Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app

Current wound assessment practices are lacking on several measures. For example, the most common method for measuring wound size is using a ruler, which has been demonstrated to be crude and inaccurate. An increase in periwound temperature is a classic sign of infection but skin temperature is not a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0183139-e0183139
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Sheila C, Anderson, John A E, Evans, Robyn, Woo, Kevin, Beland, Benjamin, Sasseville, Denis, Moreau, Linda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0183139
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0183139
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Wang, Sheila C
Anderson, John A E
Evans, Robyn
Woo, Kevin
Beland, Benjamin
Sasseville, Denis
Moreau, Linda
description Current wound assessment practices are lacking on several measures. For example, the most common method for measuring wound size is using a ruler, which has been demonstrated to be crude and inaccurate. An increase in periwound temperature is a classic sign of infection but skin temperature is not always measured during wound assessments. To address this, we have developed a smartphone application that enables non-contact wound surface area and temperature measurements. Here we evaluate the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of this novel point-of-care wound assessment tool. The wounds of 87 patients were measured using the Swift Wound app and a ruler. The skin surface temperature of 37 patients was also measured using an infrared FLIR™ camera integrated with the Swift Wound app and using the clinically accepted reference thermometer Exergen DermaTemp 1001. Accuracy measurements were determined by assessing differences in surface area measurements of 15 plastic wounds between a digital planimeter of known accuracy and the Swift Wound app. To evaluate the impact of training on the reproducibility of the Swift Wound app measurements, three novice raters with no wound care training, measured the length, width and area of 12 plastic model wounds using the app. High inter-rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.97-1.00) and high accuracies were obtained using the Swift Wound app across raters of different levels of training in wound care. The ruler method also yielded reliable wound measurements (ICC = 0.92-0.97), albeit lower than that of the Swift Wound app. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the temperature differences measured using the infrared camera and the clinically tested reference thermometer. The Swift Wound app provides highly reliable and accurate wound measurements. The FLIR™ infrared camera integrated into the Swift Wound app provides skin temperature readings equivalent to the clinically tested reference thermometer. Thus, the Swift Wound app has the advantage of being a non-contact, easy-to-use wound measurement tool that allows clinicians to image, measure, and track wound size and temperature from one visit to the next. In addition, this tool may also be used by patients and their caregivers for home monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0183139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1930441568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A501760001</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_194b223be67f464c97739c2c50a0bc70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A501760001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f19eed1dafaf63b5c33754a18fef33940dabbab52923abcfce33d55c3d2ad813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwyGDHiZOwQKoqHiNVKiqPrXXj2BlXjp3aTmH-PR4mrSaoC5RFIuc7x77H9ybJc4xWmFT43ZWdnAG9Gq0RK4RrgknzIDnGDckzmiPy8OD7KHni_RVCJakpfZwc5XWNK1o0xwl8tcqEzMqMgxPpLzuZLr1RXlmjTJ8GwTfGattv36eXYnS2m7hqlVZhm0IkgfPJAd-mVqYwqwcBfnJiECakMI5Pk0cStBfP5vdJ8uPTx-9nX7Lzi8_rs9PzjNMmD1khcSNEhzuQIClpS05IVRaAaykkIU2BOmhbaMu8yQm0XHJBSFdGrMuhqzE5SV7ufUdtPZvT8SxmgIoCl7SOxHpPdBau2OjUAG7LLCj2d8G6noELimsRVUWb56QVtJIFLXhTVaThOS8RoJZXKHp9mHeb2kF0PBbrQC9Ml3-M2rDe3rCypIg2u8O8mQ2cvZ6ED2xQngutwQg7zeeuqgrnEX31D3p_dTPVQyxAGWnjvnxnyk5LFK8bIbRLaXUPFZ9ODIrHVpIqri8EbxeCyATxO_Qwec_W3y7_n734uWRfH7AbATpsvNVTiJ3nl2CxB7mz3jsh70LGiO0m4TYNtpsENk9ClL04vKA70W3rkz_SVASD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930441568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Sheila C ; Anderson, John A E ; Evans, Robyn ; Woo, Kevin ; Beland, Benjamin ; Sasseville, Denis ; Moreau, Linda</creator><contributor>Facchiano, Antonio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sheila C ; Anderson, John A E ; Evans, Robyn ; Woo, Kevin ; Beland, Benjamin ; Sasseville, Denis ; Moreau, Linda ; Facchiano, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Current wound assessment practices are lacking on several measures. For example, the most common method for measuring wound size is using a ruler, which has been demonstrated to be crude and inaccurate. An increase in periwound temperature is a classic sign of infection but skin temperature is not always measured during wound assessments. To address this, we have developed a smartphone application that enables non-contact wound surface area and temperature measurements. Here we evaluate the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of this novel point-of-care wound assessment tool. The wounds of 87 patients were measured using the Swift Wound app and a ruler. The skin surface temperature of 37 patients was also measured using an infrared FLIR™ camera integrated with the Swift Wound app and using the clinically accepted reference thermometer Exergen DermaTemp 1001. Accuracy measurements were determined by assessing differences in surface area measurements of 15 plastic wounds between a digital planimeter of known accuracy and the Swift Wound app. To evaluate the impact of training on the reproducibility of the Swift Wound app measurements, three novice raters with no wound care training, measured the length, width and area of 12 plastic model wounds using the app. High inter-rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.97-1.00) and high accuracies were obtained using the Swift Wound app across raters of different levels of training in wound care. The ruler method also yielded reliable wound measurements (ICC = 0.92-0.97), albeit lower than that of the Swift Wound app. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the temperature differences measured using the infrared camera and the clinically tested reference thermometer. The Swift Wound app provides highly reliable and accurate wound measurements. The FLIR™ infrared camera integrated into the Swift Wound app provides skin temperature readings equivalent to the clinically tested reference thermometer. Thus, the Swift Wound app has the advantage of being a non-contact, easy-to-use wound measurement tool that allows clinicians to image, measure, and track wound size and temperature from one visit to the next. In addition, this tool may also be used by patients and their caregivers for home monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28817649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Humans ; Infections ; Infrared cameras ; Measurement ; Medical imaging equipment ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Patients ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Plastics ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ruler method ; Skin ; Skin temperature ; Smartphones ; Surface area ; Surface temperature ; Temperature effects ; Temperature measurement ; Temperature measurements ; Training ; Wound care ; Wound healing ; Wounds ; Wounds and Injuries - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0183139-e0183139</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Wang et al 2017 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f19eed1dafaf63b5c33754a18fef33940dabbab52923abcfce33d55c3d2ad813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f19eed1dafaf63b5c33754a18fef33940dabbab52923abcfce33d55c3d2ad813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8123-1713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560698/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560698/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28817649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Facchiano, Antonio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sheila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, John A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beland, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasseville, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Current wound assessment practices are lacking on several measures. For example, the most common method for measuring wound size is using a ruler, which has been demonstrated to be crude and inaccurate. An increase in periwound temperature is a classic sign of infection but skin temperature is not always measured during wound assessments. To address this, we have developed a smartphone application that enables non-contact wound surface area and temperature measurements. Here we evaluate the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of this novel point-of-care wound assessment tool. The wounds of 87 patients were measured using the Swift Wound app and a ruler. The skin surface temperature of 37 patients was also measured using an infrared FLIR™ camera integrated with the Swift Wound app and using the clinically accepted reference thermometer Exergen DermaTemp 1001. Accuracy measurements were determined by assessing differences in surface area measurements of 15 plastic wounds between a digital planimeter of known accuracy and the Swift Wound app. To evaluate the impact of training on the reproducibility of the Swift Wound app measurements, three novice raters with no wound care training, measured the length, width and area of 12 plastic model wounds using the app. High inter-rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.97-1.00) and high accuracies were obtained using the Swift Wound app across raters of different levels of training in wound care. The ruler method also yielded reliable wound measurements (ICC = 0.92-0.97), albeit lower than that of the Swift Wound app. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the temperature differences measured using the infrared camera and the clinically tested reference thermometer. The Swift Wound app provides highly reliable and accurate wound measurements. The FLIR™ infrared camera integrated into the Swift Wound app provides skin temperature readings equivalent to the clinically tested reference thermometer. Thus, the Swift Wound app has the advantage of being a non-contact, easy-to-use wound measurement tool that allows clinicians to image, measure, and track wound size and temperature from one visit to the next. In addition, this tool may also be used by patients and their caregivers for home monitoring.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infrared cameras</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical imaging equipment</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ruler method</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin temperature</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature measurement</subject><subject>Temperature measurements</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Wound care</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - physiopathology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwyGDHiZOwQKoqHiNVKiqPrXXj2BlXjp3aTmH-PR4mrSaoC5RFIuc7x77H9ybJc4xWmFT43ZWdnAG9Gq0RK4RrgknzIDnGDckzmiPy8OD7KHni_RVCJakpfZwc5XWNK1o0xwl8tcqEzMqMgxPpLzuZLr1RXlmjTJ8GwTfGattv36eXYnS2m7hqlVZhm0IkgfPJAd-mVqYwqwcBfnJiECakMI5Pk0cStBfP5vdJ8uPTx-9nX7Lzi8_rs9PzjNMmD1khcSNEhzuQIClpS05IVRaAaykkIU2BOmhbaMu8yQm0XHJBSFdGrMuhqzE5SV7ufUdtPZvT8SxmgIoCl7SOxHpPdBau2OjUAG7LLCj2d8G6noELimsRVUWb56QVtJIFLXhTVaThOS8RoJZXKHp9mHeb2kF0PBbrQC9Ml3-M2rDe3rCypIg2u8O8mQ2cvZ6ED2xQngutwQg7zeeuqgrnEX31D3p_dTPVQyxAGWnjvnxnyk5LFK8bIbRLaXUPFZ9ODIrHVpIqri8EbxeCyATxO_Qwec_W3y7_n734uWRfH7AbATpsvNVTiJ3nl2CxB7mz3jsh70LGiO0m4TYNtpsENk9ClL04vKA70W3rkz_SVASD</recordid><startdate>20170817</startdate><enddate>20170817</enddate><creator>Wang, Sheila