Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought
Significant increases in tree mortality due to drought-induced physiological stress have been documented worldwide. This trend is likely to continue with increased frequency and severity of extreme drought events in the future. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence variability in droug...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0185604 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0185604 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Carnwath, Gunnar Nelson, Cara |
| description | Significant increases in tree mortality due to drought-induced physiological stress have been documented worldwide. This trend is likely to continue with increased frequency and severity of extreme drought events in the future. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence variability in drought responses among trees will be critical to predicting ecosystem responses to climate change and developing effective management actions. In this study, we used hierarchical mixed-effects models to analyze drought responses of Pseudotsuga menziesii in 20 unmanaged forests stands across a broad range of environmental conditions in northeastern Washington, USA. We aimed to 1) identify the biotic and abiotic attributes most closely associated with the responses of individual trees to drought and 2) quantify the variability in drought responses at different spatial scales. We found that growth rates and competition for resources significantly affected resistance to a severe drought event in 2001: slow-growing trees and trees growing in subordinate canopy positions and/or with more neighbors suffered greater declines in radial growth during the drought event. In contrast, the ability of a tree to return to normal growth when climatic conditions improved (resilience) was unaffected by competition or relative growth rates. Drought responses were significantly influenced by tree age: older trees were more resistant but less resilient than younger trees. Finally, we found differences between resistance and resilience in spatial scale: a significant proportion (approximately 50%) of the variability in drought resistance across the study area was at broad spatial scales (i.e. among different forest types), most likely due to differences in the total amount of precipitation received at different elevations; in contrast, variation in resilience was overwhelmingly (82%) at the level of individual trees within stands and there was no difference in drought resilience among forest types. Our results suggest that for Pseudotsuga menziesii resistance and resilience to drought are driven by different factors and vary at different spatial scales. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0185604 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1946295164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A507893633</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7607ce1773e94193aeaa6d7b49d48a8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A507893633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3b04e8c8453ebd097a9e99e5deadd29e6e6db86bf5920436aae581c716bea3e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAYhYso7rr6D0QLguDFjGnT5uNGWNZVBxYW_LoNb5O3nQydZjZJF_33Zna6yxQUpBdN3jznND2cLHtZkGVBefF-40Y_QL_cuQGXpBA1I9Wj7LSQtFywktDHR-uT7FkIG0JqKhh7mp2UQnJKiDjN1GXboo4hd23eWBetzmEwOUzrFnR0Pp0OucdgQ4RBY36LPozhbtJb3E-S-qMbux5C3lqfR5cbn_br-Dx70kIf8MX0Pst-fLr8fvFlcXX9eXVxfrXQTJZxQRtSodCiqik2hkgOEqXE2iAYU0pkyEwjWNPWsiQVZQBYi0LzgjUIFDk9y14ffHe9C2rKJqhCVqyUdcGqRKwOhHGwUTtvt-B_KwdW3Q2c7xT49M89Ks4I11hwTlFWKURAAGZ4U0lTCRCYvD5MXxubLRqNQ_TQz0znJ4Ndq87dqpqVrGIkGbyZDLy7GTHEf1x5ojpIt7JD65KZ3tqg1XlNuJCUUZqo5V-o9BjcWp3a0do0nwnezQSJifgrdjCGoFbfvv4_e_1zzr49YtcIfVwH14_RuiHMweoAau9C8Ng-JFcQtS_3fRpqX241lTvJXh2n_iC6bzP9A9d29b4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1946295164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Carnwath, Gunnar ; Nelson, Cara</creator><creatorcontrib>Carnwath, Gunnar ; Nelson, Cara</creatorcontrib><description>Significant increases in tree mortality due to drought-induced physiological stress have been documented worldwide. This trend is likely to continue with increased frequency and severity of extreme drought events in the future. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence variability in drought responses among trees will be critical to predicting ecosystem responses to climate change and developing effective management actions. In this study, we used hierarchical mixed-effects models to analyze drought responses of Pseudotsuga menziesii in 20 unmanaged forests stands across a broad range of environmental conditions in northeastern Washington, USA. We aimed to 1) identify the biotic and abiotic attributes most closely associated with the responses of individual trees to drought and 2) quantify the variability in drought responses at different spatial scales. We found that growth rates and competition for resources significantly affected resistance to a severe drought event in 2001: slow-growing trees and trees growing in subordinate canopy positions and/or with more neighbors suffered greater declines in radial growth during the drought event. In contrast, the ability of a tree to return to normal growth when climatic conditions improved (resilience) was unaffected by competition or relative growth rates. Drought responses were