Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings. The primary aim was to identify predictors of adheren...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188390-e0188390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0188390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0188390 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Alabdan, Numan AlRuthia, Yazed Yates, Mary E D Sales, Ibrahim Finch, Christopher K Hudson, Joanna Q |
description | Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings.
The primary aim was to identify predictors of adherence to a newly approved ESA inpatient ordering policy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy on ESA usage, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and costs.
This retrospective observational record review included a sample of adult patients admitted to four tertiary care hospitals from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to calculate the odds of adherence to the new ESA inpatient ordering policy and the impact of this policy on discharge Hb level, respectively.
A total of 242 patients were included. The majority of the prescribers (77%) adhered to the new ESA ordering policy. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.306; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65) and ferritin (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 1.23-12.51) levels at admission and length of hospital stay were positively correlated with the odds of patients receiving ESAs after day 5 (OR = 1.12; 95% CI:1.05-1.20). Furthermore, adherence to the new policy did not have a significant impact on discharge Hb level (β = 0.02349; P = 0.895).
Prescribers were adherent to a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy policy which resulted in a reduction in ESA usage, did not impact the discharge Hb levels, and was proven to be cost effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0188390 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1969918971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A516065928</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d07fb644b6254c6899b950a81530c84d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A516065928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-6551a22bfdba957bb9c8a6fa6da758664d901bf37e6e8be99c2cb42825c9b9eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0uP0zAQxyMEYpfCN0AQCQnBocVOYifmgFSteFRaaRGvq-XHJHWVxsF2gH57nG121aA9IB_8-v1nPOOZJHmK0QrnJX6zs4PrRLvqbQcrhKsqZ-heco5Zni1phvL7J-uz5JH3O4RIXlH6MDnLGK4yStB5Ej470EYF63xq61ToLTjoFKTBpiLt4HcK7hC2zvbWgDd-6YPZD60IpmtS0UAXUtP1cTuurNPgxovetkYd3qbrVDnrowhUMDa-NvVh0IfHyYNatB6eTPMi-f7h_beLT8vLq4-bi_XlUtEChyUlBIssk7WWgpFSSqYqQWtBtShJDKTQDGFZ5yVQqCQwpjIli6zKiGKSgcwXyfOj3b61nk8J8xwzymICWIkjsTkS2ood753ZC3fgVhh-fWBdw4ULRrXANSprSYtC0owUilYs-iBIVJjkSFWFjrbeTd4GuQetYkacaGdG5zed2fLG_uKkRATHX1okryYDzv4cwAe-N15B24oO7DC-u0RZWeZoRF_8g94d3UQ1IgZgutpGv2o0ytcEU0QJy6pIre6g4tCwNypWV23i-UzweiaITIA_oRGD93zz9cv_s1c_5uzLE3YLog1bb9thLB0_B4sjeF1dDurbJGPEx-a4yQYfm4NPzRFlz04_6FZ00w35X5ebC9I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969918971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Alabdan, Numan ; AlRuthia, Yazed ; Yates, Mary E D ; Sales, Ibrahim ; Finch, Christopher K ; Hudson, Joanna Q</creator><creatorcontrib>Alabdan, Numan ; AlRuthia, Yazed ; Yates, Mary E D ; Sales, Ibrahim ; Finch, Christopher K ; Hudson, Joanna Q</creatorcontrib><description>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings.
The primary aim was to identify predictors of adherence to a newly approved ESA inpatient ordering policy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy on ESA usage, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and costs.
This retrospective observational record review included a sample of adult patients admitted to four tertiary care hospitals from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to calculate the odds of adherence to the new ESA inpatient ordering policy and the impact of this policy on discharge Hb level, respectively.
A total of 242 patients were included. The majority of the prescribers (77%) adhered to the new ESA ordering policy. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.306; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65) and ferritin (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 1.23-12.51) levels at admission and length of hospital stay were positively correlated with the odds of patients receiving ESAs after day 5 (OR = 1.12; 95% CI:1.05-1.20). Furthermore, adherence to the new policy did not have a significant impact on discharge Hb level (β = 0.02349; P = 0.895).
Prescribers were adherent to a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy policy which resulted in a reduction in ESA usage, did not impact the discharge Hb levels, and was proven to be cost effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188390</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29182650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Anemia ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chronic kidney failure ; Clinical medicine ; Complications and side effects ; Cost control ; Cross-sectional studies ; Delay ; Discharge ; Drug therapy ; End-stage renal disease ; Erythropoiesis ; Ferritin ; Health aspects ; Health care policy ; Hematinics ; Hemodialysis ; Hemoglobin ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney transplantation ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Patient compliance ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Pharmacists ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188390-e0188390</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Alabdan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Alabdan et al 2017 Alabdan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-6551a22bfdba957bb9c8a6fa6da758664d901bf37e6e8be99c2cb42825c9b9eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0029-5924</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705120/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705120/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alabdan, Numan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlRuthia, Yazed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Mary E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finch, Christopher K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Joanna Q</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings.
The primary aim was to identify predictors of adherence to a newly approved ESA inpatient ordering policy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy on ESA usage, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and costs.
This retrospective observational record review included a sample of adult patients admitted to four tertiary care hospitals from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to calculate the odds of adherence to the new ESA inpatient ordering policy and the impact of this policy on discharge Hb level, respectively.
