Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method

The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as suppor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052
Hauptverfasser: Bhandare, Shweta, Goldberg, Debra S, Dowell, Robin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0174052
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0174052
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Bhandare, Shweta
Goldberg, Debra S
Dowell, Robin
description The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs. Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites. The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0174052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1880542216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A486819554</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f4debd7f733b434ab961917efbf0a2bc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A486819554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOPEN0jQ-VmnS0Fa4tWznpHWX2iV2-Pj3uGs2NWgXky9sHT_n9etjnyx7idEM0xJ_WPu-c6qdbb2DGcIlQwV5lB1jQcmUE0QfH6yPsmchrBEqaMX50-yIVJRSUfDj7OqTDaazG-tUtG6Za4i_AVx-1l_mytX5YvEt19bVu71gI4S8D7t1XEF-PQ1bMLHrN_k1dA7afANx5evn2ZNGtQFeDPMk-_7l8-L0bHp-8XV-enI-NaXAcUqJSDaILmuKGl0QhYQwjKqKGShZCY3QGgHCrESUsEobLMoGiuRbIMYp0En2eq-7bX2QQz2CxFWFCkYI5omY74naq7Xcpnuq7q_0ysqbgO-WUnXRmhZkw2rQddmUlGpGmdKCY4GTC90gRbRJWh-H03q9gdqAi51qR6LjHWdXcul_yYJyWrEqCbwbBDr_s4cQ5SbVHtpWOfD9je9KlIJT8hAUE455MjvJ3vyH3l-IgVqqdFfrGp8smp2oPGEVr7AoCpao2T1UGjVsrEn_rLEpPkp4P0pITIQ_can6EOT86vLh7MWPMfv2gF2BauMq-LaP1rswBtkeNJ0PoYPm7j0wkrs2ua2G3LWJHNokpb06fMu7pNu-oP8AW0sLiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880542216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin</creator><contributor>Stoecklin, Georg</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin ; Stoecklin, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs. Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites. The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28333956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Analysis ; Antigens ; Augmentation ; Binding proteins ; Binding Sites ; Binding sites (Biochemistry) ; Bioinformatics ; Biology ; Biology and life sciences ; Breweries ; Catalytic Domain ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer science ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism ; Engineering ; Engineering and Technology ; Experiments ; Feature recognition ; Gene expression ; Genomes ; Humans ; HuR protein ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Messenger RNA ; Methods ; Models, Theoretical ; mRNA ; Physical Sciences ; Proteins ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; RNA-binding protein ; Support Vector Machine ; Support vector machines ; Transcription factors ; Tristetraprolin - metabolism</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Bhandare et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Bhandare et al 2017 Bhandare et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363848/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363848/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28333956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Stoecklin, Georg</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Debra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowell, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs. Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites. The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Binding proteins</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Binding sites (Biochemistry)</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Catalytic Domain</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feature recognition</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>HuR protein</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Messenger RNA</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>mRNA</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA-binding protein</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Tristetraprolin - metabolism</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOPEN0jQ-VmnS0Fa4tWznpHWX2iV2-Pj3uGs2NWgXky9sHT_n9etjnyx7idEM0xJ_WPu-c6qdbb2DGcIlQwV5lB1jQcmUE0QfH6yPsmchrBEqaMX50-yIVJRSUfDj7OqTDaazG-tUtG6Za4i_AVx-1l_mytX5YvEt19bVu71gI4S8D7t1XEF-PQ1bMLHrN_k1dA7afANx5evn2ZNGtQFeDPMk-_7l8-L0bHp-8XV-enI-NaXAcUqJSDaILmuKGl0QhYQwjKqKGShZCY3QGgHCrESUsEobLMoGiuRbIMYp0En2eq-7bX2QQz2CxFWFCkYI5omY74naq7Xcpnuq7q_0ysqbgO-WUnXRmhZkw2rQddmUlGpGmdKCY4GTC90gRbRJWh-H03q9gdqAi51qR6LjHWdXcul_yYJyWrEqCbwbBDr_s4cQ5SbVHtpWOfD9je9KlIJT8hAUE455MjvJ3vyH3l-IgVqqdFfrGp8smp2oPGEVr7AoCpao2T1UGjVsrEn_rLEpPkp4P0pITIQ_can6EOT86vLh7MWPMfv2gF2BauMq-LaP1rswBtkeNJ0PoYPm7j0wkrs2ua2G3LWJHNokpb06fMu7pNu-oP8AW0sLiQ</recordid><startdate>20170323</startdate><enddate>20170323</enddate><creator>Bhandare, Shweta</creator><creator>Goldberg, Debra