Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study
Disclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0181854-e0181854 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0181854 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0181854 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Dahan, Sonia Ducard, Dominique Caeymaex, Laurence |
description | Disclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the function and meaning of the apology.
The aim of this study was to explore the role ascribed to apology in communication between healthcare professionals and patients when disclosing a medical error, and to discuss these findings using a linguistic and philosophical perspective.
Qualitative exploratory study, based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews, with seven physicians in a neonatal unit in France. Discourse analysis.
Four themes emerged. Difference between apology in everyday life and in the medical encounter; place of the apology in the process of disclosure together with explanations, regrets, empathy and ways to avoid repeating the error; effects of the apology were to allow the patient-physician relationship undermined by the error, to be maintained, responsibility to be accepted, the first steps towards forgiveness to be taken, and a less hierarchical doctor-patient relationship to be created; ways of expressing apology ("I am sorry") reflected regrets and empathy more than an explicit apology.
This study highlights how the act of apology can be seen as a "language act" as described by philosophers Austin and Searle, and how it functions as a technique for making amends following a wrongdoing and as an action undertaken in order that neither party should lose face, thus echoing the sociologist Goffmann's interaction theory. This interpretation also accords with the views of Lazare, for whom the function of apology is a restoration of dignity after the humiliation of the error. This approach to the apology illustrates how meaning and impact of real-life language acts can be clarified by philosophical and sociological ideas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0181854 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1924843567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A499636179</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_914f17b1de214cd5a76da5efc46fbf29</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A499636179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-87c681f249a0eb62fe1c34781ef7e50460c6bbb24f0fe251d6dad28df52c662d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsFYL5JZsr68i0Eo2xoIFNZut0LWh62gWJlkl-XfT2ncEpdeDF_YHD3vez7kk2VvQTEHJQWf134InXDzre_0vAAMMIyeZaegKuGMwKJ8fvR9kr2KcV0UuGSEvMxOIKO4woycZteLrXe-2eW2y6WIOube5ButrBQu1yH4kCsbpfNxCPpLftP6oWn7mNeJVbnvcpFvg3Z2YzsRdnnsB7V7nb0wwkX9ZnyfZb--f7u5uJytrn4sLxarmaQV7GeMSsKAgagSha4JNBrIElEGtKEaF4gUktR1DZEpjIYYKKKEgkwZDCUhUJVn2fuD7zaVx8d5RA4qiBgqMaGJWB4I5cWab4PdpCK5F5bfBXxouAi9lU7zCiADaA2UhgBJhQVN6bA2EhFTG1glr69jtqFOA5K664NwE9PpSWdb3vhbjnFJICuSwfnBoH0ku1ys-D5WIJjaLNktSOynMVnwfwYde75Jt6CdE532w12PGFIGaZnQD4_QpycxUo1IzdrO-FSj3JvyBaoqUhJA9z3On6DSo_TGyvSjGZviE8H5RJCYXv_tGzHEyJfXP_-fvfo9ZT8esa0Wrm-jd0NvfRenIDqAMvgYgzYPkwUF3-_J_TT4fk_4uCdJ9u74Mh9E94tR_gOVWg0G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924843567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Dahan, Sonia ; Ducard, Dominique ; Caeymaex, Laurence</creator><creatorcontrib>Dahan, Sonia ; Ducard, Dominique ; Caeymaex, Laurence</creatorcontrib><description>Disclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the function and meaning of the apology.
The aim of this study was to explore the role ascribed to apology in communication between healthcare professionals and patients when disclosing a medical error, and to discuss these findings using a linguistic and philosophical perspective.
Qualitative exploratory study, based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews, with seven physicians in a neonatal unit in France. Discourse analysis.
Four themes emerged. Difference between apology in everyday life and in the medical encounter; place of the apology in the process of disclosure together with explanations, regrets, empathy and ways to avoid repeating the error; effects of the apology were to allow the patient-physician relationship undermined by the error, to be maintained, responsibility to be accepted, the first steps towards forgiveness to be taken, and a less hierarchical doctor-patient relationship to be created; ways of expressing apology ("I am sorry") reflected regrets and empathy more than an explicit apology.
This study highlights how the act of apology can be seen as a "language act" as described by philosophers Austin and Searle, and how it functions as a technique for making amends following a wrongdoing and as an action undertaken in order that neither party should lose face, thus echoing the sociologist Goffmann's interaction theory. This interpretation also accords with the views of Lazare, for whom the function of apology is a restoration of dignity after the humiliation of the error. This approach to the apology illustrates how meaning and impact of real-life language acts can be clarified by philosophical and sociological ideas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28759586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Apologies ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Communication ; Emotions ; Empathy ; Ethical aspects ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical ; Female ; Forgiveness ; France ; Health care ; Health policy ; Human communication ; Human health and pathology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Language ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Medical Errors ; Medical malpractice ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neonates ; Neonatology - manpower ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Practice ; Qualitative Research ; Restoration ; Social Sciences ; Truth Disclosure</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0181854-e0181854</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Dahan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2017 Dahan et al 2017 Dahan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-87c681f249a0eb62fe1c34781ef7e50460c6bbb24f0fe251d6dad28df52c662d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-87c681f249a0eb62fe1c34781ef7e50460c6bbb24f0fe251d6dad28df52c662d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3822-5136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536280/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536280/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28759586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.u-pec.fr/hal-04225138$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dahan, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caeymaex, Laurence</creatorcontrib><title>Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Disclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the function and meaning of the apology.
The aim of this study was to explore the role ascribed to apology in communication between healthcare professionals and patients when disclosing a medical error, and to discuss these findings using a linguistic and philosophical perspective.
