Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida)
Effectively characterizing primate diets is fundamental to understanding primate behavior, ecology and morphology. Examining temporal variation in a species' diet, as well as comparing the responses of different species to variation in resource availability, can enhance understanding of the evo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173369-e0173369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0173369 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0173369 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Clink, Dena J Dillis, Christopher Feilen, Katie L Beaudrot, Lydia Marshall, Andrew J |
description | Effectively characterizing primate diets is fundamental to understanding primate behavior, ecology and morphology. Examining temporal variation in a species' diet, as well as comparing the responses of different species to variation in resource availability, can enhance understanding of the evolution of morphology and socioecology. In this study, we use feeding data collected over five years to describe the diets of two sympatric Southeast Asian primate species of similar body size: white-bearded gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) and red leaf monkeys (Presbytis rubicunda rubida), in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Long-term data sets are especially important for characterizing primate diets in Southeast Asia, where the forests exhibit supra-annual mast fruiting events. We found that gibbons were mainly frugivorous, with fruit and figs comprising 70% of their 145 independent feeding observations, whereas leaf monkeys ate a substantial amount of seeds (26%), fruits and figs (26.5%) and leaves (30%, n = 219 independent feeding observations). Leaf monkeys consumed a higher number of plant genera, and this was due mostly to the non-frugivorous portion of their diet. To investigate resource selection by these primates we utilized two different approaches: the Manly Selectivity Ratio, which did not take into account temporal variation of resource availability, and a model selection framework which did incorporate temporal variation. Both species selected figs (Ficus) more than predicted based on their availability under the Manly Selectivity Ratio. Model selection allowed us to determine how these primates alter the proportion of leaves, flowers, seeds, figs and fruit in their diets in response to variation in fruit availability. When fruits were scarce, both gibbons and leaf monkeys incorporated more leaves and figs into their diets, indicating that these two food classes are fallback foods for these primates. We discuss how different measures of resource selection can provide seemingly contradictory results, and emphasize the importance of long term studies that combine independent feeding observations with rigorous assessment of temporal variation in resource availability when modelling feeding selectivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0173369 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1875827782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A484740099</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16dd2af9c3c5467e903f8133b179af9b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A484740099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-e4197320f2e6809db23ebfc98c7de186a74b26d7549e2de7060e46db17ce39263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk21v0zAQxyMEYqPwDRBEQkKbRIsfEjt-gzTGwypNGuLpreXYl9ZTGhfbKfTT8FVx025q0V5MfpHL-Xf_O599WfYcowmmHL-9dr3vVDtZug4mCHNKmXiQHWNByZgRRB_u2UfZkxCuESppxdjj7IhUhFcEl8fZ3w8WovLr3NgV-GDj-k3eABjbzfIALehoV4NTdSb3EFK2ACGPLm98b2MetPI6Ablr8vjb5WG9WKrorc7fO9-B6vKltwsVU8zJxbp19WCqtra18rUNg-6XJFyvY_rzfW113xk1WEadPs0eNaoN8Gz3HWU_Pn38fn4xvrz6PD0_uxxrTso4hgILTglqCLAKCVMTCnWjRaW5AVwxxYuaMMPLQgAxwBFDUDBTY66BCsLoKHu51V22Lshdb4PEFS9Tr1KzEjHdEsapazmcyq-lU1YODudnUvlodQsSM2OIaoSmuiwYB4FoU2FKUzqR3HXSerfL1tcLMBq66FV7IHq409m5nLmVLGlRpHqTwMlOwLtfPYQoFzZoaFvVges3dVeYl4JwfA-Us0IIWlUJffUfencjdtRMpbParnGpRL0RlWdFVfACoSQ3yiZ3UGkZWFid3mxjk_8g4PQgIDER_sSZ6kOQ029f789e_TxkX--xc1BtnAfX9tGmp3wIFltQexeCh-b2PjCSm5G76YbcjJzcjVwKe7F_l7dBNzNG_wF6_ykz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875827782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Clink, Dena J ; Dillis, Christopher ; Feilen, Katie L ; Beaudrot, Lydia ; Marshall, Andrew J</creator><contributor>Wilson, Brenda A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clink, Dena J ; Dillis, Christopher ; Feilen, Katie L ; Beaudrot, Lydia ; Marshall, Andrew J ; Wilson, Brenda A</creatorcontrib><description>Effectively characterizing primate diets is fundamental to understanding primate behavior, ecology and morphology. Examining temporal variation in a species' diet, as well as comparing the responses of different species to variation in resource availability, can enhance understanding of the evolution of morphology and socioecology. In this study, we use feeding data collected over five years to describe the diets of two sympatric Southeast Asian primate species of similar body size: white-bearded gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) and red leaf monkeys (Presbytis rubicunda rubida), in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Long-term data sets are especially important for characterizing primate diets in Southeast Asia, where the forests exhibit supra-annual mast fruiting events. We found that gibbons were mainly frugivorous, with fruit and figs comprising 70% of their 145 independent feeding observations, whereas leaf monkeys ate a substantial amount of seeds (26%), fruits and figs (26.5%) and leaves (30%, n = 219 independent feeding observations). Leaf monkeys consumed a higher number of plant genera, and this was due mostly to the non-frugivorous portion of their diet. To investigate resource selection by these primates we utilized two different approaches: the Manly Selectivity Ratio, which did not take into account temporal variation of resource availability, and