Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method
The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as suppor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0174052 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0174052 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Bhandare, Shweta Goldberg, Debra S Dowell, Robin |
description | The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs.
Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites.
The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0174052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1880542216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A486819554</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f4debd7f733b434ab961917efbf0a2bc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A486819554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOPEN0jQ-VmnS0Fa4tWznpHWX2iV2-Pj3uGs2NWgXky9sHT_n9etjnyx7idEM0xJ_WPu-c6qdbb2DGcIlQwV5lB1jQcmUE0QfH6yPsmchrBEqaMX50-yIVJRSUfDj7OqTDaazG-tUtG6Za4i_AVx-1l_mytX5YvEt19bVu71gI4S8D7t1XEF-PQ1bMLHrN_k1dA7afANx5evn2ZNGtQFeDPMk-_7l8-L0bHp-8XV-enI-NaXAcUqJSDaILmuKGl0QhYQwjKqKGShZCY3QGgHCrESUsEobLMoGiuRbIMYp0En2eq-7bX2QQz2CxFWFCkYI5omY74naq7Xcpnuq7q_0ysqbgO-WUnXRmhZkw2rQddmUlGpGmdKCY4GTC90gRbRJWh-H03q9gdqAi51qR6LjHWdXcul_yYJyWrEqCbwbBDr_s4cQ5SbVHtpWOfD9je9KlIJT8hAUE455MjvJ3vyH3l-IgVqqdFfrGp8smp2oPGEVr7AoCpao2T1UGjVsrEn_rLEpPkp4P0pITIQ_can6EOT86vLh7MWPMfv2gF2BauMq-LaP1rswBtkeNJ0PoYPm7j0wkrs2ua2G3LWJHNokpb06fMu7pNu-oP8AW0sLiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880542216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin</creator><contributor>Stoecklin, Georg</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin ; Stoecklin, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs.
Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites.
The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28333956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Analysis ; Antigens ; Augmentation ; Binding proteins ; Binding Sites ; Binding sites (Biochemistry) ; Bioinformatics ; Biology ; Biology and life sciences ; Breweries ; Catalytic Domain ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer science ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism ; Engineering ; Engineering and Technology ; Experiments ; Feature recognition ; Gene expression ; Genomes ; Humans ; HuR protein ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Messenger RNA ; Methods ; Models, Theoretical ; mRNA ; Physical Sciences ; Proteins ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; RNA-binding protein ; Support Vector Machine ; Support vector machines ; Transcription factors ; Tristetraprolin - metabolism</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Bhandare et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Bhandare et al 2017 Bhandare et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363848/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363848/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28333956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Stoecklin, Georg</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Debra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowell, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs.
Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites.
The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Binding proteins</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Binding sites (Biochemistry)</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Catalytic Domain</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feature recognition</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>HuR protein</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Messenger RNA</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>mRNA</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA-binding protein</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Tristetraprolin - metabolism</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOPEN0jQ-VmnS0Fa4tWznpHWX2iV2-Pj3uGs2NWgXky9sHT_n9etjnyx7idEM0xJ_WPu-c6qdbb2DGcIlQwV5lB1jQcmUE0QfH6yPsmchrBEqaMX50-yIVJRSUfDj7OqTDaazG-tUtG6Za4i_AVx-1l_mytX5YvEt19bVu71gI4S8D7t1XEF-PQ1bMLHrN_k1dA7afANx5evn2ZNGtQFeDPMk-_7l8-L0bHp-8XV-enI-NaXAcUqJSDaILmuKGl0QhYQwjKqKGShZCY3QGgHCrESUsEobLMoGiuRbIMYp0En2eq-7bX2QQz2CxFWFCkYI5omY74naq7Xcpnuq7q_0ysqbgO-WUnXRmhZkw2rQddmUlGpGmdKCY4GTC90gRbRJWh-H03q9gdqAi51qR6LjHWdXcul_yYJyWrEqCbwbBDr_s4cQ5SbVHtpWOfD9je9KlIJT8hAUE455MjvJ3vyH3l-IgVqqdFfrGp8smp2oPGEVr7AoCpao2T1UGjVsrEn_rLEpPkp4P0pITIQ_can6EOT86vLh7MWPMfv2gF2BauMq-LaP1rswBtkeNJ0PoYPm7j0wkrs2ua2G3LWJHNokpb06fMu7pNu-oP8AW0sLiQ</recordid><startdate>20170323</startdate><enddate>20170323</enddate><creator>Bhandare, Shweta</creator><creator>Goldberg, Debra S</creator><creator>Dowell, Robin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170323</creationdate><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><author>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Binding proteins</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Binding sites (Biochemistry)</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Catalytic Domain</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feature recognition</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>HuR protein</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Messenger RNA</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>mRNA</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA-binding protein</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Tristetraprolin - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Debra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowell, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhandare, Shweta</au><au>Goldberg, Debra S</au><au>Dowell, Robin</au><au>Stoecklin, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0174052</spage><epage>e0174052</epage><pages>e0174052-e0174052</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs.
Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites.
The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28333956</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0174052</doi><tpages>e0174052</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1880542216 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adaptation Analysis Antigens Augmentation Binding proteins Binding Sites Binding sites (Biochemistry) Bioinformatics Biology Biology and life sciences Breweries Catalytic Domain Computer and Information Sciences Computer science Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism Engineering Engineering and Technology Experiments Feature recognition Gene expression Genomes Humans HuR protein Learning algorithms Machine learning Messenger RNA Methods Models, Theoretical mRNA Physical Sciences Proteins Research and Analysis Methods Ribonucleic acid RNA RNA-binding protein Support Vector Machine Support vector machines Transcription factors Tristetraprolin - metabolism |
title | Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A29%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminating%20between%20HuR%20and%20TTP%20binding%20sites%20using%20the%20k-spectrum%20kernel%20method&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bhandare,%20Shweta&rft.date=2017-03-23&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0174052&rft.epage=e0174052&rft.pages=e0174052-e0174052&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0174052&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA486819554%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880542216&rft_id=info:pmid/28333956&rft_galeid=A486819554&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f4debd7f733b434ab961917efbf0a2bc&rfr_iscdi=true |