Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning
To demonstrate the incremental benefit of using free text data in addition to vital sign and demographic data to identify patients with suspected infection in the emergency department. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study performed at a tertiary academic teaching hospital. All consec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.e0174708-e0174708 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0174708 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0174708 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Horng, Steven Sontag, David A Halpern, Yoni Jernite, Yacine Shapiro, Nathan I Nathanson, Larry A |
description | To demonstrate the incremental benefit of using free text data in addition to vital sign and demographic data to identify patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study performed at a tertiary academic teaching hospital. All consecutive ED patient visits between 12/17/08 and 2/17/13 were included. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome measure was infection diagnosed in the emergency department defined as a patient having an infection related ED ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis. Patients were randomly allocated to train (64%), validate (20%), and test (16%) data sets. After preprocessing the free text using bigram and negation detection, we built four models to predict infection, incrementally adding vital signs, chief complaint, and free text nursing assessment. We used two different methods to represent free text: a bag of words model and a topic model. We then used a support vector machine to build the prediction model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the discriminatory power of each model.
A total of 230,936 patient visits were included in the study. Approximately 14% of patients had the primary outcome of diagnosed infection. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the vitals model, which used only vital signs and demographic data, was 0.67 for the training data set, 0.67 for the validation data set, and 0.67 (95% CI 0.65-0.69) for the test data set. The AUC for the chief complaint model which also included demographic and vital sign data was 0.84 for the training data set, 0.83 for the validation data set, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.84) for the test data set. The best performing methods made use of all of the free text. In particular, the AUC for the bag-of-words model was 0.89 for training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87) for the test data set. The AUC for the topic model was 0.86 for the training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86) for the test data set.
Compared to previous work that only used structured data such as vital signs and demographic information, utilizing free text drastically improves the discriminatory ability (increase in AUC from 0.67 to 0.86) of identifying infection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0174708 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1885090502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A493764734</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8bc94f749fd4432a8e0bf7b27949a1c1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A493764734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2d018a73cb8a3cd8f966a68adb11dda8a4741a58a94eb940cc93821d9b055f143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJpD7uVLNmWLoWw9GMhEOjXVYzlsVfBlhxJLsm_r7a7Cbslh6KDxOiZV5pXmix7ScmSspp-uHKztzAsJ2dxSWjNayIeZadUsmJRFYQ9PlifZM9CuCKkZKKqnmYnhWCCF7Q4zW5WHiEa2-dgc5ijGyFim0dv-h593jmfB5yCCbkejDUahrxFbYJxNg_zNDkfc4g5juh7tPo27U7g44g2bkWgx3wOW_kR9MZYzAcEb1PgefakgyHgi_18lv38_OnH6uvi4vLLenV-sdCVLOKiaAkVUDPdCGC6FZ2sKqgEtA2lbQsCeM0plAIkx0ZyorVkoqCtbEhZdpSzs-z1TncaXFB704KiQpREkpIUiVjviNbBlZq8GcHfKgdG_Q0436tUkdEDKtFoybuay67lnBUgkDRd3RS15BKopknr4_60uRmx1ckGD8OR6PGONRvVu98qvQwjvEoC7_YC3l3PGKIaTdA4DGDRzbt7S84LUSb0zT_ow9XtqR5SAcZ2Lp2rt6LqnEtWV7xmW5eWD1BptDganX5YZ1L8KOH9UUJiIt7EHuYQ1Pr7t_9nL38ds28P2A3CEDfBDXNMHy4cg3wHau9C8Njdm0yJ2jbInRtq2yBq3yAp7dXhA90n3XUE-wPF5Q0x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1885090502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Horng, Steven ; Sontag, David A ; Halpern, Yoni ; Jernite, Yacine ; Shapiro, Nathan I ; Nathanson, Larry A</creator><creatorcontrib>Horng, Steven ; Sontag, David A ; Halpern, Yoni ; Jernite, Yacine ; Shapiro, Nathan I ; Nathanson, Larry A</creatorcontrib><description>To demonstrate the incremental benefit of using free text data in addition to vital sign and demographic data to identify patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study performed at a tertiary academic teaching hospital. All consecutive ED patient visits between 12/17/08 and 2/17/13 were included. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome measure was infection diagnosed in the emergency department defined as a patient having an infection related ED ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis. Patients were randomly allocated to train (64%), validate (20%), and test (16%) data sets. After preprocessing the free text using bigram and negation detection, we built four models to predict infection, incrementally adding vital signs, chief complaint, and free text nursing assessment. We used two different methods to represent free text: a bag of words model and a topic model. We then used a support vector machine to build the prediction model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the discriminatory power of each model.