Qualitative exploratory study, based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews, with seven physicians in a neonatal unit in France. Discourse analysis.
Four themes emerged. Difference between apology in everyday life and in the medical encounter; place of the apology in the process of disclosure together with explanations, regrets, empathy and ways to avoid repeating the error; effects of the apology were to allow the patient-physician relationship undermined by the error, to be maintained, responsibility to be accepted, the first steps towards forgiveness to be taken, and a less hierarchical doctor-patient relationship to be created; ways of expressing apology ("I am sorry") reflected regrets and empathy more than an explicit apology.
This study highlights how the act of apology can be seen as a "language act" as described by philosophers Austin and Searle, and how it functions as a technique for making amends following a wrongdoing and as an action undertaken in order that neither party should lose face, thus echoing the sociologist Goffmann's interaction theory. This interpretation also accords with the views of Lazare, for whom the function of apology is a restoration of dignity after the humiliation of the error. This approach to the apology illustrates how meaning and impact of real-life language acts can be clarified by philosophical and sociological ideas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Apologies</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forgiveness</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Human communication</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Errors</subject><subject>Medical malpractice</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Neonatology - manpower</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsFYL5JZsr68i0Eo2xoIFNZut0LWh62gWJlkl-XfT2ncEpdeDF_YHD3vez7kk2VvQTEHJQWf134InXDzre_0vAAMMIyeZaegKuGMwKJ8fvR9kr2KcV0UuGSEvMxOIKO4woycZteLrXe-2eW2y6WIOube5ButrBQu1yH4kCsbpfNxCPpLftP6oWn7mNeJVbnvcpFvg3Z2YzsRdnnsB7V7nb0wwkX9ZnyfZb--f7u5uJytrn4sLxarmaQV7GeMSsKAgagSha4JNBrIElEGtKEaF4gUktR1DZEpjIYYKKKEgkwZDCUhUJVn2fuD7zaVx8d5RA4qiBgqMaGJWB4I5cWab4PdpCK5F5bfBXxouAi9lU7zCiADaA2UhgBJhQVN6bA2EhFTG1glr69jtqFOA5K664NwE9PpSWdb3vhbjnFJICuSwfnBoH0ku1ys-D5WIJjaLNktSOynMVnwfwYde75Jt6CdE532w12PGFIGaZnQD4_QpycxUo1IzdrO-FSj3JvyBaoqUhJA9z3On6DSo_TGyvSjGZviE8H5RJCYXv_tGzHEyJfXP_-fvfo9ZT8esa0Wrm-jd0NvfRenIDqAMvgYgzYPkwUF3-_J_TT4fk_4uCdJ9u74Mh9E94tR_gOVWg0G</recordid><startdate>20170731</startdate><enddate>20170731</enddate><creator>Dahan, Sonia</creator><creator>Ducard, Dominique</creator><creator>Caeymaex, Laurence</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-5136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170731</creationdate><title>Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study</title><author>Dahan, Sonia ; Ducard, Dominique ; Caeymaex, Laurence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-87c681f249a0eb62fe1c34781ef7e50460c6bbb24f0fe251d6dad28df52c662d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Apologies</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forgiveness</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Human communication</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Errors</topic><topic>Medical malpractice</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Neonatology - manpower</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dahan, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caeymaex, Laurence</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dahan, Sonia</au><au>Ducard, Dominique</au><au>Caeymaex, Laurence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-07-31</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0181854</spage><epage>e0181854</epage><pages>e0181854-e0181854</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Disclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the function and meaning of the apology.
The aim of this study was to explore the role ascribed to apology in communication between healthcare professionals and patients when disclosing a medical error, and to discuss these findings using a linguistic and philosophical perspective.
Qualitative exploratory study, based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews, with seven physicians in a neonatal unit in France. Discourse analysis.
Four themes emerged. Difference between apology in everyday life and in the medical encounter; place of the apology in the process of disclosure together with explanations, regrets, empathy and ways to avoid repeating the error; effects of the apology were to allow the patient-physician relationship undermined by the error, to be maintained, responsibility to be accepted, the first steps towards forgiveness to be taken, and a less hierarchical doctor-patient relationship to be created; ways of expressing apology ("I am sorry") reflected regrets and empathy more than an explicit apology.
This study highlights how the act of apology can be seen as a "language act" as described by philosophers Austin and Searle, and how it functions as a technique for making amends following a wrongdoing and as an action undertaken in order that neither party should lose face, thus echoing the sociologist Goffmann's interaction theory. This interpretation also accords with the views of Lazare, for whom the function of apology is a restoration of dignity after the humiliation of the error. This approach to the apology illustrates how meaning and impact of real-life language acts can be clarified by philosophical and sociological ideas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28759586</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0181854</doi><tpages>e0181854</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-5136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0181854-e0181854 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1924843567 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adult Analysis Apologies Biology and Life Sciences Communication Emotions Empathy Ethical aspects Ethics Ethics, Medical Female Forgiveness France Health care Health policy Human communication Human health and pathology Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Language Life Sciences Male Medical Errors Medical malpractice Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Neonates Neonatology - manpower Patients People and Places Physician-Patient Relations Physicians Practice Qualitative Research Restoration Social Sciences Truth Disclosure |
title | Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Apology%20in%20cases%20of%20medical%20error%20disclosure:%20Thoughts%20based%20on%20a%20preliminary%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dahan,%20Sonia&rft.date=2017-07-31&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0181854&rft.epage=e0181854&rft.pages=e0181854-e0181854&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0181854&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA499636179%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924843567&rft_id=info:pmid/28759586&rft_galeid=A499636179&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_914f17b1de214cd5a76da5efc46fbf29&rfr_iscdi=true |