Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women

The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177563-e0177563
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Yi-Ran, Wang, Panchalli, Lu, Mei-Chun, Tseng, Shih-Ting, Yang, Chun-Pai, Yan, Yuan-Horng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0177563
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0177563
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Ho, Yi-Ran
Wang, Panchalli
Lu, Mei-Chun
Tseng, Shih-Ting
Yang, Chun-Pai
Yan, Yuan-Horng
description The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/dL or greater). This prospective study enrolled 1,989 pregnant Taiwanese women. A two-step approach, including a 50-g, 1-h GCT and 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), was employed for the diagnosis of GDM at weeks 23-32. The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was measured at the time the OGTT was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the relationship between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and GDM. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationships between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An ROC curve demonstrated that the optimal mid-pregnancy HbA1c cut-off point to predict GDM, as diagnosed by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using a two-step approach, was 5.7%. The area under the ROC curve of the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level for GDM was 0.70. Compared with the levels of 4.5-4.9%, higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels (5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, 6.0-6.4, 6.5-6.9, and >7.0%) were significantly associated with increased risks of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, preterm delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, low birth weight, and macrosomia (the odds ratio [OR] ranges were 1.20-9.98, 1.31-5.16, 0.88-3.15, 0.89-4.10, and 2.22-27.86, respectively). The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was associated with various adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women. However, it lacked adequate sensitivity and specificity to replace the two-step approach in the diagnosis of GDM. The current study comprised a single-center prospective study; thus, additional, randomized control design studies are required.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0177563
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1899029309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491761777</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_42c45522bcb94ffa9fd8e75ad094c865</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A491761777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b50f0747efe36fc902ab32de6d3c802fa7548e38d881f4acc651dcb2e4f4435a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwyOBnHhukUQV0pEqVoLC1HD8Sl8Se2kmHLvnneGbSMkFdoCwc2d85to_vTZKXECwgLuCHKzd6y7vF2lm1ALAoaI4fJcewwijLEcCPD_6PkmchXAFAcZnnT5MjVFJAEaDHye9lCE4YPhhnQ-p02huZrb1qLLfiNj2rl1CkGzO0aaPCsMN4l0rDazWokHIrU2_Cz62Syxvlg0r_qt04CNdHzNi0NU2b7dBLbjbcqkhu4qJ9njzRvAvqxTSeJN8_f7o8PcvOL76sTpfnmcgrNGQ1BRoUpFBa4VyLCiBeYyRVLrEoAdK8oKRUuJRlCTXhQuQUSlEjRTQhmHJ8krze-647F9iUXmCwrKJXhUEVidWekI5fsbU3Pfe3zHHDdhPON4z7wYhOMYIEoRShWtQV0ZpXWpaqoFyCiogyp9Hr47TbWPdKCmUHz7uZ6XzFmpY17oZRghHM82jwbjLw7nqM2bPeBKG6Lkbnxv25CUQVKCP65h_04dtNVMPjBYzVLu4rtqZsSSpY5LGEikgtHqDiJ1VvRCw1beL8TPB-JojMoH4NDR9DYKtvX_-fvfgxZ98esK3i3dAG1427Qp2DZA8K70LwSt-HDAHbdspdGmzbKWzqlCh7dfhA96K71sB_AGouEE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899029309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ho, Yi-Ran ; Wang, Panchalli ; Lu, Mei-Chun ; Tseng, Shih-Ting ; Yang, Chun-Pai ; Yan, Yuan-Horng</creator><contributor>Spracklen, Cassandra Nichole</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ho, Yi-Ran ; Wang, Panchalli ; Lu, Mei-Chun ; Tseng, Shih-Ting ; Yang, Chun-Pai ; Yan, Yuan-Horng ; Spracklen, Cassandra Nichole</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/dL or greater). This prospective study enrolled 1,989 pregnant Taiwanese women. A two-step approach, including a 50-g, 1-h GCT and 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), was employed for the diagnosis of GDM at weeks 23-32. The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was measured at the time the OGTT was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the relationship between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and GDM. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationships between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An ROC curve demonstrated that the optimal mid-pregnancy HbA1c cut-off point to predict GDM, as diagnosed by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using a two-step approach, was 5.7%. The area under the ROC curve of the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level for GDM was 0.70. Compared with the levels of 4.5-4.9%, higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels (5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, 6.0-6.4, 6.5-6.9, and &gt;7.0%) were significantly associated with increased risks of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, preterm delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, low birth weight, and macrosomia (the odds ratio [OR] ranges were 1.20-9.98, 1.31-5.16, 0.88-3.15, 0.89-4.10, and 2.22-27.86, respectively). The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was associated with various adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women. However, it lacked adequate