Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food

Sulfites and other preservatives are considered food additives to limit bacterial contamination, and are generally regarded as safe for consumption by governmental regulatory agencies at concentrations up to 5000 parts per million (ppm). Consumption of bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs have been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0186629-e0186629
Hauptverfasser: Irwin, Sally V, Fisher, Peter, Graham, Emily, Malek, Ashley, Robidoux, Adriel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0186629
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0186629
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Irwin, Sally V
Fisher, Peter
Graham, Emily
Malek, Ashley
Robidoux, Adriel
description Sulfites and other preservatives are considered food additives to limit bacterial contamination, and are generally regarded as safe for consumption by governmental regulatory agencies at concentrations up to 5000 parts per million (ppm). Consumption of bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs have been shown to damage beneficial bacteria in the human gut and this damage has been associated with several diseases. In the present study, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects of two common food preservatives, sodium bisulfite and sodium sulfite, were tested on four known beneficial bacterial species common as probiotics and members of the human gut microbiota. Lactobacillus species casei, plantarum and rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus were grown under optimal environmental conditions to achieve early log phase at start of experiments. Bacterial cultures were challenged with sulfite concentrations ranging between 10 and 3780 ppm for six hours. To establish a control, a culture of each species was inoculated into media containing no sulfite preservative. By two hours of exposure, a substantial decrease (or no increase) of cell numbers (based on OD600 readings) were observed for all bacteria types, in concentrations of sulfites between 250-500 ppm, compared to cells in sulfite free media. Further testing using serial dilution and drop plates identified bactericidal effects in concentrations ranging between 1000-3780 ppm on all the Lactobacillus species by 4 hours of exposure and bactericidal effects on S. thermophilus in 2000ppm NaHSO3 after 6 hours of exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0186629
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1952655551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A510237615</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3e69dc027bfe4de9828609fd99c8045d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A510237615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2b2af5dac3b3b0c2cda5b13d61a67a1d75302d14ed0dd90c95f7731c57bbeb233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjPlo0uZGWBY_BhYWXPU2pMlpJ0unGZPUj39vZqa7TGUvbChtk-e8J3lPT1E8J3hJWEXe3fgxDLpfbv0AS0xqIah8UJwSyehCUMweHr2fFE9ivMGYs4w9Lk6oxCUvK3pahOuxb12CiNywdo1LKK0BdcH_SmvkW9TmLChuwbiM5O8GBmidcbpH3ZhQo02C4DTSCRk_GBhS0Mn5IaIAnQ4WLNIRRd1Clgr59vZp8ajVfYRn0_Os-Pbxw9eLz4vLq0-ri_PLhal4nRa0obrlVhvWsAYbaqzmDWFWEC0qTWzFGaaWlGCxtRIbyduqYsTwqmmgoYydFS8PutveRzXZFRWRnAqeL5KJ1YGwXt-obXAbHf4or53aT_jQKR2SMz0oBkJag2nVtFBakDWtBZatldLU2Uubtd5P2cZmA_bgRD8Tna8Mbq06_1NxUYqa11ngzSQQ_I8RYlIbFw30vR7Aj_t9MyorKXboq3_Q-083UZ3OB3BD63NesxNV55xgyipBeKaW91B5WNi4XNJc7Tw_C3g7C8hMgt-p02OManX95f_Zq-9z9vURuwbdp3X0_bj_m-ZgeQBN8DEGaO9MJljtWuPWDbVrDTW1Rg57cVygu6DbXmB_AVPkCnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952655551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Irwin, Sally V ; Fisher, Peter ; Graham, Emily ; Malek, Ashley ; Robidoux, Adriel</creator><contributor>Lee, Bok-Luel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Sally V ; Fisher, Peter ; Graham, Emily ; Malek, Ashley ; Robidoux, Adriel ; Lee, Bok-Luel</creatorcontrib><description>Sulfites and other preservatives are considered food additives to limit bacterial contamination, and are generally regarded as safe for consumption by governmental regulatory agencies at concentrations up to 5000 parts per million (ppm). Consumption of bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs have been shown to damage beneficial bacteria in the human gut and this damage has been associated with several diseases. In the present study, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects of two common food preservatives, sodium bisulfite and sodium sulfite, were tested on four known beneficial bacterial species common as probiotics and members of the human gut microbiota. Lactobacillus species casei, plantarum and rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus were grown under optimal environmental conditions to achieve early log phase at start of experiments. Bacterial cultures were challenged with sulfite concentrations ranging between 10 and 3780 ppm for six hours. To establish a control, a culture of each species was inoculated into media containing no sulfite preservative. By two hours of exposure, a substantial decrease (or no increase) of cell numbers (based on OD600 readings) were observed for all bacteria types, in concentrations of sulfites between 250-500 ppm, compared to cells in sulfite free media. Further