Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions
Facial expressions are important for humans in communicating emotions to the conspecifics and enhancing interpersonal understanding. Many muscles producing facial expressions in humans are also found in domestic dogs, but little is known about how humans perceive dog facial expressions, and which ps...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0170730-e0170730 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0170730 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0170730 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Kujala, Miiamaaria V Somppi, Sanni Jokela, Markus Vainio, Outi Parkkonen, Lauri |
| description | Facial expressions are important for humans in communicating emotions to the conspecifics and enhancing interpersonal understanding. Many muscles producing facial expressions in humans are also found in domestic dogs, but little is known about how humans perceive dog facial expressions, and which psychological factors influence people's perceptions. Here, we asked 34 observers to rate the valence, arousal, and the six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, and anger/aggressiveness) from images of human and dog faces with Pleasant, Neutral and Threatening expressions. We investigated how the subjects' personality (the Big Five Inventory), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and experience of dog behavior affect the ratings of dog and human faces. Ratings of both species followed similar general patterns: human subjects classified dog facial expressions from pleasant to threatening very similarly to human facial expressions. Subjects with higher emotional empathy evaluated Threatening faces of both species as more negative in valence and higher in anger/aggressiveness. More empathetic subjects also rated the happiness of Pleasant humans but not dogs higher, and they were quicker in their valence judgments of Pleasant human, Threatening human and Threatening dog faces. Experience with dogs correlated positively with ratings of Pleasant and Neutral dog faces. Personality also had a minor effect on the ratings of Pleasant and Neutral faces in both species. The results imply that humans perceive human and dog facial expression in a similar manner, and the perception of both species is influenced by psychological factors of the evaluators. Especially empathy affects both the speed and intensity of rating dogs' emotional facial expressions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0170730 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1861092182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478820292</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2d6e71c89c534ab2a1339eaf914f79f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478820292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-cd1f28de9f2c03cb30399965ea6373820ed64ba8fffec3df2c4b4ab0c3ffa8713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYYMn04S_dDEKXroFCR_dxKxT5yFawrUySR_PvJyduiUcvii4kpOd9z9GRThS9xmiOaY4_b0xvO9HMt6aDOcI5yil6Ep1iRsksI4g-PVqfRC-c2yCU0iLLnkcnpMA4oTQ9jerLvhVdvGy3wte7T_F3sM4EW-13sejKeHm7BauhkxAvlALpY19DwI3XpotvhNdd5WKj4q-m2gsOfhdCatEMagvOBdS9jJ4p0Th4Nc5n0a-L5c_zy9nV9bfV-eJqJnOS-pkssSJFCUwRiahcU0QZY1kKIqM5LQiCMkvWolBDMrQMVLJOxBpJqpQockzPorcH321jHB-L5DguMowYwQUJxOpAlEZs-NbqVtgdN0Lz_YaxFRfWa9kAJ2UGOZYFkykNUYjAlDIQiuFE5UxlwevLGK1ft1BK6LwVzcR0etLpmlfmL09JmiM0pPthNLDmTw_O81Y7CU0jOjD9Pu-C4oTh_DEozjBhyXDFd_-hDxdipCoR7qo7ZUKKcjDliyQvQrEJG6j5A1QYJbRahs-ndNifCD5OBIHxcOsr0TvHVz9uHs9e_56y74_YGkTja2eafviJbgomB1Ba45wFdf8eGPGhd-6qwYfe4WPvBNmb47e8F901C_0HfawTrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861092182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kujala, Miiamaaria V ; Somppi, Sanni ; Jokela, Markus ; Vainio, Outi ; Parkkonen, Lauri</creator><contributor>Palagi, Elisabetta</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Miiamaaria V ; Somppi, Sanni ; Jokela, Markus ; Vainio, Outi ; Parkkonen, Lauri ; Palagi, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><description>Facial expressions are important for humans in communicating emotions to the conspecifics and enhancing interpersonal understanding. Many muscles producing facial expressions in humans are also found in domestic dogs, but little is known about how humans perceive dog facial expressions, and which psychological factors influence people's perceptions. Here, we asked 34 observers to rate the valence, arousal, and the six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, and anger/aggressiveness) from images of human and dog faces with Pleasant, Neutral and Threatening expressions. We investigated how the subjects' personality (the Big Five Inventory), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and experience of dog behavior affect the ratings of dog and human faces. Ratings of both species followed similar general patterns: