Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs
The urinary bladder in healthy dogs has dogmatically been considered free of bacteria. This study used culture independent techniques to characterize the healthy canine urinary microbiota. Urine samples collected by antepubic cystocentesis from dogs without urinary infection were used for DNA extrac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177783-e0177783 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0177783 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0177783 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Burton, Erin N Cohn, Leah A Reinero, Carol N Rindt, Hans Moore, Stephen G Ericsson, Aaron C |
description | The urinary bladder in healthy dogs has dogmatically been considered free of bacteria. This study used culture independent techniques to characterize the healthy canine urinary microbiota. Urine samples collected by antepubic cystocentesis from dogs without urinary infection were used for DNA extraction. Genital tract and rectal samples were collected simultaneously from the same dogs. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and compared against Greengenes database for OTU assignment and relative abundance for urine, genital, and rectal samples. After excluding 4 dogs with cultivable bacteria, samples from 10 male (M; 1 intact) and 10 female (F) spayed dogs remained. All samples provided adequate genetic material for analysis. Four taxa (Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp., Sphingobium sp. and Bradyrhizobiaceae) dominated the urinary microbiota in all dogs of both sexes. These taxa were also detected in the genital swabs of both sexes, while the rectal microbiota differed substantially from the other sample sites. Principal component (PC) analysis of PC1 through PC3 showed overlap of urinary and genital microbiota and a clear separation of rectal swabs from the other sample sites along PC1, which explained 44.94% variation. Surprisingly, the urinary microbiota (mean # OTU 92.6 F, 90.2 M) was significantly richer than the genital (67.8 F, 66.6 M) or rectal microbiota (68.3 F, 71.2 M) (p < 0.0001), with no difference between sexes at any sample site. The canine urinary bladder is not a sterile environment and possesses its own unique and diverse microbiota compared to the rectal and genital microbiota. There was no difference between the sexes at any microbiota sample site (urine, genital, and rectal). The predominant bacterial genus for either sex in the urine and genital tracts was Pseudomonas sp. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0177783 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1899788940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491887500</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c3c2f1a6dbd47728f852f871c50c7e1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A491887500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b06842d134f77e952cc9292aeeb1a8c8a67f6d56068d6bbe0b03334feeb54c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhBWPRhxlyamw_CMngZWFjw9hrSNGkztM2YtOL66U2d7jKVfZA8JOT8zv_knPyz7BkEa4gZfLPzY-hVu9773qwBZIxx_CA7hQKjFUUAPzw6n2RnMe4AIJhT-jg7QZwUBDB4mr3dNCooPZjgfqvB-T73Nh8ak4_B9Src5J3TwZfOdyZ3fd4Y1Q7NTV75Oj7JHlnVRvN03s-zbx_ef918Wl1df9xuLq9Wmgo0rEpAeYEqiAvLmBEEaS2QQMqYEiquuaLM0orQhFW0LA0oAcYJTnFSaKzwefbioLtvfZRz21FCLgTjXBQgEdsDUXm1k_vguvRy6ZWTfy98qKUKg9OtkURjjSxUtCqrgjHELSfIcgY1AZoZmLTezdXGsjOVNv0QVLsQXUZ618ja_5SkwAQDmgRezQLB_xhNHGTnojZtq3rjx_RuATCkUJAJffkPen93M1Wr1IDrrU919SQqLwsBOWcETNT6HiqtyqQvTB6xLt0vEl4vEhIzmF9DrcYY5fbL5_9nr78v2Ysj9mCY6NtxMldcgsUBTAaLMRh7N2QI5GTx22nIyeJytnhKe378QXdJt57GfwBmqPWi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899788940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Burton, Erin N ; Cohn, Leah A ; Reinero, Carol N ; Rindt, Hans ; Moore, Stephen G ; Ericsson, Aaron C</creator><creatorcontrib>Burton, Erin N ; Cohn, Leah A ; Reinero, Carol N ; Rindt, Hans ; Moore, Stephen G ; Ericsson, Aaron C</creatorcontrib><description>The urinary bladder in healthy dogs has dogmatically been considered free of bacteria. This study used culture independent techniques to characterize the healthy canine urinary microbiota. Urine samples collected by antepubic cystocentesis from dogs without urinary infection were used for DNA extraction. Genital tract and rectal samples were collected simultaneously from the same dogs. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and compared against Greengenes database for OTU assignment and relative abundance for urine, genital, and rectal samples. After excluding 4 dogs with cultivable bacteria, samples from 10 male (M; 1 intact) and 10 female (F) spayed dogs remained. All samples provided adequate genetic material for analysis. Four taxa (Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp., Sphingobium sp. and Bradyrhizobiaceae) dominated the urinary microbiota in all dogs of both sexes. These taxa were also detected in the genital swabs of both sexes, while the rectal microbiota differed substantially from the other sample sites. Principal component (PC) analysis of PC1 through PC3 showed overlap of urinary and genital microbiota and a clear separation of rectal swabs from the other sample sites along PC1, which explained 44.94% variation. Surprisingly, the urinary microbiota (mean # OTU 92.6 F, 90.2 M) was significantly richer than the genital (67.8 F, 66.6 M) or rectal microbiota (68.3 F, 71.2 M) (p < 0.0001), with no difference between sexes at any sample site. The canine urinary bladder is not a sterile environment and possesses its own unique and diverse microbiota compared to the rectal and genital microbiota. There was no difference between the sexes at any microbiota sample site (urine, genital, and rectal). The predominant bacterial genus for either sex in the urine and genital tracts was Pseudomonas sp.