A total of 230,936 patient visits were included in the study. Approximately 14% of patients had the primary outcome of diagnosed infection. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the vitals model, which used only vital signs and demographic data, was 0.67 for the training data set, 0.67 for the validation data set, and 0.67 (95% CI 0.65-0.69) for the test data set. The AUC for the chief complaint model which also included demographic and vital sign data was 0.84 for the training data set, 0.83 for the validation data set, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.84) for the test data set. The best performing methods made use of all of the free text. In particular, the AUC for the bag-of-words model was 0.89 for training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87) for the test data set. The AUC for the topic model was 0.86 for the training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86) for the test data set.
Compared to previous work that only used structured data such as vital signs and demographic information, utilizing free text drastically improves the discriminatory ability (increase in AUC from 0.67 to 0.86) of identifying infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174708</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28384212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Clinical decision making ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer engineering ; Computer science ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Demographics ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hospital emergency services ; Humans ; Infections ; Informatics ; Information processing ; International Classification of Diseases ; Learning algorithms ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Management ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Physical Sciences ; Physicians ; Practice ; Prediction models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Sepsis ; Structured data ; Support vector machines ; Teaching ; Teaching machines ; Teaching methods ; Triage - methods ; Urinary tract infections ; Vital signs</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.e0174708-e0174708</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Horng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Horng et al 2017 Horng et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2d018a73cb8a3cd8f966a68adb11dda8a4741a58a94eb940cc93821d9b055f143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2d018a73cb8a3cd8f966a68adb11dda8a4741a58a94eb940cc93821d9b055f143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5034-7796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383046/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5383046/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horng, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sontag, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Yoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernite, Yacine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Nathan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanson, Larry A</creatorcontrib><title>Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To demonstrate the incremental benefit of using free text data in addition to vital sign and demographic data to identify patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study performed at a tertiary academic teaching hospital. All consecutive ED patient visits between 12/17/08 and 2/17/13 were included. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome measure was infection diagnosed in the emergency department defined as a patient having an infection related ED ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis. Patients were randomly allocated to train (64%), validate (20%), and test (16%) data sets. After preprocessing the free text using bigram and negation detection, we built four models to predict infection, incrementally adding vital signs, chief complaint, and free text nursing assessment. We used two different methods to represent free text: a bag of words model and a topic model. We then used a support vector machine to build the prediction model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the discriminatory power of each model.
A total of 230,936 patient visits were included in the study. Approximately 14% of patients had the primary outcome of diagnosed infection. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the vitals model, which used only vital signs and demographic data, was 0.67 for the training data set, 0.67 for the validation data set, and 0.67 (95% CI 0.65-0.69) for the test data set. The AUC for the chief complaint model which also included demographic and vital sign data was 0.84 for the training data set, 0.83 for the validation data set, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.84) for the test data set. The best performing methods made use of all of the free text. In particular, the AUC for the bag-of-words model was 0.89 for training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87) for the test data set. The AUC for the topic model was 0.86 for the training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86) for the test data set.