a model selection framework which did incorporate temporal variation. Both species selected figs (Ficus) more than predicted based on their availability under the Manly Selectivity Ratio. Model selection allowed us to determine how these primates alter the proportion of leaves, flowers, seeds, figs and fruit in their diets in response to variation in fruit availability. When fruits were scarce, both gibbons and leaf monkeys incorporated more leaves and figs into their diets, indicating that these two food classes are fallback foods for these primates. We discuss how different measures of resource selection can provide seemingly contradictory results, and emphasize the importance of long term studies that combine independent feeding observations with rigorous assessment of temporal variation in resource availability when modelling feeding selectivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28278215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Availability ; Biological evolution ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Cercopithecidae - physiology ; Cercopithecus ascanius ; Diet ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Evolution (Biology) ; Feeding ; Feeding Behavior ; Ficus ; Flowers ; Food ; Food Supply ; Forests ; Fruit ; Fruits ; Genetic aspects ; Hylobates ; Hylobates - physiology ; Leaves ; Lophocebus albigena ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Monkeys ; Morphology ; National parks ; Presbytis rubicunda ; Primates ; Resource availability ; Seeds ; Selectivity ; Species ; Sympatric populations ; Sympatry - physiology ; Temporal variations ; Variation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173369-e0173369</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Clink et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Clink et al 2017 Clink et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-e4197320f2e6809db23ebfc98c7de186a74b26d7549e2de7060e46db17ce39263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-e4197320f2e6809db23ebfc98c7de186a74b26d7549e2de7060e46db17ce39263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344392/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344392/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wilson, Brenda A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Clink, Dena J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillis, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feilen, Katie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudrot, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Effectively characterizing primate diets is fundamental to understanding primate behavior, ecology and morphology. Examining temporal variation in a species' diet, as well as comparing the responses of different species to variation in resource availability, can enhance understanding of the evolution of morphology and socioecology. In this study, we use feeding data collected over five years to describe the diets of two sympatric Southeast Asian primate species of similar body size: white-bearded gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) and red leaf monkeys (Presbytis rubicunda rubida), in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Long-term data sets are especially important for characterizing primate diets in Southeast Asia, where the forests exhibit supra-annual mast fruiting events. We found that gibbons were mainly frugivorous, with fruit and figs comprising 70% of their 145 independent feeding observations, whereas leaf monkeys ate a substantial amount of seeds (26%), fruits and figs (26.5%) and leaves (30%, n = 219 independent feeding observations). Leaf monkeys consumed a higher number of plant genera, and this was due mostly to the non-frugivorous portion of their diet. To investigate resource selection by these primates we utilized two different approaches: the Manly Selectivity Ratio, which did not take into account temporal variation of resource availability, and a model selection framework which did incorporate temporal variation. Both species selected figs (Ficus) more than predicted based on their availability under the Manly Selectivity Ratio. Model selection allowed us to determine how these primates alter the proportion of leaves, flowers, seeds, figs and fruit in their diets in response to variation in fruit availability. When fruits were scarce, both gibbons and leaf monkeys incorporated more leaves and figs into their diets, indicating that these two food classes are fallback foods for these primates. We discuss how different measures of resource selection can provide seemingly contradictory results, and emphasize the importance of long term studies that combine independent feeding observations with rigorous assessment of temporal variation in resource availability when modelling feeding selectivity.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Cercopithecidae - physiology</subject><subject>Cercopithecus ascanius</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolution (Biology)</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Ficus</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Hylobates</subject><subject>Hylobates - physiology</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lophocebus albigena</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Presbytis rubicunda</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><subject>Sympatry - physiology</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk21v0zAQxyMEYqPwDRBEQkKbRIsfEjt-gzTGwypNGuLpreXYl9ZTGhfbKfTT8FVx025q0V5MfpHL-Xf_O599WfYcowmmHL-9dr3vVDtZug4mCHNKmXiQHWNByZgRRB_u2UfZkxCuESppxdjj7IhUhFcEl8fZ3w8WovLr3NgV-GDj-k3eABjbzfIALehoV4NTdSb3EFK2ACGPLm98b2MetPI6Ablr8vjb5WG9WKrorc7fO9-B6vKltwsVU8zJxbp19WCqtra18rUNg-6XJFyvY_rzfW113xk1WEadPs0eNaoN8Gz3HWU_Pn38fn4xvrz6PD0_uxxrTso4hgILTglqCLAKCVMTCnWjRaW5AVwxxYuaMMPLQgAxwBFDUDBTY66BCsLoKHu51V22Lshdb4PEFS9Tr1KzEjHdEsapazmcyq-lU1YODudnUvlodQsSM2OIaoSmuiwYB4FoU2FKUzqR3HXSerfL1tcLMBq66FV7IHq409m5nLmVLGlRpHqTwMlOwLtfPYQoFzZoaFvVges3dVeYl4JwfA-Us0IIWlUJffUfencjdtRMpbParnGpRL0RlWdFVfACoSQ3yiZ3UGkZWFid3mxjk_8g4PQgIDER_sSZ6kOQ029f789e_TxkX--xc1BtnAfX9tGmp3wIFltQexeCh-b2PjCSm5G76YbcjJzcjVwKe7F_l7dBNzNG_wF6_ykz</recordid><startdate>20170309</startdate><enddate>20170309</enddate><creator>Clink, Dena