The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study
Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0179694-e0179694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0179694 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0179694 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Takahashi, Masahiro Takahashi, Masanobu Komine, Keigo Yamada, Hideharu Kasahara, Yuki Chikamatsu, Sonoko Okita, Akira Ito, Shukuei Ouchi, Kota Okada, Yoshinari Imai, Hiroo Saijo, Ken Shirota, Hidekazu Takahashi, Shin Mori, Takahiro Shimodaira, Hideki Ishioka, Chikashi |
description | Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patients.
Cancer patients, aged 70 years or older, were assessed for G8 and classified into three groups according to their G8 score: 14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between G8 score and OS in all patients and for each ECOG-PS-categorized group.
Out of 264 enrolled patients, most patients (87%) with solid tumor were categorized as TNM stage IV. ECOG-PS was 0 or 1 in 215 patients and ≥2 in 48; there was missing data for one patient. Among all patients, the low score group with a median OS of 7.7 months survived significantly less than both the high score group with a median OS of 25.6 months [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.63; p < 0.0001] and the intermediate score group with a median of 15.6 months (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TNM stage and G8 score were independent prognostic factors for OS. When patients with an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 were analyzed, patients with a lower G8 score showed significantly shorter OS than patients with a higher score when any two groups were compared.
This novel classification of the G8 score contributes to prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis and improved the prognostic value of ECOG-PS. Using G8 with ECOG-PS may be helpful in deciding treatment for elderly patients with advanced cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0179694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1912556200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543295286</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7428c8e7332240c4aa5164edec14e8a0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543295286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-7c52d1541d5b7da60d31b81fc2460eb4e43d462c5adb2bdce9a52c4fa1beada43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIAruOvmaDy-EstRaKCxo9TZkkjO7KdlkTDLF_Rv-YrMfLV3phczFDCfPeU_OO-cUxUtcTjGt8cdrPwYn7XTwDqYlrtuqZY-KY9xSMqlISR_f-z4qnsV4XZacNlX1tDgiTcXKhrHj4s_VEtB5g6IKAM64BUreWwRuKZ2CiIbgF87HZBS6kXaEfIzOZvNzNEDofVhtKBSTTGNExiGwGoJdI7WJBzTIZMCl-AmdogAp-DiASuYGPqCYa1nIOVk7jcn43EsWGvX6efGklzbCi_37pPjx5exq9nVyOT-_mJ1eTlTNmzSpFScac4Y172otq1JT3DW4V4RVJXQMGNWsIopL3ZFOK2glJ4r1EncgtWT0pHi90x2sj2JvZxS4xYTz7FqZiYsdob28FkMwKxnWwksjtgEfFkKGbI0FUTPSqAZqSglhpWJSclwx0KAwg0ZutD7vq43dCvJ1XArSHogenjizFAt_IzhrypbXWeDdXiD4XyPEJFYmKrBWOvDj9t6Utrxq2oy--Qd9uLs9tZC5AeN6n-uqjag45YySlucxydT0ASo_GlZG5dnrTY4fJLw_SMhMgt9pIccYxcX3b__Pzn8esm_vsUuQNi2jt9vRiYcg24Eqz1sM0N-ZjEuxWZ1bN8RmdcR-dXLaq_s_6C7pdlfoXw_qFuI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912556200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Takahashi, Masahiro ; Takahashi, Masanobu ; Komine, Keigo ; Yamada, Hideharu ; Kasahara, Yuki ; Chikamatsu, Sonoko ; Okita, Akira ; Ito, Shukuei ; Ouchi, Kota ; Okada, Yoshinari ; Imai, Hiroo ; Saijo, Ken ; Shirota, Hidekazu ; Takahashi, Shin ; Mori, Takahiro ; Shimodaira, Hideki ; Ishioka, Chikashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masahiro ; Takahashi, Masanobu ; Komine, Keigo ; Yamada, Hideharu ; Kasahara, Yuki ; Chikamatsu, Sonoko ; Okita, Akira ; Ito, Shukuei ; Ouchi, Kota ; Okada, Yoshinari ; Imai, Hiroo ; Saijo, Ken ; Shirota, Hidekazu ; Takahashi, Shin ; Mori, Takahiro ; Shimodaira, Hideki ; Ishioka, Chikashi</creatorcontrib><description>Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patients.
Cancer patients, aged 70 years or older, were assessed for G8 and classified into three groups according to their G8 score: <11 as the low score group, 11-14 as the intermediate score group, and >14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between G8 score and OS in all patients and for each ECOG-PS-categorized group.
