The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania
Newcastle disease (ND) is a viral disease of poultry with global importance, responsible for the loss of a potential source of household nutrition and economic livelihood in many low-income food-deficit countries. Periodic outbreaks of this endemic disease result in high mortality amongst free-rangi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188230-e0188230 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0188230 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0188230 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | de Bruyn, Julia Thomson, Peter C Bagnol, Brigitte Maulaga, Wende Rukambile, Elpidius Alders, Robyn G |
description | Newcastle disease (ND) is a viral disease of poultry with global importance, responsible for the loss of a potential source of household nutrition and economic livelihood in many low-income food-deficit countries. Periodic outbreaks of this endemic disease result in high mortality amongst free-ranging chicken flocks and may serve as a disincentive for rural households to invest time or resources in poultry-keeping. Sustainable ND control can be achieved through vaccination using a thermotolerant vaccine administered via eyedrop by trained "community vaccinators". This article evaluates the uptake and outcomes of fee-for-service ND vaccination programs in eight rural villages in the semi-arid central zone of Tanzania. It represents part of an interdisciplinary program seeking to address chronic undernutrition in children through improvements to existing poultry and crop systems. Newcastle disease vaccination uptake was found to vary substantially across communities and seasons, with a significantly higher level of vaccination amongst households participating in a longitudinal study of children's growth compared with non-participating households (p = 0.009). Two multivariable model analyses were used to explore associations between vaccination and chicken numbers, allowing for clustered data and socioeconomic and cultural variation amongst the population. Results demonstrated that both (a) households that undertook ND vaccination had a significantly larger chicken flock size in the period between that vaccination campaign and the next compared with those that did not vaccinate (p = 0.018); and (b) households with larger chicken flocks at the time of vaccination were significantly more likely to participate in vaccination programs (p < 0.001). Additionally, households vaccinating in all three vaccination campaigns held over 12 months were identified to have significantly larger chicken flocks at the end of this period (p < 0.001). Opportunities to understand causality and complexity through quantitative analyses are limited, and there is a role for qualitative approaches to explore decisions made by poultry-keeping households and the motivations, challenges and priorities of community vaccinators. Evidence of a bi-directional relationship, however, whereby vaccination leads to greater chicken numbers, and larger flocks are more likely to be vaccinated, offers useful insights into the efficacy of fee-for-service animal health programs. This article concludes t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0188230 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1965166466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A514689465</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_04666a4d6ac945cba35338e1a4db1a56</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A514689465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-93dfe6578630ef8c1548afbc9786ec1b0db3caad813bb8a54c40c692f05502ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1Fv0zAQxyMEYmPwDRBYQkLw0GLHsZu8gKZpQKWJSVB4tS7OJXWX2sNOurHPwQfGabvRoj2gPCQ-__7_y519SfKc0THjE_Zu4XpvoR1fOotjyvI85fRBcsgKno5kSvnDne-D5EkIC0oFz6V8nBykBctEJvlh8ns2R6LnRl-gJc6TLi6xaT6Q0-vL1nljG1KaUWU86s64mI9ACE4bGFaBlNhdYVR-wSsNoWuRVCYgBCQr0NrYNUbAVmRl2haav7nq1ukLEswNEmOJ7320noG9AWvgafKohjbgs-37KPn-8XR28nl0dv5penJ8NtKCT-io4FWNUkxyySnWuWYiy6EudREjqFlJq5JrgCpnvCxzEJnOqJZFWlMhaAoVP0pebnxjqUFtGxoUK6RgUmZSRmK6ISoHC3XpzRL8L-XAqHXA-UaB74xuUdHIS8gqCbrIhC6BC85zZDFUMhCD1_tttr5cYqXRdrHoPdP9HWvmqnErJWRBZZpGgzdbA-9-9hg6tTRBY-yrRdev_1umXFA6oK_-Qe-vbks1EAswtnYxrx5M1bFgmcyLTIpIje-h4lPh0uh4-2oT43uCt3uCyHR43TXQh6Cm377-P3v-Y599vcPOEdpuHlzbr6_iPphtQO1dCB7ruyYzqobhue2GGoZHbYcnyl7sHtCd6HZa-B-vWxbJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965166466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>de Bruyn, Julia ; Thomson, Peter C ; Bagnol, Brigitte ; Maulaga, Wende ; Rukambile, Elpidius ; Alders, Robyn G</creator><contributor>Zhou, Huaijun</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Julia ; Thomson, Peter C ; Bagnol, Brigitte ; Maulaga, Wende ; Rukambile, Elpidius ; Alders, Robyn G ; Zhou, Huaijun</creatorcontrib><description>Newcastle disease (ND) is a viral disease of poultry with global importance, responsible for the loss