Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex

Efforts to taxonomically delineate species are often confounded with conflicting information and subjective interpretation. Advances in genomic methods have resulted in a new approach to taxonomic identification that stands to greatly reduce much of this conflict. This approach is ideal for species...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189417-e0189417
Hauptverfasser: Baumsteiger, Jason, Moyle, Peter B, Aguilar, Andres, O'Rourke, Sean M, Miller, Michael R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0189417
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0189417
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Baumsteiger, Jason
Moyle, Peter B
Aguilar, Andres
O'Rourke, Sean M
Miller, Michael R
description Efforts to taxonomically delineate species are often confounded with conflicting information and subjective interpretation. Advances in genomic methods have resulted in a new approach to taxonomic identification that stands to greatly reduce much of this conflict. This approach is ideal for species complexes, where divergence times are recent (evolutionarily) and lineages less well defined. The California Roach/Hitch fish species complex is an excellent example, experiencing a convoluted geologic history, diverse habitats, conflicting species designations and potential admixture between species. Here we use this fish complex to illustrate how genomics can be used to better clarify and assign taxonomic categories. We performed restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing on 255 Roach and Hitch samples collected throughout California to discover and genotype thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). Data were then used in hierarchical principal component, admixture, and FST analyses to provide results that consistently resolved a number of ambiguities and provided novel insights across a range of taxonomic levels. At the highest level, our results show that the CA Roach/Hitch complex should be considered five species split into two genera (4 + 1) as opposed to two species from distinct genera (1 +1). Subsequent levels revealed multiple subspecies and distinct population segments within identified species. At the lowest level, our results indicate Roach from a large coastal river are not native but instead introduced from a nearby river. Overall, this study provides a clear demonstration of the power of genomic methods for informing taxonomy and serves as a model for future studies wishing to decipher difficult species questions. By allowing for systematic identification across multiple scales, taxonomic structure can then be tied to historical and contemporary ecological, geographic or anthropogenic factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1976001518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A518545500</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f635378be7874c02a46db7e78614dc30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A518545500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c2fa0237d98dc2ea3b414d8530b1ce1de8aa693b9891a1c4fe875986b5284d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWNts_2BshkHZLpLpy7J0Myhl7QKFwr5uhSwdJwqKlVr2yP795MYt8ejF0IXlV895dXTOybI3GC0wLfGnTejbRvvFLjSwQFhIhstn2SmWlMw5QfT50f4kO4txg1BBBecvsxMiCSUM0dPs6hqasHUm5sbr1tUOYt7pfbgX8yr0jU1yEl2T69y6unam910ed2AG2YTtzsP-Vfai1j7C6_E7y35efflx-XV-c3u9vLy4mRsuSTeXhtQaEVpaKawhoGnFMLOioKjCBrAFoTWXtJJCYo0Nq0GUhRS8KohgltNZ9u7gu_MhqrEEUWFZcoRwgUUilgfCBr1Ru9ZtdftHBe3UvRDaldJt54wHVXNa0FJUUIqSGUQ047Yq0x9PORmKktfn8ba-2oI10HSt9hPT6Unj1moVfquiJJwznAw-jAZtuOshdmrrogHvdQOhP-TNGJWpUbPs_T_o068bqZVOD3BNHdK9ZjBVF-m8YEWBhrwXT1BpWUhdTfNSu6RPAj5OAhLTwb5b6T5Gtfz-7f_Z219T9vyIXYP23ToG33cuNHEKsgNo2hBjC_VjkTFSw7g_VEMN467GcU9hb48b9Bj0MN_0L5gm-Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1976001518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Baumsteiger, Jason ; Moyle, Peter B ; Aguilar, Andres ; O'Rourke, Sean M ; Miller, Michael R</creator><contributor>Chiang, Tzen-Yuh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baumsteiger, Jason ; Moyle, Peter B ; Aguilar, Andres ; O'Rourke, Sean M ; Miller, Michael R ; Chiang, Tzen-Yuh</creatorcontrib><description>Efforts to taxonomically delineate species are often confounded with conflicting information and subjective interpretation. Advances in genomic methods have resulted in a new approach to taxonomic identification that stands to greatly reduce much of this conflict. This approach is ideal for species complexes, where divergence times are recent (evolutionarily) and lineages less well defined. The California Roach/Hitch fish species complex is an excellent example, experiencing a convoluted geologic history, diverse habitats, conflicting species designations and potential admixture between species. Here we use this fish complex to illustrate how genomics can be used to better clarify and assign taxonomic categories. We performed restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing on 255 Roach and Hitch samples collected throughout California to discover and genotype thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). Data were then used in hierarchical principal component, admixture, and FST analyses to provide results that consistently resolved a number of ambiguities and provided novel insights across a range of taxonomic levels. At the highest level, our results show that the CA Roach/Hitch