C</creator><creator>Anderson, John A E</creator><creator>Evans, Robyn</creator><creator>Woo, Kevin</creator><creator>Beland, Benjamin</creator><creator>Sasseville, Denis</creator><creator>Moreau, Linda</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-1713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170817</creationdate><title>Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app</title><author>Wang, Sheila C ; Anderson, John A E ; Evans, Robyn ; Woo, Kevin ; Beland, Benjamin ; Sasseville, Denis ; Moreau, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-4f19eed1dafaf63b5c33754a18fef33940dabbab52923abcfce33d55c3d2ad813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infrared cameras</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical imaging equipment</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ruler method</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin temperature</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature measurement</topic><topic>Temperature measurements</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Wound care</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sheila C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, John A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beland, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasseville, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Sheila C</au><au>Anderson, John A E</au><au>Evans, Robyn</au><au>Woo, Kevin</au><au>Beland, Benjamin</au><au>Sasseville, Denis</au><au>Moreau, Linda</au><au>Facchiano, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-08-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0183139</spage><epage>e0183139</epage><pages>e0183139-e0183139</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Current wound assessment practices are lacking on several measures. For example, the most common method for measuring wound size is using a ruler, which has been demonstrated to be crude and inaccurate. An increase in periwound temperature is a classic sign of infection but skin temperature is not always measured during wound assessments. To address this, we have developed a smartphone application that enables non-contact wound surface area and temperature measurements. Here we evaluate the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of this novel point-of-care wound assessment tool. The wounds of 87 patients were measured using the Swift Wound app and a ruler. The skin surface temperature of 37 patients was also measured using an infrared FLIR™ camera integrated with the Swift Wound app and using the clinically accepted reference thermometer Exergen DermaTemp 1001. Accuracy measurements were determined by assessing differences in surface area measurements of 15 plastic wounds between a digital planimeter of known accuracy and the Swift Wound app. To evaluate the impact of training on the reproducibility of the Swift Wound app measurements, three novice raters with no wound care training, measured the length, width and area of 12 plastic model wounds using the app. High inter-rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.97-1.00) and high accuracies were obtained using the Swift Wound app across raters of different levels of training in wound care. The ruler method also yielded reliable wound measurements (ICC = 0.92-0.97), albeit lower than that of the Swift Wound app. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the temperature differences measured using the infrared camera and the clinically tested reference thermometer. The Swift Wound app provides highly reliable and accurate wound measurements. The FLIR™ infrared camera integrated into the Swift Wound app provides skin temperature readings equivalent to the clinically tested reference thermometer. Thus, the Swift Wound app has the advantage of being a non-contact, easy-to-use wound measurement tool that allows clinicians to image, measure, and track wound size and temperature from one visit to the next. In addition, this tool may also be used by patients and their caregivers for home monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28817649</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0183139</doi><tpages>e0183139</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-1713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0183139-e0183139
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1930441568
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Engineering and Technology
Humans
Infections
Infrared cameras
Measurement
Medical imaging equipment
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Patients
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Plastics
Point-of-Care Systems
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Research and Analysis Methods
Ruler method
Skin
Skin temperature
Smartphones
Surface area
Surface temperature
Temperature effects
Temperature measurement
Temperature measurements
Training
Wound care
Wound healing
Wounds
Wounds and Injuries - physiopathology
title Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T03%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point-of-care%20wound%20visioning%20technology:%20Reproducibility%20and%20accuracy%20of%20a%20wound%20measurement%20app&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Sheila%20C&rft.date=2017-08-17&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0183139&rft.epage=e0183139&rft.pages=e0183139-e0183139&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0183139&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA501760001%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930441568&rft_id=info:pmid/28817649&rft_galeid=A501760001&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_194b223be67f464c97739c2c50a0bc70&rfr_iscdi=true