Out of 264 enrolled patients, most patients (87%) with solid tumor were categorized as TNM stage IV. ECOG-PS was 0 or 1 in 215 patients and ≥2 in 48; there was missing data for one patient. Among all patients, the low score group with a median OS of 7.7 months survived significantly less than both the high score group with a median OS of 25.6 months [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.63; p < 0.0001] and the intermediate score group with a median of 15.6 months (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TNM stage and G8 score were independent prognostic factors for OS. When patients with an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 were analyzed, patients with a lower G8 score showed significantly shorter OS than patients with a higher score when any two groups were compared.
This novel classification of the G8 score contributes to prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis and improved the prognostic value of ECOG-PS. Using G8 with ECOG-PS may be helpful in deciding treatment for elderly patients with advanced cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28640844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Classification ; Comorbidity ; Confidence intervals ; Elderly patients ; Family medical history ; Female ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - pathology ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Group dynamics ; Hematology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical tests ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Missing data ; Mortality ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Older people ; Oncology ; Patients ; People and Places ; Pricing policies ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Screening ; Studies ; Survival ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0179694-e0179694</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Takahashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Takahashi et al 2017 Takahashi et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-7c52d1541d5b7da60d31b81fc2460eb4e43d462c5adb2bdce9a52c4fa1beada43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-7c52d1541d5b7da60d31b81fc2460eb4e43d462c5adb2bdce9a52c4fa1beada43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3023-1227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480957/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480957/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masanobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komine, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hideharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikamatsu, Sonoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okita, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Shukuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouchi, Kota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Yoshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saijo, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirota, Hidekazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimodaira, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Chikashi</creatorcontrib><title>The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patients.
Cancer patients, aged 70 years or older, were assessed for G8 and classified into three groups according to their G8 score: <11 as the low score group, 11-14 as the intermediate score group, and >14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between G8 score and OS in all patients and for each ECOG-PS-categorized group.
Out of 264 enrolled patients, most patients (87%) with solid tumor were categorized as TNM stage IV. ECOG-PS was 0 or 1 in 215 patients and ≥2 in 48; there was missing data for one patient. Among all patients, the low score group with a median OS of 7.7 months survived significantly less than both the high score group with a median OS of 25.6 months [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.63; p < 0.0001] and the intermediate score group with a median of 15.6 months (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TNM stage and G8 score were independent prognostic factors for OS. When patients with an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 were analyzed, patients with a lower G8 score showed significantly shorter OS than patients with a higher score when any two groups were compared.
This novel classification of the G8 score contributes to prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis and improved the prognostic value of ECOG-PS. Using G8 with ECOG-PS may be helpful in deciding treatment for elderly patients with advanced cancer.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Elderly patients</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIAruOvmaDy-EstRaKCxo9TZkkjO7KdlkTDLF_Rv-YrMfLV3phczFDCfPeU_OO-cUxUtcTjGt8cdrPwYn7XTwDqYlrtuqZY-KY9xSMqlISR_f-z4qnsV4XZacNlX1tDgiTcXKhrHj4s_VEtB5g6IKAM64BUreWwRuKZ2CiIbgF87HZBS6kXaEfIzOZvNzNEDofVhtKBSTTGNExiGwGoJdI7WJBzTIZMCl-AmdogAp-DiASuYGPqCYa1nIOVk7jcn43EsWGvX6efGklzbCi_37pPjx5exq9nVyOT-_mJ1eTlTNmzSpFScac4Y172otq1JT3DW4V4RVJXQMGNWsIopL3ZFOK2glJ4r1EncgtWT0pHi90x2sj2JvZxS4xYTz7FqZiYsdob28FkMwKxnWwksjtgEfFkKGbI0FUTPSqAZqSglhpWJSclwx0KAwg0ZutD7vq43dCvJ1XArSHogenjizFAt_IzhrypbXWeDdXiD4XyPEJFYmKrBWOvDj9t6Utrxq2oy--Qd9uLs9tZC5AeN6n-uqjag45YySlucxydT0ASo_GlZG5dnrTY4fJLw_SMhMgt9pIccYxcX3b__Pzn8esm_vsUuQNi2jt9vRiYcg24Eqz1sM0N-ZjEuxWZ1bN8RmdcR-dXLaq_s_6C7pdlfoXw_qFuI</recordid><startdate>20170622</startdate><enddate>20170622</enddate><creator>Takahashi, Masahiro</creator><creator>Takahashi, Masanobu</creator><creator>Komine, Keigo</creator><creator>Yamada, Hideharu</creator><creator>Kasahara, Yuki</creator><creator>Chikamatsu, Sonoko</creator><creator>Okita, Akira</creator><creator>Ito, Shukuei</creator><creator>Ouchi, Kota</creator><creator>Okada, Yoshinari</creator><creator>Imai, Hiroo</creator><creator>Saijo, Ken</creator><creator>Shirota, Hidekazu</creator><creator>Takahashi, Shin</creator><creator>Mori, Takahiro</creator><creator>Shimodaira, Hideki</creator><creator>Ishioka, Chikashi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-1227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170622</creationdate><title>The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study</title><author>Takahashi, Masahiro ; Takahashi, Masanobu ; Komine, Keigo ; Yamada, Hideharu ; Kasahara, Yuki ; Chikamatsu, Sonoko ; Okita, Akira ; Ito, Shukuei ; Ouchi, Kota ; Okada, Yoshinari ; Imai, Hiroo ; Saijo, Ken ; Shirota, Hidekazu ; Takahashi, Shin ; Mori, Takahiro ; Shimodaira, Hideki ; Ishioka, Chikashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-7c52d1541d5b7da60d31b81fc2460eb4e43d462c5adb2bdce9a52c4fa1beada43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Elderly patients</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masanobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komine, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hideharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikamatsu, Sonoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okita, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Shukuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouchi, Kota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Yoshinari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Hiroo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saijo, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirota, Hidekazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimodaira, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishioka, Chikashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takahashi, Masahiro</au><au>Takahashi, Masanobu</au><au>Komine, Keigo</au><au>Yamada, Hideharu</au><au>Kasahara, Yuki</au><au>Chikamatsu, Sonoko</au><au>Okita, Akira</au><au>Ito, Shukuei</au><au>Ouchi, Kota</au><au>Okada, Yoshinari</au><au>Imai, Hiroo</au><au>Saijo, Ken</au><au>Shirota, Hidekazu</au><au>Takahashi, Shin</au><au>Mori, Takahiro</au><au>Shimodaira, Hideki</au><au>Ishioka, Chikashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-06-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0179694</spage><epage>e0179694</epage><pages>e0179694-e0179694</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patients.
Cancer patients, aged 70 years or older, were assessed for G8 and classified into three groups according to their G8 score: <11 as the low score group, 11-14 as the intermediate score group, and >14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between G8 score and OS in all patients and for each ECOG-PS-categorized group.
Out of 264 enrolled patients, most patients (87%) with solid tumor were categorized as TNM stage IV. ECOG-PS was 0 or 1 in 215 patients and ≥2 in 48; there was missing data for one patient. Among all patients, the low score group with a median OS of 7.7 months survived significantly less than both the high score group with a median OS of 25.6 months [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.63; p < 0.0001] and the intermediate score group with a median of 15.6 months (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TNM stage and G8 score were independent prognostic factors for OS. When patients with an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 were analyzed, patients with a lower G8 score showed significantly shorter OS than patients with a higher score when any two groups were compared.
This novel classification of the G8 score contributes to prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis and improved the prognostic value of ECOG-PS. Using G8 with ECOG-PS may be helpful in deciding treatment for elderly patients with advanced cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28640844</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0179694</doi><tpages>e0179694</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-1227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0179694-e0179694 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1912556200 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Cancer Cancer patients Cancer research Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Classification Comorbidity Confidence intervals Elderly patients Family medical history Female Gastrointestinal cancer Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - diagnosis Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - pathology Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatrics Group dynamics Hematology Humans Male Medical prognosis Medical tests Medicine and Health Sciences Missing data Mortality Multivariate analysis Neoplasm Staging Neoplasms - diagnosis Neoplasms - pathology Older people Oncology Patients People and Places Pricing policies Prognosis Retrospective Studies Risk Screening Studies Survival Survival Analysis |
title | The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A34%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20G8%20screening%20tool%20enhances%20prognostic%20value%20to%20ECOG%20performance%20status%20in%20elderly%20cancer%20patients:%20A%20retrospective,%20single%20institutional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Takahashi,%20Masahiro&rft.date=2017-06-22&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0179694&rft.epage=e0179694&rft.pages=e0179694-e0179694&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0179694&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA543295286%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912556200&rft_id=info:pmid/28640844&rft_galeid=A543295286&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7428c8e7332240c4aa5164edec14e8a0&rfr_iscdi=true |