Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients
The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese pat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0178268-e0178268 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0178268 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e0178268 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Fang, Huan Liang, Jingjuan Hong, Zhen Sugiyama, Kenji Nozaki, Takao Kobayashi, Susumu Sameshima, Tetsuro Namba, Hiroki Asakawa, Tetsuya |
| description | The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0178268 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1902477214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A492822003</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_14895cf360d544bd9ad6f92f13d00574</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A492822003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2e8390f58aee91aacb23cdd06aacf032f43c77de6a9d630aef7606382df19bdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpeFN0AQCQnBRYsPOd4gVRWHSivtwgK3lmuPG1eJnbWdij4TL4mzbVct2guUi9iT7__HnskkyUuMppiW-MPaDs7wdtpbA1OEy4oU1aPkHNeUTAqC6OOj9VnyzPs1QjmtiuJpckaqPCN5js-TP9d-KxrbQXBapLDh7cCDtia1Kg0NpPNGG_CQbsD5o7CDjfYg01kHUcdNes21SW-s0BC2cRM0mJBeDUFE6_TbAH40NVw7SIU1ApzRZpX2o6rjhq-gGwVxd0hoXWhsDzKeqt_Z-efJE8VbDy_274vk5-dPP-ZfJ5dXXxbz2eVElHkVJgQqWiOVVxygxpyLJaFCSlTEpUKUqIyKspRQ8FoWFHFQZYEKWhGpcL2Uil4kr3e-fWs929fZM1wjkpUlwVkkFjtCWr5mvdMdd1tmuWZ3AetWjLugRQsMZ1WdC0ULJPMsW8qay0LVRGEqYz_K0evjPtuw7ECKeFPH2xPT0y9GN2xlNyzaZWVdRoN3ewNnb8dKs057AW3LDdjh7twUFwhVeUTf_IM-fLs9teLxAtooG_OK0ZTNsppUhCBEIzV9gIqPhE7HHoPSMX4ieH8iiEyA32HFB-_Z4ub7_7NXv07Zt0dsA7wNjbftMP5x_hTMdqBw1nsH6r7IGLFxpg7VYONMsf1MRdmr4wbdiw5DRP8CefMgYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1902477214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Fang, Huan ; Liang, Jingjuan ; Hong, Zhen ; Sugiyama, Kenji ; Nozaki, Takao ; Kobayashi, Susumu ; Sameshima, Tetsuro ; Namba, Hiroki ; Asakawa, Tetsuya</creator><contributor>Devraj, Radhika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fang, Huan ; Liang, Jingjuan ; Hong, Zhen ; Sugiyama, Kenji ; Nozaki, Takao ; Kobayashi, Susumu ; Sameshima, Tetsuro ; Namba, Hiroki ; Asakawa, Tetsuya ; Devraj, Radhika</creatorcontrib><description>The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28542551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acceptable noise levels ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analgesia ; Analysis ; Assessments ; Asthma ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Bone surgery ; Cancer ; China ; Chinese (Asian people) ; Chronic pain ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Consistency ; Construction standards ; Cooperation ; Decision making ; Disorders ; Documents ; Drugs ; Evaluation ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Hair ; Headache ; Health aspects ; Health care delivery ; Hip ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Immobilization ; Immunological tolerance ; Immunology ; Indicators ; Joint surgery ; Male ; Management ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Migraine ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Nursing ; Pain ; Pain management ; Pain Management - psychology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain perception ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; People and Places ; Pharmacy ; Physicians ; Populations ; Psychology ; Psychometrics ; Quality ; Quality control ; Quality of life ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk factors ; Rivers ; Sensitivity ; Side effects ; Sleep ; Social Sciences ; Spine ; Surgery ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Task forces ; Traditions ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0178268-e0178268</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Fang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Fang et al 2017 Fang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2e8390f58aee91aacb23cdd06aacf032f43c77de6a9d630aef7606382df19bdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2e8390f58aee91aacb23cdd06aacf032f43c77de6a9d630aef7606382df19bdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5444797/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5444797/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Devraj, Radhika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jingjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Susumu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sameshima, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namba, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asakawa, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies.</description><subject>Acceptable noise levels</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese (Asian people)</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Construction standards</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hair</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Immunological tolerance</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Migraine</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Management - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpeFN0AQCQnBRYsPOd4gVRWHSivtwgK3lmuPG1eJnbWdij4TL4mzbVct2guUi9iT7__HnskkyUuMppiW-MPaDs7wdtpbA1OEy4oU1aPkHNeUTAqC6OOj9VnyzPs1QjmtiuJpckaqPCN5js-TP9d-KxrbQXBapLDh7cCDtia1Kg0NpPNGG_CQbsD5o7CDjfYg01kHUcdNes21SW-s0BC2cRM0mJBeDUFE6_TbAH40NVw7SIU1ApzRZpX2o6rjhq-gGwVxd0hoXWhsDzKeqt_Z-efJE8VbDy_274vk5-dPP-ZfJ5dXXxbz2eVElHkVJgQqWiOVVxygxpyLJaFCSlTEpUKUqIyKspRQ8FoWFHFQZYEKWhGpcL2Uil4kr3e-fWs929fZM1wjkpUlwVkkFjtCWr5mvdMdd1tmuWZ3AetWjLugRQsMZ1WdC0ULJPMsW8qay0LVRGEqYz_K0evjPtuw7ECKeFPH2xPT0y9GN2xlNyzaZWVdRoN3ewNnb8dKs057AW3LDdjh7twUFwhVeUTf_IM-fLs9teLxAtooG_OK0ZTNsppUhCBEIzV9gIqPhE7HHoPSMX4ieH8iiEyA32HFB-_Z4ub7_7NXv07Zt0dsA7wNjbftMP5x_hTMdqBw1nsH6r7IGLFxpg7VYONMsf1MRdmr4wbdiw5DRP8CefMgYA</recordid><startdate>20170525</startdate><enddate>20170525</enddate><creator>Fang, Huan</creator><creator>Liang, Jingjuan</creator><creator>Hong, Zhen</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Kenji</creator><creator>Nozaki, Takao</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Susumu</creator><creator>Sameshima, Tetsuro</creator><creator>Namba, Hiroki</creator><creator>Asakawa, Tetsuya</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170525</creationdate><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients</title><author>Fang, Huan ; Liang, Jingjuan ; Hong, Zhen ; Sugiyama, Kenji ; Nozaki, Takao ; Kobayashi, Susumu ; Sameshima, Tetsuro ; Namba, Hiroki ; Asakawa, Tetsuya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-2e8390f58aee91aacb23cdd06aacf032f43c77de6a9d630aef7606382df19bdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceptable noise levels</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese (Asian people)</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Construction standards</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hair</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Immunological tolerance</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Migraine</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Management - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jingjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Susumu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sameshima, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namba, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asakawa, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Huan</au><au>Liang, Jingjuan</au><au>Hong, Zhen</au><au>Sugiyama, Kenji</au><au>Nozaki, Takao</au><au>Kobayashi, Susumu</au><au>Sameshima, Tetsuro</au><au>Namba, Hiroki</au><au>Asakawa, Tetsuya</au><au>Devraj, Radhika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-25</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0178268</spage><epage>e0178268</epage><pages>e0178268-e0178268</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28542551</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0178268</doi><tpages>e0178268</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0178268-e0178268 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1902477214 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Acceptable noise levels Adolescent Adult Adults Aged Aged, 80 and over Analgesia Analysis Assessments Asthma Biology and Life Sciences Bone surgery Cancer China Chinese (Asian people) Chronic pain Clinical decision making Clinical medicine Clinical outcomes Consistency Construction standards Cooperation Decision making Disorders Documents Drugs Evaluation Feasibility studies Female Hair Headache Health aspects Health care delivery Hip Hospitals Humans Hypersensitivity Immobilization Immunological tolerance Immunology Indicators Joint surgery Male Management Medical personnel Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Migraine Minority & ethnic groups Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy Neurology Neurosurgery Nursing Pain Pain management Pain Management - psychology Pain Measurement - methods Pain perception Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction People and Places Pharmacy Physicians Populations Psychology Psychometrics Quality Quality control Quality of life Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Research and Analysis Methods Risk factors Rivers Sensitivity Side effects Sleep Social Sciences Spine Surgery Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Task forces Traditions Validation studies Validity Young Adult |
| title | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T13%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Chinese%20version%20of%20the%20revised%20American%20Pain%20Society%20Patient%20Outcome%20Questionnaire%20concerning%20pain%20management%20in%20Chinese%20orthopedic%20patients&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Fang,%20Huan&rft.date=2017-05-25&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0178268&rft.epage=e0178268&rft.pages=e0178268-e0178268&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0178268&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA492822003%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1902477214&rft_id=info:pmid/28542551&rft_galeid=A492822003&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_14895cf360d544bd9ad6f92f13d00574&rfr_iscdi=true |