhUC-O7R_qx4EOMaAIpZVd0vzlANEOKAnxfxo4-plK4p51rm3eegjQ5BN-XUdzlCLN9Yky3lRCkfGuvaMvlysVxrlTLikv6VLstP-mc5c9G2qxRLE_wmK5bXLuiYglXpoFZeSdfqh8U9I7uoHw3_i-L63duv0w-j-eL9bDqZj1TFURqRpuYUyMpgqshSSciXmiiCgWRMGUS1YSrnVjFWKUqpAYAhqIBRlHEM4BJfFE_3utvORzHUKwrIWYUoz2smZnui8XIttsFuZPgtvLTir8GHVsiQrOq0AIhTpAiV3BCCpGaEkhy-qRRCGlOctV4P0frlRjdKuxRkdyJ6euLsSrT-hyAMQgJJFngxCAT_vc-lExsble466bTv873ruiYcwJpl9Nk_6O3ZDVQrcwLWGZ_jqp2omBCKSQ0gB5ka30Llr9Ebq3JzGZvtJw4vTxzUvgta2ccoZl-u_p9dfDtlnx-xKy27tIq-65P1Lp6CZA-q4GPMDXsoMgRiNxs31RC72RDDbGS3J8cPdHC6GQb8B7OhCAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986259986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jonauskaite, Domicele ; Mohr, Christine ; Antonietti, Jean-Philippe ; Spiers, Peter M ; Althaus, Betty ; Anil, Selin ; Dael, Nele</creator><contributor>Cropper, Simon J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jonauskaite, Domicele ; Mohr, Christine ; Antonietti, Jean-Philippe ; Spiers, Peter M ; Althaus, Betty ; Anil, Selin ; Dael, Nele ; Cropper, Simon J</creatorcontrib><description>Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour preferences leaving open the question whether results generalise to specific objects. Here, 88 participants selected the colours they preferred most and least for three context conditions (general, interior walls, t-shirt) using a high-precision colour picker. Participants also indicated whether they associated their colour choice to a valenced object or concept. The chosen colours varied widely between individuals and contexts and so did the reasons for their choices. Consistent patterns also emerged, as most preferred colours in general were more chromatic, while for walls they were lighter and for t-shirts they were darker and less chromatic compared to least preferred colours. This meant that general colour preferences could not explain object specific colour preferences. Measures of the selection process further revealed that, compared to most preferred colours, least preferred colours were chosen more quickly and were less often linked to valenced objects or concepts. The high intra- and inter-individual variability in this and previous reports furthers our understanding that colour preferences are determined by subjective experiences and that most and least preferred colours are not processed equally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27022909</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Color ; Color Perception ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Female ; Generalized linear models ; Humans ; Light ; Male ; Measurement techniques ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Preferences ; Psychological aspects ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Visual perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0152194-e0152194</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Jonauskaite et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Jonauskaite et al 2016 Jonauskaite et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d7950a6f35c4bca19be4c430a88cf25ef8c2036886c555f00821c0fc589301b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d7950a6f35c4bca19be4c430a88cf25ef8c2036886c555f00821c0fc589301b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811414/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811414/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cropper, Simon J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jonauskaite, Domicele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonietti, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althaus, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Selin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dael, Nele</creatorcontrib><title>Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour preferences leaving open the question whether results generalise to specific objects. Here, 88 participants selected the colours they preferred most and least for three context conditions (general, interior walls, t-shirt) using a high-precision colour picker. Participants also indicated whether they associated their colour choice to a valenced object or concept. The chosen colours varied widely between individuals and contexts and so did the reasons for their choices. Consistent patterns also emerged, as most preferred colours in general were more chromatic, while for walls they were lighter and for t-shirts they were darker and less chromatic compared to least preferred colours. This meant that general colour preferences could not explain object specific colour preferences. Measures of the selection process further revealed that, compared to most preferred colours, least preferred colours were chosen more quickly and were less often linked to valenced objects or concepts. The high intra- and inter-individual variability in this and previous reports furthers our understanding that colour preferences are determined by subjective experiences and that most and least preferred colours are not processed equally.