A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting

Many accuracy measures have been proposed in the past for time series forecasting comparisons. However, many of these measures suffer from one or more issues such as poor resistance to outliers and scale dependence. In this paper, while summarising commonly used accuracy measures, a special review i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174202-e0174202
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Chao, Twycross, Jamie, Garibaldi, Jonathan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0174202
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0174202
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Chen, Chao
Twycross, Jamie
Garibaldi, Jonathan M
description Many accuracy measures have been proposed in the past for time series forecasting comparisons. However, many of these measures suffer from one or more issues such as poor resistance to outliers and scale dependence. In this paper, while summarising commonly used accuracy measures, a special review is made on the symmetric mean absolute percentage error. Moreover, a new accuracy measure called the Unscaled Mean Bounded Relative Absolute Error (UMBRAE), which combines the best features of various alternative measures, is proposed to address the common issues of existing measures. A comparative evaluation on the proposed and related measures has been made with both synthetic and real-world data. The results indicate that the proposed measure, with user selectable benchmark, performs as well as or better than other measures on selected criteria. Though it has been commonly accepted that there is no single best accuracy measure, we suggest that UMBRAE could be a good choice to evaluate forecasting methods, especially for cases where measures based on geometric mean of relative errors, such as the geometric mean relative absolute error, are preferred.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0174202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1880725459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A486956300</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b9952a359c3d440c8257354e017dafaf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A486956300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-bc1dd38affa2f91ede10ab187dd8c165bd84251f3d1000658c5e8c2ea1bfde4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F7vVwbLlm8ISelgIBNLDrRhLo10ttpVIdtq8fbXZTViXXAQhJI2--SXNaLLsNSVzyiv6aePH0EM7v_Q9zgmtCkbYk-yY1pzNSkb404P5UfYixg0hgsuyfJ4dMcl5XUhynF0s8h7_5KD1GEDf5B1CHAPmDUQ0ue_zxo-9SdOALQzuGnMMwYfcpj64DvOIwWHcrlFDHFy_epk9s9BGfLUfT7JfX7_8PP0-Ozv_tjxdnM10VdNh1mhqDJdgLTBbUzRICTRUVsZITUvRGFkwQS03lBBSCqkFSs0QaGMNFshPsrc73cvWR7UPR1RUSlIxUYg6EcsdYTxs1GVwHYQb5cGpW4MPKwVhcLpF1dS1YMBFrbkpCqIlExUXBabAGrBgk9bn_Wlj06HR2A8B2onodKd3a7Xy10rwUlBeJoEPe4Hgr0aMg-pc1Ni20KMfb-8t60qWdfUYlLIyoTyh7_5DHw7EnlpBeqvrrU9X1FtRtSiSjig5IYmaP0ClZrBzOn0z65J94vBx4pCYAf8OKxhjVMsfF49nz39P2fcH7BqhHdbRt-PgfB-nYLEDdfAxBrT3-aBEbavkLhpqWyVqXyXJ7c1hLu-d7sqC_wN42Qyc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880725459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Chen, Chao ; Twycross, Jamie ; Garibaldi, Jonathan M</creator><contributor>Gao, Zhong-Ke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao ; Twycross, Jamie ; Garibaldi, Jonathan M ; Gao, Zhong-Ke</creatorcontrib><description>Many accuracy measures have been proposed in the past for time series forecasting comparisons. However, many of these measures suffer from one or more issues such as poor resistance to outliers and scale dependence. In this paper, while summarising commonly used accuracy measures, a special review is made on the symmetric mean absolute percentage error. Moreover, a new accuracy measure called the Unscaled Mean Bounded Relative Absolute Error (UMBRAE), which combines the best features of various alternative measures, is proposed to address the common issues of existing measures. A comparative evaluation on the proposed and related measures has been made with both synthetic and real-world data. The results indicate that the proposed measure, with user selectable benchmark, performs as well as or better than other measures on selected criteria. Though it has been commonly accepted that there is no single best accuracy measure, we suggest that UMBRAE could be a good choice to evaluate forecasting methods, especially for cases where measures based on geometric mean of relative errors, such as the geometric mean relative absolute error, are preferred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28339480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Competition ; Computer science ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Forecasting ; Forecasting - methods ; Humans ; Mean square errors ; Methods ; Models, Statistical ; Normal distribution ; Outliers (statistics) ; Performance evaluation ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research methods ; Researchers ; Securities markets ; Statistics (Mathematics) ; Stock exchanges ; Time series</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174202-e0174202</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Chen et al 2017 Chen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-bc1dd38affa2f91ede10ab187dd8c165bd84251f3d1000658c5e8c2ea1bfde4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-bc1dd38affa2f91ede10ab187dd8c165bd84251f3d1000658c5e8c2ea1bfde4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9719-7361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5365136/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5365136/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gao, Zhong-Ke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twycross, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garibaldi, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><title>A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Many accuracy measures have been proposed in the past for time series forecasting