Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex
Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176020-e0176020 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0176020 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0176020 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hiremath, Shivayogi V Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C Wheeler, Jesse J Moran, Daniel W Gaunt, Robert A Collinger, Jennifer L Foldes, Stephen T Weber, Douglas J Chen, Weidong Boninger, Michael L Wang, Wei |
description | Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0176020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1897668606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491464745</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16b58fda9a5847d7bb5160fb3bebadff</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A491464745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ef9c5ccf4da301a86f6a24d2daeef9162da549b71f68a3219f64bc79434d8ef83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gWBNGHXZMmTdMX4TjUWzg4_Pkapulkt0varEkq3n9v1u0dW7kHyUPCzGe-k0y-WfackiVlFX23daMfwC53bsAloZUgBXmQndKaFQtREPbw6HySPQlhS0jJpBCPs5NCclnXlJ1mny_HHoZ8h17jLnZuyJ3J0aKOvtNg8xC7frRwyAx53GAeRm9A4x4MrofoAg7B-ZtcOx_x99PskQEb8Nm0n2XfP374dnG5uLr-tLo4v1roqpRxgabWpdaGt8AIBSmMgIK3RQuYUlSkQ8nrpqJGSGAFrY3gja5qzngr0Uh2lr086O6sC2qaRlBU1pUQUhCRiNWBaB1s1c53Pfgb5aBTfwPOrxX42GmLioqmlKaFGkrJq7ZqmpIKYhrWYAOtMUnr_dRtbHpsNQ7Rg52JzjNDt1Fr90uVvCgpoUngzSTg3c8RQ1R9FzRaCwO68XBvSVjqntBX_6D3v26i1pAe0A3Gpb56L6rOeU254BUvE7W8h0qrxb7TyTqmS_FZwdtZQWLSp8Y1jCGo1dcv_89e_5izr4_YDYKNm-DsuHdWmIP8AGrvQvBo7oZMido7_3Yaau98NTk_lb04_qC7olursz-6BQAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897668606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hiremath, Shivayogi V ; Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C ; Wheeler, Jesse J ; Moran, Daniel W ; Gaunt, Robert A ; Collinger, Jennifer L ; Foldes, Stephen T ; Weber, Douglas J ; Chen, Weidong ; Boninger, Michael L ; Wang, Wei</creator><contributor>Pouratian, Nader</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hiremath, Shivayogi V ; Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C ; Wheeler, Jesse J ; Moran, Daniel W ; Gaunt, Robert A ; Collinger, Jennifer L ; Foldes, Stephen T ; Weber, Douglas J ; Chen, Weidong ; Boninger, Michael L ; Wang, Wei ; Pouratian, Nader</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28489913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Arm ; Bioengineering ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomedical engineering ; Brain ; Brain Mapping ; Brain stimulation ; Brain-Computer Interfaces ; Cognition & reasoning ; Computer applications ; Cortex (motor) ; Cortex (somatosensory) ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrical stimuli ; Electrodes ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Engineering ; Engineering and Technology ; Feedback ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Implants ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Motor task performance ; Neurosciences ; Paralysis ; Perception ; Prosthetics ; Pulse amplitude ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Somatosensory Cortex - physiology ; Somatosensory system ; Spinal cord ; Studies ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176020-e0176020</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ef9c5ccf4da301a86f6a24d2daeef9162da549b71f68a3219f64bc79434d8ef83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ef9c5ccf4da301a86f6a24d2daeef9162da549b71f68a3219f64bc79434d8ef83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5761-659X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425101/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425101/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pouratian, Nader</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hiremath, Shivayogi V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, Jesse J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Daniel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collinger, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldes, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.