Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils
Management practices, such as tillage, crop rotation, and N fertilization, may affect net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), but their global impact on cropland soils under different soil and climatic conditions need further evaluation. Available global data from 57...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0148527 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | e0148527 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Sainju, Upendra M |
| description | Management practices, such as tillage, crop rotation, and N fertilization, may affect net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), but their global impact on cropland soils under different soil and climatic conditions need further evaluation. Available global data from 57 experiments and 225 treatments were evaluated for individual and combined effects of tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization rates on GWP and GHGI which accounted for CO(2) equivalents from N(2)O and CH(4) emissions with or withoutequivalents from soil C sequestration rate (ΔSOC), farm operations, and N fertilization. The GWP and GHGI were 66 to 71% lower with no-till than conventional till and 168 to 215% lower with perennial than annual cropping systems, but 41 to 46% greater with crop rotation than monocroppping. With no-till vs. conventional till, GWP and GHGI were 2.6- to 7.4-fold lower when partial than full accounting of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs) were considered. With 100 kg N ha(-1) , GWP and GHGI were 3.2 to 11.4 times greater with partial than full accounting. Both GWP and GHGI increased curvilinearly with increased N fertilization rate. Net GWP and GHGI were 70 to 87% lower in the improved combined management that included no-till, crop rotation/perennial crop, and reduced N rate than the traditional combined management that included conventional till, monocop- ping/annual crop, and recommended N rate. An alternative soil respiration method, which replaces ΔSOC by soil respiration and crop residue returned to soil in the previous year, similarly reduced GWP and GHGI by 133 to 158% in the improved vs. the traditional combined management. Changes in GWP and GHGI due to improved vs. traditional management varied with the duration of the experiment and inclusion of soil and climatic factors in multiple linear regressions improved their relationships. Improved management practices reduced GWP and GHGI compared with traditional management practices and combined management practices were even more effective than individual management practices in reducing net GHG emissions from cropland soils. Partial accounting overestimated GWP and GHGI values as sinks or sources of net GHGs compared with full accounting when evaluating the effect of management practices. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0148527 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1950592888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a84f5c365d8d41749d8b9fb3646fdef1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1950592888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-6a6456530275f1518bca2bdce707239dd8758adc189884b7d07e8abc3bd057183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1uEzEQhVcIREvhDRBY4oabDf5Z_90gVRGESC1UKhWX1uzam2y0awd7g5Rn4KVxmm1pEVe2Zr45Hh-donhN8IwwST5swi566Gfb4N0Mk0pxKp8Up0QzWgqK2dMH95PiRUobjDlTQjwvTqjQmCgqT4vfiz7U0KNLN0J5nvX2qUsoeDSuHVoOW2hGFFp0CR5WbnB-RFcx17rG3VJf3YgmhR8Qh86v0FUYM9blCniLFtE5vw675NACElr63EzduEdtDAOax7DtD9h16Pr0snjWQp_cq-k8K24-f_o-_1JefFss5-cXZcMVG0sBouKCM0wlbwknqm6A1rZxEkvKtLVKcgW2IUorVdXSYukU1A2rLeaSKHZWvD3qbvuQzORjMkRzzDVV6kAsj4QNsDHb2A0Q9yZAZ24LIa4MxGxC7wyoquUNE9wqWxFZaatq3dZMVKK1riVZ6-P02q4eXF7TjxH6R6KPO75bm1X4ZSopqNIiC7yfBGL4uXNpNEOXGtdn41w21hCFGda60jyj7_5B__-76kg1MaQUXXu_DMHmkK27KXPIlpmylcfePPzI_dBdmP762kIwsIpdMjfXFBOBMcFCUML-ALPj11w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950592888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Sainju, Upendra M</creator><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M</creatorcontrib><description>Management practices, such as tillage, crop rotation, and N fertilization, may affect net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), but their global impact on cropland soils under different soil and climatic conditions need further evaluation. Available global data from 57 experiments and 225 treatments were evaluated for individual and combined effects of tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization rates on GWP and GHGI which accounted for CO(2) equivalents from N(2)O and CH(4) emissions with or withoutequivalents from soil C sequestration rate (ΔSOC), farm operations, and N fertilization. The GWP and GHGI were 66 to 71% lower with no-till than conventional till and 168 to 215% lower with perennial than annual cropping systems, but 41 to 46% greater with crop rotation than monocroppping. With no-till vs. conventional till, GWP and GHGI were 2.6- to 7.4-fold lower when partial than full accounting of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs) were considered. With 100 kg N ha(-1) , GWP and GHGI were 3.2 to 11.4 times greater with partial than full accounting. Both GWP and GHGI increased curvilinearly with increased N fertilization rate. Net GWP and GHGI were 70 to 87% lower in the improved combined management that included no-till, crop rotation/perennial crop, and reduced N rate than the traditional combined management that included conventional till, monocop- ping/annual crop, and recommended N rate. An alternative soil