of a potential source of household nutrition and economic livelihood in many low-income food-deficit countries. Periodic outbreaks of this endemic disease result in high mortality amongst free-ranging chicken flocks and may serve as a disincentive for rural households to invest time or resources in poultry-keeping. Sustainable ND control can be achieved through vaccination using a thermotolerant vaccine administered via eyedrop by trained "community vaccinators". This article evaluates the uptake and outcomes of fee-for-service ND vaccination programs in eight rural villages in the semi-arid central zone of Tanzania. It represents part of an interdisciplinary program seeking to address chronic undernutrition in children through improvements to existing poultry and crop systems. Newcastle disease vaccination uptake was found to vary substantially across communities and seasons, with a significantly higher level of vaccination amongst households participating in a longitudinal study of children's growth compared with non-participating households (p = 0.009). Two multivariable model analyses were used to explore associations between vaccination and chicken numbers, allowing for clustered data and socioeconomic and cultural variation amongst the population. Results demonstrated that both (a) households that undertook ND vaccination had a significantly larger chicken flock size in the period between that vaccination campaign and the next compared with those that did not vaccinate (p = 0.018); and (b) households with larger chicken flocks at the time of vaccination were significantly more likely to participate in vaccination programs (p < 0.001). Additionally, households vaccinating in all three vaccination campaigns held over 12 months were identified to have significantly larger chicken flocks at the end of this period (p < 0.001). Opportunities to understand causality and complexity through quantitative analyses are limited, and there is a role for qualitative approaches to explore decisions made by poultry-keeping households and the motivations, challenges and priorities of community vaccinators. Evidence of a bi-directional relationship, however, whereby vaccination leads to greater chicken numbers, and larger flocks are more likely to be vaccinated, offers useful insights into the efficacy of fee-for-service animal health programs. This article concludes that attention should be focused on ways of supporting the participation of vulnerable households in ND vaccination campaigns, and encouraging regular vaccination throughout the year, as a pathway to strengthen food security, promote resilience and contribute to improved human nutrition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29145463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Animal health ; Aridity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chickens ; Children ; Correlation analysis ; Crop ; Disease control ; Eggs ; Environmental science ; Ethics ; Food security ; Group size ; Households ; Human nutrition ; Laboratories ; Livestock ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mortality ; Newcastle disease ; Nutrition ; Nutritional aspects ; Outbreaks ; Poultry ; Prevention ; Qualitative analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rural areas ; Semiarid zones ; Social Sciences ; Socio-economic aspects ; Undernutrition ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188230-e0188230</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 de Bruyn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 de Bruyn et al 2017 de Bruyn et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-93dfe6578630ef8c1548afbc9786ec1b0db3caad813bb8a54c40c692f05502ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-93dfe6578630ef8c1548afbc9786ec1b0db3caad813bb8a54c40c692f05502ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5222-6464</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690622/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690622/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zhou, Huaijun</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagnol, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maulaga, Wende</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukambile, Elpidius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alders, Robyn G</creatorcontrib><title>The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Newcastle disease (ND) is a viral disease of poultry with global importance, responsible for the loss of a potential source of household nutrition and economic livelihood in many low-income food-deficit countries. Periodic outbreaks of this endemic disease result in high mortality amongst free-ranging chicken flocks and may serve as a disincentive for rural households to invest time or resources in poultry-keeping. Sustainable ND control can be achieved through vaccination using a thermotolerant vaccine administered via eyedrop by trained "community vaccinators". This article evaluates the uptake and outcomes of fee-for-service ND vaccination programs in eight rural villages in the semi-arid central zone of Tanzania. It represents part of an interdisciplinary program seeking to address chronic undernutrition in children through improvements to existing poultry and crop systems. Newcastle disease vaccination uptake was found to vary substantially across communities and seasons, with a significantly higher level of vaccination amongst households participating in a longitudinal study of children's growth compared with non-participating households (p = 0.009). Two multivariable model analyses were used to explore associations between vaccination and chicken numbers, allowing for clustered data and socioeconomic and cultural variation amongst the population. Results demonstrated that both (a) households that undertook ND vaccination had a significantly larger chicken flock size in the period between that vaccination campaign and the next compared with those that did not vaccinate (p = 0.018); and (b) households with larger chicken flocks at the time of vaccination were significantly more likely to participate in vaccination programs (p < 0.001). Additionally, households vaccinating in all three vaccination campaigns held over 12 months were identified to have significantly larger chicken flocks at the end of this period (p < 0.001). Opportunities to understand causality and complexity through quantitative analyses are limited, and there is a role for qualitative approaches to explore decisions made by poultry-keeping households and the motivations, challenges and priorities of community vaccinators. Evidence of a bi-directional relationship, however, whereby vaccination leads to greater chicken numbers, and larger flocks are more likely to be vaccinated, offers useful insights into the efficacy of fee-for-service animal health programs. This article concludes that attention should be focused on ways of supporting the participation of vulnerable households in ND vaccination campaigns, and encouraging regular vaccination throughout the year, as a pathway to strengthen food security, promote resilience and contribute to improved human nutrition.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Crop</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human nutrition</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Newcastle disease</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional aspects</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Semiarid zones</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socio-economic aspects</subject><subject>Undernutrition</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1Fv0zAQxyMEYmPwDRBYQkLw0GLHsZu8gKZpQKWJSVB4tS7OJXWX2sNOurHPwQfGabvRoj2gPCQ-__7_y519SfKc0THjE_Zu4XpvoR1fOotjyvI85fRBcsgKno5kSvnDne-D5EkIC0oFz6V8nBykBctEJvlh8ns2R6LnRl-gJc6TLi6xaT6Q0-vL1nljG1KaUWU86s64mI9ACE4bGFaBlNhdYVR-wSsNoWuRVCYgBCQr0NrYNUbAVmRl2haav7nq1ukLEswNEmOJ7320noG9AWvgafKohjbgs-37KPn-8XR28nl0dv5penJ8NtKCT-io4FWNUkxyySnWuWYiy6EudREjqFlJq5JrgCpnvCxzEJnOqJZFWlMhaAoVP0pebnxjqUFtGxoUK6RgUmZSRmK6ISoHC3XpzRL8L-XAqHXA-UaB74xuUdHIS8gqCbrIhC6BC85zZDFUMhCD1_tttr5cYqXRdrHoPdP9HWvmqnErJWRBZZpGgzdbA-9-9hg6tTRBY-yrRdev_1umXFA6oK_-Qe-vbks1EAswtnYxrx5M1bFgmcyLTIpIje-h4lPh0uh4-2oT43uCt3uCyHR43TXQh6Cm377-P3v-Y599vcPOEdpuHlzbr6_iPphtQO1dCB7ruyYzqobhue2GGoZHbYcnyl7sHtCd6HZa-B-vWxbJ</recordid><startdate>20171116</startdate><enddate>20171116</enddate><creator>de Bruyn, Julia</creator><creator>Thomson, Peter C</creator><creator>Bagnol, Brigitte</creator><creator>Maulaga, Wende</creator><creator>Rukambile, Elpidius</creator><creator>Alders, Robyn G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5222-6464</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171116</creationdate><title>The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania</title><author>de Bruyn, Julia ; Thomson, Peter C ; Bagnol, Brigitte ; Maulaga, Wende ; Rukambile, Elpidius ; Alders, Robyn G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-93dfe6578630ef8c1548afbc9786ec1b0db3caad813bb8a54c40c692f05502ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Crop</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human nutrition</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Newcastle disease</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional aspects</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Semiarid zones</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socio-economic aspects</topic><topic>Undernutrition</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bruyn, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagnol, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maulaga, Wende</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rukambile, Elpidius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alders, Robyn G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bruyn, Julia</au><au>Thomson, Peter