Compared to previous work that only used structured data such as vital signs and demographic information, utilizing free text drastically improves the discriminatory ability (increase in AUC from 0.67 to 0.86) of identifying infection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer engineering</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital emergency services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Structured data</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching machines</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Vital signs</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01r3DAQhk1padK0_6C0hkJpD7uVLNmWLoWw9GMhEOjXVYzlsVfBlhxJLsm_r7a7Cbslh6KDxOiZV5pXmix7ScmSspp-uHKztzAsJ2dxSWjNayIeZadUsmJRFYQ9PlifZM9CuCKkZKKqnmYnhWCCF7Q4zW5WHiEa2-dgc5ijGyFim0dv-h593jmfB5yCCbkejDUahrxFbYJxNg_zNDkfc4g5juh7tPo27U7g44g2bkWgx3wOW_kR9MZYzAcEb1PgefakgyHgi_18lv38_OnH6uvi4vLLenV-sdCVLOKiaAkVUDPdCGC6FZ2sKqgEtA2lbQsCeM0plAIkx0ZyorVkoqCtbEhZdpSzs-z1TncaXFB704KiQpREkpIUiVjviNbBlZq8GcHfKgdG_Q0436tUkdEDKtFoybuay67lnBUgkDRd3RS15BKopknr4_60uRmx1ckGD8OR6PGONRvVu98qvQwjvEoC7_YC3l3PGKIaTdA4DGDRzbt7S84LUSb0zT_ow9XtqR5SAcZ2Lp2rt6LqnEtWV7xmW5eWD1BptDganX5YZ1L8KOH9UUJiIt7EHuYQ1Pr7t_9nL38ds28P2A3CEDfBDXNMHy4cg3wHau9C8Njdm0yJ2jbInRtq2yBq3yAp7dXhA90n3XUE-wPF5Q0x</recordid><startdate>20170406</startdate><enddate>20170406</enddate><creator>Horng, Steven</creator><creator>Sontag, David A</creator><creator>Halpern, Yoni</creator><creator>Jernite, Yacine</creator><creator>Shapiro, Nathan I</creator><creator>Nathanson, Larry A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-7796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170406</creationdate><title>Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning</title><author>Horng, Steven ; Sontag, David A ; Halpern, Yoni ; Jernite, Yacine ; Shapiro, Nathan I ; Nathanson, Larry A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2d018a73cb8a3cd8f966a68adb11dda8a4741a58a94eb940cc93821d9b055f143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer engineering</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital emergency services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Structured data</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching machines</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Vital signs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horng, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sontag, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Yoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jernite, Yacine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Nathan I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanson, Larry A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horng, Steven</au><au>Sontag, David A</au><au>Halpern, Yoni</au><au>Jernite, Yacine</au><au>Shapiro, Nathan I</au><au>Nathanson, Larry A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-04-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0174708</spage><epage>e0174708</epage><pages>e0174708-e0174708</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To demonstrate the incremental benefit of using free text data in addition to vital sign and demographic data to identify patients with suspected infection in the emergency department.
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study performed at a tertiary academic teaching hospital. All consecutive ED patient visits between 12/17/08 and 2/17/13 were included. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome measure was infection diagnosed in the emergency department defined as a patient having an infection related ED ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis. Patients were randomly allocated to train (64%), validate (20%), and test (16%) data sets. After preprocessing the free text using bigram and negation detection, we built four models to predict infection, incrementally adding vital signs, chief complaint, and free text nursing assessment. We used two different methods to represent free text: a bag of words model and a topic model. We then used a support vector machine to build the prediction model. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the discriminatory power of each model.
A total of 230,936 patient visits were included in the study. Approximately 14% of patients had the primary outcome of diagnosed infection. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the vitals model, which used only vital signs and demographic data, was 0.67 for the training data set, 0.67 for the validation data set, and 0.67 (95% CI 0.65-0.69) for the test data set. The AUC for the chief complaint model which also included demographic and vital sign data was 0.84 for the training data set, 0.83 for the validation data set, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.84) for the test data set. The best performing methods made use of all of the free text. In particular, the AUC for the bag-of-words model was 0.89 for training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87) for the test data set. The AUC for the topic model was 0.86 for the training data set, 0.86 for the validation data set, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.86) for the test data set.
Compared to previous work that only used structured data such as vital signs and demographic information, utilizing free text drastically improves the discriminatory ability (increase in AUC from 0.67 to 0.86) of identifying infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28384212</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0174708</doi><tpages>e0174708</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-7796</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.e0174708-e0174708 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1885090502 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adult Aged Artificial intelligence Automation Clinical decision making Computer and Information Sciences Computer engineering Computer science Data processing Datasets Decision making Decision support systems Decision Support Systems, Clinical Demographics Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Female Health aspects Hospital emergency services Humans Infections Informatics Information processing International Classification of Diseases Learning algorithms Machine Learning Male Management Medical records Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Nursing Observational studies Patients Physical Sciences Physicians Practice Prediction models Research and Analysis Methods Retrospective Studies Risk factors Sepsis Structured data Support vector machines Teaching Teaching machines Teaching methods Triage - methods Urinary tract infections Vital signs |
title | Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20an%20automated%20trigger%20for%20sepsis%20clinical%20decision%20support%20at%20emergency%20department%20triage%20using%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Horng,%20Steven&rft.date=2017-04-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0174708&rft.epage=e0174708&rft.pages=e0174708-e0174708&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0174708&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA493764734%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1885090502&rft_id=info:pmid/28384212&rft_galeid=A493764734&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8bc94f749fd4432a8e0bf7b27949a1c1&rfr_iscdi=true |