respiration method, which replaces ΔSOC by soil respiration and crop residue returned to soil in the previous year, similarly reduced GWP and GHGI by 133 to 158% in the improved vs. the traditional combined management. Changes in GWP and GHGI due to improved vs. traditional management varied with the duration of the experiment and inclusion of soil and climatic factors in multiple linear regressions improved their relationships. Improved management practices reduced GWP and GHGI compared with traditional management practices and combined management practices were even more effective than individual management practices in reducing net GHG emissions from cropland soils. Partial accounting overestimated GWP and GHGI values as sinks or sources of net GHGs compared with full accounting when evaluating the effect of management practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26901827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>accounting ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Climatic conditions ; climatic factors ; Computer and Information Sciences ; conventional tillage ; Crop residues ; Crop rotation ; cropland ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Crops, Agricultural ; Data analysis ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Emissions ; Equivalence ; farms ; Female ; Fertilization ; fertilizer rates ; Global Warming ; Greenhouse Effect ; greenhouse gas emissions ; Greenhouse gases ; Humans ; Impact analysis ; Male ; Management ; Meta-analysis ; methane ; Methods ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Nitrous oxide ; Nitrous oxides ; no-tillage ; Physical Sciences ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Respiration ; Sinkholes ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil respiration ; Soils ; Tillage ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0148527</ispartof><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-6a6456530275f1518bca2bdce707239dd8758adc189884b7d07e8abc3bd057183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-6a6456530275f1518bca2bdce707239dd8758adc189884b7d07e8abc3bd057183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762896/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762896/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26901827$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M</creatorcontrib><title>Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Management practices, such as tillage, crop rotation, and N fertilization, may affect net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), but their global impact on cropland soils under different soil and climatic conditions need further evaluation. Available global data from 57 experiments and 225 treatments were evaluated for individual and combined effects of tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization rates on GWP and GHGI which accounted for CO(2) equivalents from N(2)O and CH(4) emissions with or withoutequivalents from soil C sequestration rate (ΔSOC), farm operations, and N fertilization. The GWP and GHGI were 66 to 71% lower with no-till than conventional till and 168 to 215% lower with perennial than annual cropping systems, but 41 to 46% greater with crop rotation than monocroppping. With no-till vs. conventional till, GWP and GHGI were 2.6- to 7.4-fold lower when partial than full accounting of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs) were considered. With 100 kg N ha(-1) , GWP and GHGI were 3.2 to 11.4 times greater with partial than full accounting. Both GWP and GHGI increased curvilinearly with increased N fertilization rate. Net GWP and GHGI were 70 to 87% lower in the improved combined management that included no-till, crop rotation/perennial crop, and reduced N rate than the traditional combined management that included conventional till, monocop- ping/annual crop, and recommended N rate. An alternative soil respiration method, which replaces ΔSOC by soil respiration and crop residue returned to soil in the previous year, similarly reduced GWP and GHGI by 133 to 158% in the improved vs. the traditional combined management. Changes in GWP and GHGI due to improved vs. traditional management varied with the duration of the experiment and inclusion of soil and climatic factors in multiple linear regressions improved their relationships. Improved management practices reduced GWP and GHGI compared with traditional management practices and combined management practices were even more effective than individual management practices in reducing net GHG emissions from cropland soils. Partial accounting overestimated GWP and GHGI values as sinks or sources of net GHGs compared with full accounting when evaluating the effect of management practices.</description><subject>accounting</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>conventional tillage</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>cropland</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Global Warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous oxides</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sinkholes</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil respiration</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1uEzEQhVcIREvhDRBY4oabDf5Z_90gVRGESC1UKhWX1uzam2y0awd7g5Rn4KVxmm1pEVe2Zr45Hh-donhN8IwwST5swi566Gfb4N0Mk0pxKp8Up0QzWgqK2dMH95PiRUobjDlTQjwvTqjQmCgqT4vfiz7U0KNLN0J5nvX2qUsoeDSuHVoOW2hGFFp0CR5WbnB-RFcx17rG3VJf3YgmhR8Qh86v0FUYM9blCniLFtE5vw675NACElr63EzduEdtDAOax7DtD9h16Pr0snjWQp_cq-k8K24-f_o-_1JefFss5-cXZcMVG0sBouKCM0wlbwknqm6A1rZxEkvKtLVKcgW2IUorVdXSYukU1A2rLeaSKHZWvD3qbvuQzORjMkRzzDVV6kAsj4QNsDHb2A0Q9yZAZ24LIa4MxGxC7wyoquUNE9wqWxFZaatq3dZMVKK1riVZ6-P02q4eXF7TjxH6R6KPO75bm1X4ZSopqNIiC7yfBGL4uXNpNEOXGtdn41w21hCFGda60jyj7_5B__-76kg1MaQUXXu_DMHmkK27KXPIlpmylcfePPzI_dBdmP762kIwsIpdMjfXFBOBMcFCUML-ALPj11w</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Sainju, Upendra