human subjects classified dog facial expressions from pleasant to threatening very similarly to human facial expressions. Subjects with higher emotional empathy evaluated Threatening faces of both species as more negative in valence and higher in anger/aggressiveness. More empathetic subjects also rated the happiness of Pleasant humans but not dogs higher, and they were quicker in their valence judgments of Pleasant human, Threatening human and Threatening dog faces. Experience with dogs correlated positively with ratings of Pleasant and Neutral dog faces. Personality also had a minor effect on the ratings of Pleasant and Neutral faces in both species. The results imply that humans perceive human and dog facial expression in a similar manner, and the perception of both species is influenced by psychological factors of the evaluators. Especially empathy affects both the speed and intensity of rating dogs' emotional facial expressions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170730</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28114335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Anthropomorphism ; Arousal ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomedical engineering ; Communication ; Conspecifics ; Dogs ; Emotions ; Empathy ; Facial Expression ; Female ; Human behavior ; Humans ; Influence ; Judgments ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Muscles ; Neurosciences ; Personality ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological factors ; Ratings ; Social Sciences ; Species ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0170730-e0170730</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Kujala et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Kujala et al 2017 Kujala et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-cd1f28de9f2c03cb30399965ea6373820ed64ba8fffec3df2c4b4ab0c3ffa8713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-cd1f28de9f2c03cb30399965ea6373820ed64ba8fffec3df2c4b4ab0c3ffa8713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5257001/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5257001/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Palagi, Elisabetta</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Miiamaaria V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somppi, Sanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokela, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainio, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkkonen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><title>Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Facial expressions are important for humans in communicating emotions to the conspecifics and enhancing interpersonal understanding. Many muscles producing facial expressions in humans are also found in domestic dogs, but little is known about how humans perceive dog facial expressions, and which psychological factors influence people's perceptions. Here, we asked 34 observers to rate the valence, arousal, and the six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, and anger/aggressiveness) from images of human and dog faces with Pleasant, Neutral and Threatening expressions. We investigated how the subjects' personality (the Big Five Inventory), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and experience of dog behavior affect the ratings of dog and human faces. Ratings of both species followed similar general patterns: human subjects classified dog facial expressions from pleasant to threatening very similarly to human facial expressions. Subjects with higher emotional empathy evaluated Threatening faces of both species as more negative in valence and higher in anger/aggressiveness. More empathetic subjects also rated the happiness of Pleasant humans but not dogs higher, and they were quicker in their valence judgments of Pleasant human, Threatening human and Threatening dog faces. Experience with dogs correlated positively with ratings of Pleasant and Neutral dog faces. Personality also had a minor effect on the ratings of Pleasant and Neutral faces in both species. The results imply that humans perceive human and dog facial expression in a similar manner, and the perception of both species is influenced by psychological factors of the evaluators. Especially empathy affects both the speed and intensity of rating dogs' emotional facial expressions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropomorphism</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYYMn04S_dDEKXroFCR_dxKxT5yFawrUySR_PvJyduiUcvii4kpOd9z9GRThS9xmiOaY4_b0xvO9HMt6aDOcI5yil6Ep1iRsksI4g-PVqfRC-c2yCU0iLLnkcnpMA4oTQ9jerLvhVdvGy3wte7T_F3sM4EW-13sejKeHm7BauhkxAvlALpY19DwI3XpotvhNdd5WKj4q-m2gsOfhdCatEMagvOBdS9jJ4p0Th4Nc5n0a-L5c_zy9nV9bfV-eJqJnOS-pkssSJFCUwRiahcU0QZY1kKIqM5LQiCMkvWolBDMrQMVLJOxBpJqpQockzPorcH321jHB-L5DguMowYwQUJxOpAlEZs-NbqVtgdN0Lz_YaxFRfWa9kAJ2UGOZYFkykNUYjAlDIQiuFE5UxlwevLGK1ft1BK6LwVzcR0etLpmlfmL09JmiM0pPthNLDmTw_O81Y7CU0jOjD9Pu-C4oTh_DEozjBhyXDFd_-hDxdipCoR7qo7ZUKKcjDliyQvQrEJG6j5A1QYJbRahs-ndNifCD5OBIHxcOsr0TvHVz9uHs9e_56y74_YGkTja2eafviJbgomB1Ba45wFdf8eGPGhd-6qwYfe4WPvBNmb47e8F901C_0HfawTrw</recordid><startdate>20170123</startdate><enddate>20170123</enddate><creator>Kujala, Miiamaaria