complex should be considered five species split into two genera (4 + 1) as opposed to two species from distinct genera (1 +1). Subsequent levels revealed multiple subspecies and distinct population segments within identified species. At the lowest level, our results indicate Roach from a large coastal river are not native but instead introduced from a nearby river. Overall, this study provides a clear demonstration of the power of genomic methods for informing taxonomy and serves as a model for future studies wishing to decipher difficult species questions. By allowing for systematic identification across multiple scales, taxonomic structure can then be tied to historical and contemporary ecological, geographic or anthropogenic factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29232403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal sciences ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Cyprinidae ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Divergence ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Fish ; Gene sequencing ; Genera ; Genetics ; Genomics ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Geologic history ; Geological history ; Identification methods ; Numerical taxonomy ; Parameter estimation ; Physiological aspects ; Polymorphism ; Population ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rivers ; Scales ; Single nucleotide polymorphisms ; Single-nucleotide polymorphism ; Species ; Taxonomy ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189417-e0189417</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Baumsteiger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Baumsteiger et al 2017 Baumsteiger et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c2fa0237d98dc2ea3b414d8530b1ce1de8aa693b9891a1c4fe875986b5284d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c2fa0237d98dc2ea3b414d8530b1ce1de8aa693b9891a1c4fe875986b5284d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7921-5722</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726641/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5726641/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29232403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chiang, Tzen-Yuh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baumsteiger, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyle, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, Sean M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Michael R</creatorcontrib><title>Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Efforts to taxonomically delineate species are often confounded with conflicting information and subjective interpretation. Advances in genomic methods have resulted in a new approach to taxonomic identification that stands to greatly reduce much of this conflict. This approach is ideal for species complexes, where divergence times are recent (evolutionarily) and lineages less well defined. The California Roach/Hitch fish species complex is an excellent example, experiencing a convoluted geologic history, diverse habitats, conflicting species designations and potential admixture between species. Here we use this fish complex to illustrate how genomics can be used to better clarify and assign taxonomic categories. We performed restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing on 255 Roach and Hitch samples collected throughout California to discover and genotype thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). Data were then used in hierarchical principal component, admixture, and FST analyses to provide results that consistently resolved a number of ambiguities and provided novel insights across a range of taxonomic levels. At the highest level, our results show that the CA Roach/Hitch complex should be considered five species split into two genera (4 + 1) as opposed to two species from distinct genera (1 +1). Subsequent levels revealed multiple subspecies and distinct population segments within identified species. At the lowest level, our results indicate Roach from a large coastal river are not native but instead introduced from a nearby river. Overall, this study provides a clear demonstration of the power of genomic methods for informing taxonomy and serves as a model for future studies wishing to decipher difficult species questions. By allowing for systematic identification across multiple scales, taxonomic structure can then be tied to historical and contemporary ecological, geographic or anthropogenic factors.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Cyprinidae</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Geologic history</subject><subject>Geological history</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Numerical taxonomy</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scales</subject><subject>Single nucleotide polymorphisms</subject><subject>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWNts_2BshkHZLpLpy7J0Myhl7QKFwr5uhSwdJwqKlVr2yP795MYt8ejF0IXlV895dXTOybI3GC0wLfGnTejbRvvFLjSwQFhIhstn2SmWlMw5QfT50f4kO4txg1BBBecvsxMiCSUM0dPs6hqasHUm5sbr1tUOYt7pfbgX8yr0jU1yEl2T69y6unam910ed2AG2YTtzsP-Vfai1j7C6_E7y35efflx-XV-c3u9vLy4mRsuSTeXhtQaEVpaKawhoGnFMLOioKjCBrAFoTWXtJJCYo0Nq0GUhRS8KohgltNZ9u7gu_MhqrEEUWFZcoRwgUUilgfCBr1Ru9ZtdftHBe3UvRDaldJt54wHVXNa0FJUUIqSGUQ047Yq0x9PORmKktfn8ba-2oI10HSt9hPT6Unj1moVfquiJJwznAw-jAZtuOshdmrrogHvdQOhP-TNGJWpUbPs_T_o068bqZVOD3BNHdK9ZjBVF-m8YEWBhrwXT1BpWUhdTfNSu6RPAj5OAhLTwb5b6T5Gtfz-7f_Z219T9vyIXYP23ToG33cuNHEKsgNo2hBjC_VjkTFSw7g_VEMN467GcU9hb48b9Bj0MN_0L5gm-Tg</recordid><startdate>20171212</startdate><enddate>20171212</enddate><creator>Baumsteiger, Jason</creator><creator>Moyle, Peter