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28545071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Anesthesia ; Animals ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Bladder ; Clostridium difficile ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Dogs ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Female ; Genital tract ; Genitalia - microbiology ; Health aspects ; Infections ; Internal medicine ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Organ Specificity ; Principal Component Analysis ; Pseudomonas ; Pseudomonas - classification ; Pseudomonas - genetics ; Pseudomonas - isolation & purification ; Rectum ; Rectum - microbiology ; Relative abundance ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; rRNA 16S ; Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods ; Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Surgery ; Taxa ; Urinalysis ; Urinary bladder ; Urinary Tract - microbiology ; Urinary tract diseases ; Urinary tract infections ; Urine ; Urogenital system ; Veterinarians ; Veterinary colleges ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177783-e0177783</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Burton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Burton et al 2017 Burton et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b06842d134f77e952cc9292aeeb1a8c8a67f6d56068d6bbe0b03334feeb54c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b06842d134f77e952cc9292aeeb1a8c8a67f6d56068d6bbe0b03334feeb54c3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9364-3205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435306/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5435306/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burton, Erin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Leah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinero, Carol N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindt, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Stephen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericsson, Aaron C</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The urinary bladder in healthy dogs has dogmatically been considered free of bacteria. This study used culture independent techniques to characterize the healthy canine urinary microbiota. Urine samples collected by antepubic cystocentesis from dogs without urinary infection were used for DNA extraction. Genital tract and rectal samples were collected simultaneously from the same dogs. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and compared against Greengenes database for OTU assignment and relative abundance for urine, genital, and rectal samples. After excluding 4 dogs with cultivable bacteria, samples from 10 male (M; 1 intact) and 10 female (F) spayed dogs remained. All samples provided adequate genetic material for analysis. Four taxa (Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp., Sphingobium sp. and Bradyrhizobiaceae) dominated the urinary microbiota in all dogs of both sexes. These taxa were also detected in the genital swabs of both sexes, while the rectal microbiota differed substantially from the other sample sites. Principal component (PC) analysis of PC1 through PC3 showed overlap of urinary and genital microbiota and a clear separation of rectal swabs from the other sample sites along PC1, which explained 44.94% variation. Surprisingly, the urinary microbiota (mean # OTU 92.6 F, 90.2 M) was significantly richer than the genital (67.8 F, 66.6 M) or rectal microbiota (68.3 F, 71.2 M) (p < 0.0001), with no difference between sexes at any sample site. The canine urinary bladder is not a sterile environment and possesses its own unique and diverse microbiota compared to the rectal and genital microbiota. There was no difference between the sexes at any microbiota sample site (urine, genital, and rectal). The predominant bacterial genus for either sex in the urine and genital tracts was Pseudomonas sp.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital tract</subject><subject>Genitalia - microbiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Organ Specificity</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - classification</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - genetics</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Rectum - microbiology</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Tract - microbiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Veterinarians</subject><subject>Veterinary colleges</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhBWPRhxlyamw_CMngZWFjw9hrSNGkztM2YtOL66U2d7jKVfZA8JOT8zv_knPyz7BkEa4gZfLPzY-hVu9773qwBZIxx_CA7hQKjFUUAPzw6n2RnMe4AIJhT-jg7QZwUBDB4mr3dNCooPZjgfqvB-T73Nh8ak4_B9Src5J3TwZfOdyZ3fd4Y1Q7NTV75Oj7JHlnVRvN03s-zbx_ef918Wl1df9xuLq9Wmgo0rEpAeYEqiAvLmBEEaS2QQMqYEiquuaLM0orQhFW0LA0oAcYJTnFSaKzwefbioLtvfZRz21FCLgTjXBQgEdsDUXm1k_vguvRy6ZWTfy98qKUKg9OtkURjjSxUtCqrgjHELSfIcgY1AZoZmLTezdXGsjOVNv0QVLsQXUZ618ja_5SkwAQDmgRezQLB_xhNHGTnojZtq3rjx_RuATCkUJAJffkPen93M1Wr1IDrrU919SQqLwsBOWcETNT6HiqtyqQvTB6xLt0vEl4vEhIzmF9DrcYY5fbL5_9nr78v2Ysj9mCY6NtxMldcgsUBTAaLMRh7N2QI5GTx22nIyeJytnhKe378QXdJt57GfwBmqPWi</recordid><startdate>20170517</startdate><enddate>20170517</enddate><creator>Burton, Erin N</creator><creator>Cohn, Leah A</creator><creator>Reinero, Carol N</creator><creator>Rindt, Hans</creator><creator>Moore, Stephen G</creator><creator>Ericsson, Aaron