Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study
To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women. We requested claim data from the Korean National He...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0182341-e0182341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0182341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0182341 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Park, Chulyong Kang, Mo-Yeol Kim, Dohyung Park, Jaechan Eom, Huisu Kim, Eun-A |
description | To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women.
We requested claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance. We defined reference groups as (1) non-working women and (2) workers in the education field. Women working in each industry were compared with reference groups regarding rates of miscarriage, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, and age and income adjustment was performed.
The percentages of all adverse obstetric outcomes were higher in working women than in non-working women. Working women had higher and statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for miscarriage in 18 of the 21 industries. The age and income-adjusted OR for miscarriage for all working women was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.28). Business facilities management and business support services, manufacturing, human health and social work activities, wholesale and retail trade, and professional, scientific, and technical activities were major industries with higher adjusted ORs for adverse obstetric outcomes.
We confirmed that compared to non-working women, working women have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, adverse pregnancy outcomes such as threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction may be associated with working status. This exploratory study identified several industries where in-depth studies are required in future to improve occupational safety in women of reproductive age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0182341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1933567712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5fe11d4610d64ba297bab087a55b771b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1933567712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-7d4a064f9c69dc52cdd5a3e72a7f0f1a541809c1966ec4e83e3f527f81cd00773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsI_QGCJSy-7-NsJB6SqKlBRCQ5wtib2ZMk2sRc7WbT_nuxuWrWI01j2e2_ejF9RvGZ0yYRh79dxTAG65SYGXFJWciHZk-KUVYIvNKfi6YPzSfEi5zWlSpRaPy9OeFkqqkp1Wtx-T7iFDoNDEhsCdUxDGwOB4An4LaaMZJNwFSC4HYnj4GKPmUAfw4r8iem2PdQeA2kD-RoTwgdyQVyKOS8yur0YdCQPo9-9LJ410GV8Ndez4uenqx-XXxY33z5fX17cLJyq-LAwXgLVsqmcrrxT3HmvQKDhYBraMFCSlbRyrNIancRSoGgUN03JnKfUGHFWvD3qbrqY7bynbKdtCKWNYXxCXB8RPsLablLbQ9rZCK09XMS0sjDtwXVoVYOMeakZ9VrWwCtTQ01LA0rVk1Y9aX2cu411j95hGBJ0j0Qfv4T2l13FrVXKSE33ds9ngRR_j5gH27fZYddBwDgefVeSKqkn6Lt_oP-fTh5Rh19I2NybYdTus3PHsvvs2Dk7E-3Nw0HuSXdhEX8BC6rDtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933567712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Park, Chulyong ; Kang, Mo-Yeol ; Kim, Dohyung ; Park, Jaechan ; Eom, Huisu ; Kim, Eun-A</creator><contributor>Asnani, Monika R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Park, Chulyong ; Kang, Mo-Yeol ; Kim, Dohyung ; Park, Jaechan ; Eom, Huisu ; Kim, Eun-A ; Asnani, Monika R.</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women.
We requested claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance. We defined reference groups as (1) non-working women and (2) workers in the education field. Women working in each industry were compared with reference groups regarding rates of miscarriage, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, and age and income adjustment was performed.
The percentages of all adverse obstetric outcomes were higher in working women than in non-working women. Working women had higher and statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for miscarriage in 18 of the 21 industries. The age and income-adjusted OR for miscarriage for all working women was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.28). Business facilities management and business support services, manufacturing, human health and social work activities, wholesale and retail trade, and professional, scientific, and technical activities were major industries with higher adjusted ORs for adverse obstetric outcomes.
We confirmed that compared to non-working women, working women have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, adverse pregnancy outcomes such as threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction may be associated with working status. This exploratory study identified several industries where in-depth studies are required in future to improve occupational safety in women of reproductive age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182341</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28850585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data ; Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology ; Adjustment ; Adult ; Age ; Business ; Confidence intervals ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Employment ; Engineering and Technology ; Facilities management ; Female ; Female employees ; Health care ; Health problems ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Incidence ; Income ; Labor ; Laboratories ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Menstruation ; Miscarriage ; Multivariate analysis ; Obstetric Labor, Premature - epidemiology ; Occupational Health ; Occupational safety ; Plastics industry ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Preventive medicine ; Regression analysis ; Reproduction ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive systems ; Republic of Korea - epidemiology ; Shift work ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Support services ; Women, Working ; Womens health ; Workers ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0182341-e0182341</ispartof><rights>2017 Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Park et al 2017 Park et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-7d4a064f9c69dc52cdd5a3e72a7f0f1a541809c1966ec4e83e3f527f81cd00773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-7d4a064f9c69dc52cdd5a3e72a7f0f1a541809c1966ec4e83e3f527f81cd00773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8582-234X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574607/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574607/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,2932,23875,27933,27934,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28850585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Asnani, Monika R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Park, Chulyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mo-Yeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jaechan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eom, Huisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eun-A</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women.
We requested claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance. We defined reference groups as (1) non-working women and (2) workers in the education field. Women working in each industry were compared with reference groups regarding rates of miscarriage, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, and age and income adjustment was performed.