B</creator><creator>Aguilar, Andres</creator><creator>O'Rourke, Sean M</creator><creator>Miller, Michael R</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-5722</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171212</creationdate><title>Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex</title><author>Baumsteiger, Jason ; Moyle, Peter B ; Aguilar, Andres ; O'Rourke, Sean M ; Miller, Michael R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c2fa0237d98dc2ea3b414d8530b1ce1de8aa693b9891a1c4fe875986b5284d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Cyprinidae</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Geologic history</topic><topic>Geological history</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Numerical taxonomy</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scales</topic><topic>Single nucleotide polymorphisms</topic><topic>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumsteiger, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyle, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Rourke, Sean M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Michael R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumsteiger, Jason</au><au>Moyle, Peter B</au><au>Aguilar, Andres</au><au>O'Rourke, Sean M</au><au>Miller, Michael R</au><au>Chiang, Tzen-Yuh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189417</spage><epage>e0189417</epage><pages>e0189417-e0189417</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Efforts to taxonomically delineate species are often confounded with conflicting information and subjective interpretation. Advances in genomic methods have resulted in a new approach to taxonomic identification that stands to greatly reduce much of this conflict. This approach is ideal for species complexes, where divergence times are recent (evolutionarily) and lineages less well defined. The California Roach/Hitch fish species complex is an excellent example, experiencing a convoluted geologic history, diverse habitats, conflicting species designations and potential admixture between species. Here we use this fish complex to illustrate how genomics can be used to better clarify and assign taxonomic categories. We performed restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing on 255 Roach and Hitch samples collected throughout California to discover and genotype thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). Data were then used in hierarchical principal component, admixture, and FST analyses to provide results that consistently resolved a number of ambiguities and provided novel insights across a range of taxonomic levels. At the highest level, our results show that the CA Roach/Hitch complex should be considered five species split into two genera (4 + 1) as opposed to two species from distinct genera (1 +1). Subsequent levels revealed multiple subspecies and distinct population segments within identified species. At the lowest level, our results indicate Roach from a large coastal river are not native but instead introduced from a nearby river. Overall, this study provides a clear demonstration of the power of genomic methods for informing taxonomy and serves as a model for future studies wishing to decipher difficult species questions. By allowing for systematic identification across multiple scales, taxonomic structure can then be tied to historical and contemporary ecological, geographic or anthropogenic factors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29232403</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189417</doi><tpages>e0189417</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-5722</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189417-e0189417
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1976001518
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Animal sciences
Anthropogenic factors
Biodiversity
Bioinformatics
Biology and Life Sciences
Computer and Information Sciences
Cyprinidae
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Divergence
DNA
DNA sequencing
Earth Sciences
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Endangered & extinct species
Fish
Gene sequencing
Genera
Genetics
Genomics
Genotype & phenotype
Geologic history
Geological history
Identification methods
Numerical taxonomy
Parameter estimation
Physiological aspects
Polymorphism
Population
Research and Analysis Methods
Rivers
Scales
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Single-nucleotide polymorphism
Species
Taxonomy
Watersheds
title Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A17%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomics%20clarifies%20taxonomic%20boundaries%20in%20a%20difficult%20species%20complex&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Baumsteiger,%20Jason&rft.date=2017-12-12&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189417&rft.epage=e0189417&rft.pages=e0189417-e0189417&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189417&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA518545500%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1976001518&rft_id=info:pmid/29232403&rft_galeid=A518545500&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f635378be7874c02a46db7e78614dc30&rfr_iscdi=true