Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing

Determine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. All patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189651-e0189651
Hauptverfasser: Sabir, Sharjeel H, Krishnamurthy, Savitri, Gupta, Sanjay, Mills, Gordon B, Wei, Wei, Cortes, Andrea C, Mills Shaw, Kenna R, Luthra, Rajyalakshmi, Wallace, Michael J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0189651
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0189651
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Sabir, Sharjeel H
Krishnamurthy, Savitri
Gupta, Sanjay
Mills, Gordon B
Wei, Wei
Cortes, Andrea C
Mills Shaw, Kenna R
Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
Wallace, Michael J
description Determine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. All patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this retrospective study. Patient and procedure variables were collected. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score incorporating targeting and sampling factors was assigned to each biopsied lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. 153 patients were included (58.2% female, average age 59.5 years). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (40.5%), most common biopsied site was lung (36%), and average size of biopsied lesions was 3.8 cm (+/- 2.7). Adequacy for NGS was 69.9%. Univariate analysis showed higher likelihood of adequacy score (p = 0.004), primary malignancy type (p = 0.03), and absence of prior systemic therapy (p = 0.018) were associated with adequacy for NGS. Multivariate analysis showed higher adequacy for lesions with likelihood of adequacy scored 3 (high) versus lesions scored 1 (low) (OR, 7.82; p = 0.002). Melanoma lesions had higher adequacy for NGS versus breast cancer lesions (OR 9.5; p = 0.01). Absence of prior systemic therapy (OR, 6.1; p = 0.02) and systemic therapy 3 months before biopsy yielded greater adequacy for NGS. Lesions
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189651
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1981045646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A520531058</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a07a39409dc143faa2d14b7e3f5a7861</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A520531058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-966d799873eb1a342f6c04a2bfd8dbf15db5f8dd8cb971959b8e536673a6c81b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjEnT3F6EZfAysLDg7U3CaS4zWTrNbNKKfnvTne4ylX2QPCSkv_M_zf-cUxTPMVpiwvG7qzDEDtrlPnR2ibCQjOIHxSmWpFqwCpGHR-eT4klKVwhRIhh7XJxUshKYCXRa_FxtIYLubfSp9zqVwZV7G_XQQ2fDkEodoi0bH_bJ21SCsdcD9LZ0IZad_d2XG9vZCL0P3XgMO6_LlBnbad9tnhaPHLTJPpv2s-L7xw_fVp8XF5ef1qvzi4XmVPQLyZjhUgpObIOB1JVjGtVQNc4I0zhMTUOdMEboRnIsqWyEpYQxToBpgRtyVrw86O7bkNTkTFJYCoxqymqWifWBMAGu1D76HcQ_KoBXNxchbhTEbEBrFSAORNZIGo1r4gAqg-uGW-IocMFw1no_ZRuanTXadn2EdiY6_9L5rdqEX4ryupZMZIE3k0AM2arUq51P2rbtwfOb_-YMc1xl9NU_6P2vm6gN5Af4zoWcV4-i6pxWuewY0THt8h4qL2Nz2XIbOZ_vZwFvZwGZ6XPNNzCkpNZfv_w_e_ljzr4-YrcW2n6bQjuMXZTmYH0AdQwpRevuTMZIjVNw64Yap0BNU5DDXhwX6C7otu3JX1TMAy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1981045646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Sabir, Sharjeel H ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Gupta, Sanjay ; Mills, Gordon B ; Wei, Wei ; Cortes, Andrea C ; Mills Shaw, Kenna R ; Luthra, Rajyalakshmi ; Wallace, Michael J</creator><contributor>Chen, Suzie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Sharjeel H ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Gupta, Sanjay ; Mills, Gordon B ; Wei, Wei ; Cortes, Andrea C ; Mills Shaw, Kenna R ; Luthra, Rajyalakshmi ; Wallace, Michael J ; Chen, Suzie</creatorcontrib><description>Determine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. All patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this retrospective study. Patient and procedure variables were collected. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score incorporating targeting and sampling factors was assigned to each biopsied lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. 153 patients were included (58.2% female, average age 59.5 years). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (40.5%), most common biopsied site was lung (36%), and average size of biopsied lesions was 3.8 cm (+/- 2.7). Adequacy for NGS was 69.9%. Univariate analysis showed higher likelihood of adequacy score (p = 0.004), primary malignancy type (p = 0.03), and absence of prior systemic therapy (p = 0.018) were associated with adequacy for NGS. Multivariate analysis showed higher adequacy for lesions with likelihood of adequacy scored 3 (high) versus lesions scored 1 (low) (OR, 7.82; p = 0.002). Melanoma lesions had higher adequacy for NGS versus breast cancer lesions (OR 9.5; p = 0.01). Absence of prior systemic therapy (OR, 6.1; p = 0.02) and systemic therapy &lt;/ = 3 months (OR 3.24; p = 0.01) compared to systemic therapy &gt;3 months before biopsy yielded greater adequacy for NGS. Lesions &lt;3 cm had greater adequacy for NGS than larger lesions (OR 2.72, p = 0.02). As targeted therapy becomes standard for more cancers, percutaneous biopsy specimens adequate for NGS genomic testing will be needed. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score assigned by IR physicians and other pre-procedure variables can help predict the likelihood of biopsy adequacy for NGS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189651</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29281680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Archives &amp; records ; Biology and life sciences ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle - methods ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cancer treatment ; Confidentiality ; Female ; Genetic testing ; Genomes ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods ; Histology ; Humans ; Innovations ; Lesions ; Lung cancer ; Lung diseases ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Malignancy ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Melanoma ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Molecular targeted therapy ; Multimodal Imaging ; Multivariate analysis ; Mutation ; Pathology ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Physicians ; Radiology ; Regression analysis ; Research and analysis methods ; Therapy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189651-e0189651</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-966d799873eb1a342f6c04a2bfd8dbf15db5f8dd8cb971959b8e536673a6c81b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-966d799873eb1a342f6c04a2bfd8dbf15db5f8dd8cb971959b8e536673a6c81b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4049-9614</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744968/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744968/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29281680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Suzie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Sharjeel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Gordon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills Shaw, Kenna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luthra, Rajyalakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Michael J</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Determine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. All patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this retrospective study. Patient and procedure variables were collected. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score incorporating targeting and sampling factors was assigned to each biopsied lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. 153 patients were included (58.2% female, average age 59.5 years). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (40.5%), most common biopsied site was lung (36%), and average size of biopsied lesions was 3.8 cm (+/- 2.7). Adequacy for NGS was 69.9%. Univariate analysis showed higher likelihood of adequacy score (p = 0.004), primary malignancy type (p = 0.03), and absence of prior systemic therapy (p = 0.018) were associated with adequacy for NGS. Multivariate analysis showed higher adequacy for lesions with likelihood of adequacy scored 3 (high) versus lesions scored 1 (low) (OR, 7.82; p = 0.002). Melanoma lesions had higher adequacy for NGS versus breast cancer lesions (OR 9.5; p = 0.01). Absence of prior systemic therapy (OR, 6.1; p = 0.02) and systemic therapy &lt;/ = 3 months (OR 3.24; p = 0.01) compared to systemic therapy &gt;3 months before biopsy yielded greater adequacy for NGS. Lesions &lt;3 cm had greater adequacy for NGS than larger lesions (OR 2.72, p = 0.02). As targeted therapy becomes standard for more cancers, percutaneous biopsy specimens adequate for NGS genomic testing will be needed. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score assigned by IR physicians and other pre-procedure variables can help predict the likelihood of biopsy adequacy for NGS.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle - methods</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular targeted therapy</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLgujDjEnT3F6EZfAysLDg7U3CaS4zWTrNbNKKfnvTne4ylX2QPCSkv_M_zf-cUxTPMVpiwvG7qzDEDtrlPnR2ibCQjOIHxSmWpFqwCpGHR-eT4klKVwhRIhh7XJxUshKYCXRa_FxtIYLubfSp9zqVwZV7G_XQQ2fDkEodoi0bH_bJ21SCsdcD9LZ0IZad_d2XG9vZCL0P3XgMO6_LlBnbad9tnhaPHLTJPpv2s-L7xw_fVp8XF5ef1qvzi4XmVPQLyZjhUgpObIOB1JVjGtVQNc4I0zhMTUOdMEboRnIsqWyEpYQxToBpgRtyVrw86O7bkNTkTFJYCoxqymqWifWBMAGu1D76HcQ_KoBXNxchbhTEbEBrFSAORNZIGo1r4gAqg-uGW-IocMFw1no_ZRuanTXadn2EdiY6_9L5rdqEX4ryupZMZIE3k0AM2arUq51P2rbtwfOb_-YMc1xl9NU_6P2vm6gN5Af4zoWcV4-i6pxWuewY0THt8h4qL2Nz2XIbOZ_vZwFvZwGZ6XPNNzCkpNZfv_w_e_ljzr4-YrcW2n6bQjuMXZTmYH0AdQwpRevuTMZIjVNw64Yap0BNU5DDXhwX6C7otu3JX1TMAy0</recordid><startdate>20171227</startdate><enddate>20171227</enddate><creator>Sabir, Sharjeel H</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creator><creator>Gupta, Sanjay</creator><creator>Mills, Gordon B</creator><creator>Wei, Wei</creator><creator>Cortes, Andrea C</creator><creator>Mills Shaw, Kenna R</creator><creator>Luthra, Rajyalakshmi</creator><creator>Wallace, Michael J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-9614</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171227</creationdate><title>Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing</title><author>Sabir, Sharjeel H ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Gupta, Sanjay ; Mills, Gordon B ; Wei, Wei ; Cortes, Andrea C ; Mills Shaw, Kenna R ; Luthra, Rajyalakshmi ; Wallace, Michael J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-966d799873eb1a342f6c04a2bfd8dbf15db5f8dd8cb971959b8e536673a6c81b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle - methods</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular targeted therapy</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Sharjeel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Gordon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills Shaw, Kenna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luthra, Rajyalakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Michael J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabir, Sharjeel H</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</au><au>Gupta, Sanjay</au><au>Mills, Gordon B</au><au>Wei, Wei</au><au>Cortes, Andrea C</au><au>Mills Shaw, Kenna R</au><au>Luthra, Rajyalakshmi</au><au>Wallace, Michael J</au><au>Chen, Suzie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189651</spage><epage>e0189651</epage><pages>e0189651-e0189651</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Determine the characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies that are adequate for a next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic panel. All patients undergoing percutaneous core biopsies in interventional radiology (IR) with samples evaluated for a 46-gene NGS panel during 1-year were included in this retrospective study. Patient and procedure variables were collected. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score incorporating targeting and sampling factors was assigned to each biopsied lesion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. 153 patients were included (58.2% female, average age 59.5 years). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (40.5%), most common biopsied site was lung (36%), and average size of biopsied lesions was 3.8 cm (+/- 2.7). Adequacy for NGS was 69.9%. Univariate analysis showed higher likelihood of adequacy score (p = 0.004), primary malignancy type (p = 0.03), and absence of prior systemic therapy (p = 0.018) were associated with adequacy for NGS. Multivariate analysis showed higher adequacy for lesions with likelihood of adequacy scored 3 (high) versus lesions scored 1 (low) (OR, 7.82; p = 0.002). Melanoma lesions had higher adequacy for NGS versus breast cancer lesions (OR 9.5; p = 0.01). Absence of prior systemic therapy (OR, 6.1; p = 0.02) and systemic therapy &lt;/ = 3 months (OR 3.24; p = 0.01) compared to systemic therapy &gt;3 months before biopsy yielded greater adequacy for NGS. Lesions &lt;3 cm had greater adequacy for NGS than larger lesions (OR 2.72, p = 0.02). As targeted therapy becomes standard for more cancers, percutaneous biopsy specimens adequate for NGS genomic testing will be needed. An imaging-based likelihood of adequacy score assigned by IR physicians and other pre-procedure variables can help predict the likelihood of biopsy adequacy for NGS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29281680</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189651</doi><tpages>e0189651</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-9614</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189651-e0189651
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1981045646
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adequacy
Archives & records
Biology and life sciences
Biomarkers
Biopsy
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle - methods
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Cancer treatment
Confidentiality
Female
Genetic testing
Genomes
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods
Histology
Humans
Innovations
Lesions
Lung cancer
Lung diseases
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Male
Malignancy
Medical personnel
Medicine and Health Sciences
Melanoma
Methods
Middle Aged
Molecular targeted therapy
Multimodal Imaging
Multivariate analysis
Mutation
Pathology
Patients
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Physicians
Radiology
Regression analysis
Research and analysis methods
Therapy
Tumors
title Characteristics of percutaneous core biopsies adequate for next generation genomic sequencing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A36%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20of%20percutaneous%20core%20biopsies%20adequate%20for%20next%20generation%20genomic%20sequencing&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sabir,%20Sharjeel%20H&rft.date=2017-12-27&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189651&rft.epage=e0189651&rft.pages=e0189651-e0189651&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189651&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA520531058%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1981045646&rft_id=info:pmid/29281680&rft_galeid=A520531058&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a07a39409dc143faa2d14b7e3f5a7861&rfr_iscdi=true