The percentages of all adverse obstetric outcomes were higher in working women than in non-working women. Working women had higher and statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for miscarriage in 18 of the 21 industries. The age and income-adjusted OR for miscarriage for all working women was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.28). Business facilities management and business support services, manufacturing, human health and social work activities, wholesale and retail trade, and professional, scientific, and technical activities were major industries with higher adjusted ORs for adverse obstetric outcomes.
We confirmed that compared to non-working women, working women have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, adverse pregnancy outcomes such as threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction may be associated with working status. This exploratory study identified several industries where in-depth studies are required in future to improve occupational safety in women of reproductive age.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Facilities management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female employees</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor, Premature - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Plastics industry</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive systems</subject><subject>Republic of Korea - epidemiology</subject><subject>Shift work</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Support services</subject><subject>Women, Working</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsI_QGCJSy-7-NsJB6SqKlBRCQ5wtib2ZMk2sRc7WbT_nuxuWrWI01j2e2_ejF9RvGZ0yYRh79dxTAG65SYGXFJWciHZk-KUVYIvNKfi6YPzSfEi5zWlSpRaPy9OeFkqqkp1Wtx-T7iFDoNDEhsCdUxDGwOB4An4LaaMZJNwFSC4HYnj4GKPmUAfw4r8iem2PdQeA2kD-RoTwgdyQVyKOS8yur0YdCQPo9-9LJ410GV8Ndez4uenqx-XXxY33z5fX17cLJyq-LAwXgLVsqmcrrxT3HmvQKDhYBraMFCSlbRyrNIancRSoGgUN03JnKfUGHFWvD3qbrqY7bynbKdtCKWNYXxCXB8RPsLablLbQ9rZCK09XMS0sjDtwXVoVYOMeakZ9VrWwCtTQ01LA0rVk1Y9aX2cu411j95hGBJ0j0Qfv4T2l13FrVXKSE33ds9ngRR_j5gH27fZYddBwDgefVeSKqkn6Lt_oP-fTh5Rh19I2NybYdTus3PHsvvs2Dk7E-3Nw0HuSXdhEX8BC6rDtA</recordid><startdate>20170829</startdate><enddate>20170829</enddate><creator>Park, Chulyong</creator><creator>Kang, Mo-Yeol</creator><creator>Kim, Dohyung</creator><creator>Park, Jaechan</creator><creator>Eom, Huisu</creator><creator>Kim, Eun-A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-234X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170829</creationdate><title>Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Park, Chulyong ; Kang, Mo-Yeol ; Kim, Dohyung ; Park, Jaechan ; Eom, Huisu ; Kim, Eun-A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-7d4a064f9c69dc52cdd5a3e72a7f0f1a541809c1966ec4e83e3f527f81cd00773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Facilities management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female employees</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor, Premature - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Plastics industry</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive systems</topic><topic>Republic of Korea - epidemiology</topic><topic>Shift work</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Support services</topic><topic>Women, Working</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Chulyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mo-Yeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dohyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jaechan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eom, Huisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eun-A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Chulyong</au><au>Kang, Mo-Yeol</au><au>Kim, Dohyung</au><au>Park, Jaechan</au><au>Eom, Huisu</au><au>Kim, Eun-A</au><au>Asnani, Monika R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-08-29</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0182341</spage><epage>e0182341</epage><pages>e0182341-e0182341</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women.
We requested claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance. We defined reference groups as (1) non-working women and (2) workers in the education field. Women working in each industry were compared with reference groups regarding rates of miscarriage, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, and age and income adjustment was performed.
The percentages of all adverse obstetric outcomes were higher in working women than in non-working women. Working women had higher and statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for miscarriage in 18 of the 21 industries. The age and income-adjusted OR for miscarriage for all working women was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.28). Business facilities management and business support services, manufacturing, human health and social work activities, wholesale and retail trade, and professional, scientific, and technical activities were major industries with higher adjusted ORs for adverse obstetric outcomes.
We confirmed that compared to non-working women, working women have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, adverse pregnancy outcomes such as threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction may be associated with working status. This exploratory study identified several industries where in-depth studies are required in future to improve occupational safety in women of reproductive age.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28850585</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0182341</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-234X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0182341-e0182341 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1933567712 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced - statistics & numerical data Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology Adjustment Adult Age Business Confidence intervals Cross-Sectional Studies Employment Engineering and Technology Facilities management Female Female employees Health care Health problems Health risk assessment Humans Incidence Income Labor Laboratories Manufacturers Manufacturing Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Menstruation Miscarriage Multivariate analysis Obstetric Labor, Premature - epidemiology Occupational Health Occupational safety Plastics industry Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Prevalence Preventive medicine Regression analysis Reproduction Reproductive health Reproductive systems Republic of Korea - epidemiology Shift work Social Sciences Statistical analysis Support services Women, Working Womens health Workers Young Adult |
title | Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T17%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20abortion%20and%20adverse%20pregnancy%20outcomes%20among%20working%20women%20in%20Korea:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Park,%20Chulyong&rft.date=2017-08-29&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0182341&rft.epage=e0182341&rft.pages=e0182341-e0182341&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0182341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E1933567712%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933567712&rft_id=info:pmid/28850585&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5fe11d4610d64ba297bab087a55b771b&rfr_iscdi=true |