testing using serial dilution and drop plates identified bactericidal effects in concentrations ranging between 1000-3780 ppm on all the Lactobacillus species by 4 hours of exposure and bactericidal effects on S. thermophilus in 2000ppm NaHSO3 after 6 hours of exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186629</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29045472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - growth &amp; development ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Bisulfite ; Cell culture ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dilution ; Drugs ; Environmental conditions ; Exposure ; Food additives ; Food contamination ; Food preservatives ; Food Safety ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects ; Genomes ; Growth ; Inhibitory Concentration 50 ; Intestinal microflora ; Lactobacillus casei ; Lactobacillus plantarum ; Lactobacillus rhamnosus ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbial Viability - drug effects ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Motility ; Physical Sciences ; Preservatives ; Probiotics ; Regulatory agencies ; Sodium ; Sodium sulfite ; Species Specificity ; Streptococcus thermophilus ; Sulfites ; Sulfites - pharmacology ; Weight control</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0186629-e0186629</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Irwin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Irwin et al 2017 Irwin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2b2af5dac3b3b0c2cda5b13d61a67a1d75302d14ed0dd90c95f7731c57bbeb233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2b2af5dac3b3b0c2cda5b13d61a67a1d75302d14ed0dd90c95f7731c57bbeb233</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1494-5243</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646858/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646858/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29045472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lee, Bok-Luel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Sally V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robidoux, Adriel</creatorcontrib><title>Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Sulfites and other preservatives are considered food additives to limit bacterial contamination, and are generally regarded as safe for consumption by governmental regulatory agencies at concentrations up to 5000 parts per million (ppm). Consumption of bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs have been shown to damage beneficial bacteria in the human gut and this damage has been associated with several diseases. In the present study, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects of two common food preservatives, sodium bisulfite and sodium sulfite, were tested on four known beneficial bacterial species common as probiotics and members of the human gut microbiota. Lactobacillus species casei, plantarum and rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus were grown under optimal environmental conditions to achieve early log phase at start of experiments. Bacterial cultures were challenged with sulfite concentrations ranging between 10 and 3780 ppm for six hours. To establish a control, a culture of each species was inoculated into media containing no sulfite preservative. By two hours of exposure, a substantial decrease (or no increase) of cell numbers (based on OD600 readings) were observed for all bacteria types, in concentrations of sulfites between 250-500 ppm, compared to cells in sulfite free media. Further testing using serial dilution and drop plates identified bactericidal effects in concentrations ranging between 1000-3780 ppm on all the Lactobacillus species by 4 hours of exposure and bactericidal effects on S. thermophilus in 2000ppm NaHSO3 after 6 hours of exposure.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bisulfite</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>Food preservatives</subject><subject>Food Safety</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Inhibitory Concentration 50</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lactobacillus casei</subject><subject>Lactobacillus plantarum</subject><subject>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Viability - drug effects</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium sulfite</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Streptococcus thermophilus</subject><subject>Sulfites</subject><subject>Sulfites - pharmacology</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjPlo0uZGWBY_BhYWXPU2pMlpJ0unGZPUj39vZqa7TGUvbChtk-e8J3lPT1E8J3hJWEXe3fgxDLpfbv0AS0xqIah8UJwSyehCUMweHr2fFE9ivMGYs4w9Lk6oxCUvK3pahOuxb12CiNywdo1LKK0BdcH_SmvkW9TmLChuwbiM5O8GBmidcbpH3ZhQo02C4DTSCRk_GBhS0Mn5IaIAnQ4WLNIRRd1Clgr59vZp8ajVfYRn0_Os-Pbxw9eLz4vLq0-ri_PLhal4nRa0obrlVhvWsAYbaqzmDWFWEC0qTWzFGaaWlGCxtRIbyduqYsTwqmmgoYydFS8PutveRzXZFRWRnAqeL5KJ1YGwXt-obXAbHf4or53aT_jQKR2SMz0oBkJag2nVtFBakDWtBZatldLU2Uubtd5P2cZmA_bgRD8Tna8Mbq06_1NxUYqa11ngzSQQ_I8RYlIbFw30vR7Aj_t9MyorKXboq3_Q-083UZ3OB3BD63NesxNV55xgyipBeKaW91B5WNi4XNJc7Tw_C3g7C8hMgt-p02OManX95f_Zq-9z9vURuwbdp3X0_bj_m-ZgeQBN8DEGaO9MJljtWuPWDbVrDTW1Rg57cVygu6DbXmB_AVPkCnM</recordid><startdate>20171018</startdate><enddate>20171018</enddate><creator>Irwin, Sally