Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults

Zambia experiences high unmet need for family planning and high rates of HIV, particularly among youth. While male condoms are widely available and 95% of adults have heard of them, self-reported use in the past 12 months is low among young adults (45%). This study describes factors associated with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0172062-e0172062
Hauptverfasser: Pinchoff, Jessie, Boyer, Christopher B, Mutombo, Namuunda, Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag, Ngo, Thoai D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0172062
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0172062
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Pinchoff, Jessie
Boyer, Christopher B
Mutombo, Namuunda
Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag
Ngo, Thoai D
description Zambia experiences high unmet need for family planning and high rates of HIV, particularly among youth. While male condoms are widely available and 95% of adults have heard of them, self-reported use in the past 12 months is low among young adults (45%). This study describes factors associated with non-use of male condoms among urban young adults in Zambia. A household cross-sectional survey in four urban districts was conducted from November 2015 to January 2016 among sexually active young adults ages 18-24 years. A random walk strategy was implemented in urban areas; eligible, enrolled participants were administered a survey on household characteristics, health access, and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to contraception. Relative risk regression models were built to determine factors associated with the decision to not use a male condom (non-use) at most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2,388 individuals were interviewed; 69% were female, 35% were married, and average lifetime sex partners was 3.45 (SD±6.15). Non-use of male condoms was 59% at most recent sexual intercourse. In a multivariate model, women were more likely to report non-use of a male condom compared with men (aRR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.38]), married individuals were more likely to report non-use compared with unmarried individuals (aRR = 1.59 [1.46, 1.73]), and those residing in the highest poverty wards were more likely to report non-use compared with those in the lowest poverty wards (aRR = 1.31 [1.16, 1.48]). Those with more negative perceptions of male condom use were 6% more likely to report non-use (aRR = 1.06 [1.03, 1.09]). Discussion regarding contraception with a partner decreased non-use 13% (aRR = 0.87 [0.80, 0.95]) and agreement regarding male condom use with a partner decreased non-use 16% (aRR = 0.84 [0.77, 0.91)]). Non-use of male condoms is high among young, married adults, particularly women, who may be interested in contraception for family planning but remain at risk of STI infection. Effective marketing strategy of dual protection methods to this population is critical.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0172062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1880542109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A486819547</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8ae4f0024edb42ceb0bd8c3a2c822c59</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A486819547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-dc94c5b1bf55a5eac1a65cba434f807318a28e09fcc0db9810ddbca17622b1f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQDgpeHGXPpJX1RlsXLwMKCrgq-hNMkvQxtMiatOE9-ddOd7jCVfVgCTTn5_f85OYcTRU8JXhGWkbcbOzgD7WprjV5hklGc0nvRKckZXaYUs_tH_yfRI-83GCeMp-nD6IRyxliestPo7496h5Q1r3o0uAIM2tmhr1Fj0E_oigbQ4DWS1ijb-ffoqtbhqGwHbaRGtkSVNko7BEahDpxroAphg4w1y1EYiA7agwGCzppqvCJ8QQ1t7x9HD0povX4y7Yvo28cPV-eflxeXn9bnZxdLmdGkXyqZxzIpSFEmCSQaJIE0kQXELC45zhjhQLnGeSklVkXOCVaqkECylNKClDlbRM_3vtvWejHVzgvCOU5iSvBIrPeEsrARW9eEB-2EhUZcB6yrBLi-ka0WHHRcYkxjrYqYSl3gQnHJgEpOqUxGr3fTbUPRaSW16R20M9P5iWlqUdnfImEpG9-ziF5PBs7-GrTvRdd4qdsWjLbDdd48z3KM8V1QQlNGsjigL_5Dby_ERFWhdSK024YU5WgqzmKecpIn8Zjh6hYqLKW7JvRbl02IzwRvZoLA9PpPX8HgvVh__XJ39vL7nH15xNYa2r72th36xho_B-M9KJ313uny0A-CxThSN9UQ40iJaaSC7NlxLw-imxli_wCr_xyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880542109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pinchoff, Jessie ; Boyer, Christopher B ; Mutombo, Namuunda ; Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag ; Ngo, Thoai D</creator><contributor>Price, Matt A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pinchoff, Jessie ; Boyer, Christopher B ; Mutombo, Namuunda ; Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag ; Ngo, Thoai D ; Price, Matt A</creatorcontrib><description>Zambia experiences high unmet need for family planning and high rates of HIV, particularly among youth. While male condoms are widely available and 95% of adults have heard of them, self-reported use in the past 12 months is low among young adults (45%). This study describes factors associated with non-use of male condoms among urban young adults in Zambia. A household cross-sectional survey in four urban districts was conducted from November 2015 to January 2016 among sexually active young adults ages 18-24 years. A random walk strategy was implemented in urban areas; eligible, enrolled participants were administered a survey on household characteristics, health access, and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to contraception. Relative risk regression models were built to determine factors associated with the decision to not use a male condom (non-use) at most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2,388 individuals were interviewed; 69% were female, 35% were married, and average lifetime sex partners was 3.45 (SD±6.15). Non-use of male condoms was 59% at most recent sexual intercourse. In a multivariate model, women were more likely to report non-use of a male condom compared with men (aRR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.38]), married individuals were more likely to report non-use compared with unmarried individuals (aRR = 1.59 [1.46, 1.73]), and those residing in the highest poverty wards were more likely to report non-use compared with those in the lowest poverty wards (aRR = 1.31 [1.16, 1.48]). Those with more negative perceptions of male condom use were 6% more likely to report non-use (aRR = 1.06 [1.03, 1.09]). Discussion regarding contraception with a partner decreased non-use 13% (aRR = 0.87 [0.80, 0.95]) and agreement regarding male condom use with a partner decreased non-use 16% (aRR = 0.84 [0.77, 0.91)]). Non-use of male condoms is high among young, married adults, particularly women, who may be interested in contraception for family planning but remain at risk of STI infection. Effective marketing strategy of dual protection methods to this population is critical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28333963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adult ; Adults ; AIDS ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Condoms ; Condoms - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Contraception ; Contraception - methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family planning ; Female ; Gender ; Health aspects ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health risks ; Humans ; Lentivirus ; Male ; Marriage - psychology ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Poverty ; Random walk ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Retroviridae ; Risk factors ; Risk-Taking ; Safe Sex - psychology ; Sex Education - methods ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Sexual intercourse ; Sexual Partners - psychology ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urban areas ; Urban Population ; Young Adult ; Young adults ; Youth ; Zambia</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0172062-e0172062</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Pinchoff et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Pinchoff et al 2017 Pinchoff et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-dc94c5b1bf55a5eac1a65cba434f807318a28e09fcc0db9810ddbca17622b1f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-dc94c5b1bf55a5eac1a65cba434f807318a28e09fcc0db9810ddbca17622b1f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363807/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5363807/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28333963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Price, Matt A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pinchoff, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutombo, Namuunda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Thoai D</creatorcontrib><title>Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Zambia experiences high unmet need for family planning and high rates of HIV, particularly among youth. While male condoms are widely available and 95% of adults have heard of them, self-reported use in the past 12 months is low among young adults (45%). This study describes factors associated with non-use of male condoms among urban young adults in Zambia. A household cross-sectional survey in four urban districts was conducted from November 2015 to January 2016 among sexually active young adults ages 18-24 years. A random walk strategy was implemented in urban areas; eligible, enrolled participants were administered a survey on household characteristics, health access, and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to contraception. Relative risk regression models were built to determine factors associated with the decision to not use a male condom (non-use) at most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2,388 individuals were interviewed; 69% were female, 35% were married, and average lifetime sex partners was 3.45 (SD±6.15). Non-use of male condoms was 59% at most recent sexual intercourse. In a multivariate model, women were more likely to report non-use of a male condom compared with men (aRR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.38]), married individuals were more likely to report non-use compared with unmarried individuals (aRR = 1.59 [1.46, 1.73]), and those residing in the highest poverty wards were more likely to report non-use compared with those in the lowest poverty wards (aRR = 1.31 [1.16, 1.48]). Those with more negative perceptions of male condom use were 6% more likely to report non-use (aRR = 1.06 [1.03, 1.09]). Discussion regarding contraception with a partner decreased non-use 13% (aRR = 0.87 [0.80, 0.95]) and agreement regarding male condom use with a partner decreased non-use 16% (aRR = 0.84 [0.77, 0.91)]). Non-use of male condoms is high among young, married adults, particularly women, who may be interested in contraception for family planning but remain at risk of STI infection. Effective marketing strategy of dual protection methods to this population is critical.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Condoms - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lentivirus</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage - psychology</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Random walk</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Retroviridae</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Safe Sex - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Education - methods</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual intercourse</subject><subject>Sexual Partners - psychology</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><subject>Youth</subject><subject>Zambia</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQDgpeHGXPpJX1RlsXLwMKCrgq-hNMkvQxtMiatOE9-ddOd7jCVfVgCTTn5_f85OYcTRU8JXhGWkbcbOzgD7WprjV5hklGc0nvRKckZXaYUs_tH_yfRI-83GCeMp-nD6IRyxliestPo7496h5Q1r3o0uAIM2tmhr1Fj0E_oigbQ4DWS1ijb-ffoqtbhqGwHbaRGtkSVNko7BEahDpxroAphg4w1y1EYiA7agwGCzppqvCJ8QQ1t7x9HD0povX4y7Yvo28cPV-eflxeXn9bnZxdLmdGkXyqZxzIpSFEmCSQaJIE0kQXELC45zhjhQLnGeSklVkXOCVaqkECylNKClDlbRM_3vtvWejHVzgvCOU5iSvBIrPeEsrARW9eEB-2EhUZcB6yrBLi-ka0WHHRcYkxjrYqYSl3gQnHJgEpOqUxGr3fTbUPRaSW16R20M9P5iWlqUdnfImEpG9-ziF5PBs7-GrTvRdd4qdsWjLbDdd48z3KM8V1QQlNGsjigL_5Dby_ERFWhdSK024YU5WgqzmKecpIn8Zjh6hYqLKW7JvRbl02IzwRvZoLA9PpPX8HgvVh__XJ39vL7nH15xNYa2r72th36xho_B-M9KJ313uny0A-CxThSN9UQ40iJaaSC7NlxLw-imxli_wCr_xyg</recordid><startdate>20170323</startdate><enddate>20170323</enddate><creator>Pinchoff, Jessie</creator><creator>Boyer, Christopher