C</au><au>Bagnol, Brigitte</au><au>Maulaga, Wende</au><au>Rukambile, Elpidius</au><au>Alders, Robyn G</au><au>Zhou, Huaijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-11-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0188230</spage><epage>e0188230</epage><pages>e0188230-e0188230</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Newcastle disease (ND) is a viral disease of poultry with global importance, responsible for the loss of a potential source of household nutrition and economic livelihood in many low-income food-deficit countries. Periodic outbreaks of this endemic disease result in high mortality amongst free-ranging chicken flocks and may serve as a disincentive for rural households to invest time or resources in poultry-keeping. Sustainable ND control can be achieved through vaccination using a thermotolerant vaccine administered via eyedrop by trained "community vaccinators". This article evaluates the uptake and outcomes of fee-for-service ND vaccination programs in eight rural villages in the semi-arid central zone of Tanzania. It represents part of an interdisciplinary program seeking to address chronic undernutrition in children through improvements to existing poultry and crop systems. Newcastle disease vaccination uptake was found to vary substantially across communities and seasons, with a significantly higher level of vaccination amongst households participating in a longitudinal study of children's growth compared with non-participating households (p = 0.009). Two multivariable model analyses were used to explore associations between vaccination and chicken numbers, allowing for clustered data and socioeconomic and cultural variation amongst the population. Results demonstrated that both (a) households that undertook ND vaccination had a significantly larger chicken flock size in the period between that vaccination campaign and the next compared with those that did not vaccinate (p = 0.018); and (b) households with larger chicken flocks at the time of vaccination were significantly more likely to participate in vaccination programs (p < 0.001). Additionally, households vaccinating in all three vaccination campaigns held over 12 months were identified to have significantly larger chicken flocks at the end of this period (p < 0.001). Opportunities to understand causality and complexity through quantitative analyses are limited, and there is a role for qualitative approaches to explore decisions made by poultry-keeping households and the motivations, challenges and priorities of community vaccinators. Evidence of a bi-directional relationship, however, whereby vaccination leads to greater chicken numbers, and larger flocks are more likely to be vaccinated, offers useful insights into the efficacy of fee-for-service animal health programs. This article concludes that attention should be focused on ways of supporting the participation of vulnerable households in ND vaccination campaigns, and encouraging regular vaccination throughout the year, as a pathway to strengthen food security, promote resilience and contribute to improved human nutrition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29145463</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0188230</doi><tpages>e0188230</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5222-6464</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188230-e0188230 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1965166466 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agricultural economics Animal health Aridity Biology and Life Sciences Chickens Children Correlation analysis Crop Disease control Eggs Environmental science Ethics Food security Group size Households Human nutrition Laboratories Livestock Medicine and Health Sciences Mortality Newcastle disease Nutrition Nutritional aspects Outbreaks Poultry Prevention Qualitative analysis Research and Analysis Methods Rural areas Semiarid zones Social Sciences Socio-economic aspects Undernutrition Vaccination Vaccines |
title | The chicken or the egg? Exploring bi-directional associations between Newcastle disease vaccination and village chicken flock size in rural Tanzania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20chicken%20or%20the%20egg?%20Exploring%20bi-directional%20associations%20between%20Newcastle%20disease%20vaccination%20and%20village%20chicken%20flock%20size%20in%20rural%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=de%20Bruyn,%20Julia&rft.date=2017-11-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0188230&rft.epage=e0188230&rft.pages=e0188230-e0188230&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188230&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA514689465%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965166466&rft_id=info:pmid/29145463&rft_galeid=A514689465&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_04666a4d6ac945cba35338e1a4db1a56&rfr_iscdi=true |