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uLEzEUxwdR3HX1G4gOCKIPrbnOJPsglHorVCur62tIM8k0ZZrUJOPl25va2dLKPshAJpz8zv_knJxTFI8hGENcw1dr3wcnu_HWOz0GkCLIyZ3iHHKMRhUC-O7R_qx4EOMaAIpZVd0vzlANEOKAnxfxo4-plK4p51rm3eegjQ5BN-XUdzlCLN9Yky3lRCkfGuvaMvlysVxrlTLikv6VLstP-mc5c9G2qxRLE_wmK5bXLuiYglXpoFZeSdfqh8U9I7uoHw3_i-L63duv0w-j-eL9bDqZj1TFURqRpuYUyMpgqshSSciXmiiCgWRMGUS1YSrnVjFWKUqpAYAhqIBRlHEM4BJfFE_3utvORzHUKwrIWYUoz2smZnui8XIttsFuZPgtvLTir8GHVsiQrOq0AIhTpAiV3BCCpGaEkhy-qRRCGlOctV4P0frlRjdKuxRkdyJ6euLsSrT-hyAMQgJJFngxCAT_vc-lExsble466bTv873ruiYcwJpl9Nk_6O3ZDVQrcwLWGZ_jqp2omBCKSQ0gB5ka30Llr9Ebq3JzGZvtJw4vTxzUvgta2ccoZl-u_p9dfDtlnx-xKy27tIq-65P1Lp6CZA-q4GPMDXsoMgRiNxs31RC72RDDbGS3J8cPdHC6GQb8B7OhCAI</recordid><startdate>20160329</startdate><enddate>20160329</enddate><creator>Jonauskaite, Domicele</creator><creator>Mohr, Christine</creator><creator>Antonietti, Jean-Philippe</creator><creator>Spiers, Peter M</creator><creator>Althaus, Betty</creator><creator>Anil, Selin</creator><creator>Dael, Nele</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160329</creationdate><title>Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range</title><author>Jonauskaite, Domicele ; Mohr, Christine ; Antonietti, Jean-Philippe ; Spiers, Peter M ; Althaus, Betty ; Anil, Selin ; Dael, Nele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4d7950a6f35c4bca19be4c430a88cf25ef8c2036886c555f00821c0fc589301b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jonauskaite, Domicele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonietti, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althaus, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Selin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dael, Nele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jonauskaite, Domicele</au><au>Mohr, Christine</au><au>Antonietti, Jean-Philippe</au><au>Spiers, Peter M</au><au>Althaus, Betty</au><au>Anil, Selin</au><au>Dael, Nele</au><au>Cropper, Simon J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-03-29</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0152194</spage><epage>e0152194</epage><pages>e0152194-e0152194</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Humans like some colours and dislike others, but which particular colours and why remains to be understood. Empirical studies on colour preferences generally targeted most preferred colours, but rarely least preferred (disliked) colours. In addition, findings are often based on general colour preferences leaving open the question whether results generalise to specific objects. Here, 88 participants selected the colours they preferred most and least for three context conditions (general, interior walls, t-shirt) using a high-precision colour picker. Participants also indicated whether they associated their colour choice to a valenced object or concept. The chosen colours varied widely between individuals and contexts and so did the reasons for their choices. Consistent patterns also emerged, as most preferred colours in general were more chromatic, while for walls they were lighter and for t-shirts they were darker and less chromatic compared to least preferred colours. This meant that general colour preferences could not explain object specific colour preferences. Measures of the selection process further revealed that, compared to most preferred colours, least preferred colours were chosen more quickly and were less often linked to valenced objects or concepts. The high intra- and inter-individual variability in this and previous reports furthers our understanding that colour preferences are determined by subjective experiences and that most and least preferred colours are not processed equally.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27022909</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0152194</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0152194-e0152194 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1986259986 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biology and Life Sciences Choice Behavior Color Color Perception Computer and Information Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Female Generalized linear models Humans Light Male Measurement techniques Medicine and Health Sciences Physical Sciences Physiological aspects Preferences Psychological aspects Social networks Social Sciences Studies Visual perception Young Adult |
title | Most and Least Preferred Colours Differ According to Object Context: New Insights from an Unrestricted Colour Range |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20and%20Least%20Preferred%20Colours%20Differ%20According%20to%20Object%20Context:%20New%20Insights%20from%20an%20Unrestricted%20Colour%20Range&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Jonauskaite,%20Domicele&rft.date=2016-03-29&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0152194&rft.epage=e0152194&rft.pages=e0152194-e0152194&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152194&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA453470190%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986259986&rft_id=info:pmid/27022909&rft_galeid=A453470190&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_02952c45a9f442ae8454c20d6c22e353&rfr_iscdi=true |