B</creator><creator>Mutombo, Namuunda</creator><creator>Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag</creator><creator>Ngo, Thoai D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170323</creationdate><title>Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults</title><author>Pinchoff, Jessie ; Boyer, Christopher B ; Mutombo, Namuunda ; Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag ; Ngo, Thoai D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-dc94c5b1bf55a5eac1a65cba434f807318a28e09fcc0db9810ddbca17622b1f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Condoms - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lentivirus</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage - psychology</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Random walk</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Retroviridae</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Safe Sex - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Education - methods</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual intercourse</topic><topic>Sexual Partners - psychology</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><topic>Youth</topic><topic>Zambia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinchoff, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutombo, Namuunda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Thoai D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinchoff, Jessie</au><au>Boyer, Christopher B</au><au>Mutombo, Namuunda</au><au>Chowdhuri, Rachna Nag</au><au>Ngo, Thoai D</au><au>Price, Matt A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0172062</spage><epage>e0172062</epage><pages>e0172062-e0172062</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Zambia experiences high unmet need for family planning and high rates of HIV, particularly among youth. While male condoms are widely available and 95% of adults have heard of them, self-reported use in the past 12 months is low among young adults (45%). This study describes factors associated with non-use of male condoms among urban young adults in Zambia. A household cross-sectional survey in four urban districts was conducted from November 2015 to January 2016 among sexually active young adults ages 18-24 years. A random walk strategy was implemented in urban areas; eligible, enrolled participants were administered a survey on household characteristics, health access, and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to contraception. Relative risk regression models were built to determine factors associated with the decision to not use a male condom (non-use) at most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2,388 individuals were interviewed; 69% were female, 35% were married, and average lifetime sex partners was 3.45 (SD±6.15). Non-use of male condoms was 59% at most recent sexual intercourse. In a multivariate model, women were more likely to report non-use of a male condom compared with men (aRR = 1.24 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.38]), married individuals were more likely to report non-use compared with unmarried individuals (aRR = 1.59 [1.46, 1.73]), and those residing in the highest poverty wards were more likely to report non-use compared with those in the lowest poverty wards (aRR = 1.31 [1.16, 1.48]). Those with more negative perceptions of male condom use were 6% more likely to report non-use (aRR = 1.06 [1.03, 1.09]). Discussion regarding contraception with a partner decreased non-use 13% (aRR = 0.87 [0.80, 0.95]) and agreement regarding male condom use with a partner decreased non-use 16% (aRR = 0.84 [0.77, 0.91)]). Non-use of male condoms is high among young, married adults, particularly women, who may be interested in contraception for family planning but remain at risk of STI infection. Effective marketing strategy of dual protection methods to this population is critical.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28333963</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0172062</doi><tpages>e0172062</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0172062-e0172062
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1880542109
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Adult
Adults
AIDS
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Condoms
Condoms - statistics & numerical data
Contraception
Contraception - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family planning
Female
Gender
Health aspects
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health risks
Humans
Lentivirus
Male
Marriage - psychology
Medicine and Health Sciences
People and Places
Poverty
Random walk
Regression analysis
Regression models
Retroviridae
Risk factors
Risk-Taking
Safe Sex - psychology
Sex Education - methods
Sexual behavior
Sexual Behavior - psychology
Sexual intercourse
Sexual Partners - psychology
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban areas
Urban Population
Young Adult
Young adults
Youth
Zambia
title Why don't urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T02%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20don't%20urban%20youth%20in%20Zambia%20use%20condoms?%20The%20influence%20of%20gender%20and%20marriage%20on%20non-use%20of%20male%20condoms%20among%20young%20adults&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pinchoff,%20Jessie&rft.date=2017-03-23&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0172062&rft.epage=e0172062&rft.pages=e0172062-e0172062&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0172062&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA486819547%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880542109&rft_id=info:pmid/28333963&rft_galeid=A486819547&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8ae4f0024edb42ceb0bd8c3a2c822c59&rfr_iscdi=true