A total of 242 patients were included. The majority of the prescribers (77%) adhered to the new ESA ordering policy. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.306; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65) and ferritin (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 1.23-12.51) levels at admission and length of hospital stay were positively correlated with the odds of patients receiving ESAs after day 5 (OR = 1.12; 95% CI:1.05-1.20). Furthermore, adherence to the new policy did not have a significant impact on discharge Hb level (β = 0.02349; P = 0.895).
Prescribers were adherent to a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy policy which resulted in a reduction in ESA usage, did not impact the discharge Hb levels, and was proven to be cost effective.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chronic kidney failure</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>End-stage renal disease</subject><subject>Erythropoiesis</subject><subject>Ferritin</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hematinics</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0uP0zAQxyMEYpfCN0AQCQnBocVOYifmgFSteFRaaRGvq-XHJHWVxsF2gH57nG121aA9IB_8-v1nPOOZJHmK0QrnJX6zs4PrRLvqbQcrhKsqZ-heco5Zni1phvL7J-uz5JH3O4RIXlH6MDnLGK4yStB5Ej470EYF63xq61ToLTjoFKTBpiLt4HcK7hC2zvbWgDd-6YPZD60IpmtS0UAXUtP1cTuurNPgxovetkYd3qbrVDnrowhUMDa-NvVh0IfHyYNatB6eTPMi-f7h_beLT8vLq4-bi_XlUtEChyUlBIssk7WWgpFSSqYqQWtBtShJDKTQDGFZ5yVQqCQwpjIli6zKiGKSgcwXyfOj3b61nk8J8xwzymICWIkjsTkS2ood753ZC3fgVhh-fWBdw4ULRrXANSprSYtC0owUilYs-iBIVJjkSFWFjrbeTd4GuQetYkacaGdG5zed2fLG_uKkRATHX1okryYDzv4cwAe-N15B24oO7DC-u0RZWeZoRF_8g94d3UQ1IgZgutpGv2o0ytcEU0QJy6pIre6g4tCwNypWV23i-UzweiaITIA_oRGD93zz9cv_s1c_5uzLE3YLog1bb9thLB0_B4sjeF1dDurbJGPEx-a4yQYfm4NPzRFlz04_6FZ00w35X5ebC9I</recordid><startdate>20171128</startdate><enddate>20171128</enddate><creator>Alabdan, Numan</creator><creator>AlRuthia, Yazed</creator><creator>Yates, Mary E D</creator><creator>Sales, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Finch, Christopher K</creator><creator>Hudson, Joanna Q</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-5924</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171128</creationdate><title>Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Alabdan, Numan ; AlRuthia, Yazed ; Yates, Mary E D ; Sales, Ibrahim ; Finch, Christopher K ; Hudson, Joanna Q</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-6551a22bfdba957bb9c8a6fa6da758664d901bf37e6e8be99c2cb42825c9b9eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chronic kidney failure</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>End-stage renal disease</topic><topic>Erythropoiesis</topic><topic>Ferritin</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hematinics</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alabdan, Numan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlRuthia, Yazed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Mary E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finch, Christopher K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Joanna Q</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alabdan, Numan</au><au>AlRuthia, Yazed</au><au>Yates, Mary E D</au><au>Sales, Ibrahim</au><au>Finch, Christopher K</au><au>Hudson, Joanna Q</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-11-28</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0188390</spage><epage>e0188390</epage><pages>e0188390-e0188390</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings.
The primary aim was to identify predictors of adherence to a newly approved ESA inpatient ordering policy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy on ESA usage, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and costs.
This retrospective observational record review included a sample of adult patients admitted to four tertiary care hospitals from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to calculate the odds of adherence to the new ESA inpatient ordering policy and the impact of this policy on discharge Hb level, respectively.
A total of 242 patients were included. The majority of the prescribers (77%) adhered to the new ESA ordering policy. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.306; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65) and ferritin (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 1.23-12.51) levels at admission and length of hospital stay were positively correlated with the odds of patients receiving ESAs after day 5 (OR = 1.12; 95% CI:1.05-1.20). Furthermore, adherence to the new policy did not have a significant impact on discharge Hb level (β = 0.02349; P = 0.895).
Prescribers were adherent to a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy policy which resulted in a reduction in ESA usage, did not impact the discharge Hb levels, and was proven to be cost effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29182650</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0188390</doi><tpages>e0188390</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-5924</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188390-e0188390 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1969918971 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adhesion Anemia Biology and Life Sciences Chronic kidney failure Clinical medicine Complications and side effects Cost control Cross-sectional studies Delay Discharge Drug therapy End-stage renal disease Erythropoiesis Ferritin Health aspects Health care policy Hematinics Hemodialysis Hemoglobin Hospitalization Hospitals Kidney diseases Kidney transplantation Medicine and Health Sciences Patient compliance Patient safety Patients Pharmacists Regression analysis Risk factors Therapy |
title | Predictors of adherence to a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent inpatient ordering policy: A cross-sectional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T19%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20adherence%20to%20a%20new%20erythropoiesis-stimulating%20agent%20inpatient%20ordering%20policy:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Alabdan,%20Numan&rft.date=2017-11-28&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0188390&rft.epage=e0188390&rft.pages=e0188390-e0188390&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188390&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA516065928%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969918971&rft_id=info:pmid/29182650&rft_galeid=A516065928&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d07fb644b6254c6899b950a81530c84d&rfr_iscdi=true |