Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas
Monitoring fish assemblages is needed to assess whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are meeting their conservation and fisheries management goals, as it allows one to track the progress of recovery of exploited species and associated communities. Underwater Visual Census techniques (UVC) are used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178511-e0178511 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0178511 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0178511 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Prato, Giulia Thiriet, Pierre Di Franco, Antonio Francour, Patrice |
description | Monitoring fish assemblages is needed to assess whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are meeting their conservation and fisheries management goals, as it allows one to track the progress of recovery of exploited species and associated communities. Underwater Visual Census techniques (UVC) are used to monitor fish assemblages in MPAs. UVCs should be adapted to fish abundance, body-size and behaviour, which can strongly affect fish detectability. In Mediterranean subtidal habitats, however, UVC strip transects of one surface area (25x5 m2) are commonly used to survey the whole fish assemblage, from large shy fish to small crypto-benthic fish. Most high trophic level predators (HTLPs) are large shy fish which rarely swim close to divers and, consequently, their abundance may be under-estimated with commonly used transects. Here, we propose an improvement to traditional transect surveys to better account for differences in behaviour among and within species. First, we compared the effectiveness of combining two transect surface areas (large: 35x20 m2; medium: 25x5 m2) in quantifying large, shy fish within and outside Mediterranean MPAs. We identified species-specific body-size thresholds defining a smaller and a larger size class better sampled by medium and large transects respectively. Combining large and medium transects provided more accurate biomass and species richness estimates for large, shy species than using medium transects alone. We thus combined the new approach with two other transect surface areas commonly used to survey crypto-benthic (10x1 m2) and necto-benthic (25x5 m2) species in order to assess how effectively MPAs protection the whole fish assemblage. We verified that MPAs offer significant protection for HTLPs, their response in terms of biomass and density increase in MPAs was always higher in magnitude than other functional groups. Inside MPAs, the contribution of HTLP reached >25% of total fish biomass, against < 2% outside MPAs. Surveys with multiple transect surface areas allow for a more realistic assessment of the structure of the whole fish assemblage and better assessment of potential recovery of HTLPs within reserves of HTLP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0178511 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1907553245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A494843996</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ff1ae1a51715483294296d7f620abd40</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A494843996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e11a409e45c17de0a205dcb011815a0f8be72670ec698b241e99773b62ea50493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99u0zAUxiMEYmPwBggsISG4aLETO3-4QKqqAZU2DQHbrXWSnKSuErvYzoD34IFx12xq0C5QLhId_77P9pdzoug5o3OWZOzdxgxWQzffGo1zyrJcMPYgOmZFEs_SmCYPD76PoifObSgVSZ6mj6OjOBcFz5P0OPpzqtegK6Vb0ii3Jpe6RvsTPFpypdwAHVmidoMj3pDeXCNpTFi2NQHn0LketSem2Wt3pb7soEX3niw0ge22UxV4ZTRRmvi1RSTnWKvgbkEjaHIOVmkkX6zxWHmsycIiuKfRowY6h8_G90l0-fH0-_Lz7Ozi02q5OJtVaRH7GTIGnBbIRcWyGinEVNRVSRnLmQDa5CVmcZpRDHhexpxhUWRZUqYxgqC8SE6il3vfbWecHAN1khU0EyKJuQjEak_UBjZya1UP9rc0oORNwdhWgvWq6lA2DQNkIFjGRMg2LnhcpHXWhPyhrDkNXh_G3Yayx7oK0VnoJqbTFa3WsjXXUvCUizQPBm9GA2t-DOi87JWrsOtClma4OXfOE5FlcUBf_YPef7uRaiFcQOnGhH2rnalc8NAgPCmKNFDze6jw1NirKnRfo0J9Ing7EQTG4y_fwuCcXH37-v_sxdWUfX3ArhE6v3amG3YN5qYg34OVNc5ZbO5CZlTuhuc2DbkbHjkOT5C9OPxBd6LbaUn-AlEDFcE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907553245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Prato, Giulia ; Thiriet, Pierre ; Di Franco, Antonio ; Francour, Patrice</creator><contributor>Peck, Myron</contributor><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giulia ; Thiriet, Pierre ; Di Franco, Antonio ; Francour, Patrice ; Peck, Myron</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring fish assemblages is needed to assess whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are meeting their conservation and fisheries management goals, as it allows one to track the progress of recovery of exploited species and associated communities. Underwater Visual Census techniques (UVC) are used to monitor fish assemblages in MPAs. UVCs should be adapted to fish abundance, body-size and behaviour, which can strongly affect fish detectability. In Mediterranean subtidal habitats, however, UVC strip transects of one surface area (25x5 m2) are commonly used to survey the whole fish assemblage, from large shy fish to small crypto-benthic fish. Most high trophic level predators (HTLPs) are large shy fish which rarely swim close to divers and, consequently, their abundance may be under-estimated with commonly used transects. Here, we propose an improvement to traditional transect surveys to better account for differences in behaviour among and within species. First, we compared the effectiveness of combining two transect surface areas (large: 35x20 m2; medium: 25x5 m2) in quantifying large, shy fish within and outside Mediterranean MPAs. We identified species-specific body-size thresholds defining a smaller and a larger size class better