Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators
In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188016-e0188016 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0188016 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | e0188016 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Erdoğan, Cihat Kurt, Zeyneb Diri, Banu |
| description | In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators' performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0188016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1965167971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A514689446</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_07c99933428347c888e09010d2860dc0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A514689446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-ad8fc78abbaee59ab01c5c40cd1a4e49a77eee3de2fb32f30dc12d02596cee463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgex2Fr9B6IDgtiLXfM1meRGKKXqQqHg152ETObMbtbZyZpktP33ZnanZUd6IblISJ7znuTNOVn2AqM5piV-t3a973Q737oO5ggLgTB_lJ1gScmME0QfH6yPs6chrBEqqOD8SXZMJGYFY_Ik-3EZot3oaF2XuyaPK8i33kVwG2tyozsDPjduBjdbDyEMVOirvIP4x_mfIa9u8z7YbpnrEJyxex3YSzofnmVHjW4DPB_n0-zbh8uvF59mV9cfFxfnVzPDCYkzXYvGlEJXlQYopK4QNoVhyNRYM2BSlyUA0BpIU1HSUFQbTGpECskNAOP0NHu11922LqjRmaCw5AXmpSxxIhZ7onZ6rbY-XdDfKqet2m04v1TaR2taUKg0UkpKGRGUlUYIAUgijGoieMqMktb7MVtfbaA20EWv24no9KSzK7V0v1XBJeLlIPB2FPDuV5_sUhsbDLSt7sD1u3tzQilmMqGv_0Efft1ILXV6gO0al_KaQVSdF5hxIdnOpfkDVBo1pN9OZdTYtD8JOJsEJCbCTVzqPgS1-PL5_9nr71P2zQG7At3GVXBtP1RPmIJsDxrvQvDQ3JuMkRq64M4NNXSBGrsghb08_KD7oLuyp38BTaoDow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965167971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Erdoğan, Cihat ; Kurt, Zeyneb ; Diri, Banu</creator><contributor>Yamanishi, Yoshihiro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Erdoğan, Cihat ; Kurt, Zeyneb ; Diri, Banu ; Yamanishi, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators' performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29145449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cell cycle ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer engineering ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Data integration ; Datasets ; Diabetes ; Disease ; Estimators ; Gene expression ; Genes ; Genetic aspects ; Inference ; Internet ; Lung cancer ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Molecular interactions ; Network analysis ; Networks ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Protein expression ; Protein interaction ; Proteins ; Proteomics ; Publishing industry ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Shrinkage ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188016-e0188016</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-ad8fc78abbaee59ab01c5c40cd1a4e49a77eee3de2fb32f30dc12d02596cee463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-ad8fc78abbaee59ab01c5c40cd1a4e49a77eee3de2fb32f30dc12d02596cee463</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5495-7754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690670/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690670/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,2098,2917,23853,27911,27912,53778,53780,79355,79356</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yamanishi, Yoshihiro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Erdoğan, Cihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Zeyneb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diri, Banu</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators' performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer engineering</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Molecular interactions</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Protein expression</subject><subject>Protein interaction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Shrinkage</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgex2Fr9B6IDgtiLXfM1meRGKKXqQqHg152ETObMbtbZyZpktP33ZnanZUd6IblISJ7znuTNOVn2AqM5piV-t3a973Q737oO5ggLgTB_lJ1gScmME0QfH6yPs6chrBEqqOD8SXZMJGYFY_Ik-3EZot3oaF2XuyaPK8i33kVwG2tyozsDPjduBjdbDyEMVOirvIP4x_mfIa9u8z7YbpnrEJyxex3YSzofnmVHjW4DPB_n0-zbh8uvF59mV9cfFxfnVzPDCYkzXYvGlEJXlQYopK4QNoVhyNRYM2BSlyUA0BpIU1HSUFQbTGpECskNAOP0NHu11922LqjRmaCw5AXmpSxxIhZ7onZ6rbY-XdDfKqet2m04v1TaR2taUKg0UkpKGRGUlUYIAUgijGoieMqMktb7MVtfbaA20EWv24no9KSzK7V0v1XBJeLlIPB2FPDuV5_sUhsbDLSt7sD1u3tzQilmMqGv_0Efft1ILXV6gO0al_KaQVSdF5hxIdnOpfkDVBo1pN9OZdTYtD8JOJsEJCbCTVzqPgS1-PL5_9nr71P2zQG7At3GVXBtP1RPmIJsDxrvQvDQ3JuMkRq64M4NNXSBGrsghb08_KD7oLuyp38BTaoDow</recordid><startdate>20171116</startdate><enddate>20171116</enddate><creator>Erdoğan, Cihat</creator><creator>Kurt, Zeyneb</creator><creator>Diri, Banu</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-7754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171116</creationdate><title>Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators</title><author>Erdoğan, Cihat ; Kurt, Zeyneb ; Diri, Banu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-ad8fc78abbaee59ab01c5c40cd1a4e49a77eee3de2fb32f30dc12d02596cee463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer engineering</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Molecular interactions</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Protein expression</topic><topic>Protein interaction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Shrinkage</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erdoğan, Cihat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Zeyneb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diri, Banu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erdoğan, Cihat</au><au>Kurt, Zeyneb</au><au>Diri, Banu</au><au>Yamanishi, Yoshihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-11-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0188016</spage><epage>e0188016</epage><pages>e0188016-e0188016</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators' performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29145449</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0188016</doi><tpages>e0188016</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-7754</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188016-e0188016 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1965167971 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Algorithms Bioinformatics Biology and Life Sciences Breast cancer Cancer Cell cycle Computer and Information Sciences Computer engineering Correlation Correlation analysis Data integration Datasets Diabetes Disease Estimators Gene expression Genes Genetic aspects Inference Internet Lung cancer Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Molecular interactions Network analysis Networks Physical Sciences Physiological aspects Physiology Protein expression Protein interaction Proteins Proteomics Publishing industry Research and Analysis Methods Shrinkage Studies |
| title | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A44%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20the%20proteomic%20cancer%20co-expression%20sub%20networks%20by%20using%20association%20estimators&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Erdo%C4%9Fan,%20Cihat&rft.date=2017-11-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0188016&rft.epage=e0188016&rft.pages=e0188016-e0188016&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188016&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA514689446%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965167971&rft_id=info:pmid/29145449&rft_galeid=A514689446&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_07c99933428347c888e09010d2860dc0&rfr_iscdi=true |