</description><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Brain stimulation</subject><subject>Brain-Computer Interfaces</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Cortex (motor)</subject><subject>Cortex (somatosensory)</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrical stimuli</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Pulse amplitude</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Somatosensory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Somatosensory system</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3nn6H4gWBNGHXZMmTdMX4TjUWzg4_Pkapulkt0varEkq3n9v1u0dW7kHyUPCzGe-k0y-WfackiVlFX23daMfwC53bsAloZUgBXmQndKaFQtREPbw6HySPQlhS0jJpBCPs5NCclnXlJ1mny_HHoZ8h17jLnZuyJ3J0aKOvtNg8xC7frRwyAx53GAeRm9A4x4MrofoAg7B-ZtcOx_x99PskQEb8Nm0n2XfP374dnG5uLr-tLo4v1roqpRxgabWpdaGt8AIBSmMgIK3RQuYUlSkQ8nrpqJGSGAFrY3gja5qzngr0Uh2lr086O6sC2qaRlBU1pUQUhCRiNWBaB1s1c53Pfgb5aBTfwPOrxX42GmLioqmlKaFGkrJq7ZqmpIKYhrWYAOtMUnr_dRtbHpsNQ7Rg52JzjNDt1Fr90uVvCgpoUngzSTg3c8RQ1R9FzRaCwO68XBvSVjqntBX_6D3v26i1pAe0A3Gpb56L6rOeU254BUvE7W8h0qrxb7TyTqmS_FZwdtZQWLSp8Y1jCGo1dcv_89e_5izr4_YDYKNm-DsuHdWmIP8AGrvQvBo7oZMido7_3Yaau98NTk_lb04_qC7olursz-6BQAw</recordid><startdate>20170510</startdate><enddate>20170510</enddate><creator>Hiremath, Shivayogi V</creator><creator>Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C</creator><creator>Wheeler, Jesse J</creator><creator>Moran, Daniel W</creator><creator>Gaunt, Robert A</creator><creator>Collinger, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Foldes, Stephen T</creator><creator>Weber, Douglas J</creator><creator>Chen, Weidong</creator><creator>Boninger, Michael L</creator><creator>Wang, Wei</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-659X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170510</creationdate><title>Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex</title><author>Hiremath, Shivayogi V ; Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C ; Wheeler, Jesse J ; Moran, Daniel W ; Gaunt, Robert A ; Collinger, Jennifer L ; Foldes, Stephen T ; Weber, Douglas J ; Chen, Weidong ; Boninger, Michael L ; Wang, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ef9c5ccf4da301a86f6a24d2daeef9162da549b71f68a3219f64bc79434d8ef83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Brain stimulation</topic><topic>Brain-Computer Interfaces</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Cortex (motor)</topic><topic>Cortex (somatosensory)</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrical stimuli</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Pulse amplitude</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Somatosensory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Somatosensory system</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hiremath, Shivayogi V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, Jesse J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Daniel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collinger, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldes, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hiremath, Shivayogi V</au><au>Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C</au><au>Wheeler, Jesse J</au><au>Moran, Daniel W</au><au>Gaunt, Robert A</au><au>Collinger, Jennifer L</au><au>Foldes, Stephen T</au><au>Weber, Douglas J</au><au>Chen, Weidong</au><au>Boninger, Michael L</au><au>Wang, Wei</au><au>Pouratian, Nader</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-05-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0176020</spage><epage>e0176020</epage><pages>e0176020-e0176020</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28489913</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0176020</doi><tpages>e0176020</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-659X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-05, Vol.12 (5), p.e0176020-e0176020 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1897668606 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Arm Bioengineering Biology and Life Sciences Biomedical engineering Brain Brain Mapping Brain stimulation Brain-Computer Interfaces Cognition & reasoning Computer applications Cortex (motor) Cortex (somatosensory) Electric Stimulation Electrical stimuli Electrodes Electrodes, Implanted Engineering Engineering and Technology Feedback Health aspects Humans Implants Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Motor task performance Neurosciences Paralysis Perception Prosthetics Pulse amplitude Rehabilitation Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Somatosensory Cortex - physiology Somatosensory system Spinal cord Studies Veterans |
title | Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20perception%20of%20electrical%20stimulation%20on%20the%20surface%20of%20somatosensory%20cortex&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hiremath,%20Shivayogi%20V&rft.date=2017-05-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0176020&rft.epage=e0176020&rft.pages=e0176020-e0176020&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0176020&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA491464745%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897668606&rft_id=info:pmid/28489913&rft_galeid=A491464745&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_16b58fda9a5847d7bb5160fb3bebadff&rfr_iscdi=true |