sampled by medium and large transects respectively. Combining large and medium transects provided more accurate biomass and species richness estimates for large, shy species than using medium transects alone. We thus combined the new approach with two other transect surface areas commonly used to survey crypto-benthic (10x1 m2) and necto-benthic (25x5 m2) species in order to assess how effectively MPAs protection the whole fish assemblage. We verified that MPAs offer significant protection for HTLPs, their response in terms of biomass and density increase in MPAs was always higher in magnitude than other functional groups. Inside MPAs, the contribution of HTLP reached >25% of total fish biomass, against < 2% outside MPAs. Surveys with multiple transect surface areas allow for a more realistic assessment of the structure of the whole fish assemblage and better assessment of potential recovery of HTLPs within reserves of HTLP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28594836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animals ; Behavior ; Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomass ; Body size ; Census ; Censuses ; Communities ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Coral reefs ; Data analysis ; Density ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Estimates ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Fishes ; Fishes - physiology ; Fishing ; Functional anatomy ; Functional groups ; Habitats ; Management ; Marine conservation ; Marine protected areas ; Mediterranean Sea ; Methods ; Monitoring ; Polls & surveys ; Population Density ; Predators ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Recovery ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Reserves ; Species richness ; Strip ; Surface area ; Surveys ; Thresholds ; Tracking ; Trophic levels ; Underwater ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178511-e0178511</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Prato et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Prato et al 2017 Prato et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e11a409e45c17de0a205dcb011815a0f8be72670ec698b241e99773b62ea50493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e11a409e45c17de0a205dcb011815a0f8be72670ec698b241e99773b62ea50493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0158-2124</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464568/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464568/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peck, Myron</contributor><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiriet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francour, Patrice</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Monitoring fish assemblages is needed to assess whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are meeting their conservation and fisheries management goals, as it allows one to track the progress of recovery of exploited species and associated communities. Underwater Visual Census techniques (UVC) are used to monitor fish assemblages in MPAs. UVCs should be adapted to fish abundance, body-size and behaviour, which can strongly affect fish detectability. In Mediterranean subtidal habitats, however, UVC strip transects of one surface area (25x5 m2) are commonly used to survey the whole fish assemblage, from large shy fish to small crypto-benthic fish. Most high trophic level predators (HTLPs) are large shy fish which rarely swim close to divers and, consequently, their abundance may be under-estimated with commonly used transects. Here, we propose an improvement to traditional transect surveys to better account for differences in behaviour among and within species. First, we compared the effectiveness of combining two transect surface areas (large: 35x20 m2; medium: 25x5 m2) in quantifying large, shy fish within and outside Mediterranean MPAs. We identified species-specific body-size thresholds defining a smaller and a larger size class better sampled by medium and large transects respectively. Combining large and medium transects provided more accurate biomass and species richness estimates for large, shy species than using medium transects alone. We thus combined the new approach with two other transect surface areas commonly used to survey crypto-benthic (10x1 m2) and necto-benthic (25x5 m2) species in order to assess how effectively MPAs protection the whole fish assemblage. We verified that MPAs offer significant protection for HTLPs, their response in terms of biomass and density increase in MPAs was always higher in magnitude than other functional groups. Inside MPAs, the contribution of HTLP reached >25% of total fish biomass, against < 2% outside MPAs. Surveys with multiple transect surface areas allow for a more realistic assessment of the structure of the whole fish assemblage and better assessment of potential recovery of HTLPs within reserves of HTLP.