M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils</title><author>Sainju, Upendra M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-6a6456530275f1518bca2bdce707239dd8758adc189884b7d07e8abc3bd057183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>accounting</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>conventional tillage</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>cropland</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Global Warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous oxides</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sinkholes</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil respiration</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sainju, Upendra M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0148527</spage><pages>e0148527-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Management practices, such as tillage, crop rotation, and N fertilization, may affect net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), but their global impact on cropland soils under different soil and climatic conditions need further evaluation. Available global data from 57 experiments and 225 treatments were evaluated for individual and combined effects of tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization rates on GWP and GHGI which accounted for CO(2) equivalents from N(2)O and CH(4) emissions with or withoutequivalents from soil C sequestration rate (ΔSOC), farm operations, and N fertilization. The GWP and GHGI were 66 to 71% lower with no-till than conventional till and 168 to 215% lower with perennial than annual cropping systems, but 41 to 46% greater with crop rotation than monocroppping. With no-till vs. conventional till, GWP and GHGI were 2.6- to 7.4-fold lower when partial than full accounting of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs) were considered. With 100 kg N ha(-1) , GWP and GHGI were 3.2 to 11.4 times greater with partial than full accounting. Both GWP and GHGI increased curvilinearly with increased N fertilization rate. Net GWP and GHGI were 70 to 87% lower in the improved combined management that included no-till, crop rotation/perennial crop, and reduced N rate than the traditional combined management that included conventional till, monocop- ping/annual crop, and recommended N rate. An alternative soil respiration method, which replaces ΔSOC by soil respiration and crop residue returned to soil in the previous year, similarly reduced GWP and GHGI by 133 to 158% in the improved vs. the traditional combined management. Changes in GWP and GHGI due to improved vs. traditional management varied with the duration of the experiment and inclusion of soil and climatic factors in multiple linear regressions improved their relationships. Improved management practices reduced GWP and GHGI compared with traditional management practices and combined management practices were even more effective than individual management practices in reducing net GHG emissions from cropland soils. Partial accounting overestimated GWP and GHGI values as sinks or sources of net GHGs compared with full accounting when evaluating the effect of management practices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26901827</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0148527</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2016-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0148527 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1950592888 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | accounting Agricultural land Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Biology and Life Sciences Carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration Climate change Climatic conditions climatic factors Computer and Information Sciences conventional tillage Crop residues Crop rotation cropland Cropping systems Crops Crops, Agricultural Data analysis Ecology and Environmental Sciences Emissions Equivalence farms Female Fertilization fertilizer rates Global Warming Greenhouse Effect greenhouse gas emissions Greenhouse gases Humans Impact analysis Male Management Meta-analysis methane Methods Nitrogen nitrogen fertilizers Nitrous oxide Nitrous oxides no-tillage Physical Sciences Regression analysis Research and Analysis Methods Respiration Sinkholes Soil Soil conditions Soil respiration Soils Tillage Wheat |
| title | Global Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Management Practices on Net Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Intensity from Cropland Soils |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T22%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Meta-Analysis%20on%20the%20Impact%20of%20Management%20Practices%20on%20Net%20Global%20Warming%20Potential%20and%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Intensity%20from%20Cropland%20Soils&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sainju,%20Upendra%20M&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0148527&rft.pages=e0148527-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0148527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1950592888%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950592888&rft_id=info:pmid/26901827&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a84f5c365d8d41749d8b9fb3646fdef1&rfr_iscdi=true |