J</creator><creator>Dillis, Christopher</creator><creator>Feilen, Katie L</creator><creator>Beaudrot, Lydia</creator><creator>Marshall, Andrew J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170309</creationdate><title>Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida)</title><author>Clink, Dena J ; Dillis, Christopher ; Feilen, Katie L ; Beaudrot, Lydia ; Marshall, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-e4197320f2e6809db23ebfc98c7de186a74b26d7549e2de7060e46db17ce39263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Cercopithecidae - physiology</topic><topic>Cercopithecus ascanius</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolution (Biology)</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Ficus</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Hylobates</topic><topic>Hylobates - physiology</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lophocebus albigena</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Presbytis rubicunda</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><topic>Sympatry - physiology</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clink, Dena J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillis, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feilen, Katie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudrot, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clink, Dena J</au><au>Dillis, Christopher</au><au>Feilen, Katie L</au><au>Beaudrot, Lydia</au><au>Marshall, Andrew J</au><au>Wilson, Brenda A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0173369</spage><epage>e0173369</epage><pages>e0173369-e0173369</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Effectively characterizing primate diets is fundamental to understanding primate behavior, ecology and morphology. Examining temporal variation in a species' diet, as well as comparing the responses of different species to variation in resource availability, can enhance understanding of the evolution of morphology and socioecology. In this study, we use feeding data collected over five years to describe the diets of two sympatric Southeast Asian primate species of similar body size: white-bearded gibbons (Hylobates albibarbis) and red leaf monkeys (Presbytis rubicunda rubida), in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Long-term data sets are especially important for characterizing primate diets in Southeast Asia, where the forests exhibit supra-annual mast fruiting events. We found that gibbons were mainly frugivorous, with fruit and figs comprising 70% of their 145 independent feeding observations, whereas leaf monkeys ate a substantial amount of seeds (26%), fruits and figs (26.5%) and leaves (30%, n = 219 independent feeding observations). Leaf monkeys consumed a higher number of plant genera, and this was due mostly to the non-frugivorous portion of their diet. To investigate resource selection by these primates we utilized two different approaches: the Manly Selectivity Ratio, which did not take into account temporal variation of resource availability, and a model selection framework which did incorporate temporal variation. Both species selected figs (Ficus) more than predicted based on their availability under the Manly Selectivity Ratio. Model selection allowed us to determine how these primates alter the proportion of leaves, flowers, seeds, figs and fruit in their diets in response to variation in fruit availability. When fruits were scarce, both gibbons and leaf monkeys incorporated more leaves and figs into their diets, indicating that these two food classes are fallback foods for these primates. We discuss how different measures of resource selection can provide seemingly contradictory results, and emphasize the importance of long term studies that combine independent feeding observations with rigorous assessment of temporal variation in resource availability when modelling feeding selectivity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28278215</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0173369</doi><tpages>e0173369</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173369-e0173369 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1875827782 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Animals Availability Biological evolution Biology and Life Sciences Body size Cercopithecidae - physiology Cercopithecus ascanius Diet Ecological effects Ecology Evolution (Biology) Feeding Feeding Behavior Ficus Flowers Food Food Supply Forests Fruit Fruits Genetic aspects Hylobates Hylobates - physiology Leaves Lophocebus albigena Medicine and Health Sciences Monkeys Morphology National parks Presbytis rubicunda Primates Resource availability Seeds Selectivity Species Sympatric populations Sympatry - physiology Temporal variations Variation |
title | Dietary diversity, feeding selectivity, and responses to fruit scarcity of two sympatric Bornean primates (Hylobates albibarbis and Presbytis rubicunda rubida) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary%20diversity,%20feeding%20selectivity,%20and%20responses%20to%20fruit%20scarcity%20of%20two%20sympatric%20Bornean%20primates%20(Hylobates%20albibarbis%20and%20Presbytis%20rubicunda%20rubida)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Clink,%20Dena%20J&rft.date=2017-03-09&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0173369&rft.epage=e0173369&rft.pages=e0173369-e0173369&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0173369&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA484740099%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875827782&rft_id=info:pmid/28278215&rft_galeid=A484740099&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_16dd2af9c3c5467e903f8133b179af9b&rfr_iscdi=true |