Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband
Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177765 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e0177765 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Laeremans, Michelle Dons, Evi Avila-Palencia, Ione Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria Orjuela, Juan Pablo Anaya, Esther Brand, Christian Cole-Hunter, Tom de Nazelle, Audrey Götschi, Thomas Kahlmeier, Sonja Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark Standaert, Arnout De Boever, Patrick Int Panis, Luc |
| description | Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical activity and sedentary behaviour obtained with a self-reported instrument (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)) and a wearable sensor (SenseWear) in a repeated measures study design. Healthy adults (41 in Antwerp, 41 in Barcelona and 40 in London) wore the SenseWear armband for seven consecutive days and completed the GPAQ on the final day. This was repeated three times. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Spearman correlation coefficients, mixed effects regression models and Bland-Altman plots to study agreement between both methods. Mixed models were used to assess the effect of personal characteristics on the absolute and relative difference between estimates obtained with the GPAQ and SenseWear. Moderate to vigorous energy expenditure and duration derived from the GPAQ were significantly lower (p0.59). Results for sedentary behaviour did not differ, yet were poorly correlated (r |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0177765 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1899376056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491823742</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_db46650459c74c4a907ba5cb7142512f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A491823742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-927400dae912ac1f6d2550dd904dfb064d2a127020c253db03c6a4aab3f7cf4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ut2K00AUDqK46-obiA54oxet8z-JF0JZtC4suIuKl8PJzKSdkma6M2mhL-OzOm3TsgUlhCQn3885Z76ieE3wmDBFPi7COnbQjlehc2NMlFJSPCkuScXoSFLMnj56vyhepLTAWLBSyufFBS0Fxaokl8Wfu_k2eQMtAtP7je-3CDqLkrOu6yFuUe3msPHZC_kOWfDtFrW-cZ_QBJmwXEGETHOZBG0WSig0qJ87NG1DnUVP6pOj-v3apd6HrgMfHXo_vZvcf9hb7lg_XJfcbwcRQVzWufqyeNZAm9yr4XlV_Pr65ef1t9Ht9-nN9eR2ZCQT_aiiimNswVWEgiGNtFQIbG2FuW1qLLmlQKjCFBsqmK0xMxI4QM0aZRoO7Kp4e9BdtSHpYbVJk7KqmJJYyIy4OSBsgIVeRb_M29EBvN4XQpxpiL03rdO25lIKzEVlFDccKqxqEKZWhFNBaJO1Pg9u63rprMmrjtCeiZ7_6fxcz8JGC86Y4lUWIAcBk9ZGR2dcNNDviaeP3Z0PmWpayhKTzHk3mMbwsDuE_4w5oGaQJ_FdE3IDZumT0RNekZJmf5pR43-g8mXd0pscyMbn-hmBDw3HkFJ0zWlYgvUuzsdm9C7Oeohzpr15vKgT6Zhf9hc77fPi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899376056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Recercat</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Laeremans, Michelle ; Dons, Evi ; Avila-Palencia, Ione ; Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria ; Orjuela, Juan Pablo ; Anaya, Esther ; Brand, Christian ; Cole-Hunter, Tom ; de Nazelle, Audrey ; Götschi, Thomas ; Kahlmeier, Sonja ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark ; Standaert, Arnout ; De Boever, Patrick ; Int Panis, Luc</creator><contributor>Harezlak, Jaroslaw</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laeremans, Michelle ; Dons, Evi ; Avila-Palencia, Ione ; Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria ; Orjuela, Juan Pablo ; Anaya, Esther ; Brand, Christian ; Cole-Hunter, Tom ; de Nazelle, Audrey ; Götschi, Thomas ; Kahlmeier, Sonja ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark ; Standaert, Arnout ; De Boever, Patrick ; Int Panis, Luc ; Harezlak, Jaroslaw</creatorcontrib><description>Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical activity and sedentary behaviour obtained with a self-reported instrument (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)) and a wearable sensor (SenseWear) in a repeated measures study design. Healthy adults (41 in Antwerp, 41 in Barcelona and 40 in London) wore the SenseWear armband for seven consecutive days and completed the GPAQ on the final day. This was repeated three times. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Spearman correlation coefficients, mixed effects regression models and Bland-Altman plots to study agreement between both methods. Mixed models were used to assess the effect of personal characteristics on the absolute and relative difference between estimates obtained with the GPAQ and SenseWear. Moderate to vigorous energy expenditure and duration derived from the GPAQ were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to the SenseWear, yet these variables showed significant correlations ranging from 0.45 to 0.64. Estimates of vigorous-intensity physical activity in particular showed high similarity (r>0.59). Results for sedentary behaviour did not differ, yet were poorly correlated (r<0.25). The differences between all variables were reproducible across repeated measurements. In addition, we observed a relationship between these differences and BMI, body fat and physical activity domain. Due to the lack of a standardized protocol, results from different studies measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour are difficult to compare. Therefore, we suggested an easy-to-implement approach for future studies adding the GPAQ to the wearable of choice as a basis for comparisons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177765</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28520781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Analysis ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body fat ; Body mass ; Comparative analysis ; Condició física ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Energy expenditure ; Energy Metabolism ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental policy ; Environmental science ; Epidemiology ; Everyday life ; Exercise ; Exercise physiology ; Female ; Fisiologia de l'exercici ; Health aspects ; Health surveillance ; Humans ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Monitoring, Physiologic - standards ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Physical Sciences ; Physical training ; Physiology ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Recall ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sedentary Behavior ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validity ; Wearable technology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177765</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Laeremans et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>cc by (c) Laeremans et al., 2017 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a></rights><rights>2017 Laeremans et al 2017 Laeremans et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-927400dae912ac1f6d2550dd904dfb064d2a127020c253db03c6a4aab3f7cf4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-927400dae912ac1f6d2550dd904dfb064d2a127020c253db03c6a4aab3f7cf4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1406-7893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433749/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433749/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,26951,27843,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28520781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Harezlak, Jaroslaw</contributor><creatorcontrib>Laeremans, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dons, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila-Palencia, Ione</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orjuela, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole-Hunter, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Nazelle, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götschi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahlmeier, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standaert, Arnout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Boever, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Int Panis, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical activity and sedentary behaviour obtained with a self-reported instrument (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)) and a wearable sensor (SenseWear) in a repeated measures study design. Healthy adults (41 in Antwerp, 41 in Barcelona and 40 in London) wore the SenseWear armband for seven consecutive days and completed the GPAQ on the final day. This was repeated three times. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Spearman correlation coefficients, mixed effects regression models and Bland-Altman plots to study agreement between both methods. Mixed models were used to assess the effect of personal characteristics on the absolute and relative difference between estimates obtained with the GPAQ and SenseWear. Moderate to vigorous energy expenditure and duration derived from the GPAQ were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to the SenseWear, yet these variables showed significant correlations ranging from 0.45 to 0.64. Estimates of vigorous-intensity physical activity in particular showed high similarity (r>0.59). Results for sedentary behaviour did not differ, yet were poorly correlated (r<0.25). The differences between all variables were reproducible across repeated measurements. In addition, we observed a relationship between these differences and BMI, body fat and physical activity domain. Due to the lack of a standardized protocol, results from different studies measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour are difficult to compare. Therefore, we suggested an easy-to-implement approach for future studies adding the GPAQ to the wearable of choice as a basis for comparisons.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Condició física</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fisiologia de l'exercici</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - standards</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sedentary Behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wearable technology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>XX2</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ut2K00AUDqK46-obiA54oxet8z-JF0JZtC4suIuKl8PJzKSdkma6M2mhL-OzOm3TsgUlhCQn3885Z76ieE3wmDBFPi7COnbQjlehc2NMlFJSPCkuScXoSFLMnj56vyhepLTAWLBSyufFBS0Fxaokl8Wfu_k2eQMtAtP7je-3CDqLkrOu6yFuUe3msPHZC_kOWfDtFrW-cZ_QBJmwXEGETHOZBG0WSig0qJ87NG1DnUVP6pOj-v3apd6HrgMfHXo_vZvcf9hb7lg_XJfcbwcRQVzWufqyeNZAm9yr4XlV_Pr65ef1t9Ht9-nN9eR2ZCQT_aiiimNswVWEgiGNtFQIbG2FuW1qLLmlQKjCFBsqmK0xMxI4QM0aZRoO7Kp4e9BdtSHpYbVJk7KqmJJYyIy4OSBsgIVeRb_M29EBvN4XQpxpiL03rdO25lIKzEVlFDccKqxqEKZWhFNBaJO1Pg9u63rprMmrjtCeiZ7_6fxcz8JGC86Y4lUWIAcBk9ZGR2dcNNDviaeP3Z0PmWpayhKTzHk3mMbwsDuE_4w5oGaQJ_FdE3IDZumT0RNekZJmf5pR43-g8mXd0pscyMbn-hmBDw3HkFJ0zWlYgvUuzsdm9C7Oeohzpr15vKgT6Zhf9hc77fPi</recordid><startdate>20170516</startdate><enddate>20170516</enddate><creator>Laeremans, Michelle</creator><creator>Dons, Evi</creator><creator>Avila-Palencia, Ione</creator><creator>Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria</creator><creator>Orjuela, Juan Pablo</creator><creator>Anaya, Esther</creator><creator>Brand, Christian</creator><creator>Cole-Hunter, Tom</creator><creator>de Nazelle, Audrey</creator><creator>Götschi, Thomas</creator><creator>Kahlmeier, Sonja</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark</creator><creator>Standaert, Arnout</creator><creator>De Boever, Patrick</creator><creator>Int Panis, Luc</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>PLOS</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>XX2</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-7893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170516</creationdate><title>Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband</title><author>Laeremans, Michelle ; Dons, Evi ; Avila-Palencia, Ione ; Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria ; Orjuela, Juan Pablo ; Anaya, Esther ; Brand, Christian ; Cole-Hunter, Tom ; de Nazelle, Audrey ; Götschi, Thomas ; Kahlmeier, Sonja ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark ; Standaert, Arnout ; De Boever, Patrick ; Int