V</creator><creator>Fisher, Peter</creator><creator>Graham, Emily</creator><creator>Malek, Ashley</creator><creator>Robidoux, Adriel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-5243</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171018</creationdate><title>Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food</title><author>Irwin, Sally V ; Fisher, Peter ; Graham, Emily ; Malek, Ashley ; Robidoux, Adriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2b2af5dac3b3b0c2cda5b13d61a67a1d75302d14ed0dd90c95f7731c57bbeb233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bisulfite</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>Food preservatives</topic><topic>Food Safety</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Inhibitory Concentration 50</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lactobacillus casei</topic><topic>Lactobacillus plantarum</topic><topic>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Viability - drug effects</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium sulfite</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Streptococcus thermophilus</topic><topic>Sulfites</topic><topic>Sulfites - pharmacology</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Sally V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robidoux, Adriel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irwin, Sally V</au><au>Fisher, Peter</au><au>Graham, Emily</au><au>Malek, Ashley</au><au>Robidoux, Adriel</au><au>Lee, Bok-Luel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-10-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0186629</spage><epage>e0186629</epage><pages>e0186629-e0186629</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Sulfites and other preservatives are considered food additives to limit bacterial contamination, and are generally regarded as safe for consumption by governmental regulatory agencies at concentrations up to 5000 parts per million (ppm). Consumption of bactericidal and bacteriostatic drugs have been shown to damage beneficial bacteria in the human gut and this damage has been associated with several diseases. In the present study, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects of two common food preservatives, sodium bisulfite and sodium sulfite, were tested on four known beneficial bacterial species common as probiotics and members of the human gut microbiota. Lactobacillus species casei, plantarum and rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus were grown under optimal environmental conditions to achieve early log phase at start of experiments. Bacterial cultures were challenged with sulfite concentrations ranging between 10 and 3780 ppm for six hours. To establish a control, a culture of each species was inoculated into media containing no sulfite preservative. By two hours of exposure, a substantial decrease (or no increase) of cell numbers (based on OD600 readings) were observed for all bacteria types, in concentrations of sulfites between 250-500 ppm, compared to cells in sulfite free media. Further testing using serial dilution and drop plates identified bactericidal effects in concentrations ranging between 1000-3780 ppm on all the Lactobacillus species by 4 hours of exposure and bactericidal effects on S. thermophilus in 2000ppm NaHSO3 after 6 hours of exposure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29045472</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0186629</doi><tpages>e0186629</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-5243</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0186629-e0186629
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1952655551
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Bacteria - drug effects
Bacteria - growth & development
Biology and Life Sciences
Bisulfite
Cell culture
Colony Count, Microbial
Dilution
Drugs
Environmental conditions
Exposure
Food additives
Food contamination
Food preservatives
Food Safety
Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects
Genomes
Growth
Inhibitory Concentration 50
Intestinal microflora
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
Medicine and Health Sciences
Microbial Viability - drug effects
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Motility
Physical Sciences
Preservatives
Probiotics
Regulatory agencies
Sodium
Sodium sulfite
Species Specificity
Streptococcus thermophilus
Sulfites
Sulfites - pharmacology
Weight control
title Sulfites inhibit the growth of four species of beneficial gut bacteria at concentrations regarded as safe for food
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sulfites%20inhibit%20the%20growth%20of%20four%20species%20of%20beneficial%20gut%20bacteria%20at%20concentrations%20regarded%20as%20safe%20for%20food&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Irwin,%20Sally%20V&rft.date=2017-10-18&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0186629&rft.epage=e0186629&rft.pages=e0186629-e0186629&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0186629&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA510237615%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952655551&rft_id=info:pmid/29045472&rft_galeid=A510237615&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3e69dc027bfe4de9828609fd99c8045d&rfr_iscdi=true