C</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-3205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170517</creationdate><title>Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs</title><author>Burton, Erin N ; Cohn, Leah A ; Reinero, Carol N ; Rindt, Hans ; Moore, Stephen G ; Ericsson, Aaron C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b06842d134f77e952cc9292aeeb1a8c8a67f6d56068d6bbe0b03334feeb54c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital tract</topic><topic>Genitalia - microbiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Organ Specificity</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - classification</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - genetics</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Rectum - microbiology</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Tract - microbiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Veterinarians</topic><topic>Veterinary colleges</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burton, Erin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Leah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinero, Carol N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindt, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Stephen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ericsson, Aaron C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burton, Erin N</au><au>Cohn, Leah A</au><au>Reinero, Carol N</au><au>Rindt, Hans</au><au>Moore, Stephen G</au><au>Ericsson, Aaron C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0177783</spage><epage>e0177783</epage><pages>e0177783-e0177783</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The urinary bladder in healthy dogs has dogmatically been considered free of bacteria. This study used culture independent techniques to characterize the healthy canine urinary microbiota. Urine samples collected by antepubic cystocentesis from dogs without urinary infection were used for DNA extraction. Genital tract and rectal samples were collected simultaneously from the same dogs. The V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and compared against Greengenes database for OTU assignment and relative abundance for urine, genital, and rectal samples. After excluding 4 dogs with cultivable bacteria, samples from 10 male (M; 1 intact) and 10 female (F) spayed dogs remained. All samples provided adequate genetic material for analysis. Four taxa (Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp., Sphingobium sp. and Bradyrhizobiaceae) dominated the urinary microbiota in all dogs of both sexes. These taxa were also detected in the genital swabs of both sexes, while the rectal microbiota differed substantially from the other sample sites. Principal component (PC) analysis of PC1 through PC3 showed overlap of urinary and genital microbiota and a clear separation of rectal swabs from the other sample sites along PC1, which explained 44.94% variation. Surprisingly, the urinary microbiota (mean # OTU 92.6 F, 90.2 M) was significantly richer than the genital (67.8 F, 66.6 M) or rectal microbiota (68.3 F, 71.2 M) (p < 0.0001), with no difference between sexes at any sample site. The canine urinary bladder is not a sterile environment and possesses its own unique and diverse microbiota compared to the rectal and genital microbiota. There was no difference between the sexes at any microbiota sample site (urine, genital, and rectal). The predominant bacterial genus for either sex in the urine and genital tracts was Pseudomonas sp.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28545071</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0177783</doi><tpages>e0177783</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-3205</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177783-e0177783 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1899788940 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Abundance Anesthesia Animals Antimicrobial agents Bacteria Bacteria - classification Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Biology and Life Sciences Bladder Clostridium difficile Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Dogs E coli Escherichia coli Female Genital tract Genitalia - microbiology Health aspects Infections Internal medicine Male Medicine and Health Sciences Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Organ Specificity Principal Component Analysis Pseudomonas Pseudomonas - classification Pseudomonas - genetics Pseudomonas - isolation & purification Rectum Rectum - microbiology Relative abundance RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics rRNA 16S Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary Studies Substance abuse treatment Surgery Taxa Urinalysis Urinary bladder Urinary Tract - microbiology Urinary tract diseases Urinary tract infections Urine Urogenital system Veterinarians Veterinary colleges Veterinary medicine |
title | Characterization of the urinary microbiome in healthy dogs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20the%20urinary%20microbiome%20in%20healthy%20dogs&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Burton,%20Erin%20N&rft.date=2017-05-17&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0177783&rft.epage=e0177783&rft.pages=e0177783-e0177783&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0177783&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA491887500%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899788940&rft_id=info:pmid/28545071&rft_galeid=A491887500&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5c3c2f1a6dbd47728f852f871c50c7e1&rfr_iscdi=true |