sensitivity and specificity to replace the two-step approach in the diagnosis of GDM. The current study comprised a single-center prospective study; thus, additional, randomized control design studies are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28505205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Angiography ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Biology and life sciences ; Biomarkers ; Blood glucose ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Cancer ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Control ; Criteria ; Cut-off ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes, Gestational - blood ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic software ; Diagnostic systems ; Downloading ; Electronic mail ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Fetuses ; Food ; Format ; Gestation ; Gestational diabetes ; Glucose ; Glucose tolerance ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Hyperglycemia ; Infant, Newborn ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Measurement ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical records ; Medicine and health sciences ; Metabolism ; Mortality ; Neurology ; Nutrition ; Obstetrics ; Odds Ratio ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Public health ; Public Health Surveillance ; Regression models ; Risk ; Risk factors ; ROC Curve ; Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177563-e0177563</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Ho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Ho et al 2017 Ho et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b50f0747efe36fc902ab32de6d3c802fa7548e38d881f4acc651dcb2e4f4435a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b50f0747efe36fc902ab32de6d3c802fa7548e38d881f4acc651dcb2e4f4435a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3865-9057</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432166/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432166/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28505205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Spracklen, Cassandra Nichole</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ho, Yi-Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Panchalli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Shih-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chun-Pai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yuan-Horng</creatorcontrib><title>Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/dL or greater). This prospective study enrolled 1,989 pregnant Taiwanese women. A two-step approach, including a 50-g, 1-h GCT and 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), was employed for the diagnosis of GDM at weeks 23-32. The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was measured at the time the OGTT was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the relationship between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and GDM. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationships between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An ROC curve demonstrated that the optimal mid-pregnancy HbA1c cut-off point to predict GDM, as diagnosed by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using a two-step approach, was 5.7%. The area under the ROC curve of the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level for GDM was 0.70. Compared with the levels of 4.5-4.9%, higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels (5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, 6.0-6.4, 6.5-6.9, and &gt;7.0%) were significantly associated with increased risks of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, preterm delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, low birth weight, and macrosomia (the odds ratio [OR] ranges were 1.20-9.98, 1.31-5.16, 0.88-3.15, 0.89-4.10, and 2.22-27.86, respectively). The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was associated with various adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women. However, it lacked adequate sensitivity and specificity to replace the two-step approach in the diagnosis of GDM. The current study comprised a single-center prospective study; thus, additional, randomized control design studies are required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Cut-off</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic software</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Downloading</subject><subject>Electronic mail</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine and health sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health Surveillance</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEQkKwyOBnHhukUQV0pEqVoLC1HD8Sl8Se2kmHLvnneGbSMkFdoCwc2d85to_vTZKXECwgLuCHKzd6y7vF2lm1ALAoaI4fJcewwijLEcCPD_6PkmchXAFAcZnnT5MjVFJAEaDHye9lCE4YPhhnQ-p02huZrb1qLLfiNj2rl1CkGzO0aaPCsMN4l0rDazWokHIrU2_Cz62Syxvlg0r_qt04CNdHzNi0NU2b7dBLbjbcqkhu4qJ9njzRvAvqxTSeJN8_f7o8PcvOL76sTpfnmcgrNGQ1BRoUpFBa4VyLCiBeYyRVLrEoAdK8oKRUuJRlCTXhQuQUSlEjRTQhmHJ8krze-647F9iUXmCwrKJXhUEVidWekI5fsbU3Pfe3zHHDdhPON4z7wYhOMYIEoRShWtQV0ZpXWpaqoFyCiogyp9Hr47TbWPdKCmUHz7uZ6XzFmpY17oZRghHM82jwbjLw7nqM2bPeBKG6Lkbnxv25CUQVKCP65h_04dtNVMPjBYzVLu4rtqZsSSpY5LGEikgtHqDiJ1VvRCw1beL8TPB-JojMoH4NDR9DYKtvX_-fvfgxZ98esK3i3dAG1427Qp2DZA8K70LwSt-HDAHbdspdGmzbKWzqlCh7dfhA96K71sB_AGouEE0</recordid><startdate>20170515</startdate><enddate>20170515</enddate><creator>Ho, Yi-Ran</creator><creator>Wang, Panchalli</creator><creator>Lu, Mei-Chun</creator><creator>Tseng, Shih-Ting</creator><creator>Yang, Chun-Pai</creator><creator>Yan, Yuan-Horng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-9057</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170515</creationdate><title>Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women</title><author>Ho, Yi-Ran ; Wang, Panchalli ; Lu, Mei-Chun ; Tseng, Shih-Ting ; Yang, Chun-Pai ; Yan, Yuan-Horng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-b50f0747efe36fc902ab32de6d3c802fa7548e38d881f4acc651dcb2e4f4435a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Cut-off</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic software</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Downloading</topic><topic>Electronic mail</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine and health sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health Surveillance</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Taiwan - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Yi-Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Panchalli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Mei-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Shih-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chun-Pai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yuan-Horng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Yi-Ran</au><au>Wang, Panchalli</au><au>Lu, Mei-Chun</au><au>Tseng, Shih-Ting</au><au>Yang, Chun-Pai</au><au>Yan, Yuan-Horng</au><au>Spracklen, Cassandra Nichole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0177563</spage><epage>e0177563</epage><pages>e0177563-e0177563</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/dL or greater). This prospective study enrolled 1,989 pregnant Taiwanese women. A two-step approach, including a 50-g, 1-h GCT and 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), was employed for the diagnosis of GDM at weeks 23-32. The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was measured at the time the OGTT was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the relationship between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and GDM. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationships between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and adverse pregnancy outcomes. An ROC curve demonstrated that the optimal mid-pregnancy HbA1c cut-off point to predict GDM, as diagnosed by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using a two-step approach, was 5.7%. The area under the ROC curve of the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level for GDM was 0.70. Compared with the levels of 4.5-4.9%, higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels (5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, 6.0-6.4, 6.5-6.9, and &gt;7.0%) were significantly associated with increased risks of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, preterm delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, low birth weight, and macrosomia (the odds ratio [OR] ranges were 1.20-9.98, 1.31-5.16, 0.88-3.15, 0.89-4.10, and 2.22-27.86, respectively). The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was associated with various adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women. However, it lacked adequate sensitivity and specificity to replace the two-step approach in the diagnosis of GDM. The current study comprised a single-center prospective study; thus, additional, randomized control design studies are required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28505205</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0177563</doi><tpages>e0177563</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-9057</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0177563-e0177563
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1899029309
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Adults
Age
Angiography
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Biology and life sciences
Biomarkers
Blood glucose
Body mass
Body mass index
Cancer
Cardiovascular diseases
Control
Criteria
Cut-off
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes, Gestational - blood
Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis
Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology
Diagnosis
Diagnostic software
Diagnostic systems
Downloading
Electronic mail
Endocrinology
Female
Fetuses
Food
Format
Gestation
Gestational diabetes
Glucose
Glucose tolerance
Glycated Hemoglobin A
Gynecology
Health aspects
Health risk assessment
Health risks
Hemoglobin
Humans
Hygiene
Hyperglycemia
Infant, Newborn
Maternal & child health
Measurement
Medical diagnosis
Medical records
Medicine and health sciences
Metabolism
Mortality
Neurology
Nutrition
Obstetrics
Odds Ratio
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Public health
Public Health Surveillance
Regression models
Risk
Risk factors
ROC Curve
Taiwan - epidemiology
title Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations%20of%20mid-pregnancy%20HbA1c%20with%20gestational%20diabetes%20and%20risk%20of%20adverse%20pregnancy%20outcomes%20in%20high-risk%20Taiwanese%20women&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ho,%20Yi-Ran&rft.date=2017-05-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0177563&rft.epage=e0177563&rft.pages=e0177563-e0177563&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0177563&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA491761777%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899029309&rft_id=info:pmid/28505205&rft_galeid=A491761777&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_42c45522bcb94ffa9fd8e75ad094c865&rfr_iscdi=true