S</creator><creator>Dowell, Robin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170323</creationdate><title>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</title><author>Bhandare, Shweta ; Goldberg, Debra S ; Dowell, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-3298332b7d30fb52a099c43a84ce747ef9bb0e014703248bc197fe539590463e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Binding proteins</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Binding sites (Biochemistry)</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Catalytic Domain</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feature recognition</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>HuR protein</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Messenger RNA</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>mRNA</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA-binding protein</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Tristetraprolin - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Debra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowell, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhandare, Shweta</au><au>Goldberg, Debra S</au><au>Dowell, Robin</au><au>Stoecklin, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0174052</spage><epage>e0174052</epage><pages>e0174052-e0174052</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The RNA binding proteins (RBPs) human antigen R (HuR) and Tristetraprolin (TTP) are known to exhibit competitive binding but have opposing effects on the bound messenger RNA (mRNA). How cells discriminate between the two proteins is an interesting problem. Machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines (SVMs), may be useful in the identification of discriminative features. However, this method has yet to be applied to studies of RNA binding protein motifs. Applying the k-spectrum kernel to a support vector machine (SVM), we first verified the published binding sites of both HuR and TTP. Additional feature engineering highlighted the U-rich binding preference of HuR and AU-rich binding preference for TTP. Domain adaptation along with multi-task learning was used to predict the common binding sites. The distinction between HuR and TTP binding appears to be subtle content features. HuR prefers strongly U-rich sequences whereas TTP prefers AU-rich as with increasing A content, the sequences are more likely to be bound only by TTP. Our model is consistent with competitive binding of the two proteins, particularly at intermediate AU-balanced sequences. This suggests that fine changes in the A/U balance within a untranslated region (UTR) can alter the binding and subsequent stability of the message. Both feature engineering and domain adaptation emphasized the extent to which these proteins recognize similar general sequence features. This work suggests that the k-spectrum kernel method could be useful when studying RNA binding proteins and domain adaptation techniques such as feature augmentation could be employed particularly when examining RBPs with similar binding preferences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28333956</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0174052</doi><tpages>e0174052</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-792X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0174052-e0174052
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1880542216
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adaptation
Analysis
Antigens
Augmentation
Binding proteins
Binding Sites
Binding sites (Biochemistry)
Bioinformatics
Biology
Biology and life sciences
Breweries
Catalytic Domain
Computer and Information Sciences
Computer science
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
ELAV-Like Protein 1 - metabolism
Engineering
Engineering and Technology
Experiments
Feature recognition
Gene expression
Genomes
Humans
HuR protein
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Messenger RNA
Methods
Models, Theoretical
mRNA
Physical Sciences
Proteins
Research and Analysis Methods
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
RNA-binding protein
Support Vector Machine
Support vector machines
Transcription factors
Tristetraprolin - metabolism
title Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A29%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminating%20between%20HuR%20and%20TTP%20binding%20sites%20using%20the%20k-spectrum%20kernel%20method&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bhandare,%20Shweta&rft.date=2017-03-23&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0174052&rft.epage=e0174052&rft.pages=e0174052-e0174052&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0174052&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA486819554%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880542216&rft_id=info:pmid/28333956&rft_galeid=A486819554&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f4debd7f733b434ab961917efbf0a2bc&rfr_iscdi=true