significantly influenced by tree age: older trees were more resistant but less resilient than younger trees. Finally, we found differences between resistance and resilience in spatial scale: a significant proportion (approximately 50%) of the variability in drought resistance across the study area was at broad spatial scales (i.e. among different forest types), most likely due to differences in the total amount of precipitation received at different elevations; in contrast, variation in resilience was overwhelmingly (82%) at the level of individual trees within stands and there was no difference in drought resilience among forest types. Our results suggest that for Pseudotsuga menziesii resistance and resilience to drought are driven by different factors and vary at different spatial scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28973008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abies - physiology ; Abiotic factors ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Biogeography ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Canopies ; Carbon ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Climatic conditions ; Competition ; Complications and side effects ; Drought ; Drought resistance ; Droughts ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem components ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conditions ; Extreme drought ; Extreme weather ; Forests ; Growth rate ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Pinus sylvestris ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Rainfall ; Resilience ; Resistance factors ; Stress (physiology) ; Trees ; Variability ; Washington ; Water shortages ; Weather extremes</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0185604</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3b04e8c8453ebd097a9e99e5deadd29e6e6db86bf5920436aae581c716bea3e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3b04e8c8453ebd097a9e99e5deadd29e6e6db86bf5920436aae581c716bea3e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8610-3171</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626460/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626460/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28973008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carnwath, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cara</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Significant increases in tree mortality due to drought-induced physiological stress have been documented worldwide. This trend is likely to continue with increased frequency and severity of extreme drought events in the future. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence variability in drought responses among trees will be critical to predicting ecosystem responses to climate change and developing effective management actions. In this study, we used hierarchical mixed-effects models to analyze drought responses of Pseudotsuga menziesii in 20 unmanaged forests stands across a broad range of environmental conditions in northeastern Washington, USA. We aimed to 1) identify the biotic and abiotic attributes most closely associated with the responses of individual trees to drought and 2) quantify the variability in drought responses at different spatial scales. We found that growth rates and competition for resources significantly affected resistance to a severe drought event in 2001: slow-growing trees and trees growing in subordinate canopy positions and/or with more neighbors suffered greater declines in radial growth during the drought event. In contrast, the ability of a tree to return to normal growth when climatic conditions improved (resilience) was unaffected by competition or relative growth rates. Drought responses were significantly influenced by tree age: older trees were more resistant but less resilient than younger trees. Finally, we found differences between resistance and resilience in spatial scale: a significant proportion (approximately 50%) of the variability in drought resistance across the study area was at broad spatial scales (i.e. among different forest types), most likely due to differences in the total amount of precipitation received at different elevations; in contrast, variation in resilience was overwhelmingly (82%) at the level of individual trees within stands and there was no difference in drought resilience among forest types. Our results suggest that for Pseudotsuga menziesii resistance and resilience to drought are driven by different factors and vary at different spatial scales.</description><subject>Abies - physiology</subject><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem components</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Extreme drought</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pinus sylvestris</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>Stress (physiology)</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Weather