V</creator><creator>Somppi, Sanni</creator><creator>Jokela, Markus</creator><creator>Vainio, Outi</creator><creator>Parkkonen, Lauri</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170123</creationdate><title>Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions</title><author>Kujala, Miiamaaria V ; Somppi, Sanni ; Jokela, Markus ; Vainio, Outi ; Parkkonen, Lauri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-cd1f28de9f2c03cb30399965ea6373820ed64ba8fffec3df2c4b4ab0c3ffa8713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropomorphism</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Miiamaaria V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somppi, Sanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jokela, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vainio, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkkonen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kujala, Miiamaaria V</au><au>Somppi, Sanni</au><au>Jokela, Markus</au><au>Vainio, Outi</au><au>Parkkonen, Lauri</au><au>Palagi, Elisabetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-01-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0170730</spage><epage>e0170730</epage><pages>e0170730-e0170730</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Facial expressions are important for humans in communicating emotions to the conspecifics and enhancing interpersonal understanding. Many muscles producing facial expressions in humans are also found in domestic dogs, but little is known about how humans perceive dog facial expressions, and which psychological factors influence people's perceptions. Here, we asked 34 observers to rate the valence, arousal, and the six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, and anger/aggressiveness) from images of human and dog faces with Pleasant, Neutral and Threatening expressions. We investigated how the subjects' personality (the Big Five Inventory), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and experience of dog behavior affect the ratings of dog and human faces. Ratings of both species followed similar general patterns: human subjects classified dog facial expressions from pleasant to threatening very similarly to human facial expressions. Subjects with higher emotional empathy evaluated Threatening faces of both species as more negative in valence and higher in anger/aggressiveness. More empathetic subjects also rated the happiness of Pleasant humans but not dogs higher, and they were quicker in their valence judgments of Pleasant human, Threatening human and Threatening dog faces. Experience with dogs correlated positively with ratings of Pleasant and Neutral dog faces. Personality also had a minor effect on the ratings of Pleasant and Neutral faces in both species. The results imply that humans perceive human and dog facial expression in a similar manner, and the perception of both species is influenced by psychological factors of the evaluators. Especially empathy affects both the speed and intensity of rating dogs' emotional facial expressions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28114335</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0170730</doi><tpages>e0170730</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0170730-e0170730 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1861092182 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adult Analysis Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Anthropomorphism Arousal Biology and Life Sciences Biomedical engineering Communication Conspecifics Dogs Emotions Empathy Facial Expression Female Human behavior Humans Influence Judgments Male Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Muscles Neurosciences Personality Psychological aspects Psychological factors Ratings Social Sciences Species Veterinary medicine |
| title | Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Empathy,%20Personality%20and%20Experience%20Affect%20the%20Emotion%20Ratings%20of%20Dog%20and%20Human%20Facial%20Expressions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kujala,%20Miiamaaria%20V&rft.date=2017-01-23&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0170730&rft.epage=e0170730&rft.pages=e0170730-e0170730&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0170730&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478820292%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861092182&rft_id=info:pmid/28114335&rft_galeid=A478820292&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2d6e71c89c534ab2a1339eaf914f79f6&rfr_iscdi=true |