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Functional anatomy</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Mediterranean Sea</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Reserves</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Strip</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Underwater</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99u0zAUxiMEYmPwBggsISG4aLETO3-4QKqqAZU2DQHbrXWSnKSuErvYzoD34IFx12xq0C5QLhId_77P9pdzoug5o3OWZOzdxgxWQzffGo1zyrJcMPYgOmZFEs_SmCYPD76PoifObSgVSZ6mj6OjOBcFz5P0OPpzqtegK6Vb0ii3Jpe6RvsTPFpypdwAHVmidoMj3pDeXCNpTFi2NQHn0LketSem2Wt3pb7soEX3niw0ge22UxV4ZTRRmvi1RSTnWKvgbkEjaHIOVmkkX6zxWHmsycIiuKfRowY6h8_G90l0-fH0-_Lz7Ozi02q5OJtVaRH7GTIGnBbIRcWyGinEVNRVSRnLmQDa5CVmcZpRDHhexpxhUWRZUqYxgqC8SE6il3vfbWecHAN1khU0EyKJuQjEak_UBjZya1UP9rc0oORNwdhWgvWq6lA2DQNkIFjGRMg2LnhcpHXWhPyhrDkNXh_G3Yayx7oK0VnoJqbTFa3WsjXXUvCUizQPBm9GA2t-DOi87JWrsOtClma4OXfOE5FlcUBf_YPef7uRaiFcQOnGhH2rnalc8NAgPCmKNFDze6jw1NirKnRfo0J9Ing7EQTG4y_fwuCcXH37-v_sxdWUfX3ArhE6v3amG3YN5qYg34OVNc5ZbO5CZlTuhuc2DbkbHjkOT5C9OPxBd6LbaUn-AlEDFcE</recordid><startdate>20170608</startdate><enddate>20170608</enddate><creator>Prato, Giulia</creator><creator>Thiriet, Pierre</creator><creator>Di Franco, Antonio</creator><creator>Francour, Patrice</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-2124</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170608</creationdate><title>Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas</title><author>Prato, Giulia ; Thiriet, Pierre ; Di Franco, Antonio ; Francour, Patrice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e11a409e45c17de0a205dcb011815a0f8be72670ec698b241e99773b62ea50493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Functional anatomy</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Mediterranean Sea</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Reserves</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Strip</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Underwater</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiriet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francour, Patrice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prato, Giulia</au><au>Thiriet, Pierre</au><au>Di Franco, Antonio</au><au>Francour, Patrice</au><au>Peck, Myron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-06-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0178511</spage><epage>e0178511</epage><pages>e0178511-e0178511</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Monitoring fish assemblages is needed to assess whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are meeting their conservation and fisheries management goals, as it allows one to track the progress of recovery of exploited species and associated communities. Underwater Visual Census techniques (UVC) are used to monitor fish assemblages in MPAs. UVCs should be adapted to fish abundance, body-size and behaviour, which can strongly affect fish detectability. In Mediterranean subtidal habitats, however, UVC strip transects of one surface area (25x5 m2) are commonly used to survey the whole fish assemblage, from large shy fish to small crypto-benthic fish. Most high trophic level predators (HTLPs) are large shy fish which rarely swim close to divers and, consequently, their abundance may be under-estimated with commonly used transects. Here, we propose an improvement to traditional transect surveys to better account for differences in behaviour among and within species. First, we compared the effectiveness of combining two transect surface areas (large: 35x20 m2; medium: 25x5 m2) in quantifying large, shy fish within and outside Mediterranean MPAs. We identified species-specific body-size thresholds defining a smaller and a larger size class better sampled by medium and large transects respectively. Combining large and medium transects provided more accurate biomass and species richness estimates for large, shy species than using medium transects alone. We thus combined the new approach with two other transect surface areas commonly used to survey crypto-benthic (10x1 m2) and necto-benthic (25x5 m2) species in order to assess how effectively MPAs protection the whole fish assemblage. We verified that MPAs offer significant protection for HTLPs, their response in terms of biomass and density increase in MPAs was always higher in magnitude than other functional groups. Inside MPAs, the contribution of HTLP reached >25% of total fish biomass, against < 2% outside MPAs. Surveys with multiple transect surface areas allow for a more realistic assessment of the structure of the whole fish assemblage and better assessment of potential recovery of HTLPs within reserves of HTLP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28594836</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0178511</doi><tpages>e0178511</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-2124</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178511-e0178511 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1907553245 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abundance Animals Behavior Bias Biology and Life Sciences Biomass Body size Census Censuses Communities Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Coral reefs Data analysis Density Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Estimates Fish Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management Fishes Fishes - physiology Fishing Functional anatomy Functional groups Habitats Management Marine conservation Marine protected areas Mediterranean Sea Methods Monitoring Polls & surveys Population Density Predators Protected areas Protection and preservation Recovery Research and Analysis Methods Reserves Species richness Strip Surface area Surveys Thresholds Tracking Trophic levels Underwater Visual perception |
title | Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20fish%20Underwater%20Visual%20Census%20to%20move%20forward%20assessment%20of%20fish%20assemblages:%20An%20application%20in%20three%20Mediterranean%20Marine%20Protected%20Areas&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Prato,%20Giulia&rft.date=2017-06-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0178511&rft.epage=e0178511&rft.pages=e0178511-e0178511&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0178511&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA494843996%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907553245&rft_id=info:pmid/28594836&rft_galeid=A494843996&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ff1ae1a51715483294296d7f620abd40&rfr_iscdi=true |