extremes</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAYhYso7rr6D0QLguDFjGnT5uNGWNZVBxYW_LoNb5O3nQydZjZJF_33Zna6yxQUpBdN3jznND2cLHtZkGVBefF-40Y_QL_cuQGXpBA1I9Wj7LSQtFywktDHR-uT7FkIG0JqKhh7mp2UQnJKiDjN1GXboo4hd23eWBetzmEwOUzrFnR0Pp0OucdgQ4RBY36LPozhbtJb3E-S-qMbux5C3lqfR5cbn_br-Dx70kIf8MX0Pst-fLr8fvFlcXX9eXVxfrXQTJZxQRtSodCiqik2hkgOEqXE2iAYU0pkyEwjWNPWsiQVZQBYi0LzgjUIFDk9y14ffHe9C2rKJqhCVqyUdcGqRKwOhHGwUTtvt-B_KwdW3Q2c7xT49M89Ks4I11hwTlFWKURAAGZ4U0lTCRCYvD5MXxubLRqNQ_TQz0znJ4Ndq87dqpqVrGIkGbyZDLy7GTHEf1x5ojpIt7JD65KZ3tqg1XlNuJCUUZqo5V-o9BjcWp3a0do0nwnezQSJifgrdjCGoFbfvv4_e_1zzr49YtcIfVwH14_RuiHMweoAau9C8Ng-JFcQtS_3fRpqX241lTvJXh2n_iC6bzP9A9d29b4</recordid><startdate>20171003</startdate><enddate>20171003</enddate><creator>Carnwath, Gunnar</creator><creator>Nelson, Cara</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-3171</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171003</creationdate><title>Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought</title><author>Carnwath, Gunnar ; Nelson, Cara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3b04e8c8453ebd097a9e99e5deadd29e6e6db86bf5920436aae581c716bea3e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abies - physiology</topic><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem components</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Extreme drought</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pinus sylvestris</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>Stress (physiology)</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Weather extremes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carnwath, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Cara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carnwath, Gunnar</au><au>Nelson, Cara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-10-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0185604</spage><pages>e0185604-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Significant increases in tree mortality due to drought-induced physiological stress have been documented worldwide. This trend is likely to continue with increased frequency and severity of extreme drought events in the future. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence variability in drought responses among trees will be critical to predicting ecosystem responses to climate change and developing effective management actions. In this study, we used hierarchical mixed-effects models to analyze drought responses of Pseudotsuga menziesii in 20 unmanaged forests stands across a broad range of environmental conditions in northeastern Washington, USA. We aimed to 1) identify the biotic and abiotic attributes most closely associated with the responses of individual trees to drought and 2) quantify the variability in drought responses at different spatial scales. We found that growth rates and competition for resources significantly affected resistance to a severe drought event in 2001: slow-growing trees and trees growing in subordinate canopy positions and/or with more neighbors suffered greater declines in radial growth during the drought event. In contrast, the ability of a tree to return to normal growth when climatic conditions improved (resilience) was unaffected by competition or relative growth rates. Drought responses were significantly influenced by tree age: older trees were more resistant but less resilient than younger trees. Finally, we found differences between resistance and resilience in spatial scale: a significant proportion (approximately 50%) of the variability in drought resistance across the study area was at broad spatial scales (i.e. among different forest types), most likely due to differences in the total amount of precipitation received at different elevations; in contrast, variation in resilience was overwhelmingly (82%) at the level of individual trees within stands and there was no difference in drought resilience among forest types. Our results suggest that for Pseudotsuga menziesii resistance and resilience to drought are driven by different factors and vary at different spatial scales.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28973008</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0185604</doi><tpages>e0185604</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-3171</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0185604 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1946295164 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Abies - physiology Abiotic factors Adaptation, Physiological Biogeography Biology and Life Sciences Canopies Carbon Climate Climate change Climate effects Climatic conditions Competition Complications and side effects Drought Drought resistance Droughts Ecology Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem components Ecosystems Environmental conditions Extreme drought Extreme weather Forests Growth rate Physiological aspects Physiology Pinus sylvestris Pseudotsuga menziesii Rainfall Resilience Resistance factors Stress (physiology) Trees Variability Washington Water shortages Weather extremes |
| title | Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on resistance versus resilience of Douglas fir to drought |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20biotic%20and%20abiotic%20factors%20on%20resistance%20versus%20resilience%20of%20Douglas%20fir%20to%20drought&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Carnwath,%20Gunnar&rft.date=2017-10-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0185604&rft.pages=e0185604-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0185604&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA507893633%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1946295164&rft_id=info:pmid/28973008&rft_galeid=A507893633&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7607ce1773e94193aeaa6d7b49d48a8e&rfr_iscdi=true |