The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study
According to the fear avoidance model, beliefs and thoughts can modify the outcome of patient with low back pain. The Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ)-a 14 items scale-assesses these consequences of low back pain. To test the psychometric properties of the French version of the BBQ. The BBQ was trans...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0186753-e0186753 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0186753 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0186753 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Dupeyron, Arnaud Lanhers, Charlotte Bastide, Sophie Alonso, Sandrine Toulotte, Matthias Jourdan, Claire Coudeyre, Emmanuel |
| description | According to the fear avoidance model, beliefs and thoughts can modify the outcome of patient with low back pain. The Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ)-a 14 items scale-assesses these consequences of low back pain.
To test the psychometric properties of the French version of the BBQ.
The BBQ was translated using the forward-backward translation process. Throughout three repeated evaluation time points (D1, D7 and D30), various aspects of validity were analysed: acceptability, quality of items, unidimentionality, internal consistency, temporal stability (between D1 and D7), responsiveness (between D7 and D30), and construct validity comparing it to other validated scales.
One hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled and 128 were analyzed. The acceptability and the quality of the items were excellent. The scale was unidimensional and reliable (internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.8). The responsiveness was moderate but in line with other scores. The BBQ was, as expected, convergent with day-to-day activities and fear avoidance (FABQ and Tampa), disability (Quebec and Dallas scores), or anxiety and depression (HAD); and not correlated with pain. Best correlations were found with Tampa and FABQ. The temporal stability (test-retest reliability) was poor. However, similar changes were observed in near conceptual score (FABQ), which confirmed that clinical status may have not been stable and suggesting sensitivity to early changes for BBQ.
The BBQ showed good psychometric properties to assess false beliefs and related fear in French or English LBP populations and can be used either for evaluation in international trials or as a part of self-care training. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0186753 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1973446243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A517670461</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_55b01c44e1804d7eb2a4f963f17dc747</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A517670461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-19a8123132a15862cd183af913f7cfc097caec34ccab21234a5835d1671c519b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEolB4AwSWkBA97JLxnzjhgLStgFaqVAGFqzVxnF0XbxzipNDH4U1xstuqW_WAckg885tv4s-eJHkB6RyYhHcXfugadPPWN2aeQp5JwR4kT6BgdJbRlD289b2XPA3hIk0Fy7PscbJHCwoguXiS_D1fGXKI-ic5NM6amnwZTOitbxq0nSE2EFPXVlvT9KT3BEMwIZAaXTCknCoCwaYinXHYm4rUBjtiG-L8b1KOsi3GVevbIeajbHhPFqTvsAl6cP3QoSNYYdtPyUnpEp2tNsvQD9XVs-TR1O759r2ffP_08fzoeHZ69vnkaHE605Jm_QwKzIEyYBRB5BnVFeQM6wJYLXWt00JqNJpxrbGkEeQociYqyCRoAUXJ9pNXG93W-aC27gYFhWScZ5SzSJxsiMrjhWo7u8buSnm0agr4bqmw6612RglRpqA5N5CnvJKmpMjrImM1yEpLLqPWh223oVybSkd_oxc7oruZxq7U0l8qISHnmYgCBxuB1Z2y48WpGmMpyJQKKi8hsm-3zTr_azxftbZBG-ewMX6Y9shTiH7xiL6-g97vxJZaYtysbWof_1GPomohQGYy5dnYdn4PFZ_KrK2O17a2Mb5TcLBTEJne_OmXOISgTr59_X_27Mcu--YWuzLo-lXwbpgu5C7IN6DufAidqW-chVSNU3fthhqnTm2nLpa9vH2YN0XXY8b-AU1WJ9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973446243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study</title><source>PLoS</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dupeyron, Arnaud ; Lanhers, Charlotte ; Bastide, Sophie ; Alonso, Sandrine ; Toulotte, Matthias ; Jourdan, Claire ; Coudeyre, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Dupeyron, Arnaud ; Lanhers, Charlotte ; Bastide, Sophie ; Alonso, Sandrine ; Toulotte, Matthias ; Jourdan, Claire ; Coudeyre, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>According to the fear avoidance model, beliefs and thoughts can modify the outcome of patient with low back pain. The Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ)-a 14 items scale-assesses these consequences of low back pain.
To test the psychometric properties of the French version of the BBQ.