Panis, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-927400dae912ac1f6d2550dd904dfb064d2a127020c253db03c6a4aab3f7cf4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Condició física</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fisiologia de l'exercici</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - standards</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sedentary Behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wearable technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laeremans, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dons, Evi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila-Palencia, Ione</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orjuela, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole-Hunter, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Nazelle, Audrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götschi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahlmeier, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Standaert, Arnout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Boever, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Int Panis, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laeremans, Michelle</au><au>Dons, Evi</au><au>Avila-Palencia, Ione</au><au>Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria</au><au>Orjuela, Juan Pablo</au><au>Anaya, Esther</au><au>Brand, Christian</au><au>Cole-Hunter, Tom</au><au>de Nazelle, Audrey</au><au>Götschi, Thomas</au><au>Kahlmeier, Sonja</au><au>Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark</au><au>Standaert, Arnout</au><au>De Boever, Patrick</au><au>Int Panis, Luc</au><au>Harezlak, Jaroslaw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0177765</spage><pages>e0177765-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Reduction of sedentary time and an increase in physical activity offer potential to improve public health. However, quantifying physical activity behaviour under real world conditions is a major challenge and no standard of good practice is available. Our aim was to compare the results of physical activity and sedentary behaviour obtained with a self-reported instrument (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)) and a wearable sensor (SenseWear) in a repeated measures study design. Healthy adults (41 in Antwerp, 41 in Barcelona and 40 in London) wore the SenseWear armband for seven consecutive days and completed the GPAQ on the final day. This was repeated three times. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Spearman correlation coefficients, mixed effects regression models and Bland-Altman plots to study agreement between both methods. Mixed models were used to assess the effect of personal characteristics on the absolute and relative difference between estimates obtained with the GPAQ and SenseWear. Moderate to vigorous energy expenditure and duration derived from the GPAQ were significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to the SenseWear, yet these variables showed significant correlations ranging from 0.45 to 0.64. Estimates of vigorous-intensity physical activity in particular showed high similarity (r>0.59). Results for sedentary behaviour did not differ, yet were poorly correlated (r<0.25). The differences between all variables were reproducible across repeated measurements. In addition, we observed a relationship between these differences and BMI, body fat and physical activity domain. Due to the lack of a standardized protocol, results from different studies measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour are difficult to compare. Therefore, we suggested an easy-to-implement approach for future studies adding the GPAQ to the wearable of choice as a basis for comparisons.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28520781</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0177765</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-7893</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177765 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1899376056 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Recercat; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Activities of daily living Adolescent Adult Adults Analysis Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Body fat Body mass Comparative analysis Condició física Correlation Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Energy expenditure Energy Metabolism Engineering and Technology Environmental policy Environmental science Epidemiology Everyday life Exercise Exercise physiology Female Fisiologia de l'exercici Health aspects Health surveillance Humans Male Mathematical models Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation Monitoring, Physiologic - methods Monitoring, Physiologic - standards Physical activity Physical fitness Physical Sciences Physical training Physiology Public health Questionnaires Recall Regression analysis Regression models Research and Analysis Methods Sedentary Behavior Studies Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Validity Wearable technology |
| title | Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in daily life: A comparative analysis of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the SenseWear armband |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A20%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20activity%20and%20sedentary%20behaviour%20in%20daily%20life:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20Global%20Physical%20Activity%20Questionnaire%20(GPAQ)%20and%20the%20SenseWear%20armband&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Laeremans,%20Michelle&rft.date=2017-05-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0177765&rft.pages=e0177765-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0177765&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA491823742%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899376056&rft_id=info:pmid/28520781&rft_galeid=A491823742&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_db46650459c74c4a907ba5cb7142512f&rfr_iscdi=true |