comparisons. However, many of these measures suffer from one or more issues such as poor resistance to outliers and scale dependence. In this paper, while summarising commonly used accuracy measures, a special review is made on the symmetric mean absolute percentage error. Moreover, a new accuracy measure called the Unscaled Mean Bounded Relative Absolute Error (UMBRAE), which combines the best features of various alternative measures, is proposed to address the common issues of existing measures. A comparative evaluation on the proposed and related measures has been made with both synthetic and real-world data. The results indicate that the proposed measure, with user selectable benchmark, performs as well as or better than other measures on selected criteria. Though it has been commonly accepted that there is no single best accuracy measure, we suggest that UMBRAE could be a good choice to evaluate forecasting methods, especially for cases where measures based on geometric mean of relative errors, such as the geometric mean relative absolute error, are preferred.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Forecasting - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mean square errors</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Outliers (statistics)</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Statistics (Mathematics)</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6G0F7vVwbLlm8ISelgIBNLDrRhLo10ttpVIdtq8fbXZTViXXAQhJI2--SXNaLLsNSVzyiv6aePH0EM7v_Q9zgmtCkbYk-yY1pzNSkb404P5UfYixg0hgsuyfJ4dMcl5XUhynF0s8h7_5KD1GEDf5B1CHAPmDUQ0ue_zxo-9SdOALQzuGnMMwYfcpj64DvOIwWHcrlFDHFy_epk9s9BGfLUfT7JfX7_8PP0-Ozv_tjxdnM10VdNh1mhqDJdgLTBbUzRICTRUVsZITUvRGFkwQS03lBBSCqkFSs0QaGMNFshPsrc73cvWR7UPR1RUSlIxUYg6EcsdYTxs1GVwHYQb5cGpW4MPKwVhcLpF1dS1YMBFrbkpCqIlExUXBabAGrBgk9bn_Wlj06HR2A8B2onodKd3a7Xy10rwUlBeJoEPe4Hgr0aMg-pc1Ni20KMfb-8t60qWdfUYlLIyoTyh7_5DHw7EnlpBeqvrrU9X1FtRtSiSjig5IYmaP0ClZrBzOn0z65J94vBx4pCYAf8OKxhjVMsfF49nz39P2fcH7BqhHdbRt-PgfB-nYLEDdfAxBrT3-aBEbavkLhpqWyVqXyXJ7c1hLu-d7sqC_wN42Qyc</recordid><startdate>20170324</startdate><enddate>20170324</enddate><creator>Chen, Chao</creator><creator>Twycross, Jamie</creator><creator>Garibaldi, Jonathan M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-7361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170324</creationdate><title>A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting</title><author>Chen, Chao ; Twycross, Jamie ; Garibaldi, Jonathan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-bc1dd38affa2f91ede10ab187dd8c165bd84251f3d1000658c5e8c2ea1bfde4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Forecasting - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mean square errors</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Outliers (statistics)</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Statistics (Mathematics)</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twycross, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garibaldi, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chao</au><au>Twycross, Jamie</au><au>Garibaldi, Jonathan M</au><au>Gao, Zhong-Ke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-24</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0174202</spage><epage>e0174202</epage><pages>e0174202-e0174202</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Many accuracy measures have been proposed in the past for time series forecasting comparisons. However, many of these measures suffer from one or more issues such as poor resistance to outliers and scale dependence. In this paper, while summarising commonly used accuracy measures, a special review is made on the symmetric mean absolute percentage error. Moreover, a new accuracy measure called the Unscaled Mean Bounded Relative Absolute Error (UMBRAE), which combines the best features of various alternative measures, is proposed to address the common issues of existing measures. A comparative evaluation on the proposed and related measures has been made with both synthetic and real-world data. The results indicate that the proposed measure, with user selectable benchmark, performs as well as or better than other measures on selected criteria. Though it has been commonly accepted that there is no single best accuracy measure, we suggest that UMBRAE could be a good choice to evaluate forecasting methods, especially for cases where measures based on geometric mean of relative errors, such as the geometric mean relative absolute error, are preferred.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28339480</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0174202</doi><tpages>e0174202</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-7361</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174202-e0174202
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1880725459
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accuracy
Analysis
Competition
Computer science
Error analysis
Errors
Forecasting
Forecasting - methods
Humans
Mean square errors
Methods
Models, Statistical
Normal distribution
Outliers (statistics)
Performance evaluation
Physical Sciences
Research and Analysis Methods
Research methods
Researchers
Securities markets
Statistics (Mathematics)
Stock exchanges
Time series
title A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A36%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20accuracy%20measure%20based%20on%20bounded%20relative%20error%20for%20time%20series%20forecasting&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Chen,%20Chao&rft.date=2017-03-24&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0174202&rft.epage=e0174202&rft.pages=e0174202-e0174202&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0174202&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA486956300%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880725459&rft_id=info:pmid/28339480&rft_galeid=A486956300&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b9952a359c3d440c8257354e017dafaf&rfr_iscdi=true