The BBQ was translated using the forward-backward translation process. Throughout three repeated evaluation time points (D1, D7 and D30), various aspects of validity were analysed: acceptability, quality of items, unidimentionality, internal consistency, temporal stability (between D1 and D7), responsiveness (between D7 and D30), and construct validity comparing it to other validated scales.
One hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled and 128 were analyzed. The acceptability and the quality of the items were excellent. The scale was unidimensional and reliable (internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.8). The responsiveness was moderate but in line with other scores. The BBQ was, as expected, convergent with day-to-day activities and fear avoidance (FABQ and Tampa), disability (Quebec and Dallas scores), or anxiety and depression (HAD); and not correlated with pain. Best correlations were found with Tampa and FABQ. The temporal stability (test-retest reliability) was poor. However, similar changes were observed in near conceptual score (FABQ), which confirmed that clinical status may have not been stable and suggesting sensitivity to early changes for BBQ.
The BBQ showed good psychometric properties to assess false beliefs and related fear in French or English LBP populations and can be used either for evaluation in international trials or as a part of self-care training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29211745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Activities of daily living ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Aged ; Anxiety ; Avoidance ; Back pain ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive science ; Consistency ; Cultural Characteristics ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Exercise ; Fear ; Fear & phobias ; Female ; Human health and pathology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - psychology ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental depression ; Methods and statistics ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Patients ; People and Places ; Populations ; Psychology ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk factors ; Social Sciences ; Stability analysis ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0186753-e0186753</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Dupeyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2017 Dupeyron et al 2017 Dupeyron et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-19a8123132a15862cd183af913f7cfc097caec34ccab21234a5835d1671c519b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-19a8123132a15862cd183af913f7cfc097caec34ccab21234a5835d1671c519b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5085-3739 ; 0000-0001-9691-8059 ; 0000-0001-9838-0272 ; 0000-0002-6584-8411 ; 0000-0001-5753-2890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718465/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718465/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29211745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01702527$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dupeyron, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanhers, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastide, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toulotte, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudeyre, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>According to the fear avoidance model, beliefs and thoughts can modify the outcome of patient with low back pain. The Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ)-a 14 items scale-assesses these consequences of low back pain.
To test the psychometric properties of the French version of the BBQ.
The BBQ was translated using the forward-backward translation process. Throughout three repeated evaluation time points (D1, D7 and D30), various aspects of validity were analysed: acceptability, quality of items, unidimentionality, internal consistency, temporal stability (between D1 and D7), responsiveness (between D7 and D30), and construct validity comparing it to other validated scales.
One hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled and 128 were analyzed. The acceptability and the quality of the items were excellent. The scale was unidimensional and reliable (internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.8). The responsiveness was moderate but in line with other scores. The BBQ was, as expected, convergent with day-to-day activities and fear avoidance (FABQ and Tampa), disability (Quebec and Dallas scores), or anxiety and depression (HAD); and not correlated with pain. Best correlations were found with Tampa and FABQ. The temporal stability (test-retest reliability) was poor. However, similar changes were observed in near conceptual score (FABQ), which confirmed that clinical status may have not been stable and suggesting sensitivity to early changes for BBQ.
The BBQ showed good psychometric properties to assess false beliefs and related fear in French or English LBP populations and can be used either for evaluation in international trials or as a part of self-care training.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Avoidance</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Methods and statistics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEolB4AwSWkBA97JLxnzjhgLStgFaqVAGFqzVxnF0XbxzipNDH4U1xstuqW_WAckg885tv4s-eJHkB6RyYhHcXfugadPPWN2aeQp5JwR4kT6BgdJbRlD289b2XPA3hIk0Fy7PscbJHCwoguXiS_D1fGXKI-ic5NM6amnwZTOitbxq0nSE2EFPXVlvT9KT3BEMwIZAaXTCknCoCwaYinXHYm4rUBjtiG-L8b1KOsi3GVevbIeajbHhPFqTvsAl6cP3QoSNYYdtPyUnpEp2tNsvQD9XVs-TR1O759r2ffP_08fzoeHZ69vnkaHE605Jm_QwKzIEyYBRB5BnVFeQM6wJYLXWt00JqNJpxrbGkEeQociYqyCRoAUXJ9pNXG93W-aC27gYFhWScZ5SzSJxsiMrjhWo7u8buSnm0agr4bqmw6612RglRpqA5N5CnvJKmpMjrImM1yEpLLqPWh223oVybSkd_oxc7oruZxq7U0l8qISHnmYgCBxuB1Z2y48WpGmMpyJQKKi8hsm-3zTr_azxftbZBG-ewMX6Y9shTiH7xiL6-g97vxJZaYtysbWof_1GPomohQGYy5dnYdn4PFZ_KrK2O17a2Mb5TcLBTEJne_OmXOISgTr59_X_27Mcu--YWuzLo-lXwbpgu5C7IN6DufAidqW-chVSNU3fthhqnTm2nLpa9vH2YN0XXY8b-AU1WJ9Y</recordid><startdate>20171206</startdate><enddate>20171206</enddate><creator>Dupeyron, Arnaud</creator><creator>Lanhers, Charlotte</creator><creator>Bastide, Sophie</creator><creator>Alonso, Sandrine</creator><creator>Toulotte, Matthias</creator><creator>Jourdan, Claire</creator><creator>Coudeyre, Emmanuel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-3739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-8059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-0272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-8411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-2890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171206</creationdate><title>The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study</title><author>Dupeyron, Arnaud ; Lanhers, Charlotte ; Bastide, Sophie ; Alonso, Sandrine ; Toulotte, Matthias ; Jourdan, Claire ; Coudeyre, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-19a8123132a15862cd183af913f7cfc097caec34ccab21234a5835d1671c519b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Avoidance</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Methods and statistics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dupeyron, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanhers, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastide, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toulotte, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudeyre, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dupeyron, Arnaud</au><au>Lanhers, Charlotte</au><au>Bastide, Sophie</au><au>Alonso, Sandrine</au><au>Toulotte, Matthias</au><au>Jourdan, Claire</au><au>Coudeyre, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0186753</spage><epage>e0186753</epage><pages>e0186753-e0186753</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>According to the fear avoidance model, beliefs and thoughts can modify the outcome of patient with low back pain. The Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ)-a 14 items scale-assesses these consequences of low back pain.
To test the psychometric properties of the French version of the BBQ.
The BBQ was translated using the forward-backward translation process. Throughout three repeated evaluation time points (D1, D7 and D30), various aspects of validity were analysed: acceptability, quality of items, unidimentionality, internal consistency, temporal stability (between D1 and D7), responsiveness (between D7 and D30), and construct validity comparing it to other validated scales.
One hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled and 128 were analyzed. The acceptability and the quality of the items were excellent. The scale was unidimensional and reliable (internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.8). The responsiveness was moderate but in line with other scores. The BBQ was, as expected, convergent with day-to-day activities and fear avoidance (FABQ and Tampa), disability (Quebec and Dallas scores), or anxiety and depression (HAD); and not correlated with pain. Best correlations were found with Tampa and FABQ. The temporal stability (test-retest reliability) was poor. However, similar changes were observed in near conceptual score (FABQ), which confirmed that clinical status may have not been stable and suggesting sensitivity to early changes for BBQ.
The BBQ showed good psychometric properties to assess false beliefs and related fear in French or English LBP populations and can be used either for evaluation in international trials or as a part of self-care training.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29211745</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0186753</doi><tpages>e0186753</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-3739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-8059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-0272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-8411</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-2890</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0186753-e0186753 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1973446243 |
| source | PLoS; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Acceptability Activities of daily living Adaptation, Psychological Adult Aged Anxiety Avoidance Back pain Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Clinical trials Cognitive science Consistency Cultural Characteristics Diagnosis Evaluation Exercise Fear Fear & phobias Female Human health and pathology Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Life Sciences Low back pain Low Back Pain - psychology Male Medicine and Health Sciences Mental depression Methods and statistics Middle Aged Pain Patients People and Places Populations Psychology Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Rehabilitation Research and Analysis Methods Risk factors Social Sciences Stability analysis Surveys and Questionnaires Validation studies |
| title | The Back Belief Questionnaire is efficient to assess false beliefs and related fear in low back pain populations: A transcultural adaptation and validation study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Back%20Belief%20Questionnaire%20is%20efficient%20to%20assess%20false%20beliefs%20and%20related%20fear%20in%20low%20back%20pain%20populations:%20A%20transcultural%20adaptation%20and%20validation%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dupeyron,%20Arnaud&rft.date=2017-12-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0186753&rft.epage=e0186753&rft.pages=e0186753-e0186753&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0186753&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA517670461%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973446243&rft_id=info:pmid/29211745&rft_galeid=A517670461&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_55b01c44e1804d7eb2a4f963f17dc747&rfr_iscdi=true |